Connect with us

Published

on

During a strange publicly livestreamed “all-hands” meeting, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said once again that he’s working on a “Master Plan Part 4” for the company, which is currently on part 3 of its master plan. But the problem is, even part 2 is not yet complete.

Tesla’s “master plans” have guided the company for years, showing a general outline of what direction it plans to go.

The first installment of Tesla’s master plan was posted in 2006, titled “The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me)” (it has since been deleted from the website).

The blog post was a tongue in cheek list of Tesla’s priorities for the future, with four steps laid out:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

  1. Build sports car.
  2. Use that money to build an affordable car.
  3. Use that money to build an even more affordable car.
  4. While doing above, also provide zero-emission electric power generation options.

Tesla managed to finish all of those steps, by releasing the Roadster, Model S, and Model 3. It also purchased SolarCity and sells solar panel installations today, so, job completed. And completed quite well, considering Tesla was nothing in 2006 and hadn’t sold a single car, and is now a global powerhouse changing the entire auto industry.

Ten years after that original blog post, the “plan” was updated in 2016 with “Master Plan, Part Deux” (which has also since been deleted from the website). That plan was summarized as:

  1. Create stunning solar roofs with seamlessly integrated battery storage
  2. Expand the electric vehicle product line to address all major segments
  3. Develop a self-driving capability that is 10X safer than manual via massive fleet learning
  4. Enable your car to make money for you when you aren’t using it

This plan has not been quite as successful as the original secret master plan.

A progress check on master plan part 2

First, Tesla’s “solar roof” business has turned more into the company providing solar panel systems to independent installers. These are integrated well through software with Tesla’s Powerwall system (and additional features like Virtual Power Plants, Storm Watch, and so on). But Tesla’s solar roof project didn’t quite turn out as planned – it’s a single design instead of the four designs originally promised, and deployment of that design was… rocky, to say the least.

Second, Tesla has expanded its product line to cover two (or three) more segments: mid-size SUVs, with the Model Y; something kinda sorta approximating a truck, with the Cybertruck; and heavy trucking, with the Tesla Semi.

These are the “major” segments it said it would address in the blog post, so they get partial credit there – except that the Semi is still yet to reach any significant volume numbers, and Tesla has not released a promised “high passenger-density urban transport” (the closest thing there is the recently-announced Robovan, which is absolutely nowhere near production).

Third, Tesla has not successfully deployed self-driving capability that is 10X safer, even by its own numbers. Tesla’s Autopilot Safety Report, which the company only occasionally releases, says that Autopilot is a bit more than 5X safer than a human – but this comes with the caveat that the system will typically spend more time activated in situations where it’s more capable, and drivers will choose to take over when they think the system isn’t going to be able to do something.

Tesla doesn’t publicize data on how much safer FSD is than human drivers, rather referring to “miles between critical disengagement” and other moving goalposts.

So those are three steps which haven’t really gotten finished, but, we can perhaps give some credit for movement in the direction of each of them.

The fourth step, however, has simply not happened. This referred to an idea which at the time was called “Tesla Network,” which was supposed to be a ride-hailing app that Tesla owners could send their cars out to make money with – and the source of Musk’s “appreciating asset” comments.

Not only has that not happened, but even autonomy has not happened. Tesla FSD is still level 2, and while it claims it will have level 4 capable vehicles this year in Austin, we’ve yet to see that.

So, partial credit for master plan part 2, but we’re still in progress.

Part 3 goes in another direction, is huge in scope

After that, Tesla released Master Plan Part 3 in 2023, an entirely different sort of document than the last two. Instead of just being a snarky blog post, this was a 40-page white paper with calculations showing that the world could transition to renewable energy and solve climate change with the resources and technology available to us today.

It’s an interesting read, and despite the weird analogues to Musk’s personal beliefs about population growth, the calculations, while optimistic and self-serving for an EV/sustainable tech company, do make sense. It lays out the case about how to transition the entire world to sustainability, and I think it does so pretty persuasively. I’ve recommended it to many as a way to lay out the potential green transition.

…But, clearly, that has not happened yet either.

Musk drops hints at Tesla Master Plan 4

Then, with two plans still in progress, and only a bit more than a year after unveiling the third part, Musk announced last June that he is “working on Tesla Master Plan 4.”

Nine months later, we’ve yet to hear more details about that idea, but today during his presentation, he did refer back to it again.

Today, he was asked a question by one of the… uh… employees? assembled for his… uh… all-hands meeting/stock pumping livestream?, and the question went thusly (the question was hard to hear, so here’s the meat of it):

“What phase of the plan are we in and how long will it go?”

To which Musk responded:

“We’re at phase 3 of the master plan, since master plan 1 and 2 have been completed. Now, master plan part 3 is a very long master plan, because it’s basically making all energy on earth sustainable. And I actually need to supplement it with the, sort of, ‘abundance for all.’ Maybe thats master plan 4. I’ve kinda described master plan 4 essentially. Which is autonomous cars, autonomous humanoid robots, combine that with solar and battery storage, and I think the future’s gonna be incredible.”

So, we now have an idea of what Musk thinks master plan part 4 will be, at least, which is similar to what Electrek’s Fred Lambert predicted it would be back in June: robots and self-driving.

Electrek’s Take

But what about them? We know this is what Musk has been talking about recently, and a lot of those ideas haven’t really turned out – at least not yet.

First of all, we already know about the solar and battery storage, and the autonomous cars. Those were in previous parts of the master plan, and Musk has been promising them next year for ten years, so there’s nothing new there.

In particular, the autonomous car reaches all the way back to part 2, initiated in 2016, and is still incomplete – despite Musk’s incorrect statement today saying that it has been completed. This either suggests he doesn’t know what is going on with his company, or he’s lying. Neither is a great option.

And robots, the only new portion of the proposed master plan part 4, are definitely not quite what they’re cracked up to be – yet, at least. But that’s the point of a master plan, to start heading in that direction, not to already be there – so, fair enough.

But are Musk’s predictions about robotics realistic?

Musk has also stated that humanoid robots will be worth $20-30 trillion to Tesla’s market cap, because everyone in the world will have two personal robots. This seems unlikely on its face, but especially so when Musk says that AGI – Artificial General Intelligence, where a single computer is capable of accomplishing all the same tasks as a human – is coming this year.

Beyond AGI, Musk has claimed that Tesla will change the world in several other ways this year, but thats quite a packed release schedule given Tesla’s recent history (and its leadership’s current distractions and anti-sustainability actions). Musk is known for overpromising, and this feels like another example of such.

The idea that Tesla, a car company, will somehow be the first in the world to accomplish AGI, scaling humanoid robots to the point where everyone in the world can have two, alongside everything else, and on such a short timeline, seems unlikely.

It seems perhaps a little more likely that this meeting, and a potential part 4 of the plan, are both an attempt to reframe the current conversation about Tesla, which is quite negative as sales drop drastically amid Musk’s meddling in anti-sustainability and white supremacist politics.


Charge your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla officially launches Model YL with 6 seats, starting at ~$47,000

Published

on

By

Tesla officially launches Model YL with 6 seats, starting at ~,000

Tesla has officially launched the Model YL, a new, larger Model Y with 6 seats, in China, and it starts at 339,000 Chinese Yuan, the equivalent of about $47,000 USD.

After a few weeks of teasing, Tesla has officially launched the new version of the Model Y on its online configurator in China:

The main things we didn’t know about the vehicle yet were the price and range. Those questions are now answered.

The Model YL starts at ¥339,000, equivalent to approximately $47,000 USD. It’s about $3,600 USD more expensive than the Model Y Long Range AWD in China.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

It is rated with a range of 751 km (466 miles) based on the CLTC driving cycle, which typically yields a longer range than the WLTP and EPA standards.

For comparison, the larger version achieves roughly the same range as the smaller Model Y Long Range AWD, thanks to its larger battery pack.

Tesla has released new images of the new version of the Model Y:

Last month, the first specifications and dimensions were released, confirming a length of approximately 180mm (7 inches) longer, a height of about 24mm (1 inch) taller, and a wheelbase that is also 150mm (or approximately 6 inches) longer.

Now, Tesla has confirmed a few more features, including up to 2,539 liters of storage space and electric armrests in the second-row seats.

The automaker is guiding deliveries in September.

Electrek’s Take

The price is reasonable in comparison to Tesla’s current lineup, making the upgrade relatively affordable.

However, it is a lot more expensive than other 6-seater all-electric SUV options in China, such as the Onvo L90, which is about $8,000 cheaper.

I’m curious to see how it will be priced in North America, where I think it would be much more popular than in China.

Tesla needs to go downmarket to access a bigger market in China – not upmarket, but the new option is still a positive for the automaker.

If the pricing matches the one in China, it shouldn’t be much more than $51,000 in the US, which I think would make it a popular option.

However, I think it would be the end of the Model X.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Analysts downplay AI bubble worries as Altman says some investors will be left ‘very burnt’

Published

on

By

Analysts downplay AI bubble worries as Altman says some investors will be left 'very burnt'

Wedbush's Dan Ives: The next two to three years will be a tech bull market

The artificial intelligence boom that Sam Altman helped ignite with ChatGPT in late 2022 is starting to make even him uneasy.

Startups with little more than a pitch deck are raising hundreds of millions. Valuations have become “insane.” Capital is chasing a “kernel of truth” with feverish speed.

The OpenAI CEO still believes the long-term societal upside of AI will outweigh the froth, and he’s ready to keep spending in pursuit of that goal.

“Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes,” he said at a recent dinner with reporters. “Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes.”

He repeated the word ‘bubble‘ three times in 15 seconds, then half-joked, “I’m sure someone’s gonna write some sensational headline about that. I wish you wouldn’t, but that’s fine.”

While Altman warned that valuations are now out of control, he’s ready to shell out on more infrastructure.

“You should expect OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on datacenter construction in the not very distant future,” Altman said. “And you should expect a bunch of economists wringing their hands, saying, ‘This is so crazy, it’s so reckless,’ and we’ll just be like, ‘You know what? Let us do our thing.'”

OpenAI is already looking beyond Microsoft Azure’s cloud capacity, and is shopping around for more.

The company signed a deal with Google Cloud this spring and, according to Altman, OpenAI is “beyond the compute demand” of what any one hyperscaler can offer.

“You should expect us to take as much compute as we can,” he added. “Our bet is, our demand is going to keep growing, our training needs are going to keep going, and we will spend maybe more aggressively than any company who’s ever spent on anything ahead of progress, because we just have this very deep belief in what we’re seeing.”

It’s not just OpenAI. All the megacaps are trying to keep up.

In their most recent earnings, tech’s biggest names all raised capital expenditure guidance to keep pace with AI demand: Microsoft is now targeting $120 billion in full-year capital expenditures, Amazon is topping $100 billion, Alphabet raised its forecast to $85 billion, and Meta lifted the high end of its capex range to $72 billion.

Sam Altman says OpenAI pushed a 'much warmer' tone for GPT-5

Wedbush’s Dan Ives said Monday on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” that demand for AI infrastructure has grown 30% to 40% in the last months, calling the capex surge a validation moment for the sector.

Ives acknowledged “some froth” in parts of the market, but said the AI revolution with autonomous is only starting to play out and we are in the “second inning of a nine-inning game.”

“The actual impact over the medium and long term is actually being underestimated,” he said.

Citi’s Rob Rowe, speaking Monday on CNBC’s “Money Movers,” pushed back on comparisons between today’s AI boom and the dotcom bubble.

“Back then, you had a lot of over-leveraged situations. You didn’t have a lot of companies that had earnings,” Rowe said. “Here you’re talking about companies that have very solid earnings, very strong cash flow, and they’re funding a lot of this growth through that cash flow. So in many respects, it’s a little different than that.”

He added that the current wave of AI investment is being driven by structural shifts in the global economy, particularly the rapid growth of digital services, which now account for a large share of global exports. Also unlike the dotcom cycle of the late 90s, companies today are funding their infrastructure spending with strong cash flow rather than relying on debt.

Still, concerns about overheating have been mounting. 

Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai pointed to worrying signs in the AI sector well before the hyperscalers raised their annual capex guidance during the latest earnings prints.

In March, he warned of a brewing AI bubble in the U.S.

Speaking at HSBC’s Global Investment Summit in Hong Kong, Tsai said he was astounded by the scale of datacenter spending under discussion. Tsai questioned whether hundreds of billions in spending is necessary, and flagged concern about companies starting to build datacenters “on spec,” without clear demand.

Altman, for his part, sees these cycles as part of the natural rhythm of technological progress.

The dotcom crash wiped out scores of companies, but still gave rise to the modern internet. He expects AI to follow a similar path: a few high-profile wipeouts, followed by a lasting transformation.

“I do think some investors are likely to get very burnt here, and that sucks. And I don’t want to minimize that,” he said. “But on the whole, it is my belief that… the value created by AI for society will be tremendous.”

WATCH: OpenAI staffer reportedly to sell $6 billion in stock to SoftBank and other investors

OpenAI staffer reportedly to sell $6 billion in stock to SoftBank and other investors

Continue Reading

Environment

Waymo founder: Please let me know when Tesla launches a robotaxi — I’m still waiting”

Published

on

By

Waymo founder: Please let me know when Tesla launches a robotaxi — I'm still waiting

Waymo founder and former CEO John Krafcik is a critic of Tesla’s approach to self-driving, and he has so far accurately predicted the rollout of the “Robotaxi” service.

He is now taking another dig at Tesla.

Krafcik is a highly respected leader in the auto industry. He began his career as a mechanical engineer at the NUMMI plant, which was then a joint GM-Toyota factory, but is now owned by Tesla.

He spent 14 years at Ford, where he was chief engineer of the Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator, a very successful vehicle program. He then moved to Hyundai America, where he served as President for five years.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

However, Krafcik is best known for leading Waymo from 2015 to 2021, helping it become the consensus leader in self-driving technology.

Ahead of Tesla’s rollout of its so-called “Robotaxi” service in Austin in June, Krafcik suggested that Tesla could fake the service:

“There are many ways to fake a robotaxi service.”

He wasn’t exactly wrong.

There’s a Tesla employee in the front seat of every “Robotaxi” in the fleet, which is only about a dozen vehicles, based on crowdsource data, which is the only data available, as Tesla doesn’t release any.

Those supervisors in the front seat have their fingers on a kill switch ready to stop the vehicle at all times, and there are many examples of them intervening to prevent accidents or traffic violations.

In new comments (via Business Insider), Krafcik makes it clear that he doesn’t consider this to be a “robotaxi” service:

“Please let me know when Tesla launches a robotaxi — I’m still waiting. It’s (rather obviously) not a robotaxi if there’s an employee inside the car.”

More recently, Tesla expanded its “Robotaxi” service area to the Bay Area in California, but it again has an employee in the car, this time in the driver’s seat.

Krafcik commented:

“If they were striving to re-create today’s Bay Area Uber experience, looks like they’ve absolutely nailed it.”

He continued:

“I think the AV industry would be delighted if Tesla followed Waymo’s approach to launch a robotaxi service, but they are not doing that.”

Furthermore, Tesla has been limiting access to “invite-only” and the invites have been primarily going to Tesla influencers and investors who are rarely critical of the company.

CEO Elon Musk has been discussing “opening up” the service in Austin to the public next month, but it appears that Tesla will need to retain the in-car supervisor for the foreseeable future.

Electrek’s Take

It must be a bit frustrating for Waymo, which has deployed an actual robotaxi service for years, to see Tesla calling this a robotaxi.

When Waymo was using in-car “safety drivers’, it didn’t call its service “robotaxi.” It was obviously in the testing phase.

If Tesla were to remove the safety drivers, which I suggest they don’t, based on the current disengagement rate of FSD and the interventions we have seen from supervisors in the currently minimal “Robotaxi” service in Austin, it would officially be about 5 years behind Waymo.

The argument that Tesla will magically scale faster because they don’t use lidar should be retired, as the goal should be the safest, not the fastest, at scaling.

And when it comes to scaling, Tesla’s current bottleneck is safety. It needs to be safe enough to remove the safety supervisor, and it’s clearly not there yet.

I really don’t like Tesla’s approach. It seems to be more about optics than adopting a safe and transparent approach.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending