Update March 22, 2025, 10:08 a.m. UTC: This article has been updated to include an embed of the Chainreaction episode.
The cryptocurrency industry may still be facing debanking-related issues in the United States, despite the recent wave of positive legislation, according to crypto regulatory experts and industry leaders.
The collapse of crypto-friendly banks in early 2023 sparked the first allegations of Operation Chokepoint 2.0. Critics, including venture capitalist Nic Carter, described it as a government effort to pressure banks into cutting ties with cryptocurrency firms.
Despite numerous crypto-positive decisions from US President Donald Trump, including the March 7 order to use Bitcoin (BTC) seized in government criminal cases to establish a national reserve, the industry may still be facing banking issues.
“It’s premature to say that debanking is over,” according to Caitlin Long, founder and CEO of Custodia Bank. Long said during Cointelegraph’s Chainreaction daily X show on March 21:
“There are two crypto-friendly banks under examination by the Fed right now and an army of examiners was sent into these banks, including the examiners from Washington, a literal army just smothering the banks.”
“The Fed is the outlier and the Fed is still controlled by democrats,” explained Long, adding:
“Trump won’t have the ability to appoint a new Fed governor until January. So therefore you can see the breadcrumbs leading up to a potentially big fight. Because if the OCC and FDIC overturn their anti-crypto guidance but the Fed does not, where does that leave us?”
Long’s Custodia Bank was repeatedly targeted by the US debanking efforts, which cost the firm months of work and “a couple of million dollars,” she explained.
Industry outrage over alleged debanking reached a crescendo when a June 2024 lawsuit spearheaded by Coinbase resulted in the release of letters showing US banking regulators asked certain financial institutions to “pause” crypto banking activities.
Crypto debanking is the biggest operational problem in EU: blockchain regulations adviser
Cryptocurrency debanking is also among the biggest challenges for European cryptocurrency firms, according toAnastasija Plotnikova, co-founder and CEO of blockchain regulatory firm Fideum.
“We’re living in 2025 and debanking is still one of the main operational issues for both small and large crypto firms,” said Plotnikova, adding:
“Crypto debanking is also a problem here in the EU. I had my accounts closed in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022, but 2024 was a good year. Operationally these problems exist for both users and crypto firms operating.”
The comments come two weeks after the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) eased its stance on how banks can engage with crypto just hours after US President Donald Trump vowed to end the prolonged crackdown restricting crypto firms’ access to banking services.
Former US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) member Paul Atkins is scheduled to appear before lawmakers in the Senate Banking Committee on March 27 as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to get the president’s picks into high-level government positions.
Since US President Donald Trump took office on Jan. 20, the SEC, under the leadership of acting chair Mark Uyeda, has dropped several investigations and enforcement actions against major crypto firms, many of which had been in court for months or years. Many analysts see the SEC’s recent actions as the administration acting on its campaign promises to the crypto industry, of which some figures donated directly to the then-presidential candidate or his inauguration fund after the Nov. 5 election.
The commission’s actions — which include declaring that memecoins aren’t securities — also stand in stark contrast to its position under former chair Gary Gensler, leading many to speculate that the SEC under Trump will lead to a booming US crypto industry essentially free of regulatory scrutiny.
Atkins, whom Trump picked in December 2024 and officially nominated after taking office, received support from industry players at Coinbase and Ripple, both of which had ongoing enforcement actions brought by the SEC. The cases have since been dropped.
Given the SEC’s seeming about-face on crypto enforcement and Trump’s potential conflicts of interest with the industry — with ties to the crypto firm World Liberty Financial and the launch of his own memecoin — some lawmakers are likely to question Atkins’ views on digital assets at the confirmation hearing.
If confirmed by the Senate, Atkins could return to a soon-to-be entirely Republican-controlled SEC, with Democratic Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw expected to leave by 2026.
It’s unclear if Atkins will have the votes to pass a confirmation hearing in the banking committee or a full floor vote in the Senate. Republicans hold a 53-seat majority in the chamber with only 51 votes required to confirm a nominee, and — with the exception of former Representative Matt Gaetz for US Attorney General — have not suggested that they intend to oppose any of Trump’s picks for crucial government positions.
Democratic opposition to Atkins’ nomination
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the banking committee who has often equated crypto with drug trafficking and other illicit actions, said in a March 23 letter to Atkins that she had concerns about his potential role at the SEC after his consulting firm, Patomak Global Partners, was an adviser to defunct crypto exchange FTX. He was also an adviser to the advocacy group Chamber of Digital Commerce.
“Your deep involvement with FTX and other high-paying crypto clients raises questions about your approach to crypto regulation — and concerns about the extent of your knowledge of FTX’s illegal activities,” said Warren, adding:
“Your financial ties to the industries you will soon regulate raise serious concerns about your ability to avoid conflicts of interest as a regulator.”
Warren suggested that some members of the Senate would likely question Trump’s pick about the SEC recently dropping enforcement cases against crypto firms, reports that Trump’s family had held talks with Binance about acquiring a stake in the company as well as a possible pardon for former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, how Atkins intends to apply securities laws to digital assets if confirmed, and the commission’s recent opinion that memecoins were not securities.
She hinted that Atkins may have also communicated with Republican SEC commissioners Uyeda and Hester Peirce after being nominated.
Ahead of his hearing, Atkins has already met with Republican lawmakers on the committee, including Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis. Cointelegraph contacted Lummis’ office for comment on Atkins’ nomination but hadn’t received a response at the time of publication.
If his nomination moves through the Banking Committee and the Senate, Atkins would likely be confirmed to a term ending in June 2031, taking over as chair from Uyeda. In addition to the commission dropping investigations and enforcement actions, the SEC acting chair has proposed abandoning rules requiring crypto firms to register with the agency.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is poised to deliver an update on the health of the British economy on Wednesday.
The spring statement is not a formal budget – as Labour pledged to only deliver one per year – but rather an update on the economy and any progress since her fiscal statement last October.
While it’s not billed as a major economic event, Rachel Reeves has a big gap to plug in the public finances and speculation has grown she may have to break her self-imposed borrowing rules.
Here, Sky News explains everything you need to know.
What is the spring statement?
The spring statement is an annual speech made by the chancellor in the House of Commons, in which they provide MPs with an update on the overall health of the economy and Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts.
It is one of two major financial statements in the financial year – which runs from 1 April to 31 March.
The other is the autumn budget, a more substantial financial event in which the chancellor sets out a raft of economic policy for the year ahead.
Typically, the spring statement – which was first delivered by ex-chancellor Phillip Hammond in 2018 – gives an update on the state of the economy, and details any progress that has been made since the autumn budget.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:55
Sam Coates previews the chancellor’s announcements
What could be announced?
The government has already announced some big cuts – and there may be more to come.
Ms Reeves could decide to extend the freeze on thresholds at which people start to pay different rates of income tax, beyond the current freeze, which is due to end in April 2028.
The government could also raise the relief rate for struggling retail, hospitality, and leisure businesses after cutting it to 40% in the October budget.
The chancellor is expected to announce £400m in spending on the government’s new UK Defence Investment body to “harness UK ingenuity and boost military technology”, according to The Mirror.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
She has been called on to reduce the £20,000 tax-free annual limit on cash ISAs to £4,000 to encourage more people to invest their savings in stocks and shares – a move that could hurt cash ISA savers.
To read more on what is expected to be announced in the Spring Statement, and what has already been announced, check out Sky News political reporter Alix Culbertson‘s piece here.
When will Rachel Reeves deliver it?
The OBR, which monitors the government’s spending plans, will publish its forecast on the UK economy on 26 March.
It is required to produce two economic forecasts a year, but the chancellor said she would only give one budget a year to provide stability and certainty on upcoming tax changes.
The OBR will also provide an estimate on the cost of living for British households, and detail whether it believes the Labour government will adhere to its own rules on borrowing and spending.
The chancellor will then present the OBR’s findings to the House of Commons, and make her first spring statement.
This will be responded to by either Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch or shadow chancellor Mel Stride.
Image: Rachel Reeves is looking to plug gaps in the UK’s finances. Pic: PA
Why does it matter?
The UK economy is thought to be underperforming – potentially due to global factors, like Donald Trump’s trade tariffs – and there are rumours that the chancellor could consider breaking her own rules on borrowing in response.
The economy contracted slightly in January, while inflation has climbed to a 10-month high of 3%. Meanwhile, the government has committed to boosting defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 – an expensive task.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules mean she cannot borrow for day-to-day spending – leaving cuts as one of her only options. Her other “non-negotiable” is to get debt falling as a share of national income by the end of this parliament.
It is expected that welfare cuts will be part of the spring statement package to help the chancellor come within her borrowing limit.
In short, the Treasury believes Ms Reeves must maintain £10bn in headroom after months of economic downturn and geopolitical events since last October’s budget.
It is widely expected the OBR will confirm that this financial buffer has been wiped clean.
The spring statement will be delivered in the House of Commons on Wednesday 26 March, directly after Prime Minister’s Questions, which is usually finished by around 12.30pm.
You’ll be able to keep up to date on Sky News – and follow live updates in the Politics Hub.
The government is telling local councils they must publish data on how many potholes they have fixed or risk losing their share of an extra £500m set aside for fixing roads.
From the middle of next month, local authorities across England will start to receive their allocation of the £1.6bn for fixing roads across the country.
But in order to get the full amount, all councils must publish annual reports on how many potholes they’ve filled – or see a quarter of the additional £500m in funding the government has allocated this year withheld.
By 30 June, all councils must publish reports detailing how much they are spending, how many potholes they have filled, what percentage of their roads are in what condition, and how they are minimising disruption.
Meanwhile, the transport secretary is unveiling a funding package of £4.8bn for 2025-6 for National Highways to deliver critical road schemes and maintain motorways and major A-roads.
This new money will mean “pivotal” road construction schemes can be pushed forward, the government said.
This is a key part of Downing Street’s drive to ensure the voting public sees and feels the difference the government is making in their local communities as they fight off a challenge from Reform UK.
Image: The transport secretary has promised £4.8bn for National Highways to deliver improvements and maintenance. Pic: PA
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: “The broken roads we inherited are not only risking lives but also cost working families, drivers and businesses hundreds – if not thousands of pounds – in avoidable vehicle repairs.
“British people are bored of seeing their politicians aimlessly pointing at potholes with no real plan to fix them. That ends with us.
“We’ve done our part by handing councils the cash and certainty they need – now it’s up to them to get on with the job, put that money to use and prove they’re delivering for their communities.”
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: “After years of neglect we’re tackling the pothole plague, building vital roads and ensuring every penny is delivering results for the taxpayer.”
Responding to the announcement, the transport spokesperson for the Local Government Association said the cash will “help start to address the previously ever-growing backlog of local road repairs” which, he added, “could take more than a decade to fix”.
Councillor Adam Hug also called for the government to “play its full part” by using its Spending Review “to ensure that councils receive sufficient, long-term funding certainty, so they can focus their efforts on much more cost-effective, preventative measures”.
The Conservatives have responded by claiming Labour “want credit for handing councils a pothole sticking plaster”.
Gareth Bacon, shadow transport secretary, continued: “Labour are running on empty. They’ve got no plan for motorists, no grip on the problem, and no credibility.
“Voters shouldn’t be fooled – Labour aren’t fixing the roads, they’re steering Britain into a ditch.”
Spending on roads and cuts in Whitehall
The spending on roads across England comes as the chancellor is preparing to make billions of pounds of spending cuts at the spring statement on Wednesday.
A turbulent economic climate since October means the £9.9bn gap in her fiscal headroom (the amount she could increase spending or cut taxes without breaking her fiscal rules) has been wiped out.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:47
Chancellor says 10,000 civil service roles could be axed
A total of £5bn is expected to be saved by making it more difficult to qualify for Pip, and also abolishing the work capability assessment in 2028, which determines whether someone on universal credit is fit to work.
Quangos are also on the chopping block, with the prime minister having already announced NHS England is being abolished to both bring the health service back under more direct ministerial control, and also save money.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Money is being redirected towards defence, with the chancellor expected to announce £400m in spending on the government’s new UK Defence Investment body to “harness UK ingenuity and boost military technology”, The Mirror reports.
And the full details of how international aid funding will be reallocated to defence are expected, after the prime minister said UK defence spending will rise to 2.5% of GDP by 2027.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:21
How will the UK scale up defence?
Speaking to Trevor Phillips, the chancellor said “the world has changed” as she laid the groundwork for the spring statement.
“We’ll respond to the change and continue to meet our fiscal rule,” she said. “But we’re also shaping the new world, whether that’s in the defence and security realm, or indeed on the economy.
The chancellor highlighted that “interest rates have been cut three times since the general election”, adding: “That’s a far cry from the 11% inflation and the interest rate hikes that we saw under the previous government.”
But shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the government has not “gripped the economy”, accusing ministers of having talked it down and having a negative impact on growth.