Connect with us

Published

on

This is a hugely significant moment. For the first time in more than three years, Washington is lifting sanctions on Moscow instead of imposing them.

It’s the most tangible evidence yet of a US-Russia rapprochement, and a crystal clear signal of Donald Trump’s intentions to turn Vladimir Putin the pariah into Putin the partner.

For now, they’re only talking about easing a handful of restrictions so that Russia’s agricultural and fertiliser exports can return to global markets.

Ukraine war latest: Russia launches drone attacks

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Black Sea ceasefire: Who benefits?

It’s important to point out that Russian food and fertiliser have, in fact, always been exempt from Western sanctions, but exports were disrupted by Russian banks’ exclusion from the SWIFT global payments system.

It has meant higher fees and delays in payments, even when it comes to cross-border trade with friendly nations.

That’s why Moscow wants sanctions to be lifted on Rosselkhozbank – the state-owned Russian agriculture bank – and for it to be reconnected to SWIFT.

FILE - President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the beginning of a meeting at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, July 16, 2018. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)
Image:
Perhaps the most galling thing for Ukraine will be that Putin seems to have secured this without giving up very much. File pic: AP

One could argue that it’s just one brick in what is still a whole wall of sanctions surrounding Russia. But its removal will nevertheless be massively symbolic.

Ukraine’s Western allies were in lockstep when they built that wall – now its powerful supporter is starting the process of bringing it down.

What’s more, there’ll be fears that Moscow could abuse America’s charity here, particularly when it comes to one of the Kremlin’s other demands – lifting restrictions on the supply of agricultural machinery to Russia.

Read more from Sky News:
Trump urged to fire defence secretary over war plans leak
Drones shot down over Black Sea, Russia claims

Restrictions were imposed on agricultural machinery due to some components being classified as ‘dual-use’ goods, which could potentially aid Russia’s war machine.

What’s to say these fears won’t be realised? That parts meant for tractors and harvesters suddenly find their way into weapon production? Washington might be happy to take Moscow’s word for it, but Kyiv certainly won’t be.

Perhaps the most galling thing for Ukraine and its European allies, however, will be that Mr Putin appears to have secured this without giving up very much at all.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Ukraine and Russia agree sea deal

Yes, Russia has agreed to a maritime ceasefire. But it’s a long way short of a full ceasefire, and it’s something that was first agreed back in July 2022 with the Black Sea Grain Initiative.

Russia withdrew from that deal in 2023, unhappy at the obstacles facing its food and fertiliser exports – sound familiar?

Since then, attacks in the Black Sea have dropped off significantly. In fact, Ukrainian grain exports are pretty much back at pre-war levels already.

So, a maritime ceasefire may not actually make that much of a difference to the conflict itself. The bigger impact will be in Washington and Moscow.

For Mr Trump, it’s something to show off – proof that he’s taken a step closer to peace.

For Mr Putin, it’s Russia’s first step coming back in from the cold.

Continue Reading

US

Trump suffers setback in bid to act as national police chief after chaos on streets of LA

Published

on

By

Trump suffers setback in bid to act as national police chief after chaos on streets of LA

The deployment of National Guard soldiers on to the streets of LA by Donald Trump was always deeply controversial – and now it has been deemed illegal, too, by a federal judge.

In late spring in Los Angeles, I observed as peaceful protests against immigration raids turned confrontational.

I watched as Waymos – self-driving cars – were set alight and people waving flags shut down one of the city’s busiest freeways. I saw government buildings spray-painted with anti-government sentiment and expletives. Some people even threw bottles at police officers in riot gear.

In exchange, I saw law enforcement deploy “flash bang” crowd control devices and fire rubber bullets into crowds, indiscriminately, on occasion.

Mounted Los Angeles police officers disperse protesters earlier this summer. Pic: San Francisco Chronicle/AP
Image:
Mounted Los Angeles police officers disperse protesters earlier this summer. Pic: San Francisco Chronicle/AP

A person reacts to non-lethal munitions shot in Los Angeles.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
A person reacts to non-lethal munitions shot in Los Angeles.
Pic: Reuters

It was chaotic at times, violent, even, in a corner of the downtown area of the city. But I didn’t witness anything that suggested police were on the brink of being overcome by rioters. I didn’t see anything that I believe justified the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 marines to the heart of America’s second-biggest city.

But Trump sent them in anyway, against the wishes of the local government. LA mayor Karen Bass condemned the deployment as an act of political theatre and said it risked stoking tensions.

The language Trump used was, arguably, inflammatory, too. He described LA as an “invaded” and “occupied city”. He spoke of “a full-blown assault on peace”, carried out by “rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: ‘We will liberate Los Angeles’

It didn’t reflect reality. The size of the protests were modest, several thousand people marching through a handful of streets in downtown LA, a city which spans 500 square miles and has a population of almost four million.

The majority of the soldiers simply stood guard outside government buildings, often looking bored. Some of them are still here, with nothing to do. Now a judge has ruled that the operation was illegal.

US District Judge Charles Breyer said the Trump administration “used armed soldiers (whose identity was often obscured by protective armour) and military vehicles to set up protective perimeters and traffic blockades, engage in crowd control, and otherwise demonstrate a military presence in and around Los Angeles”.

Read more from Sky News:
French government on brink of collapse
Xi hails ‘great regeneration of China’ at parade

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Marines head to Los Angeles

In a scathing judgement, he effectively accused the White House of turning National Guard soldiers and marines into a “national police force.”

That breaches a law from 1878, barring the use of soldiers for civilian law enforcement activities.

It is a blow to what some view as the president’s ambition to federalise Democrat-run cities and deploy the National Guard in other states around the country. He had threatened to send troops to Chicago as part of an initiative he says is cracking down on crime, widening the use of National Guard troops, as seen on the streets of Washington DC.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The fightback against immigration raids in LA

But since this judge ruled that the deployment of National Guard and marines to LA in June was unlawful in the way it unfolded, Trump may have to be inventive with his rationale for sending soldiers into other US cities in the future.

This legal judgement, though, is being appealed and may well be overturned. Either way, it is unlikely to stem the president’s ambition to act as national police chief.

Continue Reading

US

Partial release of Epstein files feeds view the whole truth is being covered up

Published

on

By

“Don’t let this fool you.”  

Continue Reading

US

Trump says 11 dead in strike on Venezuelan drugs boat

Published

on

By

Trump says 11 dead in strike on Venezuelan drugs boat

A strike on what the US called a Venezuelan gang’s drug-carrying vessel killed 11 people, Donald Trump has said.

Speaking at a news conference at the White House, the US president told reporters: “We just, over the last few minutes, literally shot out a boat, a drug-carrying boat, a lot of drugs in that boat.

“And there’s more where that came from. We have a lot of drugs pouring into our country, coming in for a long time.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio then added: “These particular drugs were probably headed to Trinidad or some other country in the Caribbean.

“Suffice to say the president is going to be on offence against drug cartels and drug trafficking in the United States.”

Mr Trump later posted a video on Truth Social of a vessel exploding, in what appeared to mark the first US military operation in the southern Caribbean to crack down on drug cartels.

The president said on social media that the US military had identified the crew as members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which was designated a terrorist group in February.

He then alleged that Tren de Aragua is being controlled by Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro, which the country denies.

Venezuelan officials have repeatedly said that Tren de Aragua is no longer active in their country after they dismantled it during a prison raid in 2023.

The US last month doubled its reward for information leading to the arrest of Mr Maduro to $50m, accusing him of links to drug trafficking and criminal groups.

The US has deployed warships in the southern Caribbean in recent weeks.

Seven warships, along with one nuclear-powered fast-attack submarine, are either in the region or expected to arrive soon, carrying more than 4,500 sailors and Marines.

Read more from Sky News:
Graham Linehan ‘arrested at Heathrow over posts on X’
New Green leader doesn’t rule out pact with Jeremy Corbyn
The staggering numbers behind France’s brewing debt crisis

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Officials have said that the US military has also been flying P-8 spy planes over international waters in the region to gather intelligence.

Mr Maduro said on Monday that he “would constitutionally declare a republic in arms” if Venezuela were attacked by US forces deployed in the Caribbean.

Continue Reading

Trending