The University of Sussex has been fined a record £585,000 by the higher education regulator for failing to uphold freedom of speech.
The Office for Students (OfS) criticised the university’s policy statement on transgender and non-binary equality, saying that it could lead to self-censorship.
The policy required staff and students to “positively represent trans people” adding that “transphobic propaganda [would] not be tolerated”.
The university accused the regulator of pursuing a “politically motivated” inquiry and said it believes the findings were not lawful. It is seeking to challenge the ruling through a judicial review.
Professor Sasha Roseneil, vice chancellor at the university, told Sky News the OfS investigation was “quite a Kafkaesque experience”.
She claimed the fine would “paralyse university leaders” and “cause havoc across the UK higher education sector”.
The OfS launched its investigation after campus protests calling for the dismissal of Professor Kathleen Stock.
Image: Professor Kathleen Stock speaking at the Oxford Union before activists stormed her talk in 2023. Pic: Oxford Union Society/PA
She left the university in 2021 after being accused of transphobia when she published a book questioning whether gender identity was more “socially significant” than biological sex.
The OfS said the University of Sussex’s policy had a “chilling effect” on the views of Prof Stock, who has been targeted by trans rights protesters.
Image: Trans rights protesters in Oxford demonstrating in 2023 ahead of Prof Stock’s speech. Pic: PA
“Professor Stock said that she became more cautious in her expression of gender critical views as a result of the policy,” the OfS said in a statement.
“There were some views she did not feel able to express, and therefore teach, despite those views being lawful.”
Prof Roseneil, the vice chancellor at the university, said the OfS findings mean “it makes it almost impossible for universities to have any policies that will control how people speak or relate to each other on campuses”.
She added: “It’s free speech absolutism and puts free speech above all else. And the only thing that universities will effectively be able to do is regulate unlawful speech.”
Prof Roseneil explained she believed the university could only take action against antisemitic or anti-Muslim propaganda if it was actually illegal which is a “very high bar”.
Image: The university’s campus in Falmer. Pic: iStock
But Arif Ahmed, the director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, defended the fine.
He told Sky News: “If you have policies which are restricting what viewpoints you can express, what ideas can be expressed, then that’s inconsistent with the whole aim of the university, with the aim of research and with the aim of a genuine humanistic education.
“So for all of those reasons, we think it’s really important that the fine reflects the severity of the breaches that we saw, the damage that they caused,” he said.
The OfS was given the power in January to issue fines where freedom of speech was not upheld at a university.
The penalty issued to the University of Sussex is the largest-ever issued by the regulator, with the institution saying it is 15 times larger than any other sanction imposed.
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, said that “free speech and academic freedom are non-negotiables in our universities”.
“If you go to university you must be prepared to have your views challenged, hear contrary opinions and be exposed to uncomfortable truths,” she said.
“We are giving the OfS stronger powers on freedom of speech so students and academics are not muzzled by the chilling effect demonstrated in this case.”
A major incident has been declared in Birmingham over an ongoing bin strike, which has left around 17,000 tonnes of waste on the streets of the city.
Birmingham City Council said the “regrettable” step was taken in response to public health concerns, with picket lines blocking depots and preventing waste vehicles from collecting rubbish.
Members of Unite have been on all-out strike since 11 March in a row over pay, which the union claims will leave some members of staff £8,000 worse off. A series of walkouts have also impacted refuse collections since January.
By declaring a major incident, the council will be able to increase the availability of street cleansing and fly-tip removal with an additional 35 vehicles and crews around the city.
This action will also allow the council to explore what further support is available from neighbouring authorities and the government to assist in the management of the situation.
Council leader John Cotton said it was a “regrettable” step, but the situation was “causing harm and distress” to local people.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:51
Birmingham suffers bin crisis
“I respect the right to strike and protest, however actions on the picket line must be lawful and sadly the behaviour of some now means we are seeing a significant impact on residents and the city’s environment,” he said.
Jim McMahon, the minister for local government, said the all-out strike by Unite members is causing “misery and disruption” to residents, as well as posing a “public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived”.
He said the government “stands ready” to respond to any request for extra resources, but insisted that any deal to end the bin strike must “maintain value for money”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:58
‘They can’t hold the city to ransom’
Mr McMahon told the Commons: “This is causing a public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived residents. As a result, I am aware that Birmingham has today declared a major incident to give them the mechanisms to better manage the impact on local residents.
“I support that decision, and I will back local leaders.”
The minister added that the government will “not hesitate to give support in any way that Birmingham leaders need”.
He said: “If local leaders on the ground in Birmingham feel that tackling these issues goes beyond the resources available to them and they request national support, then of course we stand ready to respond to any such request.”
Members of the Unite union met with Birmingham City Council last Thursday, but talks have so far failed.
Unite says the dispute will not end unless the “hugely damaging” cuts to bin collectors’ wages are reversed.
But Birmingham City Council says the aim of the restructuring is to create a “modern, sustainable and consistently reliable waste collection service”.
An “extensive search” is under way to find an 11-year-old girl after she fell into the River Thames in east London.
The Metropolitan Police said it was called at around 1.15pm on Monday to reports the girl had entered the river near Barge House Causeway, near London City Airport.
All emergency services are forming a “large-scale response” to the incident.
The girl’s next of kin have been made aware and are being supported by officers.
The London Ambulance Service was also called at a similar time, after receiving a report of a person in the water at Lowestoft Mews, which is close to the airport.
“We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an advanced paramedic, an incident response officer and members of our hazardous area response team,” a spokesperson said.
“Our crews assisted our emergency services partners at the scene but were later stood down.”
London Fire Brigade Deputy Assistant Commissioner Joseph Kenny added that “firefighters responded to reports of a person in the River Thames near Lowestoft Mews, Newham”.
He said crews from East Ham, Barking, Ilford and Bexley fire stations were sent to the scene alongside other emergency services.
“The brigade also deployed its drone team and fire boat as part of its response, with crews carrying out a systematic search of the area,” he added.
“The brigade was first called about the incident at 1.23pm. Search operations for firefighters were concluded at 3.49pm when responsibility for the incident was left with the police.”
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Controversial sentencing guidelines that were due to come into force on Tuesday have been delayed after a political backlash.
The Sentencing Council, the independent body that sets out sentencing guidance to courts in England and Wales, was due to bring in new rules around how judges should determine punishment for people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
The new guidance states that a pre-sentence report – the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence – will “usually be necessary” before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.
Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, had said the proposed guidance was “unacceptable” and amounted to “differential treatment before the law” as she urged the council to reverse it.
When the Sentencing Council initially refused her request, Ms Mahmood threatened to legislate to overturn the guidance if necessary.
She confirmed this evening that she would introduce legislation on Tuesday to block these guidelines coming into effect.
More on Ministry Of Justice
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
7:26
Robert Jenrick has hit out at what he says is
The Sentencing Council has now delayed the “in force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect”.
It said in a statement that the council “remains of the view that its guideline, imposition of community and custodial sentences, as drafted is necessary and appropriate”.
However, in a meeting between the chairman Lord Justice Davis and Ms Mahmood on Monday, the minister “indicated her intention to introduce legislation imminently that would have the effect of rendering the section on ‘cohorts’ in the guideline unlawful”.
The council said it is unable to introduce a guideline when there is a draft bill due for introduction that would make it unlawful.
Ms Mahmood said: “This differential treatment is unacceptable – equality before the law is the backbone of public confidence in our justice system. I will change the law to ensure fairness for all in our courts.”
The Sentencing Council also attracted criticism from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who said its updated guidance was an example of “two-tier justice” that would lead to “blatant bias” against Christians and straight white men.
He also argued that it would make “a custodial sentence less likely for those from an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community” – something the council denied.
The council previously rejected calls from the government to abandon the guidelines, which ask judges to consider offenders’ racial, cultural and religious background when deciding a sentence.
Lord Davis denied that pre-sentence reports reduced the prospect of a jail sentence.
However, he said the council would provide “some clarification of the language” to avoid confusion.