Connect with us

Published

on

More than a thousand jobs are being axed at a key government department in a move officials say will help deliver cost savings of over £100m over the three years.

Approximately 1,200 full-time jobs will be removed in the Cabinet Office through voluntary and mutually agreed exits and through not replacing some staff members who leave, while a further 900 roles will be moved to other departments.

The changes will result in the headcount of the Cabinet Office – the department headed by one of Sir Keir Starmer’s closest allies, Pat McFadden – reducing by a third.

Politics latest: Why is there more controversy about grooming gangs inquiries?

The Cabinet Office is responsible for supporting the prime minister and ensuring the government runs effectively.

However, there have been concerns about the increase in the size of the department following Brexit and the COVID pandemic.

The cuts form part of a wider government agenda to streamline the civil service and the size of the British state, which the prime minister criticised as “weaker than it has ever been” in a speech where he also announced he was scrapping NHS England, the administrative body that runs the health service.

Last month, Sky News reported that the Cabinet Office was one of a number of government departments to kickstart voluntary exit schemes, alongside the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs and the Foreign Office.

Voluntary exit schemes differ from voluntary redundancy schemes in that they offer departments more flexibility around the terms offered to departing staff.

Others, including the Department for Health and Social Care and the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, have yet to start schemes, but it is expected they soon will.

Cabinet Office staff were informed by Catherine Little, the permanent secretary, that the changes were being delivered to make the department smaller and more strategic and specialist in its approach.

A Cabinet Office source said: “Leading by example, we are creating a leaner and more focused Cabinet Office that will drive work to reshape the state and deliver our plan for change.

“This government will target resources at frontline services – with more teachers in classrooms, extra hospital appointments and police back on the beat.”

Since launching its voluntary exit scheme in January, the Cabinet Office has accepted 500 applications – 100 more than it was originally targeting.

It comes on top of the 900 people who have already moved out of the department, including the transfer of the government digital service to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.

The department hopes that the use of AI and technology and other restructuring reforms will create savings of more than £110m by 2028.

Read more:
Home secretary insists five local grooming gang inquiries will go ahead

Fewer criminals set to be jailed amid overcrowding

Lucille Thirlby, the assistant general secretary of the FDA union, which represents civil servants, said the sector was “desperate for reform” but warned that cutting Cabinet Office headcount by a third would impinge on the government’s ability to deliver policies.

“As we are seeing with the reorganisation of NHS England – there is a difference between reforming and cutting,” she told Sky News.

“The Cabinet Office is instrumental in coordinating cross-government work. Cutting a third of the core department will impact the delivery of the government’s own agenda, including their ‘plan for change’.

“Ministers will now need to be honest about what the government will stop doing as a result of these cuts.”

Her concerns were echoed by Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect trade union, who said: “The Cabinet Office has an important role to play operating the machinery of government, driving efficiency and reform, and ensuring other departments are fully aligned with and able to deliver the government’s missions.

“Blunt cuts of this scale will make it harder to play that role and could impact on delivery across government.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Published

on

By

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

The CARF regulation, which brings crypto under global tax reporting standards akin to traditional finance, marks a crucial turning point.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Published

on

By

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

The nascent real-world tokenized assets track prices but do not provide investors the same legal rights as holding the underlying instruments.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government’s controversial welfare bill.

Sir Keir Starmer’s Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion.

MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.

Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole – close to breaching Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules set out last year.

Read more:
Yet another fiscal ‘black hole’? Here’s why this one matters

Success or failure: One year of Keir in nine charts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were “costs” to watering down the welfare bill.

“I’m not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that,” Ms Reeves told the outlet.

More on Rachel Reeves

“We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement.

“So we’ll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.”

Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised.

The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more.

It comes after Ms Reeves said she was “totally” up to continuing as chancellor after appearing tearful at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was the chancellor crying at PMQs?

Criticising Sir Keir for the U-turns on benefit reform during PMQs, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the chancellor looked “absolutely miserable”, and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election.

Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a “tough day” before adding: “People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday.

“Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

Sir Keir also told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby on Thursday that he “didn’t appreciate” that Ms Reeves was crying in the Commons.

“In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,” he said. “That’s what it was yesterday.

“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”

Continue Reading

Trending