Connect with us

Published

on

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said it is “likely” that British Steel will be nationalised.

It comes after he appeared to row back on his claim that he would not bring a Chinese company into the steel sector again after the government had to urgently step in to save the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe.

Mr Reynolds, speaking to reporters in the Lincolnshire town, said that nationalisation was the “likely option at this stage”.

He added: “What we are now going to do, having secured both control of the site and the supply of raw materials, so the blast furnaces won’t close in a matter of days, is work on the future.

“We’ve got the ownership question, which is pressing.

“I was clear when I gave the speech in parliament – we know there is a limited lifespan of the blast furnaces, and we know that what we need for the future is a private sector partner to come in and work with us on that transformation and co-fund that transformation.”

Reynolds rows back

Mr Reynolds said he would look at Chinese firms “in a different way” following the race to save British Steel, but did not rule out their involvement completely.

The comments were at odds with his previous remarks to Sky News’ Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, when he said he would not “personally bring a Chinese company into our steel sector” again, describing steel as a “sensitive area” in the UK.

The government has taken over British Steel’s Scunthorpe plant, the last in the UK capable of producing virgin steel, after talks with its Chinese owners, Jingye, broke down.

Politics latest: US ‘working very hard’ on negotiating ‘great’ UK trade deal

The company recently cancelled orders for supplies of the raw materials needed to keep the blast furnaces running, sparking a race against time to keep it operational.

Materials secured by the government arrived at the site on Tuesday, but questions remain about the long-term future of British Steel and whether it will be fully nationalised or the private sector will get involved.

Earlier on Tuesday, industry minister Sarah Jones said she is “not ruling out” the possibility of another Chinese partner.

She said having a pragmatic relationship with Beijing, the world’s second-biggest economy, is still important and stringent tests would apply “to a Chinese company as they would to any other company”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

China relationship ‘really important’

Asked for clarity on his position during a visit to the port of Immingham, where materials from two ships are being unloaded and transported to the plant, Mr Reynolds said: “I think we’ve got to recognise that steel is a sensitive sector.

“A lot of the issues in the global economy with steel come from production and dumping of steel products… so I think you would look at a Chinese firm in a different way.

“But I’m really keen to stress the action we’ve taken here was to step in because it was one specific company that I thought wasn’t acting in the UK’s national interest, and we had to take the action we did.”

Explainer: Why has the government rescued British Steel?

The materials that arrived on Tuesday, including coking coal and iron, are enough to keep the furnaces running for weeks, the Department for Business and Trade said.

They are needed because if the furnaces cool down too much, the molten iron solidifies and blocks the furnaces, making it extremely difficult and expensive to restart them.

Switching off furnaces is a costly nightmare the govt wants to avoid

There’s no switch that easily turns a blast furnace on and off.

Temperatures inside can approach 2,000C and to protect the structure the interior is lined with ceramic insulation.

But the ceramic bricks expand and contract depending on the temperature, and any change needs to be done carefully over several weeks to stop them cracking.

Molten material inside the furnace also needs to be drained by drilling a hole through the wall of the furnace.

It’s a dangerous and expensive process, normally only ever done when there’s a major planned refurbishment.

That’s why the government wants to keep the furnaces at Scunthorpe burning.

The problem is, supplies for the furnaces are running low.

They need pellets of iron ore – the main raw material for making steel.

And they also need a processed form of coal called coke – the fuel that provides both the heat and the chemical reaction to purify the iron so it’s ready to make strong steel alloy.

Without a fresh supply of both the furnaces may have to be turned off in just a fortnight. And that would be a complex, costly nightmare the government wants to avoid.

‘Chinese ownership truly dreadful’

Opposition politicians have accused China of sabotage to increase reliance on its steel products, and want the country to be prevented from future dealings not only with steel but any UK national infrastructure.

Veteran Tory MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith said the government needs to define which industries are “strategic” – and prevent China from being allowed to invest in such sectors.

Liberal Democrats foreign affairs spokesperson Calum Miller said reverting to Chinese ownership would be like finding “your house ransacked and then leaving your doors unlocked”.

Raw materials for Scunthorpe steel plant arrive at port
Image:
Raw materials for the Scunthorpe steel plant


Coking coal is unloaded at Immingham Port, northern England, on April 15, 2025 as raw materials that had been waiting in the dock are transported to British Steel's steelworks site after payment was settled. DARREN STAPLES/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
Coking coal is unloaded at Immingham Port. Pic: Reuters

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage took the same position, saying the thought the government “could even contemplate another Chinese owner of British steel is truly dreadful”, and that he would not have China “in our nuclear program, anywhere near our telecoms or anything else”.

“They are not our friends,” he added.

Number 10 said on Monday that it was not aware of any “sabotage” at the plant and there is no block on Chinese companies.

The Chinese embassy has urged the British government not to “politicise” the situation by “linking it to security issues”, saying it is “an objective fact that British steel companies have generally encountered difficulties in recent years”.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Jingye reported losses of around £700k a day at Scunthorpe, which will now come at a cost to the taxpayer after emergency legislation on Saturday allowed the government to take it over.

During Tuesday morning’s interview round, Ms Jones said the government had offered Jingye money in return for investment and “we think that there is a model there that we could replicate with another private sector company”.

But she said there “isn’t another private sector company there waiting in the wings” currently, and that it may be a “national solution” that is needed.

She said “all of the options” were expensive but that it would have cost more to the taxpayer to allow the site to shut.

A YouGov poll shows the majority of the public (61%) support the government’s decision to nationalise British Steel.

Continue Reading

UK

Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case after report finds officers prioritised suspect’s welfare

Published

on

By

Police admit failures in Harry Dunn case after report finds officers prioritised suspect's welfare

Northamptonshire Police has admitted it failed Harry Dunn and his family after a report found officers prioritised the welfare of the suspect in the case over the investigation.

The 19-year-old died in 2019 after US state department employee Anne Sacoolas – who was driving a car on the wrong side of the road – hit his motorbike near RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.

However, Sacoolas was not immediately arrested following the crash and was able to flee the country, claiming diplomatic immunity, because police did not believe a “necessity test” had been met.

An independent report, published on Wednesday, has now criticised the force’s senior leadership for their handling of the case – including describing its former chief constable as having a “detrimental” impact.

Harry Dunn’s mother Charlotte Charles said she welcomed the findings.

She told Sky News: “Unfortunately, we were treated extremely poorly. All the authorities wanted to shut us down…

“This report does validate everything, of the way we felt and everything that we’ve been put through. To be treated as we were, as the victims of a serious crime, we were let down really, really badly.”

Following a long fight for justice by Mr Dunn’s family, Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022.

She later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From 2022: Anne Sacoolas pleads guilty

Following the report, Assistant Chief Constable Emma James said in a statement: “On behalf of Northamptonshire Police, I want to apologise to Harry’s family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him.

“The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts”.

She also added: “It was vitally important that Northamptonshire Police conducted this review into the most high-profile case in the force’s history, a case where clear and significant shortcomings have now been properly and independently unearthed.”

Assistant Chief Constable Emma James
Image:
Assistant Chief Constable Emma James

The report, which has 38 recommendations, found that Nick Adderley, who was sacked as head of the force last year after lying about his military record, had caused a breakdown in relations with Mr Dunn’s family.

It also revealed that his “erroneous statements” about Sacoolas’s immunity status led the Foreign Office to contact the force asking him not to repeat them.

Read more:
Harry Dunn’s family’s fight for justice never wavered
‘I couldn’t have asked for a better brother’, Harry’s twin tells inquest

Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire, said Mr Adderley’s behaviour was “unfathomable”.

She added that the report “makes really clear his culpability.”

Danielle Stone, the Police, Fire & Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire
Image:
Danielle Stone said Mr Adderley’s behaviour was “unfathomable”

The report also said Northamptonshire Police potentially had a culture of not arresting suspects “in circumstances such as these, which could lead to evidence not being obtained”. It recommended that the force adopt an “investigative mindset” over serious road crashes.

Regarding the decision not to arrest Sacoolas, the report said the decision had not been “explained in enough detail”. It added: “The overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.

“A prompt and effective investigation was not considered or articulated. The view is that in these circumstances the suspect could and should have been arrested to assist the evidence-gathering process.”

A report into Northamptonshire Police's failures in investigating the death of Harry Dunn

The report continued: “The duty (police sergeant) made the decision not to arrest.

“The rationale was largely based on a belief that the necessity test was not met, and information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock.

“Whilst the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas.”

Ms Charles, who was recently honoured with an MBE after her campaigning efforts led to road safety improvements near US airbases, said: “I don’t think you’re ever done grieving. There’s never any closure to losing a child. You live with it, it’s so profound.

“So the only thing I would ever say to anybody else who feels that they’ve got a fight ahead of them, dig deep, do your best, because you just never know the resilience that you’ve got until you absolutely have to find it.”

Continue Reading

UK

Battle to convince MPs to back benefit cuts to more than three million households

Published

on

By

Battle to convince MPs to back benefit cuts to more than three million households

Plans for cuts to benefits which will impact more than three million households will be published today – as the government faces a battle to convince dozens of Labour MPs to back them.

Liz Kendall, the welfare secretary, has set out proposals to cut £5bn from the welfare budget – which she has said is “unsustainable” and “trapping people in welfare dependency”.

Disabled people claiming PIP, the personal independence payment which helps people – some of them working – with the increased costs of daily living, face having their awards reviewed from the end of next year.

An estimated 800,000 current and future PIP recipients will lose an average of £4,500 a year, according to a government assessment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Government’s battle over welfare reforms

The government also intends to freeze the health element of Universal Credit, claimed by more than two million people, at £97 a week during this parliament, and cut the rate to £50 for new claimants.

Under pressure from Labour MPs concerned particularly that changes to PIP will drive families into poverty, Ms Kendall will announce new protections in the bill today.

Sky News understands they include a 13-week transition period for those losing PIP; a higher rate of Universal Credit for people with the most serious conditions; and a commitment that disabled people who take a job will not immediately lose their benefits.

More on Benefits

Some 40 Labour MPs have signed a letter refusing to support the cuts; and dozens of others have concerns, including ministers.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Benefits cuts explained

Ms Kendall is determined to press ahead, and has said the number of new PIP claimants has doubled since 2019 – at 34,000, up from 15,000.

Ministers say 90% of current claimants will not lose their benefits; and that many people will be better off – with the total welfare bill set to continue to rise over this parliament.

To keep the benefit, claimants must score a minimum of four points out of eight on one of the daily living criteria.

Ministers say claimants with the most serious conditions, who cannot work, will not face constant reassessments.

A £1bn programme is proposed, intended to give disabled people who can work tailored support to find jobs.

Some Labour MPs have angrily opposed the reforms – which will be voted on later this month.

Last night in a parliamentary debate, Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan disputed the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures.

Read More:
Minister tells MPs controversial disability benefit reforms will go ahead
Big benefits cuts are imminent – here’s what to expect

He said: “We already know that PIP is an underclaimed benefit. The increase in claims is a symptom of declining public health and increased financial hardship disabled people are facing.

“We have the same proportion of people on working-age benefits as in 2015. This is not an economic necessity, it’s a political choice.”

Liz Kendall
Image:
Liz Kendall

Rachael Maskell, Labour MP for York, called the proposals “devastating “. She said: “We must change direction and not proceed with these cuts.”

Disability groups say they fear an increase in suicides and mental health conditions.

The government’s own assessment forecast an extra 250,000 people could be pushed into poverty – including 50,000 children. It did not include the impact of people moving into work.

Ms Kendall was urged by MPs on the Commons Work and Pensions committee to delay the reforms, to carry out an impact assessment, but wrote back to the committee saying the reforms were too urgent to delay – and that MPs would be able to amend the legislation.

Continue Reading

UK

Missing teen Cole Cooper: Grieving mum alleges ‘third party’ involved in death

Published

on

By

Missing teen Cole Cooper: Grieving mum alleges 'third party' involved in death

The grieving mother of a Scottish teen who vanished for a month has told Sky News she believes a “third party” was involved in her son’s death.

Cole Cooper, 19, was discovered dead in woods near Falkirk earlier this month following a missing persons inquiry his relatives don’t believe was taken seriously enough by police.

He was last seen on CCTV in May after leaving a house party, but police later revealed a former school friend had spoken to Cole a few days later nearby.

Speaking exclusively to Sky News, his mum Wendy Stewart, 42, has revealed her son had “various arguments” in the days and hours before he disappeared.

Wendy&Aimee
Image:
Cole’s mum Wendy (L) and his aunt Aimee

In an emotional interview, she said: “He was only 19, he should never have been taken. I am never going to see him again. I never got a chance to give him a last cuddle and hold his hand.

“Someone has taken that away from me far too soon. Whether it be intentionally or unintentionally, I do believe there has been some involvement by a third party and the result is the death of Cole.”

The family, who organised a local vigil in Cole’s memory last weekend, have vowed to get “justice”.

More on Scotland

Asked what that means, Ms Stewart told Sky News: “Finding the culprit and getting justice that way. Finding the person that is responsible for the death of my child.”

Police previously said 400 residents were spoken to during door-to-door enquires and more than 2,000 hours of CCTV footage was collected.

The 19-year-old’s death is being treated as “unexplained”.

Read more from Sky News:
Council apologises amid school Union Flag row
Winter fuel payment in Scotland ‘will not be less than UK benefit’

Cole Cooper's mother Wendy Stewart, comforts her son Coby, 10 and daughter Casia, 11, during a vigil at the Glenskirlie Hotel in Banknock, f
Image:
Cole Cooper’s mother Wendy at a vigil in Banknock. Pic: PA

Cole’s aunt Aimee Tennie, 32, revealed the family’s anger over the police handling of the case as they attempt to find out what happened.

She said: “We are aware of small details surrounding the weekend leading up to it with arguments. He had a few arguments over that weekend. We want the details re-examined thoroughly.”

Sky News put all of the family’s concerns and allegations to Police Scotland.

The force swerved our questions and responded saying: “Enquiries remain ongoing.”

Wendy Stewart claimed the probe has been handled “shockingly” with a failure to take her son’s disappearance seriously.

The 42-year-old said: “I have had to scream and shout from rooftops to be heard by the police. I don’t think they have handled it well.

“The police really need to take accountability and listen to families, they are reporting a missing child and understand the family knows their child best.”

Cole Cooper’s loved ones still have not been told when his body will be released to allow them to lay him to rest.

Continue Reading

Trending