Connect with us

Published

on

Juiced Bikes spent 15 years as a beloved e-bike brand building some of the most iconic and highest-performance electric bicycles in the US market. But financial troubles put the brand into a tailspin last year, ultimately culminating in bankruptcy and closure. The brand appeared to be a goner until two young e-bike entrepreneurs stepped up to try and salvage Juiced’s legacy in a deal whose details have never been revealed – until now.

I covered the apparent collapse of Juiced Bikes late last year, including watching the company’s assets eventually surface on an auction site seemingly run as a way to repay Juiced’s creditors.

The auction included everything from Juiced Bikes’ designs, patents, and other intellectual property (IP) to its wide assortment of e-bike inventory and spare parts, and even the company’s Sprinter delivery van. The submitters of the winning bid were revealed to be Levi Conlow and Robby Deziel, the free-spirited founders of the largest electric bicycle company in the US, Phoenix-based Lectric Ebikes. I reported on that revelation last month, but the rest of the story had remained a mystery.

I recently had the chance to talk to Lectric Ebikes’ CEO Levi Conlow about the rollercoaster ride of trying to buy Juiced Bikes, and what comes next in the long process of restoring the brand to its former glory.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

This is that story.

Lectric co-founders Robby Deziel (left) and Levi Conlow (right) sporting their new Juiced Bikes swag

Levi, Robby, and the entire team at Lectric Ebikes have long shown a penchant for giving back not just to the broader e-bike community, but also for taking a wholistic approach to philanthropy as a company. In the past I’ve covered how they give away millions of dollars each year, both in terms of free e-bikes and donations to worthy causes.

Considering that the concept of doing the right thing is firmly engrained in the Lectric DNA, this seemed to Levi as another chance to give back to the larger e-bike community.

“We saw it as an opportunity to once again show the industry that Lectric can do the right thing,” said Levi. “We always pride ourselves on doing the right thing. We saw this as an opportunity to buy Juiced, give it a pathway to continue on, put the necessary resources into it to make it successful, but also to help resolve all these customers that had just gotten burned.”

That was a major sore spot in Juiced’s larger fall from grace. Not only did the brand cease operations and leave its tens of thousands of riders without support, but hundreds of customers had already paid in full for pre-ordered electric bikes that were never delivered.

“Our plan was to get that inventory and send those bikes to the customers that had already paid, and then we’d begin fresh once those customers are taken care of,” Levi explained. “We could pause for a bit then and rebuild the brand.”

The auction for Juiced’s assets, both physical and IP, included hundreds of e-bikes that were sitting in US logistics warehouses, waiting to be shipped to customers who had already paid for them.

After placing the winning bid in the auction, Levi and Robby intended to ship those e-bikes out to their original owners as quickly as possible. But the pair immediately ran into the first of what would soon become an ever-growing pile of obstacles.

“So we win the winning bid for this auction. And after we win the auction, I called the agency that ran the process and I was like, ‘Hey, my name is Levi Conlow. I just won this bid, what’s the next step?!’ and they were like, ‘Well, now it’s up to the creditors and the seller to decide if your bid is acceptable,’ and I’m thinking, ‘What?! What do you mean? I thought that was the point of the auction.’”

As it turned out, the $1.2 million winning bid wasn’t high enough to satisfy the creditors. Juiced owed significantly more than that. So Levi brought in the rest of his team and his board, then went back and forth with the company running the sale until new terms were finally accepted, and a deal was made to buy Juiced for a higher figure to get everything in the auction.

Site default logo image

Now that Lectric had bought up Juiced’s assets for a higher number which Juiced’s creditors could live with, the next step was to start moving out those bikes. That would be its own logistical problem and so Levi wanted to get to work on solving it right away.

“We wanted to make sure we could physically go pick up the inventory, even though we now owned it,” Levi continued. “So we reached out to the different warehouses where the inventory was stored and quickly the warehouses responded ‘No, they owe us this sum of money, so they have to pay it before the inventory can be picked up.’ And the amount of money in warehouse storage costs was ridiculous, because they had not been paying for warehousing for, well for some locations it seemed like years, so it was this massive balance. So the inventory at the warehouses wasn’t even worth the amount that the warehouses were owed.”

Despite the massive storage fee debts that Juiced had racked up, Levi was under the impression that he had bought and owned all that inventory after working out the deal with Juiced’s creditors. Unfortunately, he was then informed that the inventory had already been sold out from under him. “They told me, ‘Oh, so that inventory was already sold to some other company, it was kind of a supplier debt, and they took ownership over it.’ So at one point this inventory was sold to customers, then it was sold to me, and then it was sold to another company.”

I had already discovered that the Chinese-owned e-bike brand Velowave had begun selling what appeared to be brand-new Juiced Ebikes on its US website, and Levi confirmed that Velowave was, in fact, the other company that had snatched up the inventory that was mostly pre-sold to existing customers.

With that US-based inventory lost, the next goal for Levi and Robby was to hopefully get ahold of the inventory and spare parts that were left in Asia.

However, Levi soon discovered that the Asian suppliers were owed around twice as much as the US-based creditors. “These Asian suppliers, many of them were left out of millions and millions of dollars owed to them. That relationship between Juiced and its suppliers is so far gone that there is no pathway for us to get bikes and parts from them. The non-proprietary stuff like Shimano parts and Tektro, the wheels and parts like that, that stuff is pretty easy to get. But the proprietary parts like controllers and motors, those are relationships that have really been damaged by the amount of money that Juiced owed.”

The damage done by the trail of debt left in Juiced’s wake is a problem that Lectric is now wading through.

“That’s one of the biggest hurdles we have to overcome,” sighed Levi. “There are a couple of suppliers that overlap with Lectric’s supply chain or where their sister companies already work with Lectric. And Lectric’s checks always clear – we’ve never missed a payment, we always pay on time. So there are a couple suppliers that we’re going to be able to resolve with and be able to get some warranty parts, but something that it’s important for people to know and prepare for is that for the vast majority, unfortunately, we are not going to be able to remedy those relationships. That’s basically been most of the work I’ve been doing recently, is trying to repair those relationships.”

juiced scrambler x2

Now, Levi and Robby are working on a solution to make things right for the hundreds of Juiced customers who are left empty-handed, out thousands of dollars for their pre-order and with no e-bike to show for it. But even that work has been hampered by the slow process of physically taking over Juiced’s digital assets, including access to the company’s website and the sales info trapped inside of it.

“Even getting into a platform like Shopify to figure out which customers didn’t get paid and what is owed to certain customers, that’s basically one of our only options right now for Rob and I, is to figure out who hasn’t been paid, reach out to those customers and write them a check to reimburse them or maybe offer them an e-bike from Lectric’s lineup. But we can’t even get into Shopify yet because Shopify was also owed a ton of money, and we can’t get into the email list because the email list was owed a lot of money too. All of those things are resolved through the bankruptcy, but there’s a legal process of providing the proper documentation and reporting in order for us to get access to those things. So there’s a lot of work before I can even turn the website on and email my first customer. But that is priority #1 right now, is to get the website live and communicate with customers.”

From there, the next step will be rebuilding the high-performance e-bike lineup that Juiced spent years developing. As involved as Levi and Robby will be, they also still have to run North America’s largest e-bike company, Lectric Ebikes, and so Juiced will still need a dedicated team of its own. “The first real hire we’re going to make is probably to hire a product manager. With how long development will take, maybe we can get it done in 9-12 months, but that really requires someone dedicating their full focus on it. So our day one objective is to hire someone to start rebuilding the product portfolio from the ground up,” explained Levi, before offering to toss that massive undertaking my way. “Are you bored? Are you looking for more work, Micah?,” he laughed.

As awesome of a job as that would be, the mere 24 hours I get in a day don’t seem quite enough for me, and I can only imagine how daunting of a task that will be for someone coming in ready to throw their entire focus at it. But Levi sounds excited about the possibilities, even as he acknowledges the headwinds they will face.

Site default logo image

The direction that the new Juiced e-bikes will go is still uncertain, but it sounds like the designs will remain true to the style and performance of e-bikes that helped Juiced build its massive fanbase over the last decade and a half.

“There’s an iconicness to bikes like the Scrambler, Scorpion, and Juiced’s products like that,” Levi reflected. “I think we need to carry forward that performance and platform, but some industrial design needs to happen there as well. For the most part, the things that made us like Juiced over the last 15 years as a community of riders, that stuff is going to carry over into the next 15 years. The high performance, the awesome torque and acceleration, it’s something special. And we ought to carry that on because that’s what people really loved about the brand in the first place, so it’d be foolish to lose that.”

As for the division between Lectric Ebikes and Juiced moving forward, Levi has clear intentions there. It appears that Juiced will remain a separate company from Lectric, even if it benefits from the relationships and the purchasing power that Lectric enjoys. “I’m really looking forward to this challenge,” Levi continued, “because I see an extremely clear pathway to making this successful. You know, Lectric is the #1 selling bike company here in North America, and I think that the expectation for how Rob and I should push ourselves is to try and get Juiced to #2.”

That clear pathway in Levi’s mind is based upon a tried and true formula that he and his Lectric co-founder Robby Deziel developed over the last six years of building Lectric Ebikes. “So how do you do that?” Levi asked himself. “You’ve got to have the world’s best performance, the best price point, and exceptional customer service. And those are things that we have a ton of experience with. We know exactly how those formulas work. And so we have very high aspirations for Juiced.”

juiced scorpion X e-bike

That experience is going to be a major benefit to rebuilding Juiced Bikes. “On day one, Juiced will get the benefit of our economies of scale. Our shipping rates are 75% less than what Juiced was paying to ship to customers. I haven’t fully run the numbers yet, but maybe that one thing alone is enough to take Juiced from unprofitable to breaking even. And then if you look at Lectric’s rates for shipping containers or our optimization for how we run every aspect of our business, there’s a very clear path to Juiced not just being reborn, but being a good business, fundamentally.”

It sounds like Levi, Robby, and the rest of their team at Lectric Ebikes have their work cut out for them. It’s not something foreign to any of them, and now they have the benefit of years of experience doing this once before.

However, they must also forge ahead against the headwinds of tariff uncertainty and without the boost offered by a post-pandemic e-bike buying spree. If there was ever an e-bike brand whose iconic legacy was worth fighting for though, Juiced Bikes is it.

As a final note, I contacted Juiced Bikes’ founder and former CEO, Tora Harris, for comment on this story but did not receive a response.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Venmo gaining ground in payments as Cash App struggles

Published

on

By

Venmo gaining ground in payments as Cash App struggles

Block shares plunge on revenue miss, slashed guidance

In the increasingly crowded market for peer-to-peer payments, Venmo is showing momentum while Cash App has hit a rough patch.

The parents of both businesses reported quarterly results this week. PayPal, which owns Venmo, reported an earnings beat and kept its forecast for the year. Block, meanwhile, plummeted in extended trading on Thursday after the Cash App parent missed on revenue and issued disappointing guidance.

Venmo and Cash App are simultaneously competing to gobble up more consumers for their peer-to-peer offerings while also adding services like debit, credit and transfer services so they can actually make money from those users.

For PayPal CEO Alex Chriss, who took over the struggling payments company in 2023, monetizing Venmo is a key piece to his turnaround plan.

Venmo revenue jumped 20% in the first quarter from a year earlier, though PayPal didn’t provide a dollar figure. PayPal pointed to growing adoption of features like the Venmo debit card, instant transfers, and integration into online checkout. The company said monetization per user is improving and that Venmo continues to play a role in its broader e-commerce push.

Revenue at Venmo increased at twice the rate of total payment volume, which rose 10%, reflecting progress in turning engagement into profit.

Read more about tech and crypto from CNBC Pro

During the quarter, PayPal added nearly two million first-time debit card users across PayPal and Venmo, and said Venmo debit card payment volume rose more than 60%. Monthly actives on the card grew about 40%, while Pay with Venmo volume surged 50%.

“We’ve leaned into Venmo and the investment is starting to pay off,” Chriss said on the company’s earnings call.

Block CEO Jack Dorsey struck a different tone on his company’s call.

Cash App posted 10% gross profit growth from a year earlier to $1.38 billion in the first quarter. PayPal’s gross payment volume, or a measure of money moving through Square and Cash App, came in at $56.8 billion, missing the average analyst estimate of $58 billion, according to StreetAccount.

Dorsey acknowledged Cash App’s recent underperformance.

“I just don’t think we were focused enough and had enough attention on the network and the network density, and that is our foundation,” he said.

Dorsey noted that some users still don’t view Cash App as a true banking platform, in part because their experience with the app can feel limited or restrictive when trying to move or access funds. The company is promoting its lending program, Cash App Borrow, which has received approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and can now bring origination and servicing in-house.

“We of course want to deepen engagement with our customers through banking services and Borrow, and I have no doubt we will,” Dorsey said. “But at the same time, we need to make sure that we continuously grow our network, and that starts with peer to peer.”

WATCH: Interview with PayPal CEO Alex Chriss

PayPal CEO Alex Chriss: Huge opportunity to deliver to consumers and help small business

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla (TSLA) reveals web of transactions between Elon Musk’s companies

Published

on

By

Tesla (TSLA) reveals web of transactions between Elon Musk's companies

Tesla (TSLA) has revealed the latest web of transactions between itself, Elon Musk, his multiple companies, and board members.

As a public company, Tesla has to report to its shareholders transactions between the company and its executives, board members, and other companies linked to them.

With a new SEC filing, the company has disclosed those latest transactions for 2024 and up to February 2025.

Here’s a list with my comments:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

SpaceX is party to certain commercial, licensing and support agreements with Tesla. Under these agreements, SpaceX incurred expenses of approximately $2.4 million in 2024 and approximately $0.1 million through February 2025.

Tesla didn’t specifically disclosed what are those “certain commercial, licensing and support agreements”.

However, we do know that Tesla and SpaceX share a material science team and they have shared ERP systems in the past.

Tesla also pays SpaceX for the use of Elon Musk’s jet:

Since April 2016, SpaceX has invoiced Tesla for our use of an aircraft owned and operated by SpaceX at rates determined by Tesla and SpaceX, subject to rules of the Federal Aviation Administration governing such arrangements. Tesla incurred expenses of approximately $0.8 million in 2024 and approximately $0.04 million through February 2025.

These transactions have been reported every year between Tesla and SpaceX.

X is a newer addition to Musk enterprises and the CEO has pushed Tesla to spend on advertising on his privately owned platform.

It only amounted to about $400,000 in Tesla spending on X last year aboud only $10,000 this year:

X is party to certain commercial, consulting and support agreements with Tesla. Under these agreements, Tesla incurred expenses of approximately $0.1 million in 2024. As part of a multi-platform advertising campaign, Tesla also directly or indirectly purchased advertising on X, which totaled approximately $0.4 million in 2024 and approximately $0.01 million through February 2025.

Tesla only started to advertise in 2023, shortly after Musk bought Twitter, a platform that relies on advertising, but it has yet to really ramp up its advertising effort.

Instead, it relies on marketing.

xAI is the latest private Musk company that Tesla’s CEO is pushing to work with Tesla.

Based on Tesla’s new disclosure, xAI paid Tesla almost $200 million in 2024 and almost $37 million in the first two months of 2025:

xAI is party to certain commercial (including those for the purchase of Megapacks), consulting and support agreements with Tesla. Under these agreements, xAI incurred expenses of approximately $198.3 million in 2024 and approximately $36.9 million through February 2025. Approximately $191.0 million during 2024 and $36.8 million through February 2025 was incurred by xAI for its purchase of our Megapack products.

The vast majority of that was xAI buying Tesla Megapacks to power its data centers.

However, there are also a few millions not accounted for.

Musk has admitted to redirecting NVIDIA computers that were supposed to be used for Tesla’s super cluster in Texas to xAI.

Tesla also disclosed paying The Boring Company (TBC), a company privately owned by Musk, over $3 million in 2024 and $800,000 in the first two months of 2025:

TBC is party to commercial agreements with Tesla. Under these agreements, Tesla incurred expenses of approximately $3.6 million in 2024 and approximately $0.8 million through February 2025.

This is likely related to TBC building a tunnel to link the Cybertruck’s end-of-line at Gigafactory Texas to a loading lot.

Tesla also pays a security company owned by Musk to provide security services to the CEO:

We are party to a service agreement with a security company, owned by Elon Musk and organized to provide security services concerning him, including in connection with his duties to and work for Tesla. Tesla incurred expenses of approximately $2.8 million for such security services in 2024 and approximately $0.5 million through February 2025, representing a portion of the total cost of security services concerning Elon Musk.

These costs have greatly increased. In 2023, Tesla paid $2.4 million. It increased to $2.8 million in 2024 and based on Tesla having spent $500,000 in the first two months of the year, it looks like it could increase to $3 million in 2025.

Tesla also disclosed that it sold about $30 million worth of scrap materials for JB Straubel’s Redwood Mateirals to recycle:

JB Straubel is the Chief Executive Officer of Redwood. Tesla is party to an agreement with Redwood to supply certain scrap materials. Under this agreement, Redwood incurred expenses of approximately $30.3 million in 2024 and approximately $0.6 million through February 2025.

Straubel is a Tesla co-founder and long-time CTO. He left in 2019 to build a battery recycling and battery material firm, but he also more recently rejoined Tesla’s board – hence why transactions between his company and Tesla need to be reported.

Finally, Tesla disclosed that it paid $300,000 to Kimbal Musk’s company, Nova Sky Stories, for a drone show:

Kimbal Musk is the Chief Executive Officer of Nova Sky Stories. In 2024, we entered into a commercial agreement with Nova Sky Stories in relation to the production of an aerial show. Under this agreement, Tesla incurred expenses of approximately $0.3 million in 2024.

Kimbal Musk is on Tesla’s board and he is Elon Musk’s brother.

Electrek’s Take

I can admit that there can be interesting synergy between companies. When Musk was just leading Tesla and SpaceX, I had some reservations, but I thought it was feasible and some collaboration, like the material science team, made sense.

However, now that Musk is leading Tesla, SpaceX, X, xAI, The Boring Company, Neuralink, and DOGE, it makes no sense whatsoever. It’s too much.

And the synergy between them is often looking like a stretch. For example, the $3 million tunnel is ridiculous. Tesla should have simply better designed its EOL. The Boring Company had a ton of projects that never amounted to anything and it looks like Musk is keeping them busy with Tesla money.

Tesla sending its NVIDIA computers to xAI is also ridiculous. Musk’s excuse was that Tesla’s data center was not ready to receive them, but then he boasted about xAI being to deploy its own data center in a record time of just 3 weeks.

Why was xAI able to do it in 3 weeks but Tesla couldn’t?

Finally, Tesla giving Elon’s brother $300,000 for a drone show is also highly questionable.

Like Leo KoGuan said, “Tesla is a family business masquerading as a public company.”

If you’re interested in installing solar panels and/or batteries for your home, we recommend using EnergySage. You will be able to get quotes without any hassle and only talk to someone when you are ready to move forward. Within minutes, you can get on the path to producing your own power with solar and battery storage, including with Powerwall.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

ACT Expo 2025 – one step forward, two steps back for clean trucking [part 1]

Published

on

By

ACT Expo 2025 – one step forward, two steps back for clean trucking [part 1]

ACT Expo is North America’s premier clean truck and transport trade show – and for 2025 it was bigger than ever, with more exhibitors and more, more capable battery electric vehicles than ever. The downsides? NACFE have scored with their “messy middle” messaging, and the return of “clean diesel” talking points.

The re-election of Donald Trump to the Presidency of the United States has thrown the steady pace of electric fleet adoption – along with just about every thing else – into a state of confusion and disarray. Into that chaos, NACFE (the North American Council for Freight Efficiency) has thrown a positively progress-shattering bromide that may as well have been designed to distract attention from the proliferation of practical medium- and heavy-duty EVs, the rapid expansion of a comprehensive DC fast charging network, and the rapidly decreasing delta between the up-front costs of conventional diesel and battery electric offerings.

I’m talking about the phrase, “the messy middle,” which posits that, while we can all agree that electric vehicles and battery technology are the future, “we’re not quite there, yet.” The result is a series of observations that, while very timely in 2019, seem to disingenuously portray EVs as new technology today, while claiming that there are unanswered questions regarding battery costs and component longevity.

Never mind that next year will mark the (checks notes) twenty-ninth year of Toyota Prius production, and the thirtieth anniversary of the production launch of GM’s EV1, or that Volvo is on its third generation of battery electric semi, or that dozens of EV fleets have logged hundreds of millions of all-electric miles on their vehicles – never mind, in other words, that BEVs are in production now, ready now, in customer hands now, delivering on the promise of reduced TCO now … an EV may not be suitable for some fleets – and NACFE’s “messy middle” messaging is going to give a lot of fleets an excuse to buy one more round diesel-engined semi trucks to fill up with more diesel from Shell their favorite truck stops.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

All that said, it’s catchy. Outside of NACFE’s booth or Shell’s panels I’ve heard the phrase “messy middle” repeated sincerely at least a dozen times over the last three days, and I have to admit that the alliterative lure of that particular little ear worm that, regardless of the sincerity of NACFE’s intent, is going to set the pace of EV adoption back at least the length of one Presidential term (give or take 100 days).

Moving on …

There was plenty of good stuff

Despite my ranting and raving against the whole “messy middle” messaging, there was an incredible amount of awesome, zero-emission, battery-powered goodness at this year’s ACT Expo. Too much, in fact, to jam into a single article (unless y’all like 5,000 word articles).

As such, I won’t even try.

Instead, I’ll use this post to give you a sneak peek at some of the stories I’ll be posting in the coming days, bringing you fully up to speed with all the latest and greatest new EVs, EREVs, and HFCEVs that commercial fleet buyers can place an order for today, and start putting the messy middle (and their backwards-looking competitors) behind them. So, check out the short list, below, then watch this space to see the links go live.

ACT 2025 News

  • Zenobe arrives in North America
  • Honda wants to sell you a fuel cell
  • Hyundai opens up about its hydrogen semi
  • ABB has figured out this whole charging deal
  • Windrose gets real, and Wen Han signs my truck
  • Volvo has the best deal going for commercial EVs
  • New Mack electric trucks are coming, and one is already here
  • The new autonomous terminal tractor from Kalmar is a next-level EV

Original content from Electrek; special thanks to ACT Expo.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending