Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer used his first visit to Albania to announce the UK is keen to set up “return hubs” to deport migrants.

Formal discussions are under way, he said, with various countries. We don’t know which these are, but we know which aren’t keen – rather awkwardly, Albania.

Their prime minister, Edi Rama, said he remained “loyal” to their “marriage” with Italy – relations with other countries are “simply love”.

The Conservatives say the trip is therefore an embarrassment for Sir Keir. His team say this was never on the agenda for this trip, which is about joint policing and intelligence sharing.

Politics latest: ‘Moral imperative’ to ensure aid gets to civilians in Gaza, say Tories

First of all, what are return hubs?

Essentially, return hubs are processing centres for people who have exhausted all their options to stay in the UK – including asylum applications, appeals and attempts to claim certain work or study visas.

They will be sent back to their home country, and while that happens, they can go to these return hubs – to prevent them absconding.

Officials said it would also prevent them starting a family, for example, and using that as part of their claim to stay in the UK.

Italy has one already but it’s not used

Giorgia Meloni’s government has been keen on these for some time, and has built two in Albania – at the port of Shengjin, and the village of Gjader – big enough for 36,000 people a year.

But both, which Sky News visited last year, are currently empty. The courts in Rome say they can’t be used until the European Court of Justice rules them safe. A ruling is expected next month.

Although, in a boost to the UK government’s plans, the UN’s refugee agency, has backed the principle of return hubs, if they meet human rights standards.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM confirms ‘return hubs’ plan

Is this like the Rwanda plan?

Spending millions on housing for migrants that then lies empty may sound familiar- but this is different to the Rwanda plan.

Agreed by the Conservatives, Rwanda was scrapped by Sir Keir when Labour won office – he said it was “unethical, unworkable and extortionate”.

The key difference is that under the Rwanda plan, asylum seekers would not be able to claim to stay in the UK – they would be deported and could only apply to stay in Rwanda. This was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.

Why did Albania say no?

The UK hasn’t always endeared itself to Albania, with comments by former home secretary Suella Braverman about an “invasion” of “Albanian criminals” causing anger here.

David Cameron cut short a much-anticipated visit, as foreign secretary, to just 89 minutes, when the 2024 general election was called – causing offence.

And Mr Rama pointedly talked about the “stigmatising” of Albanians living legally in the UK.

Read more:
Top Tory caught admitting Brexit drawback in leaked clip
NHS waiting list increases for first time in seven months

Andi Hoxhaj, a Balkan expert at Kings’ College London, told me: “The UK just hasn’t put in the work. It’s the first visit by a UK prime minister 103 years after diplomatic relations were established. Starmer and Yvette Cooper understand this and want warmer relations. But it was wishful thinking that a return hub would be agreed.”

So who else might have one?

The government has been concentrating their efforts to “smash the gangs” on the Western Balkans.

The joint enforcement in Albania, has – according to the National Crime Agency – been a model which other countries could follow.

There are likely to be discussions at the European Political Community summit on Friday with countries such as Serbia, North Macedonia and Montenegro to scope out their interest, and the UK is hosting a Western Balkans summit in London in autumn 2025.

So, all is not lost – but there are big legal and logistical hurdles to overcome.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Published

on

By

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

The CARF regulation, which brings crypto under global tax reporting standards akin to traditional finance, marks a crucial turning point.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Published

on

By

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

The nascent real-world tokenized assets track prices but do not provide investors the same legal rights as holding the underlying instruments.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government’s controversial welfare bill.

Sir Keir Starmer’s Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion.

MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.

Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole – close to breaching Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules set out last year.

Read more:
Yet another fiscal ‘black hole’? Here’s why this one matters

Success or failure: One year of Keir in nine charts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were “costs” to watering down the welfare bill.

“I’m not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that,” Ms Reeves told the outlet.

More on Rachel Reeves

“We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement.

“So we’ll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.”

Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised.

The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more.

It comes after Ms Reeves said she was “totally” up to continuing as chancellor after appearing tearful at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was the chancellor crying at PMQs?

Criticising Sir Keir for the U-turns on benefit reform during PMQs, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the chancellor looked “absolutely miserable”, and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election.

Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a “tough day” before adding: “People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday.

“Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

Sir Keir also told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby on Thursday that he “didn’t appreciate” that Ms Reeves was crying in the Commons.

“In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,” he said. “That’s what it was yesterday.

“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”

Continue Reading

Trending