Connect with us

Published

on

There’s plenty of star power in the 2025 quarterback class. Carson Beck, Cade Klubnik and Drew Allar return. Kevin Jennings, Maddux Madsen and Sam Leavitt led playoff teams and are back for more. Oh, and there’s some guy named Manning who’ll finally get his shot to start at Texas.

But after the past few years in which blue bloods routinely chased veterans in the transfer portal, we’re about to enter a season in which Michigan, Georgia, Texas, Ohio State, Notre Dame, Alabama and Ole Miss expect to start guys with little or no experience as QB1.

After COVID-19 rules allowed players to stick around for five, six or even seven years in college, 2025 represents the unofficial end point of the bonus year — unless you’re Diego Pavia, who might play until he’s eligible to collect social security.

Meanwhile, some of last season’s most disappointing QB stories — Miller Moss, Conner Weigman, Jackson Arnold — will get a chance to rewrite their script with new teams this season.

It all shapes up to be one of the more intriguing seasons at the game’s most important position.

But luckily, we’ve done the heavy lifting of sifting through the depth charts of all 136 FBS teams, digging deep into the stats, and consulted our Magic Eight Ball to rank every QB situation in the country by tiers.

Jump to a section:
Best of the best | Waiting time is over
One more try
Wily veterans | Used to be starters

Tier 1: Top of the class (11 players)

Clemson (Cade Klubnik, Christopher Vizzina)
LSU (Garrett Nussmeier, Michael Van Buren Jr.)
Oklahoma (John Mateer, Michael Hawkins Jr., Whitt Newbauer)
Penn State (Drew Allar, Ethan Grunkemeyer)
South Carolina (LaNorris Sellers, Air Noland)

Last season’s best quarterback, Cam Ward, was electric — a magician on the field who routinely made awe-inspiring plays. This year’s best don’t exactly fit that mold. Instead, some of the biggest names — Allar, Klubnik, Nussmeier — didn’t so much catch lightning in a bottle as slowly build their repertoire until earning their place at the top of the sport. They’re consistent producers; veterans who, if you follow the career trend lines, should reach peak performance in 2025.

Sellers and Mateer, on the other hand, had a few more of those “Heisman moments” last year. Sellers started slow but blossomed late, playing at as high a level as anyone in the country by year’s end. Mateer flourished in the relative obscurity of Washington State and now will be tasked with reviving Oklahoma’s program under the glare of the SEC spotlight. Both players scratched the surface of greatness last year and enter 2025 with massive expectations.

QB comparison

QB A: 78.1 QBR, 68% completions, 7.4 yards per pass, 25 touchdowns
QB B: 78.8 QBR, 64% completions, 7.7 yards per pass, 26 touchdowns

QB B is LSU’s Nussmeier last season against FBS opponents. He was good, but the numbers aren’t eye-popping. So why is there so much buzz around him? Well, QB A is Jayden Daniels‘ line at LSU from 2022 — a year before he won the Heisman Trophy with some truly eye-popping stats. Could Nussmeier be on the same trajectory?

Fun facts:

Eight QBs in the playoff era have racked up at least 4,100 yards and 43 touchdowns while having seven or fewer turnovers, as Klubnik did last season. The others include five Heisman winners and two finalists. Each was selected within the first 10 picks of the NFL draft.

No QB had more touchdown passes on throws of 20 yards or more last season than Klubnik (16). His line on deep balls: 47% completions, 16 TDs, 3 INTs, 16.6 yards/attempt.

In the playoff era, 14 players posted a line of 4,000 yards, 40 touchdowns, 9 yards per pass and no more than 10 turnovers. That group includes 13 players selected in the first 15 picks of the draft, six Heisman winners and eight more finalists. Mateer missed that club by only 36 yards last year.

Mateer’s 53 broken or evaded tackles last season topped all FBS quarterbacks.

No QB who averaged at least 9 air yards per throw had a lower rate of off-target throws than Mateer (9.1%).

Penn State ran a successful play on 52.8% of its dropbacks last season, tops by a team returning its 2024 starter. Next best was TCU (50.3%).

If Allar starts nine games, he’ll be the fourth Penn State QB since 2013 with 38 career starts while playing for only one team. There are only 33 other Power 5 QBs who’ve done that in the same span. No other team has more than two.

Sellers’ 2024 production:
In Weeks 1-9: 51.7 QBR, 5 passing TDs, 4 INTs, 6.91 yards per pass
In Weeks 10 through the bowl game: 81.4 QBR, 13 passing TDs, 4 INTs, 9.85 yards per pass


Tier 1b: So hot right now (six players)

Florida (DJ Lagway, Harrison Bailey)
Miami (Carson Beck, Emory Williams)
Texas (Arch Manning, Matthew Caldwell)

A year ago, Beck was the clear-cut top QB entering the season, and though he put up relatively strong numbers again in 2024, he was largely considered a disappointment. Then he was injured in the SEC title game and transferred to Miami, and now Beck he enters 2025 as something of a mystery. He could recover his NFL draft stock with an elite season following in Ward’s footsteps … or he could be a multimillion-dollar bust.

The conversation around Manning and Lagway is two former five-star recruits who appear on the verge of breakout performances. Their ceilings are ridiculously high, but their actual on-field production so far leaves plenty of room for questions.

QB comparison

What if I told you one of these QBs is getting love as a potential No. 1 draft pick for 2026 and the other is coming off a “down year”?

QB A: 82.3 QBR, 28 TD passes, 12 INTs, 64.7% completions, 7.78 yards per attempt
QB B: 79.1 QBR, 29 TD passes, 12 INTs, 64.2% completions, 7.72 yards per attempt

So, who’s the hot shot and who’s spiraling downward? QB B is LSU’s Nussmeier, who’s a favorite in the way-too-early mock drafts. QB A is Miami’s Beck, who was supposed to be a possible No. 1 pick until his 2024 performance drew heavy criticism.

OK, one more.

QB A: 72% completions, 28 total TDs, six picks, 9.5 yards-per-pass, 3,941 yards of total offense
QB B: 71% completions, 32 total TDs, 10 picks, 8.4 yards-per-pass, 3,784 yards of total offense

Pretty darn close, right? Well, QB A is Beck’s 2023 season at Georgia, when he was lauded as one of the nation’s best. QB B is Beck’s 2024 season at Georgia, if you adjust his stat line to the same rate of drops and contested catches by his receiving corps in 2024 than he had in 2023.

Fun facts:

Returning QBs who averaged at least 9 yards per attempt last season:
Lagway, 9.97
Blake Horvath, 9.73
Darian Mensah, 9.49
Mateer, 9.05
Deshawn Purdie, 9.01

The first month of the season showcased Manning’s potential: 983 yards on 91 touches, 12 touchdowns and two turnovers — all against lesser competition in Texas blowouts. From Oct. 1 on, he threw only 12 more passes for 38 yards.


Tier 2: Pretty darned good (eight players)

Arizona State (Sam Leavitt, Jeff Sims)
Baylor (Sawyer Robertson, Walker White)
Georgia Tech (Haynes King, Aaron Philo)
Iowa State (Rocco Becht, Connor Moberly)

If none of the four starting QBs here is a household name, it’s only because those names haven’t been paid enough attention. Leavitt led Arizona State to the College Football Playoff last year. Becht had Iowa State knocking on the door. Robertson finished as strong as any QB in the country, and King kept winning games despite cruising to the finish line of the season like Monty Python’s Black Knight — down a few limbs but still fighting like crazy.

QB comparison

One of these QBs was lauded for his ridiculous final stretch of the season. The other flew mostly below the radar nationally.

QB A: 6-1 (loss in bowl), 80.1 QBR, 64% completions, 20 TDs, 5 turnovers, 314 yards per game
QB B: 6-1 (loss in bowl), 80.1 QBR, 67% completions, 18 TDs, 5 turnovers, 302 yards per game

Do that over a full season and either would be in the Heisman conversation. But it was only QB A — South Carolina’s Sellers — who received much love last December. But it’s worth appreciating that QB B — Baylor’s Robertson — was every bit as good.

Fun facts:

From Nov. 1 on, no returning QB posted a better QBR than Leavitt (86.8).

No returning QB scrambled for more yards last season than Leavitt (423).

Becht has accounted for at least one touchdown in 27 straight games, the longest active streak in FBS — six games more than any other QB.

Becht numbers when Iowa State was trailing in the second half last season: 82.3 QBR, 8.55 yards/attempt, 11 total touchdowns, 3 interceptions.

No QB had a higher percentage of his passing yards come from throws behind the line of scrimmage last year than King (28.2%). Leavitt was third (26.6%).

ACC QBs to post a 7-to-1 touchdown-to-interception ratio over the past 20 years: Jordan Travis, Devin Leary, Trevor Lawrence, Deshaun Watson, Russell Wilson and King.

Robertson’s 82.9 QBR is the best by any returning Power 4 QB from last season.


Tier 3: Buckle up (19 players)

Arkansas (Taylen Green, KJ Jackson)
Duke (Darian Mensah, Henry Belin IV)
Kansas (Jalon Daniels, Cole Ballard)
Louisville (Miller Moss, Brady Allen)
Navy (Blake Horvath, Braxton Woodson)
SMU (Kevin Jennings, Ty Hawkins, Tyler Van Dyke)
TCU (Josh Hoover, Ken Seals)
Texas Tech (Behren Morton, Mitch Griffis)
Vanderbilt (Diego Pavia, Drew Dickey)

Every projected starter in Tier 3 has delivered serious highlights — massive wins, explosive plays, and even a chance for Vandy fans to dump a goal post into the river. But for all the success, there are still some minor questions — Morton’s health or Jennings’ playoff performance or whether Pavia will have to leave film study early to take his grandkids to soccer practice — that add a bit of danger to the proceedings. That probably means this is the tier that’ll provide the most fun in 2025.

QB comparison

Two QB lines since Week 7 of 2023. Who’s better?

QB A: 76.3 QBR, 64.9% completions, 8.01 yards per pass, 40 pass touchdowns, 18 interceptions
QB B: 75.6 QBR, 62.9% completions, 7.79 yards per pass, 40 pass touchdowns, 10 interceptions

Aside from the INTs, edge QB A? Well, that’s TCU’s Hoover. QB B is Penn State’s Allar, widely considered one of the best in the nation.

Here’s another.

QB A: 5-8 record, 45.6 QBR, 58% completions, 18 TD passes, 14 picks
QB B: 9-1 record, 68.7 QBR, 65% completions, 23 TD passes, 6 picks

QB A is Texas Tech’s Morton vs. FPI top-50 teams in his career. QB B is Morton vs. everyone else.

Fun facts:

Horvath’s 83.6 QBR was the best last season — and the seventh best of the playoff era — by any quarterback outside the Power 4. The playoff era non-power conference QBs ahead of him are also some big names: McKenzie Milton (2017), D’Eriq King (2018), Zach Wilson (2020) and new Colorado QB Kaidon Salter (2023) among them.

Last season, 36.6% of Mensah’s attempts were to a wide-open target, second highest nationally. Last year, only 21% of throws to Duke receivers were wide open (104th in FBS), and the Blue Devils said goodbye to their top two receivers, their starting tight end and their top pass-catching back.

Mensah’s past six games: 80.3 QBR, 9.74 yards per pass, 69% completions, 11 touchdowns, 4 picks.

In the first 18 games of his career, Jennings had 333 touches and committed seven turnovers. In his past eight games, he has had 317 touches and 14 turnovers.

No returning P4 QB was blitzed more often last season than Pavia.

No returning QB had a higher successful play rate on red zone dropbacks last year than Pavia (50%).

Pavia vs. top-40 defenses last season: 78.8 QBR, 12 TD passes, 3 interceptions and 7.0 yards per dropback.

Last season, 23.8% of Jalon Daniels’ passes were thrown 20 yards or more downfield, most by any Power 4 QB.

No P4 QB had a higher rate of off-target throws last season than Daniels (19.5%).

Daniels vs. FBS competition last year:
First four games: 6 TDs, 9 turnovers, 41.3 QBR
Next five games: 12 TDs, 2 turnovers, 85.9 QBR
Last three games: 1 TD, 3 turnovers, 77.2 QBR

Moss had five touchdown passes in the second half or OT to put USC ahead last year, tied for the most by any QB in the country. The Trojans still went 2-3 in those games.

No returning QB had more explosive plays last season than Green (98).


Tier 4: The young pups (eight players)

Michigan (Bryce Underwood, Mikey Keene)
Notre Dame (CJ Carr, Kenny Minchey)
Ohio State (Julian Sayin, Lincoln Kienholz)
Washington (Demond Williams Jr., Kai Horton)

Four schools with playoff hopes turn to young QBs with elite recruiting backgrounds. Not long ago, this wouldn’t seem like a wild premise, but in the era of the transfer portal, the notion that programs with as much talent as Notre Dame or Ohio State are putting their fates into the hands of QBs with no on-field experience feels akin to handing your teenager, who has his learner’s permit, the keys to your new Ferrari.

QB comparison

QB A: 82.9 QBR, 68% completions, 8.6 yards per pass, 4.4 touchdown-to-interception ratio
QB B: 66.2 QBR, 59.8% completions, 7.3 yards per pass, 1.9 touchdown-to-interception ratio

QB A is Michigan’s passing rates in 2022 and 2023, largely buoyed by J.J. McCarthy. QB B is Michigan’s passing every other year of the playoff era. Last season was defined by woeful QB play, but the Wolverines are betting they’ve found another star in Underwood, and even if he doesn’t blossom immediately, Keene seems to be an upgrade from anyone they relied on in 2024.

Fun facts:

Since 2010, the only Ohio State QB to start at least six games and finish with a QBR less than 70 is Cardale Jones in 2015. He won a national championship the year before.

No returning QB had a higher adjusted completion percentage last season than Keene (76.6%).

Williams played at least 10 snaps in five games last season (including two starts). Four were vs. top-40 defenses. His stat line in those games: 79% completions, 8.99 yards per attempt, eight touchdowns, one turnover, 86.0 QBR, 265 non-sack rushing yards.


Tier 5: The waiting is the hardest part (nine players)

Alabama (Ty Simpson, Austin Mack, Keelon Russell)
Georgia (Gunner Stockton, Ryan Puglisi)
Ole Miss (Austin Simmons, Maealiuaki Smith)
Oregon (Dante Moore, Austin Novosad)

After three years as a backup, Stockton drove his 1984 F-150 onto center stage in last season’s Sugar Bowl, and while he ended up on the losing end, he played well enough for Georgia to feel comfortable handing him the offense in 2025. Simpson, a top-five QB recruit in 2022, also has patiently waited his turn at Alabama. Moore earned starting experience at UCLA as a freshman, then left for Oregon and waited behind Dillon Gabriel. Simmons watched Jaxson Dart for two years at Ole Miss. These guys know the system, know the locker room, and they are ready for their moment in the spotlight.

QB comparison

QB A: 80.3 QBR, 67% completions, 8.84 yards per attempt
QB B: 66.3 QBR, 62% completions, 7.84 yards per attempt

QB B isn’t awful, but QB A is bordering on elite. That’s no surprise. QB A is Georgia’s average with Beck or Stetson Bennett on the field. QB B is Georgia’s passing game with anyone else at QB since Kirby Smart took over in 2016.

Fun facts:

In his five years as head coach at Ole Miss, Lane Kiffin’s starting QBs have averaged 24 touchdown passes, eight picks, 67% completions and 9.5 yards per pass with a QBR of 82.0. Overall, Ole Miss’s QBR in that span is 80.4, trailing only Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia and Oregon nationally.

In 11 career games (three starts) vs. Power 5 competition, Moore has completed 52% of his throws with four touchdowns and eight picks.

Oregon’s 87.4 QBR since Dan Lanning took over as head coach in 2022 is tops in the nation.

Of the past 10 quarterbacks to start Week 1 for Alabama, eight took over the job having fewer than 100 career attempts under their belts. The three QBs competing for the job this season have a combined 53 college pass attempts.

Alabama quarterbacks accounted for 17 turnovers last season, the most for the Tide since at least 2004 and more than double their 2023 total.


Tier 6: Second time’s the charm (eight players)

Kansas State (Avery Johnson, Jacob Knuth)
Nebraska (Dylan Raiola, Marcos Davila)
NC State (CJ Bailey, Lex Thomas)
Texas A&M (Marcel Reed, Jacob Zeno)
UCLA (Nico Iamaleava, Luke Duncan)

Tier 6 quarterbacks all got a healthy dose of life as QB1 last season with some mixed results. But if those growing pains as a first-time starter in 2024 translate into more refined play in 2025, each QB could easily blossom into one of the country’s best.

QB comparison

Consider these two true freshmen from last season.

QB A: Nine starts, 60.1 QBR, 65% completions, 22 TDs, 13 turnovers, 74.0 Pro Football Focus grade
QB B: Seven starts, 57.9 QBR, 60% completions, 12 TDs, 9 turnovers, 67.0 Pro Football Focus grade

Who’s better? Aside from a few extra turnovers, you’d probably lean with QB A, right? Well QB B is a guy everyone is high on this year — Florida’s DJ Lagway. QB A is NC State’s Bailey.

Fun facts:

Bailey in the red zone last year: 17 total TDs, zero turnovers.

Returning Power 4 QBs who accounted for 32 TDs and 3,200 yards last year: Nussmeier, Klubnik, Robertson, Becht and Kansas State’s Johnson.

Raiola’s numbers last season from Oct. 1 onward: 53.8 QBR, 5.95 yards per attempt, 4 touchdowns, 11 turnovers, 9.1 yards per completion.

Last season, Reed had six plays with a 20% win probability added. Over the past two seasons, all other Texas A&M quarterbacks had one.

Iamaleava last season vs. Chattanooga, UTEP, Kent State and Mississippi State (combined 4-31 vs. FBS teams last year): 71% completions, 10 touchdown passes, zero picks, 10.9 yards per attempt. Iamaleava vs. all others: 61% completions, 9 touchdown passes, 5 interceptions, 6.9 yards per pass.


Tier 7: Consistently consistent (16 players)

Boise State (Maddux Madsen, Max Cutforth)
BYU (Jake Retzlaff, Bear Bachmeier)
Cincinnati (Brendan Sorsby, Brady Lichtenberg)
Illinois (Luke Altmyer, Ethan Hampton)
Indiana (Fernando Mendoza, Alberto Mendoza, Grant Wilson)
Michigan State (Aidan Chiles, Alessio Milivojevic)
USC (Jayden Maiava, Husan Longstreet, Sam Huard)
Virginia Cavaliers (Chandler Morris, Daniel Kaelin)

The term “game manager” gets thrown around a lot in QB analysis, and it’s often used in place of the term “average.” That’s an unfair descriptor for these players, who are game managers more in a sense of doing all the little things it takes to give their teams a chance to win without often hogging much of the spotlight in the process. They’re very good — they’re just probably not going to emerge as superstars.

QB comparison

QB A: 74.9 QBR, 62% completions, 7.1 yards per dropback, 20 TD passes and 6 interceptions
QB B: 74.7 QBR, 62% completions, 7.4 yards per dropback, 19 TD passes and 6 interceptions

Pretty close, right? QB A is Boise State’s Madsen. QB B is former Louisville QB Tyler Shough, who was the third quarterback selected in last month’s NFL draft.

Fun facts:

Two QBs return for 2025 after having thrown for 3,500 yards and 35 touchdowns last year: Klubnik and Virginia’s Morris.

Last season, 67.6% of Retzlaff’s completions went for a first down or TD, tops among all Power 4 QBs.

Retzlaff’s production:
vs. top-40 defenses: 50.0 QBR, 55% completions, 4 touchdowns, 6 picks, 7.0 yards per dropback.
vs. all others: 74.2 QBR, 60.1% completions, 16 touchdowns, 6 picks, 8.0 yards per dropback.

Altmyer finished last season with 22 passing touchdowns (most by an Illinois QB since 2008) and 2,717 passing yards (most since 2015).

In four wins vs. FBS opponents last season, Sorsby threw four touchdowns and three interceptions. In seven losses, he threw 12 touchdowns and four picks.

Michigan State has not thrown more touchdowns than its opponents in any full season since 2017.

USC had a 48.2% successful play rate on offense with Maiava at QB last year and a 48.1% rate with Moss, but the Trojans averaged more yards per play (6.41 to 6.16) and a better EPA per play (0.16 to 0.05) with Moss than Maiava.


Tier 8a: Fresh starts: veteran edition (nine players)

Auburn (Jackson Arnold, Ashton Daniels, Deuce Knight)
Florida State (Tommy Castellanos, Brock Glenn)
Houston (Conner Weigman, Zeon Chriss)
Northwestern (Preston Stone, Jack Lausch)

Remember that season of “Dallas” that turned out to be just a bad dream, and the next year the show pretended as if none of it ever happened? That’s sort of how this tier wants to view 2024. Arnold and Weigman were among the most touted recruits and seemed poised to break out last season. Instead, they fell flat. Stone and Castellanos had both turned in impressive 2023 campaigns only to get benched a year later. Now, all four are getting a fresh start in a new home with a chance to prove 2024 was the aberration and all the hype they’d enjoyed before last year was entirely deserved.


Tier 8b: Fresh starts: untested edition (six players)

Cal (Devin Brown, Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele)
Missouri (Beau Pribula, Sam Horn)
Syracuse (Steve Angeli, Rickie Collins)

These jobs are still up in the air, and the contenders include a host of once-heralded prospects who’ve never quite clicked. Aside from Horn, all have transferred to new schools looking for a change of scenery and a chance to play, and odds are, one or two will finally prove the long-forgotten recruiting buzz was deserved.

QB comparison

QB A: 69.0 QBR, 9.16 yards per pass, 33 touchdowns, 7 interceptions
QB B: 43.7 QBR, 6.23 yards per pass, 27 touchdowns, 19 interceptions

QB A looks pretty good. QB B looks entirely bleak. Well, QB A is Stone, Northwestern’s new quarterback, over the past two seasons at SMU, the latter of which resulted in him being benched. QB B is the combined production of all Northwestern quarterbacks over the same span.

Fun facts:

Arnold was pressured on 45.1% of his dropbacks last season when the defense did not blitz — the highest rate of any QBR-qualified Power 4 player.

Arnold’s career numbers vs. man coverage: nine touchdowns, one INT. Arnold vs. zone coverage: six touchdowns, five INTs.

Arnold played at least 20 snaps vs. seven Power 4 opponents last season. Six of them won at least nine games and ranked in the top 20 in ESPN’s FPI at season’s end. He also faced Tulane from the Group of 5. The Green Wave won nine games and ranked 32nd in FPI.

Angeli was ESPN’s No. 179 recruit in the class of 2022. Collins was No. 199 in 2023. They haven’t played much in college, but when given playing time, they’ve been good: 88.0 QBR, 75% completions, 10 passing touchdowns, one interception and averaged 9.31 yards per attempt.

In the playoff era, only one QB (not coached by Mike Leach) had more passing attempts in a season than Kyle McCord did for Syracuse last year. The Orange averaged 46 passes per game, which is the third most by an ACC team in the past 20 years.

Over the past two seasons, other Texas A&M quarterbacks combined for 23 plays of at least a 10% win probability added. Weigman had zero.

The only Power 4 QB who finished with a worse QBR last year than Castellanos (37.9) was Utah’s Isaac Wilson, who will not be the Utes’ starter in 2025. Among QBs with eight or more starts for a Power 5 school, Castellanos posted the 21st-worst QBR of the playoff era.

No Power 4 team averaged fewer yards per dropback last year than Florida State (4.8).

Pribula, Horn, Angeli and Brown were all considered blue-chip recruits and ranked among the top 30 QBs of the class of 2022. Entering Year 4 of their careers, they’ve combined to make two starts and have thrown 192 total passes.


Tier 9: Welcome to the big leagues (14 players)

Colorado (Kaidon Salter, Julian Lewis)
Iowa (Mark Gronowski, Hank Brown)
North Carolina (Gio Lopez, Bryce Baker, Max Johnson)
Tennessee (Joey Aguilar, Jake Merklinger, George MacIntyre)
Utah (Devon Dampier, Brendan Zurbrugg, Isaac Wilson, Nate Johnson)

Bill Belichick is betting big on a QB from South Alabama. Iowa’s offense could finally have some life with a QB from South Dakota State. Utah might’ve planned to keep turning to Cam Rising right up until Cam Rising Jr. was ready to take over, but instead, the Utes will turn to a QB from New Mexico. All of the Tier 9 quarterbacks are moving up from a lower level and will be expected to produce immediately at places with high hopes for a playoff run in 2025.

QB comparison

QB A: 70.1 QBR, 61 TD passes, 31 turnovers, 8.0 yards per attempt, 60.1 completions, 289 yards per game
QB B: 69.7 QBR, 54 TD passes, 16 turnovers, 7.7 yards per attempt, 63.5 completions, 249 yards per game

QB A definitely needs to cut down on the turnovers, but aside from that, they’re pretty close, right? Well, QB A is Aguilar’s numbers over the past two years. QB B is Tennessee’s quarterback production over that same span.

OK, one more.

QB A: 395 plays, 25 TDs, 7 turnovers, 2,559 pass yards in 11 starts
QB B: 391 plays, 18 TDs, 10 turnovers, 2,459 pass yards in 10 starts

You’d lean QB A, but not by a wide margin. QB A is UNC’s Lopez last year playing in the Sun Belt. QB B is former UNC quarterback Jacolby Criswell‘s line for the Heels in 2024.

Fun facts:

Most touchdowns accounted for over the past two seasons, returning QBs:
Salter, 66
Klubnik, 66
King, 62
Pavia, 61
Aguilar, 61

No QB was more elusive under pressure last year than Dampier. No one even came close. Dampier was sacked once for every 25.2 dropbacks under pressure — nearly eight more dropbacks per sack than the next-best player.

Iowa has only 47 touchdown passes in the past five seasons combined. In that same span, Ohio State has 173.

Iowa hasn’t averaged 1.0 passing touchdowns per game since … 2019.

QBs who accounted for 1,000 non-sack rush yards last year and return for 2025: Mateer (1,032), Parker Navarro (1,143), Dampier (1,187) and Horvath (1,298).

Lopez saw man coverage on just 19.3% of his dropbacks last year, the lowest rate of any returning QBR-qualified FBS player and roughly half as often as UNC QBs last season.


Tier 10: One more try (seven players)

Arizona (Noah Fifita, Braedyn Locke)
Mississippi State (Blake Shapen, Luke Kromenhoek)
Virginia Tech (Kyron Drones, William Watson III, Garret Rangel)

Like the QBs in Tier 8, these players are hoping to erase some bad memories from 2024. But unlike Tier 8, these QBs stayed put. Fifita, Drones and Shapen have all experienced success, but all fell flat last season. But they all have enough potential that the schools who’ve been on the roller coaster with them were willing to go for one last ride in 2025.

QB comparison

QB A: 88.0 QBR, 9.84 yards per pass, 8 touchdowns, 4 picks, 19 completions of 20 yards or more
QB B: 59.4 QBR, 6.06 yards per pass, 6 touchdowns, 6 picks, 6 completions of 20 yards or more

QB A has some swagger, right? Well, that’s Arizona’s Fifita last season when targeting future No. 8 draft pick Tetairoa McMillan. QB B is Fifita when throwing to any other wide receiver.

Fun facts:

Drones in wins over the past two seasons: 11 games, 75.6 QBR, 63.8% completions, 8.63 yards per pass, 29 touchdowns, 6 turnovers, 15 sacks
Drones in losses over the past two seasons: nine games, 47.3 QBR, 55.8% completions, 5.85 yards per pass, 10 touchdowns, 11 turnovers, 20 sacks.

Since the start of the 2023 season, Shapen has averaged 7.8 yards per pass, accounted for 27 touchdowns and thrown only four picks. But he has also sat out 12 games.


Tier 11: Room for improvement (eight players)

Oregon State (Maalik Murphy, Gabarri Johnson)
Pitt (Eli Holstein, David Lynch, Cole Gonzales)
West Virginia (Nicco Marchiol, Jaylen Henderson, Max Brown)

Holstein, Marchiol and Murphy, who were all solid recruits, have shown flashes of brilliance but have left fans wanting more. But if they can build off the foundation from 2024 and blossom this season, there’s a chance they could become genuine stars.

QB comparison

QB A: 45.5 QBR, 7.1 yards per pass, 15 touchdowns, 7 turnovers
QB B: 91.4 QBR, 10.8 yards per pass, 5 touchdowns, 1 turnover

Two completely different players, right? Well, QB A is Holstein in the first three quarters last season. QB B is Holstein’s fourth-quarter production.

Fun facts:

Holstein vs. top-40 defenses (by efficiency) last season: 31.6 QBR, 5.3 yards per attempt, 0 touchdowns, 4 interceptions
Holstein vs. everyone else: 55.6 QBR, 8.54 yards per attempt, 17 touchdowns, 3 interceptions.

Marchiol has 10 career games since 2022 in which he has taken at least 10 snaps. His line in those games: 58% completions, 9 total TDs, 5 turnovers, 6.16 yards per pass.

The only Power 4 QBs with more games with three passing touchdowns than Murphy’s six last season? Ward, Klubnik and Shedeur Sanders.

Murphy is 11-3 as a starting QB. That’s a better career winning percentage than Jordan Travis, Dillon Gabriel and Riley Leonard.


Tier 12: What’s in the box? (10 players)

Boston College (Dylan Lonergan, Grayson James)
Minnesota (Drake Lindsey, Dylan Wittke, Emmett Morehead)
Oklahoma State (Hauss Hejny, Zane Flores)
Stanford (Elijah Brown, Ben Gulbranson, Dylan Rizk)

The four schools in Tier 12 are turning to largely unproven quarterbacks in 2025. Hejny, Brown, Lonergan and Lindsey — should they end up the starters — have a combined 11 career passing attempts. So, what will happen? That’s the beauty of the unknown. Until the games are played, we can assume this will all work out wonderfully.

QB comparison

QB A: 78.9 QBR, 8.11 yards per attempt, 2.8 TD-INT ratio
QB B: 56.0 QBR, 6.84 yards per attempt, 1.5 TD-INT ratio

It might be hard to remember, but there was a time when Stanford churned out some exceptional quarterbacks. QB A is the Cardinal’s passing rates from 2010 to 2018, when Andrew Luck, Kevin Hogan and KJ Costello put up big numbers, played in Rose Bowls and won 78% of their games. QB B, on the other hand, is Stanford’s QBs over the past six seasons — none amounting to more than four wins.

Fun facts:

Best QBR vs. bowl-eligible Power 4 teams among returning players (minimum four starts):
Robertson, 83.2
Pavia, 82.6
Beck, 82.1
Grayson James, 82.1

During Mike Gundy’s first 15 seasons at Oklahoma State, the Cowboys averaged a touchdown pass every 15.5 attempts. Since 2020, that rate has jumped to one for every 24.7 attempts.

Stanford has not thrown 20 touchdown passes in a season since 2018.


Tier 13: Wily veterans (11 players)

Colorado State (Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi, Jackson Brousseau)
Kentucky (Zach Calzada, Beau Allen)
Miami (OH) (Dequan Finn, Henry Hesson)
Memphis (Brendon Lewis, Antwann Hill)
Rutgers (Athan Kaliakmanis, AJ Surace, Rocco Rainone)

The COVID-19 season afforded everyone an extra year of eligibility, and that changed QB play for the past few years. In 2018, the average QBR-qualified quarterback had started 18.4 games by season’s end. In 2023, that number had jumped to 23.6 — basically an extra half-season, on average, of starting experience. Last year, 29 different quarterbacks (21% of FBS starters) finished the season with at least 36 career starts — essentially three full seasons’ worth — with Bo Nix topping the list with 61. Gabriel ended his career with 63 starts. The 2025 season will be the last to include a sizable number of COVID-eligibility players, while the trend toward less experienced QBs is already beginning. Still, there are a few who have paid their dues — and then some. That’s what Tier 13 is all about. The anticipated starters here already have 157 career starts across 13 schools under their belts.

QB comparison

QB A: 57.7 QBR, 2 touchdowns, 4 interceptions
QB B: 78.2 QBR, 10 touchdowns, 2 interceptions

The first guy is Rutgers’ Kaliakmanis through the first five games of last season. The second guy is Kaliakmanis after that.

Fun facts:

Two teams had a single QB throw every pass last season: Rutgers and New Mexico.

No returning QB had a higher Pro Football Focus grade last season than Lewis.

Four quarterbacks — Paxton Lynch, Brady White, Riley Ferguson and Seth Henigan — account for 153 of the past 154 games started for the Tigers, dating to 2013. Each started at least 26 games at Memphis and accounted for at least 70 touchdowns.


Tier 14: Best of the Group of 5 (10 players)

Florida Atlantic (Caden Veltkamp, Kasen Weisman)
UConn (Joe Fagnano, Nick Evers)
Ohio (Parker Navarro, Nick Poulos)
Old Dominion (Colton Joseph, Quinn Henicle)
Southern Miss (Braylon Braxton, Jeremy Hecklinski)
Toledo (Tucker Gleason, John Alan Richter)
South Florida (Byrum Brown, Bryce Archie)
UTSA (Owen McCown, Dematrius Davis Jr.)

These days in college football, there’s a pretty steady talent drain from the Group of 5 to the big boys. In the past two seasons, 47 quarterbacks from outside the Power 5 finished with a QBR of 60 or better. Only 17 returned to their team the next year (36%). Sixteen transferred to Power 4 schools. The point is, keeping talented quarterbacks in the Group of 5 is tough to do. The players in Tier 14 still fit the bill.

QB comparison

QB A: 9.9 yards per pass, 13 touchdowns, 1 pick
QB B: 7.2 yards per pass, five touchdowns, 7 picks

QB A was basically unstoppable. That was FAU’s Veltkamp last season (at Western Kentucky) against man coverage. QB B struggled much more. That was Veltkamp vs. zone defenses.

Fun facts:

Braxton vs. the blitz last season: 94.3 QBR (best among returning QBs), 8 TDs, 0 INTs, 10.51 yards per attempt.

Braxton’s 59.7 QBR when pressured is the second best among all returning QBs (trailing only Horvath).

Last year at Marshall, Braxton went 8-0 as the starter. In those games, he had 15 touchdowns and two picks.

Braxton had three games in which he threw three touchdowns and no interceptions while tallying fewer than 220 yards passing. In the playoff era, only three other QBs have done that.

In the fourth quarter last season, Navarro completed 77% of his throws, averaged 9.8 yards per attempt, and posted a QBR of 96.0, the best mark of any QB in the country.

Navarro is one of just 13 FBS QBs to rush for 18 touchdowns or more in a season in the playoff era.

UConn’s offense averaged 6.7 yards per play and 7.97 yards per pass with Fagnano at QB last year. With Evers: 4.96 yards per play and 5.04 yards per pass.

The only Group of 5 QB with 3,000 yards, 30 touchdowns and 13 or fewer turnovers returning to his team this season: Gleason.

QBs returning to the same team who posted a QBR of 60, threw 25 touchdowns and 10 or fewer interceptions: Klubnik, Becht, Robertson, Johnson and UTSA’s McCown.


Tier 15a: We used to be somebody: top recruit edition (10 players)

Maryland (Justyn Martin, Malik Washington)
Louisiana (Walker Howard, Daniel Beale)
UCF (Tayven Jackson, Jacurri Brown, Davi Belfort, Cam Fancher)
Wake Forest (Robby Ashford, Deshawn Purdie)

The transfer portal has turned the task of evaluating QB depth charts into something akin to joining Facebook in the 2010s, where you find out what happened to folks you used to know but had all but forgotten about — only instead of realizing your prom date is now a divorced dental hygienist in Topeka, you shake your head and think, “Robby Ashford’s at Wake Forest now? I never would’ve guessed!” And in true mid-2010s Facebook fashion, Purdue’s Browne ended up rekindling a relationship with his ex.


Tier 15b: We used to be somebody: established starter edition (17 players)

James Madison (Matthew Sluka, Camden Coleman)
Liberty (Ethan Vasko, Ryan Burger)
Purdue (Ryan Browne, Bennett Meredith, Evans Chuba, Malachi Singleton)
Tulane (Kadin Semonza, Brendan Sullivan)
UNLV (Anthony Colandrea, Alex Orji)
Washington State (Zevi Eckhaus, Ajani Sheppard, Jaxon Potter)
Wisconsin (Billy Edwards Jr., Danny O’Neil)

It’s fun that Purdue’s starting QB situation can be reasonably explained with the GIF of Grandpa Simpson opening a door, doing a lap and walking back out the door. Browne started a pair of games for the Boilermakers last season, entered the portal, spent four months with Belichick, then went right back to Purdue, no harm done.

QB comparison

QB A: 72.3% completions, 13 touchdowns, two turnovers, 70.0 QBR
QB B: 59.7% completions, seven touchdowns, nine turnovers, 48.8 QBR

That’s one QB playing elite football and another who deserves a seat on the bench, right? Well QB A was Edwards in August and September of last year at Maryland. QB B is Edwards the rest of the way. On the other hand, Maryland’s record in August and September dating back to 2013 is 36-10. After Oct. 1, however, the Terps are 28-69. So maybe the problem wasn’t Edwards.

Fun facts:

Only returning QBs with an adjusted completion percentage less than 60%: Purdie (59.6) and Parker Awad (53.4)

The only QBR-qualified Power 4 QB not to throw a single touchdown pass on third or fourth down last season: Edwards (0 TDs, 4 INTs).

Among 207 QBs with at least 60 dropbacks last season, Anthony Colandrea finished 162nd in yards per dropback (5.48) and Alex Orji finished 207th (2.93).

UCF has three quarterbacks on its roster who were four-star recruits and another with four years of experience as part-time starters. The combined stat line of those QBs: 37 starts, 17-20 record, 45.3 QBR, 38 touchdown passes, 37 interceptions.

Sullivan spent the past three years at Iowa and Northwestern. Those two teams combined in that span have a QBR of 37.1, with 63 TD passes and 62 INTs. Tulane in that same span: 64.0 QBR, 80 touchdown passes and 20 INTs.


Tier 16a: We used to be ACC starters (17 players)

Akron (Ben Finley, Brayden Roggow)
Charlotte (Conner Harrell, Grayson Loftis, Zach Wilcke)
Coastal Carolina (MJ Morris, Emmett Brown)
Georgia State (Christian Veilleux, Cameran Brown)
Nevada (Chubba Purdy, AJ Bianco)
South Alabama (Zach Pyron, Bishop Davenport)
Texas State (Nate Yarnell, Keldric Luster, Holden Geriner, Brad Jackson)


Tier 16b: We used to be starters in the Big Ten, Big 12 or SEC (11 players)

App State (AJ Swann, JJ Kohl)
Bowling Green (Drew Pyne, Lucian Anderson III)
Eastern Michigan (Noah Kim, Jeremiah Salem)
UMass (Brandon Rose, AJ Hairston, Grant Jordan)
Utah State (Bryson Barnes, Jacob Conover)

The Peter Principle suggests that people rise to the level of their incompetence. The inverse of this might be true in college football now, where QBs fall to the level of their competence. This tier has 79 career starts at the Power 4 level, winning 35 of them. These QBs moved on — in some cases, twice already — and now find themselves helming Group of 5 offenses. For a few, such as Finley and Veilleux, it has already proved to be a smart move. For the rest, 2025 could be the year they find new life at a slightly lower level.

QB comparison

QB A: 9-4 as a starter, 64% completions, 29 touchdown passes, 12 picks, 7.7 yards per attempt
QB B: 9-3 as a starter, 61% completions, 29 touchdown passes, 12 picks, 7.1 yards per attempt

Both guys are pretty solid, right? QB A is getting plenty of love for it, too. That’s LSU’s Nussmeier last season. QB B though? That’d be Bowling Green’s Pyne dating to 2021 across three different Power 5 schools.

Fun facts:

In the playoff era, Bryson Barnes is one of just five QBs to account for at least 17 touchdowns on fewer than 200 touches.

Finley’s last five games of the season at Akron: 3-2 record, 9 TD passes, 2 interceptions, 21 completions of 20 yards or more. Finley averaged 11.4 air yards per throw in that span, completing just 47% but averaging 14.7 yards per completion.


Tier 17: We can make this work (16 players)

Arkansas State (Jaylen Raynor, Ethan Crawford)
ECU (Katin Houser, Raheim Jeter)
FIU (Keyone Jenkins, Chayden Peery)
Georgia Southern (JC French, Turner Helton)
Louisiana Tech (Evan Bullock, Blake Baker)
Middle Tennessee (Nicholas Vattiato, Roman Gagliano)
Sam Houston (Hunter Watson, Mabrey Mettauer)
SJSU (Walker Eget, Xavier Ward)

There’s no shame in being in Tier 17. These QBs have all had a little success, proved they belong and figure to be perfectly good in 2025, too. They’re a little like flying out of Atlanta-Hartsfield. It’s far from a pleasant experience, but when you consider the context, it really should be so much worse.

QB comparison

QB A: 48.6 QBR, 56% completions, 22 touchdowns, 11 turnovers, 21 completions of 20 yards or more
QB B: 48.1 QBR, 62% completions, 21 touchdowns, 10 turnovers, 21 completions of 20 yards or more

QB A is one of the biggest names in the Group of 5 — Liberty’s Salter, now QB1 at Colorado. QB B is Sam Houston’s Watson.

Fun facts:

ECU’s Katin Houser had the lowest average time to delivery among returning QBs (2.35 seconds).

Jenkins’ last four games of the season: 70.3 QBR, 64% completions, 10.2 yards per pass, 12 touchdowns, one interception.

In six games vs. teams with a .500 record or better, Raynor had four touchdown passes and seven interceptions. In seven games vs. teams with a losing record, he threw 12 TD passes and three interceptions.

Vattiato has thrown for more yards (7,524) in his career than all but three other returning quarterbacks.


Tier 18a: New faces, good places (17 players)

Air Force (Josh Johnson, Liam Szarka, Maguire Martin)
Army (Dewayne Coleman, Cale Hellums, Ethan Washington)
Fresno State (E.J. Warner, Jayden Mandal)
Jacksonville State (Cade Cunningham, Gavin Wimsatt)
North Texas (Reese Poffenbarger, Drew Mestemaker)
San Diego State (Jayden Denegal, Bert Emanuel Jr)
Wyoming (Kaden Anderson, Mason Drube, Landon Sims)

Everyone in this tier has a fresh face at QB, but these schools have some history of talent at the position. Whether anyone can repeat the success of past stars such as Bryson Daily or Josh Allen, however, remains a big question.


Tier 18b: Welcome to the club (six players)

Delaware (Zach Marker, Nick Minicucci, Braden Streeter)
Missouri State (Jacob Clark, Drew Viotto, Deuce Bailey)

The two newest FBS programs both return established QBs with some talent, and given the quick success of JMU, Jacksonville State and Sam Houston after moving up from the FCS, it’s certainly possible these guys could make some noise in Conference USA.

Tier 18c: Lost that loving feeling (four players)

Troy (Goose Crowder, Tucker Kilcrease)
Western Kentucky (Maverick McIvor, Tucker Parks)

It’s just a shame that a QB named Maverick and a QB named Goose aren’t on the depth chart at Navy.

Fun facts:

The only active QBs with more multi-touchdown passing games than Warner (18): Finn, Aguilar and Pavia.

Warner’s 37 career interceptions are the most by any returning QB.

Air Force’s QBR from 2019 through 2022: 67.9. Air Force’s QBR the past two seasons: 34.6.


Tier 19: It could be worse (21 players)

Ball State (Kiael Kelly, Walter Taylor III)
Buffalo (Ta’Quan Roberson, Gunnar Gray)
Central Michigan (Joe Labas, Angel Flores)
Marshall (Zion Turner, Carlos Del Rio-Wilson)
New Mexico State (Logan Fife, Parker Awad)
Northern Illinois (Josh Holst, Jalen Macon)
Rice (AJ Padgett, Drew Devillier)
Temple (Evan Simon, Gevani McCoy, Anthony Chiccitt)
UAB (Jalen Kitna, Ryder Burton)
UTEP (Skyler Locklear, Malachi Nelson)

Each year, there are quarterbacks who fly completely beneath the radar, have perfectly fine seasons, and for one random Tuesday night in November, capture the imagination of a few thousand of the most die-hard college football fans by throwing for 400 yards and six touchdowns against Akron. Somewhere in this tier is that QB for 2025.

Fun facts:

Turner and Del-Rio Wilson have combined to play for six schools, make 14 starts and throw 13 touchdown passes.

Kitna vs. Tulsa last season: 78% completions, 6 touchdown passes, 12.6 yards per pass.
Kitna vs. everyone else: 60% completions, 11 touchdown passes, 11 picks, 6.4 yards per pass.

Last season, Labas threw five interceptions against Florida International. Every other quarterback in the country accounted for six interceptions against Florida International. Labas accounted for 17% of all of FIU’s interceptions since 2020

Locklear and UConn’s Nick Evers are the only FBS QBs to throw for 90 yards or fewer while attempting at least 10 passes in four different games last season.


Tier 20: Nowhere but up (16 players)

Hawai’i (Micah Alejado, Luke Weaver, Jarret Nielsen)
Kennesaw State (Dexter Williams, Amari Odom)
Kent State (Devin Kargman, Ruel Tomlinson)
New Mexico (Cole Welliver, Toa Faavae, Jack Layne)
Tulsa (Kirk Francis, Carson Horton)
UL Monroe (Aiden Armenta, Hunter Herring)
Western Michigan (Broc Lowry, Brady Jones)

Each season, only a few hundred players get to say they’re an FBS quarterback. These guys are among them. That’s something.

Fun facts:

QBs with seven or more starts who threw more interceptions than touchdowns last season:
Zeon Chriss: four TDs, eight picks
Gevani McCoy: three TDs, six picks
Ashton Daniels: 10 TDs, 12 picks
Isaac Wilson: 10 TDs, 11 picks
Bryce Archie: nine TDs, 10 picks
Jack Lausch: seven TDs, eight picks
Armenta: nine TDs, 10 picks; he’s the only member of this group pegged to start again in 2025

No QBR-qualified player returning for 2025 finished last season with a lower QBR than Francis (27.7).

The last QB to start a win vs. an FBS team at Kent State is Collin Schlee. He played for two other teams since then and is out of eligibility.

Continue Reading

Sports

Braves’ Acuña homers on 1st pitch after year away

Published

on

By

Braves' Acuña homers on 1st pitch after year away

ATLANTA — Ronald Acuña Jr. crushed his first pitch 467 feet for a home run in his dramatic return to the Atlanta Braves on Friday night, almost one year after he tore his left ACL.

Acuña, in his customary leadoff position in the lineup, turned on a fastball from San Diego Padres right-hander Nick Pivetta and sent the ball into the seats in left-center. Acuña hesitated briefly on his jog around the bases for a shuffle step.

The homer by Acuña had an exit velocity of 115.5 mph. It was the hardest hit ball by a Braves player this season.

Acuña added a single in his next at-bat and also enjoyed a defensive highlight, throwing out Elias Díaz at second base in the eighth following Díaz’s single.

But San Diego’s Manny Machado hit a tiebreaking homer off Raisel Iglesias in the ninth inning to overcome Acuña’s homer and beat the Braves 2-1 to end a six-game losing streak.

Acuña said after the game “I had a feeling” about hitting a homer in his return.

When asked if he meant he had a feeling about a first-pitch homer, Acuña said: “Exactly how it happened. … To me that’s just the culmination of all the work I put in.”

Infielder Orlando Arcia, a 2023 All-Star, was designated for assignment to clear a roster spot for Acuña, who started in right field.

Acuña said through interpreter Franco Garcia that he was “super excited, super happy” to make his return and added “I couldn’t sleep that much” after receiving the news of his return Thursday.

Braves manager Brian Snitker announced after Thursday night’s 8-7 loss at Washington that Acuña would make his season debut Friday night.

Snitker said Friday it felt good to make out his first lineup of 2025 that included Acuña.

“He’s one of those players that you better not go get a beer or whatever because you might miss something really cool, you know?” Snitker said. “I mean, he’s that type of force, I think, in the game. I think he’s going to energize everybody. Going to energize the fans. Going to energize his teammates.”

Acuña, the 2023 NL MVP, hurt his left knee May 26, 2024, and had surgery on June 6. The 27-year-old played six games in the minors on a rehab assignment, going 6-for-15 with two home runs.

Acuña played in only 49 games last season, batting .250 with four homers, 15 RBIs, 16 stolen bases and a .716 OPS.

This is Acuña’s second comeback from a major knee injury. He tore his right ACL on July 10, 2021, and returned the following April. When asked Friday what is different about this rehabilitation process, he said, “Patience. The patience, for sure. … I just think I’m in a much better place.”

Atlanta is 24-26 after an 0-7 start.

“It’s huge,” third baseman Austin Riley said. “The talent is there. The energy he brings, having Ronald up there at the top of the lineup. … He can change a game at any point.”

Acuña was a unanimous NL MVP in 2023 when he hit .336 with 41 home runs, 106 RBIs and a league-leading 1.012 OPS. Acuña also stole 73 bases that year to become the only player with 40 homers and 70 steals in one season.

Arcia, 30, was a 2023 NL All-Star when he hit .264 with 17 homers and 65 RBIs. Arcia lost his starting job due to an inability to compensate at the plate while suffering a defensive decline. He hit only .194 in 31 at-bats this season.

Snitker said he hopes Arcia will accept a minor league assignment if he does not land another job in the majors.

“I think we all know that it’s a business,” Acuña said of Arcia getting cut. “I’m happy to be back but I’m sorry that’s the move.”

Nick Allen has taken over as the starting shortstop. Snitker said Luke Williams is the backup shortstop and Eli White, a part-time starter in the outfield, will see more time in the infield.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Sports

Skenes on trade chatter: ‘Anybody can play GM’

Published

on

By

Skenes on trade chatter: 'Anybody can play GM'

PITTSBURGH — Paul Skenes didn’t hear Pittsburgh Pirates general manager Ben Cherington say that trading the reigning National League Rookie of the Year to give the last-place club an influx of much-needed position player talent is “not at all part of the conversation.”

When someone relayed Cherington’s comments to him, the 22-year-old ace laughed.

“It doesn’t affect anything,” Skenes told The Associated Press late Friday night after the Pirates rallied for a 6-5, 10-inning win over Milwaukee. “Anybody can play GM.”

If Skenes, who celebrated his first anniversary in the majors two weeks ago, has learned anything during his rise to stardom over the past three years, it’s that noise is not the same as news.

“There’s no substance to just all that talk that you hear on social media and news outlets and stuff like that,” Skenes said.

It’s one of the many reasons he makes it a point to try and block out all the noise.

There could be a time when Skenes moves on, either by Pittsburgh’s choice or his own. That time, at least to Skenes, is not coming soon.

Pittsburgh is last in the major leagues in runs with 157, and has no high-profile position player prospect ready to walk into the home clubhouse at PNC Park as a big leaguer anytime soon.

“Ben’s job is to create a winning team and a winning organization,” Skenes said. “So, what it looks like to him [is up to him].”

Skenes added if the Pirates make a highly unusual move by trading one of the sport’s brightest young stars, even though he remains under team control for the rest of the decade and isn’t eligible for arbitration until 2027, he wouldn’t take it personally.

“I don’t expect it to happen,” Skenes stressed. “[But Cherington] is going to look out for what’s best for the Pirates. If he feels [trading me] is the right way to go, then he feels that’s the right way to go. But you know, I have to pitch well, that’s the bottom line.”

Skenes has been every bit the generational talent Pittsburgh hoped it was getting when it selected him with the top pick in the 2023 draft.

The 6-foot-6 right-hander was a sensation from the moment he made his big league debut last May and even as the team around him has scuffled — the Pirates tied a major league record by going 26 straight games without scoring more than four runs, a streak that ended in a loss to the Brewers on Thursday — he has not.

Five days after throwing the first complete game of his career in a 1-0 loss to Philadelphia, Skenes kept the Brewers in check over six innings, giving up one run on four hits with two walks and eight strikeouts.

When he induced Sal Frelick into a grounder to second to finish the sixth, many in the crowd of 24,646 rose to their feet to salute him as he sauntered back to the dugout. He exited with a 2-1 lead, then watched from afar as the struggling bullpen let it slip away. The Pirates, in an all-too-rare occurrence, fought back, rallying to tie it in the ninth on Oneil Cruz‘s second home run, then winning it in the 10th when Adam Frazier raced home on a wild pitch.

Afterward, music blared and Skenes — who hasn’t won in a month despite a 2.32 ERA across his five May starts — flashed a smile that was a mixture of happiness and relief.

“It’s nice to see us pull it out, which is something that we haven’t done as much to this point in the year,” he said. “Hopefully, it’s a good sign.”

The challenge of trying to help make the Pirates truly matter is something Skenes has eagerly accepted. He’s as invested in the city as he is in the team.

Asked if the outside speculation that the club should move on from him so quickly is disrespectful to the effort he has given the Pirates, the former Air Force cadet shrugged.

“I don’t feel anything good or bad toward it,” he said.

It hasn’t been the start to 2025 that anybody associated with the Pirates has wanted. Skenes believes there has been a “little bit more fight” since Don Kelly took over as manager. He believes that he’s gaining more mastery over his ever-expanding arsenal. He believes he’s developing chemistry with catcher Henry Davis.

Skenes was asked about what it has been like to work with Davis, the top overall pick in the 2021 draft.

“Just really got to keep doing what we’re doing,” Skenes said, “continue learning and let everything take care of itself, I guess.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Sports

Oilers make a statement with 3-0 win in Game 2: Grades, takeaways for both teams

Published

on

By

Oilers make a statement with 3-0 win in Game 2: Grades, takeaways for both teams

The Edmonton Oilers atoned for letting Game 1 of the Western Conference finals slip away in a dominating 3-0 Game 2 win over the Dallas Stars on Friday to even the series.

Oilers goaltender Stuart Skinner continued to be the most boom-or-bust player in the postseason. He gave up 20 goals and didn’t have a save percentage better than .833 in four losses. His three wins? All shutouts, becoming just the second Edmonton goalie in franchise history to record three in a playoff year. (The other was Curtis Joseph in 1998.)

Once again, the Oilers flexed their impressive depth. The stars combined on their power-play goal in the first period, with Ryan Nugent-Hopkins getting the tally on assists from Evan Bouchard and Leon Draisaitl. The other two non-empty-netters: Brett Kulak‘s first of the playoffs, snapping his rebound past Jake Oettinger; and Connor Brown, continuing an incredible playoff run with his fifth goal in the second period.

(Of course, the highlight of Brown’s night was avoiding a calamitous injury when Mikael Granlund‘s skate nearly clipped his face.)

How did both teams perform? What are the big questions facing each team ahead of Game 3 on Sunday afternoon in Edmonton? Here’s our breakdown of the Oilers’ Game 2 win.

As I warned after Game 1: Not every game of the Western Conference finals would have a third-period implosion by the Oilers, nor the power-play success the Stars enjoyed to rally for that win.

Edmonton continued to roll at 5-on-5, winning the special teams battle. The Stars weren’t sharp on the details. There were too many shots that didn’t get through to Stuart Skinner, and there were not enough moments that truly tested the Edmonton goalie — outside of a third-period short-handed breakaway that Wyatt Johnston couldn’t convert, extending his drought to one point in eight games.

The Stars had more giveaways through two periods (21) than they had in any game of the 2025 postseason. That’s gift-wrapping the game to Edmonton. The Oilers were going to be desperate after losing Game 1, and Dallas didn’t come close to answering that effort or execution. — Greg Wyshynski

Edmonton Oilers
Grade: A

Edmonton got the start it wanted in Game 2 — Ryan Nugent-Hopkins tallied an early power-play goal that felt like exacting revenge on that costly, penalty-filled third period the Oilers handed Dallas in Game 1. Then, Edmonton tempted fate, handing the Stars a power play — but neutralized it with an excellent kill. That was a confidence booster.

The Oilers followed that by holding Dallas at bay in the second frame, when Skinner was particularly strong as the Stars pushed for an equalizer. That success set up Edmonton to extend its lead with a pair of goals in just 1:13, off a powerful shot from Brett Kulak and a tip from Connor Brown. Edmonton exorcised a few more demons by killing the Stars’ power-play opportunities in the third period.

This was a low-shot game, with only three registered from both sides by midway through the frame, and it was clear how much effort Edmonton was exerting in trying to limit Dallas’ chances. It worked in the end. And a round of applause for Skinner, who rebounded from a brutal performance in the final 20 minutes of Game 1 to be a true difference-maker while recording his third shutout in four games. — Kristen Shilton

play

0:32

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins tips in opening goal for Oilers

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins buries the goal for Edmonton to give the Oilers an early 1-0 lead.


Three Stars of Game 2

Nugent-Hopkins had a goal and an assist, and his power-play goal to open the scoring was the winner. He has multipoint outings in both games of this series, and both of the Oilers’ power-play goals through two games.

Skinner had 25 saves for his third shutout of the postseason, joining Curtis Joseph in 1998 as the only Oilers goalies with three clean sheets in a postseason.

3. Bouncing back

The Oilers flushed an abysmal third period in Game 1 to control Game 2 virtually for the entire 60 minutes, en route to a 3-0 victory to even the series heading to Edmonton for Games 3 and 4. — Arda Öcal


Players to watch in Game 3

The Stars winger shares the postseason scoring lead with McDavid and Leon Draisaitl, at 20 points, thanks to a four-game stretch in which he has generated only one point — a power-play assist in Game 1 of this series. Rantanen earned all of his Conn Smythe hype by carrying the Stars through their first-round win over the Colorado Avalanche, and then posting two, three-point games in wins over the Winnipeg Jets.

But in Game 2, he had as many shot attempts as he did giveaways (three). Neither number is good for the Stars. With Roope Hintz leaving Game 2 because of an injury, there are even more questions about their top line, which hasn’t produced an even-strength goal since Game 4 against the Jets. — Wyshynski

Fans are always watching for McDavid. But for all McDavid’s marvellous moves and powerful playmaking, he hasn’t been a goal-scoring threat for Edmonton. McDavid has just three goals (with 20 points) in these playoffs, and 11 goals in his past 38 postseason contests.

There’s no discounting McDavid’s impact on the Oilers’ game, but there’s a need to see him light the lamp, too. Right now, McDavid is sitting on just one goal since Game 3 of Edmonton’s first-round series against Los Angeles. The Oilers are matching up well against the Stars at 5-on-5 in the series. And McDavid appeared to ring the iron at least once in Game 2.

If McDavid can put more doubt in Dallas by slipping one (or more) past Jake Oettinger, it could ignite Edmonton’s game further — and nothing would get the Oilers’ home crowd fired up quite like seeing the captain go off. — Shilton


Big questions for Game 3

What’s the status of Roope Hintz?

The Stars lost their top center in the third period after a nasty slash to the top of the skate by Edmonton defenseman Darnell Nurse. Hintz crumpled to the ice, clutching his left leg and needed help leaving the playing surface just 3:40 into the final period.

Nurse received only a minor penalty after the officials reviewed it — and the Department of Player Safety will review it further.

Losing Hintz, or having him diminished, would be a huge blow to Dallas, as the veteran Finn has five goals and six assists in 14 games, also playing on the Stars’ power play and penalty kill. — Wyshynski

The Oilers should be feeling good as the series shifts to their home ice. Getting one of the club’s top defensemen back would be an enormous boost for the Oilers, too.

Ekholm has been sidelined because of an undisclosed injury since mid-April, missing all of the Oilers’ postseason run to date. But he returned to practice Thursday, and though he remains day-to-day, even Ekholm admitted he didn’t expect to be back soon.

Edmonton has leaned on Ty Emberson and Troy Stecher in Ekholm’s absence, but there’s no question he would strengthen its back end when he’s ready. The Oilers must prepare for Dallas’ response in Game 3, and having Ekholm — who averaged 22 minutes in the regular season for Edmonton, while collecting nine goals and 33 points — makes that more manageable. — Shilton

Continue Reading

Trending