Connect with us

Published

on

South Western Railway (SWR) has been renationalised this weekend as part of the government’s transition towards Great British Railways.

The train operator officially came under public ownership at around 2am on Sunday – and the first journey, the 5.36am from Woking, was partly a rail replacement bus service due to engineering works.

So what difference will renationalisation make to passengers and will journeys be cheaper?

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

What is nationalisation?

Nationalisation means the government taking control of industries or companies, taking them from private to public ownership.

Britain’s railway lines are currently run by train operating companies as franchises under fixed-term contracts, but Labour have said they want to take control of the lines when those fixed terms end.

In its manifesto, the party vowed to return rail journeys to public ownership within five years by establishing Great British Railways (GBR) to run both the network tracks and trains.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said renationalising SWR was “a watershed moment in our work to return the railways to the service of passengers”.

“But I know that most users of the railway don’t spend much time thinking about who runs the trains – they just want them to work,” she added. “That’s why operators will have to meet rigorous performance standards and earn the right to be called Great British Railways.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How reliable are UK trains?

How will ticket prices be affected?

Labour have argued cutting off payments flowing into the private sector could save the taxpayer £150m a year.

But the government has not explicitly promised the savings made from nationalisation will be used to subsidise fees.

It is unlikely rail fares will fall as a result of nationalisation, rail analyst William Barter told Sky News.

“The government could mandate fare cuts if it wanted to, but there’s no sign it wants to,” he said.

“At the moment, I’m sure they would want to keep the money rather than give it back to passengers. The current operator aims to maximise revenue, and there’s no reason the government would want them to do anything differently under government control.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK has most expensive train tickets in Europe

What difference will it make for passengers?

Britain’s railways are frequently plagued by delays, cuts to services and timetable issues, but Mr Barter said nationalisation will make very little day-to-day difference to passengers.

There was “no reason to think” the move would improve issues around delays and cancellation of services, he said.

“It’s going to be the same people, the same management,” he explained.

“The facts of what the operator has to deal with in terms of revenue, infrastructure, reliability, all the rest of it – they haven’t changed.”

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Which services are being next to be nationalised?

In the longer term, the move is likely to bring “a degree of certainty compared with relatively short-term franchises”, Mr Barter said, noting the government would only want to renationalise a franchise “because in one way or another something very bad is going on in that franchise, so in a way it can only get better”.

It also means the government will have greater accountability for fixing problems with punctuality and cancellations.

Mr Barter said: “If this is the government’s baby, then they’re going to do their best to make sure it doesn’t fail. So rather than having a franchise holder they can use as a political scapegoat, it’s theirs now.”

He added: “In the short term, I don’t think you’d expect to see any sort of change. Long term, you’ll see stability and integration bringing about gradual benefits. There’s not a silver bullet of that sort here.”

Next to be renationalised later this year will be c2c and Greater Anglia, while seven more companies will transfer over when their franchises end in the future.

Continue Reading

Politics

Cabinet minister admits UK-France migrant returns could be ‘frustrated’ by legal challenges

Published

on

By

Cabinet minister admits UK-France migrant returns could be 'frustrated' by legal challenges

A cabinet minister has said attempts to deport asylum seekers could be delayed in the courts, amid confusion over whether there is a human rights “loophole” in the UK’s migration deal with France.

The “one in, one out” agreement will see migrants ineligible to stay in the UK sent back across the Channel. In exchange, the UK will take from France those who have links to Britain.

Politics Live: Chancellor warned ‘substantial tax rises’ needed

The treaty contains a clause that says in order for people to be returned, the UK must confirm they do not have an “outstanding human rights claim”.

Critics have argued this could risk bogus applications being made to frustrate the deportation process and cause delays.

Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, said it was an obvious “loophole” in the deal.

However, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky News this was “not the case at all”.

“The deal that we’ve struck will allow people with us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. Those claims will be heard in France,” she said.

 Channel crossings have reached a record high. Pic: PA
Image:
Channel crossings have reached a record high. Pic: PA

But despite denying there was a loophole, Ms Nandy admitted deportations could get held up in UK the courts.

She said: “Obviously there are people who will try to frustrate the process through the courts, but we’re speeding up the court process to make sure that those delays will be minimal and we will be able to return people to France so that, if they have an asylum claim, for example, that claim can be heard in France if they’ve travelled through France on the way here on small boats.”

When asked for clarity, the Home Office insisted people can be removed from the UK if they have made a human rights claim which is “clearly unfounded” in UK law.

It is understood that preparations have been made for judicial challenges against these decisions to be heard by UK courts from France, though sources suggested that once France has agreed to accept a return, there is no way back.

The charity Care4Calais said it would consider its options, with a spokesperson telling Sky News: “Care4Calais initiated legal challenges against the last government’s Rwanda policy and their attempts to introduce ‘pushbacks’ in the Channel – and we won.

“We will consider all options open to us to oppose any plans that will put more lives at risk, and involve governments trading humans.”

The government is under pressure for the scheme to work as Channel crossings have risen to a record high under their watch, despite a promise in the Labour manifesto to “smash the gangs”.

Row as crossings continue

A row broke out on Wednesday afternoon after Mr Philp shared footage from Calais showing migrants making the journey from France to England.

The senior Tory claimed this showed the government’s deal “is not deterring anyone”.

Dame Angela Eagle, the border security minister, accused him of being a “hypocrite”, saying thousands of people crossed the Channel while the Tories tried and failed to get their Rwanda scheme going.

She said the deal with France “will take time and it will be hard” but insisted it will ” make an important contribution to the all-out assault we are waging against the business model of the smuggling gangs, which was allowed to flourish and grow for six years while your government was in charge”.

“That is the difference between having a serious and comprehensive plan to fix this crisis, and just standing in a boat pointing at it. I hope you’re getting a nice tan, though,” she said.

The deal with France is one of a number of measures the government has implemented to crack down on small boat crossings.

Read more from Sky News:
Explained: What is the UK-France migrant returns deal?
Row over checks for Gazans who’ve earned places at UK unis

Ministers have refused to say how many people could be sent back across the Channel, claiming that would benefit smuggling gangs.

However, reports have suggested that about 50 a week could be sent to France – a small number compared to the 800 people every week on average who have arrived in the UK via small boats this year.

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”.

The initial agreement will be in place until June 2026.

Continue Reading

Politics

What is the UK-France migrant returns deal, who will be returned and how many?

Published

on

By

What is the UK-France migrant returns deal, who will be returned and how many?

A new UK-France migrant returns deal has come into force in a bid to reduce the number of migrants crossing the Channel in small boats.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced the “one in, one out” agreement on 10 July after months of talks, and it has since been approved by the European Commission.

Here is what we know about the deal so far.

What is the basic agreement?

The UK will be able to send migrants who enter the UK on small boats back to France.

For each one returned, the UK will allow an asylum seeker to enter through a safe and legal route – as long as they have not previously tried to enter illegally.

This is a pilot scheme for now, which will be in place until June 2026. A joint committee has been set up to review it on a monthly basis pending a decision on its long-term future.

When will it begin?

The agreement came into force on 5 August, having been signed by both countries and approved by the European Commission.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Sky News anyone arriving in the UK by small boat after this date can be detained “immediately upon arrival”.

The process of then transferring them to France will take up to three months, according to the treaty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Cooper insists no panic over migration

Who will be returned?

The scheme applies to adults or accompanied minors who have arrived by small boat via France.

There have been no details released on how the government will select who is returned out of this cohort – as it will only apply to a small fraction of arrivals – but the treaty notes some cases in which migrants will be ineligible for deportation.

This includes if someone has an outstanding human rights claim, outstanding suspensive judicial remedies or an injunction or court order that prevents their transfer.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has rejected accusations from the Tories that these are “easy loopholes” for lawyers to exploit, telling Sky News: “That’s not the case at all. The deal that we’ve struck will allow us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. Those claims will be heard in France.”

Read more:
What difference will ‘one in, one out’ small boats deal make?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Yvette Cooper: ‘No fixed numbers yet’

How many will be returned?

No numbers have been mentioned as part of the scheme, but there are reports around 50 people a week will ultimately be returned to France.

Since the start of March, an average of more than 1,000 people have arrived in small boats every week. Sending 50 of them back would represent less than 5% of that total.

Home Secretary Ms Cooper has admitted the scheme will start small as it is just a pilot at this stage, but says the hope is that it can be expanded.

She has declined to give a figure, saying people smuggling gangs would then operate their networks around that information.

Is the deal set in stone?

The treaty will remain in force until June 2026. Both countries will continually review the scheme over the next year, pending a decision on the long-term future of the arrangements.

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”, adding that it marked the “first stage” of efforts by the whole of the European Union sparked by the UK-EU summit in London in May.

Who will be accepted into the UK?

As part of the deal, the UK has agreed to provide a voluntary application route for entry from France. Those wanting to come will have to submit an Expression of Interest application to the Home Office.

They will need to establish their identity and nationality and will be subject to strict security and eligibility checks before a decision is made.

How much is it costing?

The UK will pay the full cost of transporting migrants in both directions under the terms of the treaty. The government has not put a figure on how much this could cost.

This is on top of the hundreds of millions the UK has given to France to police the Calais coast.

What have the French said?

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”.

He added that it marked the “first stage” of efforts by the whole of the European Union sparked by the UK-EU summit in London in May.

What else is being done?

Mr Macron has repeatedly said the UK needs to address “pull factors”, such as illegal working.

The Home Office has said authorities will soon undertake “a major nationwide blitz targeting illegal working hotspots, focusing on the gig economy and migrants working as delivery riders”.

Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Just Eat have already committed to ramp up facial verification and fraud checks in the coming months after ministers called in bosses for talks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Officers in crackdown on suspected illegal delivery drivers

The government has also introduced eVisas for people in the UK on a visa to make it easy to identify those who are in the UK legally.

For the first time, France has also agreed to allow police officers to enter the water from the beaches in northern France to try to stop the boats from leaving.

Over the past two weeks, they have been filmed slashing the rigid inflatable boats (RIBs) the people smugglers load up with migrants.

The British government, which is helping to fund the French police’s efforts, is pushing France to go further and let officers intervene against boats in deeper waters.

Continue Reading

Politics

This man used a Coinbase-like URL — Now he’s facing a major lawsuit

Published

on

By

This man used a Coinbase-like URL — Now he’s facing a major lawsuit

This man used a Coinbase-like URL — Now he’s facing a major lawsuit

A German man is facing a US federal lawsuit after allegedly using a Coinbase‑like domain name to earn affiliate commissions and pose phishing risks.

Continue Reading

Trending