Kosovo will be one of the countries asked to take failed asylum seekers from the UK as part of the government’s plan for “return hubs” abroad, according to reports.
The Western Balkan country is on a list of nine countries drawn up by the government of potential places to deport illegal migrants who have exhausted all avenues of appeal for asylum in the UK, according to The Times newspaper.
The report comes after the president of Kosovo revealed to Sky News that they would be “open to discussing it”, but there had been “no formal talks” so far.
The Tories say that return hubs will “not work as a deterrent”, and the “vast majority who illegally cross the [English] Channel have their asylum claims accepted, so would never be removed under the return hubs plan”.
Sir Keir Starmer revealed last Thursday at a news conference with the Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama that the UK “is in talks with a number of countries about return hubs”.
More on Kosovo
Related Topics:
They would be for processing failed asylum seekers prior to their eventual deportation, wherever that might be.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:30
PM confirms ‘return hubs’ plan
Downing Street said they would be for people “who have exhausted all legal routes to remain in the UK”, but who may be employing tactics to delay their removal – like “losing their paperwork”.
The hubs would effectively buy time to return or deport illegal migrants without the government having to house them in Britain in the meantime, such as in the asylum hotels, which the government has promised to close.
The prime minister described the hubs as a “really important innovation” that complements other measures the government is taking to crack down on criminal smuggling gangs and stop small boat crossings.
He refused to reveal which countries the government is in talks with, but he was left slightly red-faced after the Albanian prime minister publicly slapped down the idea of a UK return hub in his country, saying their agreement with Italy was a “one-off” deal for a key ally.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:30
Are ‘return hubs’ the new Rwanda plan?
But speaking exclusively to Sky’s Tamara Cohen, the president of Kosovo said her government is open to the idea.
Vjosa Osmani said: “There’s been no formal talks with the UK on this issue. It hasn’t been raised so far.
“We would be open to discussing it, however I can’t say more than that because I don’t know the details. I cannot give an answer on a request that hasn’t been made so far.”
Ms Osmani called the UK a “steadfast ally”. UK-supplied technology is being used in Kosovo to stop illicit goods and vulnerable people from reaching British shores.
Image: Foreign Secretary David Lammy signed a friendship book with Kosovo’s president on a visit last month. Pic: PA
Nearly 22,000 people used the Western Balkans to enter Europe last year, the Foreign Office said earlier this year.
There are six countries in the Western Balkans which are seen as central to UK efforts to tackling illegal migration. Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Montenegro are the others, alongside Albania, Kosovo and North Macedonia.
The Times reports that countries outside Europe are on a shortlist to be approached for talks about return hubs.
The plan is part of the broader government efforts to stop small boat crossings.
Over 12,000 people have crossed the Channel illegally on small boats so far this year, with 2025 on course to a record year for crossings, which will cause a major headache for Labour after being elected on a manifesto promise to “smash the gangs”.
Chris Philp, shadow home secretary, said in response to the report: “The prime minister’s attempt to get Albania to act as a return hub was humiliatingly dismissed by the Albanian prime minister.
“Return hubs will anyway not work as a deterrent because only illegal immigrants whose asylum claims fail get removed. The vast majority who illegally cross the channel have their asylum claims accepted, so would never be removed under the return hubs plan.”
Swiss crypto bank AMINA Bank AG said it has secured regulatory approval in Hong Kong to offer crypto trading and custody services to institutional clients in the region, adding its the first international bank to receive such permission.
AMINA said the “Type 1 license uplift” received from the Securities and Futures Commission would help it address a gap in the Hong Kong institutional crypto market, which has faced limited access to bank-grade crypto services due to the region’s high regulatory compliance standards.
The license will allow AMINA’s Hong Kong subsidiary to offer 13 cryptocurrencies — including Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), USDC (USDC), Tether (USDT) and major decentralized finance tokens.
📢 Crypto trading and custody – now available at AMINA Hong Kong!
Today, AMINA becomes the first international banking group to launch comprehensive crypto trading and custody services in Hong Kong.
It comes as AMINA reported a 233% increase in trading volume on Hong Kong crypto exchanges in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period last year, indicating that both retail and institutional traders are increasingly embracing the asset class.
Michael Benz, head of AMINA for Hong Kong, stated that the license would enable the company to expand into private fund management, structured products, derivatives and tokenized real-world assets, thereby providing a wider range of crypto offerings for its client base.
Hong Kong courts international crypto firms
Hong Kong has been positioning itself as a global crypto hub, and the latest approval could encourage other foreign firms to consider the market.
While AMINA claims to be the first international firm to win a Type 1 license upgrade, it is entering a market already serviced by local players such as Tiger Brokers, HashKey, and others.
Hong Kong launched new stablecoin rules in August
Hong Kong has adopted a cautious approach to crypto. It rolled out long-awaited stablecoin rules in August — prompting HSBC and ICBC to consider seeking licenses soon after.
Hong Kong tightened rules around self-custodying crypto in August, though the move was aimed more at reducing cybersecurity risks than restricting user freedom.
The home secretary has admitted the UK’s illegal immigrant numbers are “too high” – but said Nigel Farage can “sod off” after he claimed she sounded like a Reform supporter.
Speaking to Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby, the home secretary said: “I acknowledge the numbers are too high, and they’ve gone up, and I want to bring them down.
“I’m impatient to bring those numbers down.”
She refused to “set arbitrary numbers” on how much she wanted to bring illegal migration down to.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:40
Beth Rigby: The two big problems with Labour’s asylum plan
Earlier on Monday, Ms Mahmood announced a new direction in Labour’s plan to crack down on asylum seekers.
The “restoring order and control” plan includes:
• The removal of more families with children – either voluntarily through cash incentives up to £3,000, or by force; • Quadrupling the time successful asylum seekers must wait to claim permanent residency in the UK, from five years to 20; • Removing the legal obligation to provide financial support to asylum seekers, so those with the right to work but choose not to will receive no support; • Setting up a new appeals body to significantly speed up the time it takes to decide whether to refuse an asylum application; • Reforming how the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is interpreted in immigration cases; • Banning visas for countries refusing to accept deportees; • And the establishment of new safe and legal refugee routes.
The home secretary wants to make it less attractive for illegal migrants to try to get to the UK by making it much harder to get permanent residence here, by overhauling human rights laws to make it harder for illegal migrants to stay, and by suspending UK visas to some countries who refuse to take back illegal migrants.
That’s the plan, but there are two really big problems.
The first one is the Labour Party.
Labour knows it has to try to win back voters turning to Reform, but also risks a backlash from those with more liberal values who believe Mahmood is abandoning what Labour stands for to them.
That’s the politics. But on the policy, they just have to deliver and so much is at stake.
There’s no doubt Keir Starmer’s Number 10 is in real trouble.
There’s now open chatter about whether he should lead Labour into the next general election and whether his chancellor really is the person to deliver on the economy as she faces into that very difficult budget.
With the government in the doldrums, there is a lot riding on this policy and this politician.
Beth was speaking after her interview with Shabana Mahmood, watch her full analysis in the video above.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the plan was much like something his party would put forward, and said Ms Mahmood sounded like a Reform supporter.
The home secretary responded with her usual frankness, telling Rigby: “Nigel Farage can sod off. I’m not interested in anything he’s got to say.
“He’s making mischief. So I’m not going to let him live forever in my head.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:09
Home secretary announces details on asylum reform
You might need our support, says Badenoch
Her plans have also been tentatively welcomed by the Conservatives, with Kemi Badenoch suggesting the home secretary work with her in case of a rebellion by Labour MPs.
The backing of Tory MPs could “come in handy”, Ms Badenoch said.
The government’s attempts to cut the welfare bill earlier this year were thwarted by its own backbenchers, and the proposals announced on Monday have already attracted backlash from some on the left of the Labour Party.
Nadia Whittome MP called Ms Mahmood’s plans “dystopian” and “shameful”, while Richard Burgon MP said she should change course now rather than be forced into a U-turn later.
Image: Nigel Farage said the home secretary was sounding like a Reform supporter
Mahmood’s warning to Labour MPs
But Ms Mahmood has warned her colleagues that disrupting her bid to reform the asylum system – thus hoping to bring down the number of small boat crossings – risks “dark forces” coming to prominence.
Speaking in the House of Commons on Monday evening, Ms Mahmood said: “If we fail to deal with this crisis, we will draw more people down a path that starts with anger and ends in hatred.”
She later told Beth Rigby that Reform wanted to “rip up” indefinite leave to remain altogether, which she called “immoral” and “deeply shameful”.
The home secretary, who is a practising Muslim, was born in Birmingham to her Pakistani parents.
Earlier, in the House of Commons, she said she sees the division that migration and the asylum system are creating across the country. She told MPs she regularly endures racial slurs.
MPs and bereaved families have launched a new campaign urging the government to re-think its position on introducing Graduated Driving Licences.
The event, in Parliament, came at the start of Road Safety Week and ahead of the government’s highly anticipated new road safety strategy, the first in a decade, which could be published next month.
Kim Leadbeater MP told the gathering that the idea for tougher rules for new drivers “transcends party politics” and could leave to “saving people’s lives”.
Image: Five young adults died in a crash in Ireland on Saturday night. Pic: PA
Organisations, including fire services, police and crime commissioners, motoring organisations as well as road safety charities, are behind a new website, “Protect Young Drivers: Time for Change”, which documents the case for introducing stronger measures.
Graduated Driving Licences (GDLs) is a system designed to give new drivers a staggered approach to gaining full privileges on the road, such as driving at night or with a full car of passengers.
The system has been successful in countries including Canada and Australia at reducing the number of young people killed or seriously injured.
“I feel as a bereaved parent we are very easily dismissed”
More on Roads
Related Topics:
Last year 22% of fatalities on Britain’s roads involved a young person behind the wheel.
Data released by the Department for Transport also shows that male drivers aged 17-24 are four times more likely to be killed or seriously injured than all drivers aged over 25.
Chris Taylor, who lost his 18-year-old daughter Rebecca in a road traffic collision in 2008, said the grief doesn’t go away.
“I feel as a bereaved parent we are very easily dismissed,” he said. “We’ve got an opportunity. Together we are a movement that can create real change.”
The Department for Transport has previously told Sky News it is not considering GDLs.
“Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts are with everyone who has lost a loved one in this way,” said a spokesperson.
“Whilst we are not considering Graduated Driving Licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads and continue to tackle this through our THINK! campaign.
“We are considering other measures to address this problem and protect young drivers, as part of our upcoming strategy for road safety – the first in over a decade.”