New calls to revive a cancelled pipeline project pit Republican President Donald Trump against Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul , with Coterra Energy caught in the middle. Conversations about the natural gas Constitution Pipeline resurfaced last week after Trump lifted a stop-work order on the Empire Wind 1 project as part of what appeared to be a compromise with New York. The pipeline met opposition during Trump’s first term and was shelved roughly five years ago. One of the original sponsors of the pipeline was Cabot Oil & Gas, which merged with Cimarex Energy in 2021 to form Coterra, a holding in the Club’s 30-stock portfolio. “I am encouraged by Governor Hochul’s comments about her willingness to move forward on critical pipeline capacity,” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum posted on X on May 19. Then, a day later, the Empire Wind project was given the green light to go forward. Burgum’s office did not reply when CNBC reached out for further details regarding his statement. The White House did not respond immediately to our inquiries either. A spokesperson for Hochul told CNBC, however, that “no deal on any natural gas pipeline was reached,” in exchange for the wind project, which, coincidentally, a unit of another Club name, GE Vernova , has a hand in. The governor’s office said the timing of Burgum’s post alluded to a quid pro quo that did not happen. In a statement last week , Hochul said, “New York will work with the Administration and private entities on new energy projects that meet the legal requirements under New York law.” The pipeline is not the only dispute between Trump and Hochul. They are also locked in a toll battle over congestion pricing for motorists to enter the busiest parts of New York City. As the politics play out on the pipeline, Coterra CEO Tom Jorden reminded investors what’s at stake during the company’s post-earnings conference call earlier this month. “The Constitution Pipeline, as originally configured, originates in our [Marcellus] field in Northeast Pennsylvania and goes into the New England market [through New York],” Jorden said. “We’re watching and participating in that [pipeline] conversation seriously.” If the pipeline were to be built, “the expectation is that we would make a commitment to deliver long-term volumes into that line,” the CEO continued. “We’re looking at that as a potential future opportunity for growth in the Marcellus.” Most of Coterra’s Marcellus Shale properties, which represent 75% of the firm’s total natural gas output, are in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. Alongside a messy first quarter earlier this month, overshadowed by operational issues, Coterra said it’s shifting more of its near-term focus away from oil, which has been struggling, and toward natural gas . The company, which we covet for its ability to switch between oil and gas spending, cited positive macro conditions and Northeast storage volumes as reasons to predict a robust 2025 and 2026 for gas. Coterra said it began drilling two Marcellus rigs in April, lifting its capital spending in the region by an additional $50 million. The Constitution Pipeline, which would certainly support Coterra’s bet on natural gas and the Marcellus, has taken many twists and turns over the years. Cabot, the original champion of the project, sold a majority ownership stake to Williams Energy in 2010, four years before it was approved. The pipeline was canceled in 2020 after a slew of regulatory and legal hurdles, including a denied water permit by New York State. Cabot’s minority stake, however, kept what’s now Coterra in the game. CTRA YTD mountain Coterra YTD The financial benefits of easier and more cost-effective transportation of natural gas could also translate into a boost for Coterra shares, which closed just under $25 on Tuesday and moved lower Wednesday. The stock has declined more than 3% year to date compared to the S & P 500 ‘s slight 2025 gain. “We’re going to be in a bull market for gas, at least for the next year or so,” said Roth analyst Leo Mariani, echoing Jorden’s prediction. Mariani and his Roth colleagues have a $34 per share price target on Coterra. That’s higher than our Club price target of $30. At current share price levels, Coterra’s multiple of 8.5 times next 12 months’ earnings per share (EPS) estimates makes it cheaper compared to industry peers such as EOG Resources , which trades at 11.5 times forward earnings, and Diamondback Energy , which trades at 10.15 times. That could change if investors became more willing to pay up for Coterra earnings. Bottom line The Club agrees that Coterra’s shift to natural gas is a smart play, given current macro conditions and commodity prices. If the Constitution Pipeline were to become a reality, that would be a big deal. As our sole oil and energy stock, we’re fans of the company’s flexibility to shift its strategy to adapt to commodity prices. Jorden’s interview earlier this month with Jim Cramer on “Mad Money” helped ease our concerns about the company, including some operational issues that muddied the latest quarter. While these issues are resolved, Jim still isn’t ready to add to our Coterra position given the oil industry’s headwinds. That’s reflected in our hold-equivalent 2 rating on the stock. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long CTRA See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul (C) holds a picture of US President Donald Trump during a press conference at Grand Central Terminal on Feb. 19, 2025 in New York City.
More than $14 billion in US renewable and EV investments and 10,000 new jobs have been scrapped or put on hold since January, according to a new analysis from E2 and the Clean Economy Tracker. The reason: growing fears that the Republican-majority Congress will pull the plug on federal clean energy tax credits.
In April alone, companies backed out of $4.5 billion in battery, EV, and wind projects right before the House passed a sweeping tax and spending bill that would gut the federal tax incentives fueling the clean energy boom. E2 also found another $1.5 billion in previously unreported project cancellations from earlier in the year.
Now, with the Senate preparing to take up the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” E2 says over 10,000 clean energy jobs have already vanished.
“If the tax plan passed by the House last week becomes law, expect to see construction and investments stopping in states across the country as more projects and jobs are cancelled,” said Michael Timberlake, E2’s communications director. “Businesses are now counting on Congress to come to its senses and stop this costly attack on an industry that is essential to meeting America’s growing energy demand and that’s driving unprecedented economic growth in every part of the country.”
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Ironically, it’s Republican-led congressional districts – the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration’s clean energy tax credits passed in 2022 – that are feeling the most pain. So far, more than $12 billion in investments and over 13,000 jobs have been canceled in GOP districts.
Through April, 61% of all clean energy projects, 72% of jobs, and 82% of investments have been in Republican districts.
Despite the rising number of cancellations, some companies are still forging ahead. In April, businesses announced nearly $500 million in new clean energy investments across six states. That includes a $400 million expansion by Corning in Michigan to make solar wafers, which is expected to create at least 400 jobs, and a $9.3 million investment from a Canadian solar equipment company in North Carolina.
If completed, the seven projects announced last month could create nearly 3,000 permanent jobs.
To date, E2 has tracked 390 major clean energy projects across 42 states and Puerto Rico since the Inflation Reduction Act passed in August 2022. In total, companies plan to invest $132 billion and hire 123,000 permanent workers.
But the report warns that momentum could grind to a halt if the House tax plan becomes law. Since the clean energy tax credits were signed into law, 45 announced projects have been canceled, downsized, or closed entirely, wiping out nearly 20,000 jobs and $16.7 billion in investments.
What’s more, Trump’s Department of Energy announced today that it was killing more than $3.7 billion in funding for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) and decarbonization initiatives. Eighteen out of 24 projects were awarded through DOE’s Industrial Demonstrations Program (IDP), which was made law in the Inflation Reduction Act. It aimed to strengthen the economic competitiveness of US manufacturers in global markets demanding lower carbon emissions, while supporting US manufacturing jobs and communities.
Executive Director Jason Walsh of the BlueGreen Alliance said in a statement in response to today’s DOE announcement:
The awarded projects that DOE is seeking to kill are concentrated in rural areas and red states. American manufacturers are hungry to partner with the federal government to bolster US industry. The IDP saw $60 billion worth of applications during the program selection process, a ten-times oversubscription.
President Trump claims to be a champion of American manufacturing, but today’s announcement is further evidence that he and his Secretary of Energy are liars.
If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
A Tesla prototype was spotted at the Fremont factory in California, sparking speculation that it’s the new “cheaper Tesla”, but it looks like a regular Model Y.
A drone operator flew over the Fremont factory this week and spotted a Tesla prototype with light camouflage on the front and back ends.
The vehicle is making a lot of people talk on social media and the media as many think it could be a new “affordable model” coming to Tesla.
Other than the camouflage, the vehicle looks just like a regular Model Y:
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It’s likely one of two things: a new “stripped-down Model Y” or a Model Y Performance.
Model Y Performance is the only version that Tesla hasn’t launched since the design changeover earlier this year.
The “stripped-down Model Y” is what will replace Tesla’s upcoming “affordable models.”
We have been reporting on this new vehicle program from Tesla for a while now.
It came to life just over a year ago as a pivot for Tesla after CEO Elon Musk canceled two cheaper vehicles that Tesla was working on, commonly referred as “the $25,000 Tesla”. Those vehicles were codenamed NV91 and NV92, and they were based on the new vehicle platform that Tesla is now reserving for the Cybercab.
Instead, Musk saw that Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y production lines were starting to be underutilized as Tesla faced demand issues. Therefore, Tesla canceled the vehicles program based on the new platform and decided to build new vehicles on Model 3/Y platform using the same production lines.
We previously reported that these electric vehicles will likely look very similar to Model 3 and Model Y.
In recent months, several other media reports reinforced that, and Tesla all but confirmed it during its latest earnings call.
Considering this looks like a regular Model Y, it could be the new cheaper and less feature rich Model Y:
Some people are claiming that this vehicle looks smaller than the Model Y, but it’s difficult to tell as the black camouflage on the ends can confuse the eye.
It looks like a very similar size when it passes near other Tesla vehicles:
What do you think it is? Let us know in the comment section below.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
San Francisco-based founder Ahmed Shubber wants to emulate Elon Musk’s success in the electric construction equipment world – and he hopes his new, 32-ton electric bulldozer is enough to make the world sit up and take notice.
Since launching his company, Lumina, in 2021, Shubber has raised more than $8 million and grown the company’s global (!?) headcount to 26 people. That fruit of that team’s labor is the machine seen here. Dubbed “Moonlander,” the first-of-its-kind prototype occupies the physical footprint of something like a Caterpillar D6, but packs the blade and performance of the larger, more powerful Cat D9.
“A D6 could not push that blade,” David Wright, Lumina’s head of UK operations, told the assembled media at the Moonlander’s launch last week. “We can have that blade full of material, full dozing seven to nine cubic meters of material, for eight to 10 hours.”
“Even if you spend all morning heavy dozing and you’re a bit worried about how much juice you’ve used — well, your operators are going to take a union-mandated lunch break, right?” asks Wright. “Plug it in, and in 30 minutes, you’ve put 50% of power back in again.”
Shubber says Lumina is working to raise from $20-40 million for its Series A round to develop the company’s next electric equipment asset: a 100-ton electric excavator called Blade Runner. And, in a truly Tesla-like fashion, Shubber says he’s on track to hit an ambitious $100 million revenue target sometime in the next 24 months.
We’ll see how that unfolds in 2 year’s time, I guess. In the meantime, check out this Lumina promo video for Moonlander, below, then let us know what you think of Shuber’s take on an electric job site in the comments.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.