Connect with us

Published

on

As hundreds lie dead following the latest tragedy to beset a Boeing passenger plane, it is too early to determine blame.

Pilot error, engine failure and bird strikes are among the theories all being banded about. Only the recovery of Flight AI171‘s black box flight recorders are likely to provide the concrete answers.

What is inescapable though is that this is an air disaster the plane’s maker, Boeing, could well do without.

Plane crash latest: 53 Britons on board

It sounds petty, in the midst of such a catastrophe, to be talking about the impact on a company, but this has been a civil aviation giant left deeply scarred, in the public eye, through its attitude to safety in recent years.

While the 787 Dreamliner’s record had been impressive up until today, the same can not be said for the company’s 737 MAX planes.

The entire fleet was grounded globally for almost two years following the demise of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 outside Addis Ababa in March 2019.

More from Money

Women mourn next to the coffins of relatives who died in the Ethiopian Airlines crash
Image:
Women mourn next to the coffins of relatives who died in the Ethiopian Airlines crash in 2019. Pic: Reuters

All 157 people aboard were killed.

Six months earlier, a Lion Air 737 MAX, carrying 189 passengers and crew, crashed in Indonesia.

At fault was flight control software that has since been rectified.

That recent past continues to haunt Boeing.

It took those crashes to uncover a culture of cover-up. It amounted to not only a corporate failure but one of regulation and justice too, according to critics, as relatives were denied their days in court due to plea bargains.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What happened to the Air India plane?

Just last month, the US Justice Department and Boeing agreed a non-prosecution agreement over those two fatal crashes in return for $1.1bn in fines and an admission that it obstructed the investigation.

It raises several questions over the US legal system and its ability to police corporate activity and incentivise playing by the rules.

Boeing safety record under scrutiny after first fatal Dreamliner crash

Mickey Carroll

Science and Technology reporter

The crash of an Air India plane, carrying 242 people bound for Gatwick Airport from Ahmedabad, is the first fatal incident for Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner.

Experienced pilots who have studied video of the moments before the crash have told Sky News the flaps on the wings appear not to be set in the normal take-off position, however the cause of incident is unknown.

In a statement, Boeing said: “We are in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171 and stand ready to support them.

“Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected.”

Multiple concerns about Boeing’s Dreamliners, the most modern passenger aircraft in service, have previously been raised by whistleblowers.

In April 2024, a Boeing quality engineer, Sam Salehpour, told members of a Senate subcommittee that Boeing was taking shortcuts to bolster production levels that could lead to jetliners breaking apart.

The engineer said he studied Boeing’s own data and concluded “that the company is taking manufacturing shortcuts on the 787 programme that could significantly reduce the airplane’s safety and the life cycle”.

“They are putting out defective airplanes,” he said.

Boeing denied Mr Salehpour’s claims about the Dreamliner’s structural integrity.

In the same week, a separate Senate commerce committee heard from members of an expert panel that found serious flaws in Boeing’s safety culture.

One of the panel members, MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis, said workers feel pressure to push planes through the factory as fast as they can.

When talking to Boeing workers, he said he heard “there was a very real fear of payback and retribution if you held your ground”.

Speaking to a Senate subcommittee in June 2024, Boeing chief executive Dave Calhoun said: “Our culture is far from perfect, but we are taking action and making progress. We understand the gravity.”

“We are taking comprehensive action today to strengthen safety and quality.”

In May 2024, federal investigators opened a fresh investigation into the Boeing 787 Dreamliner – after the firm said several employees had committed “misconduct” by falsely claiming tests had been completed.

The Federal Aviation Authority said Boeing was “reinspecting all 787 airplanes still within the production system and must also create a plan to address the in-service fleet” while the investigation is taking place.

Would a British manufacturer have been offered such a deal by US prosecutors?

As for regulation, we’re told oversight has been stepped up and the number of planes that Boeing makes is still subject to controls in a bid to boost quality.

The company has long denied putting profit before safety, but that is what almost every whistleblower to have come forward to date has alleged.

The production limits were implemented after a mid-air door plug blowout aboard an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 flight in January last year.

They are hampering Boeing’s efforts to restore profitability.

Read more:
Air India plane ripped apart medical hostel
What we know so far about AI171 crash

A 5% fall in its share price at the market open on Wall Street goes to the heart of Boeing’s problem.

That is every time a Boeing plane is involved in an accident or failure, investors’ first instincts are to run for the hills.

Boeing says it is seeking more information on the nature of the Air India crash.

But whether Boeing’s plane is at fault for the loss of Flight 171 or not – and we have seen nothing so far to indicate that was the case – it’s clear the company has a long way to go to restore trust.

In a statement, Boeing president and chief executive Kelly Ortberg, said: “Our deepest condolences go out to the loved ones of the passengers and crew on board Air India Flight 171, as well as everyone affected in Ahmedabad.

“I have spoken with Air India chairman N. Chandrasekaran to offer our full support, and a Boeing team stands ready to support the investigation led by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB).”

Boeing will defer to India’s AAIB to provide information about Air India Flight 171, in adherence with the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization protocol, the company added.

Continue Reading

Business

US Federal Reserve defies calls from Donald Trump to cut interest rate

Published

on

By

US Federal Reserve defies calls from Donald Trump to cut interest rate

The Federal Reserve has defied calls from US President Donald Trump for a cut to the interest rate by leaving it unchanged.

The decision means it has an effective rate of 4.3%, where it has remained after the central bank, known as the Fed, reduced it three times last year.

“We’re keeping the rates high, and it’s hurting people from buying houses,” Mr Trump told reporters. “All because of the Fed.”

Money latest: Three major broadband firms hike prices

Mr Trump has repeatedly been asked whether he would fire Fed chair Jerome Powell if he failed to heed his demand to cut the rate.

In June, the US president labelled Mr Powell a “stupid person” after the Fed decided not to change rates. Then less than two weeks later, in a further attack, he said the Fed’s chair should “ashamed” and would “love” him to resign.

The US president has spent months verbally attacking Mr Powell.

More from US

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Fed chair has ‘done a bad job’, says Trump

There were clear tensions between the pair last Thursday as they toured the Federal Reserve in Washington DC, which is undergoing renovations.

When taking questions, Mr Trump said: “I’d love him to lower interest rates,” then laughed and slapped Powell’s arm.

Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell
Image:
There were clear tensions between the US President and Mr Powell during last week’s visit to the Federal Reserve. Pic: Reuters

The US president also challenged him, in front of reporters, about an alleged overspend on the renovations and produced paperwork to prove his point. Mr Powell shook his head as Trump made the claim.

When Mr Trump was asked what he would do as a real estate mogul if this happened to one of his projects, he said he’d fire his project manager – seemingly in reference to Mr Powell.

Donald Trump challenges Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell about the cost of renovations
Image:
Donald Trump challenged Mr Powell in front of reporters. Pic: Reuters

Unlike the UK, the US interest rate is a range to guide lenders rather than a single percentage.

The Fed has expressed concern about the impact of Mr Trump’s signature economic policy of implementing new tariffs, taxes on imports to the US.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know

On Wednesday, the president said he was still negotiating with India on trade after announcing the US will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country from Friday.

Mr Trump also signed an executive order on Wednesday implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50%, excluding certain products, including oil and precious metals.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Read more from Sky News:
Visa blamed for payment errors
Care provider nears collapse
Apollo set to buy £7bn stake in MFG

The committee which sets rates voted 9 to 2 to keep the benchmark rate steady, the two dissenters were appointees of President Trump who believe monetary policy is too tight.

In a policy statement to explain their decision, the Federal Reserve said that “uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated” but growth “moderated in the first half of the year,” possibly bolstering the case to lower rates at a future meeting.

Nathan Thooft, chief investment officer at Manulife Investment Management, described the rate decision as a “kind of a nothing burger” and it was “widely expected”.

Tony Welch, chief investment officer at SignatureFD, agreed that it was “broadly as expected”. He added: “That explains why you’re not seeing a lot of movement in the market right now because there’s nothing that’s surprising.”

Continue Reading

Business

Apollo charges in for stake in £7bn petrol retailer Motor Fuel Group

Published

on

By

Apollo charges in for stake in £7bn petrol retailer Motor Fuel Group

The investment giant Apollo Global Management is close to snapping up a stake in Motor Fuel Group (MFG), one of Britain’s biggest petrol forecourt empires, in a deal valuing it about £7bn.

Sky News has learnt that Apollo could announce as soon as Thursday that it has agreed to buy a large minority stake in MFG from Clayton Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), its current majority-owner.

The transaction will come after several months of talks involving CD&R and a range of prospective investors in a company which is rapidly expanding its presence in the electric vehicle charging infrastructure arena.

Money latest: Three major broadband providers confirm price hikes

Banking sources said there had been a “large appetite” to invest in the next phase of MFG’s growth, with CD&R having built the company from a mid-sized industry player over the course of more than a decade.

Lazard and Royal Bank of Canada are understood to be advising on the deal.

A stake of roughly 25-30% in MFG has been expected to change hands during the process, with Apollo’s investment said to be broadly in that range.

MFG is the largest independent forecourt operator in the UK, having grown from 360 sites at the point of CD&R’s acquisition of the company.

It trades under a number of brands, including Esso and Shell.

CD&R, which also owns the supermarket chain Morrisons, united MFG’s petrol forecourt businesses with that of the grocer in a £2.5bn transaction, which completed nearly 18 months ago.

MFG now comprises roughly 1,200 sites across Britain, with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of about £700m anticipated in this financial year.

It is now focused on its role in the energy transition, with hundreds of electric vehicle charging points installed across its network, and growing its high-margin foodservice offering.

MFG has outlined plans to invest £400m in EV charging, and is now the second-largest ultra-rapid player in the UK – which delivers 100 miles of range in ten minutes – with close to 1,000 chargers.

It aims to grow that figure to 3,000 by 2030.

CD&R, which declined to comment on Wednesday afternoon, will retain a controlling stake in MFG after any stake sale, while Morrisons also holds a 20% interest in the company.

Read more from Sky News:
Visa blamed for payment errors
Care provider nears collapse
Gary Neville attacks NI rise

Bankers expect that the minority deal with Apollo will be followed a couple of years later with an initial public offering on the London stock market.

CD&R invested in MFG in 2015, making its investment a long-term one by the standards of most private equity holding periods.

The sale of a large minority stake at a £7bn enterprise valuation will crystallise a positive return for the US-based buyout firm.

CD&R and its investors have already been paid hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from MFG, having seen its earnings grow 14-fold since the original purchase.

Morrisons’ rival, Asda, has undertaken a similar transaction with its petrol forecourts, with EG Group acquiring the Leeds-based grocer’s forecourt network.

EG Group, which along with Asda is controlled by private equity firm TDR Capital, is now being prepared for a listing in the US.

Apollo declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Sainsbury’s blames Visa card issues for online payment failure

Published

on

By

Sainsbury's blames Visa card issues for online payment failure

J Sainsbury, the supermarket chain, was on Wednesday racing to resolve an issue with card payments made involving Visa and Barclays which was impacting customers’ ability to pay for online grocery orders.

Sky News understands that Sainsbury’s is working with Visa and Barclays to address the issue after a number of shoppers reported that their card payments had failed.

A Sainsbury’s spokeswoman initially said Visa card payments were to blame for the problems, with the retailer subsequently updating its position to say the technical issue actually rested with Barclays.

Money latest: The best places to retire in Britain

The grocer ruled out the possibility of a cyberattack and said its website and app were functioning normally, with no direct impact on customers.

The issue nevertheless illustrates the extent to which the industry is on high alert for cybersecurity-related incidents after a spate of attacks which have raised concerns about the sector’s resilience.

In recent months, major British retailers including Marks & Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods have been the victim of cyberattacks, with the impact on M&S particularly acute.

More from Money

M&S has said the attack on its systems would cost it at least £300m and forced it to suspend online orders for months.

The Co-op saw in-store availability of thousands of products disrupted for several weeks.

A Sainsbury’s spokesperson said, “We’re working with one of our payment providers to resolve a temporary issue processing some payments for our Groceries Online service.

“We continue to deliver orders for customers and our website and app are working as normal.”

Visa said: “”Visa systems are operating normally. We are working with our partners to help them investigate.”

Barclays has been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Trending