Connect with us

Published

on

Tesla rejected a $60 million settlement offer in the Autopilot wrongful death case which resulted in a $243 million verdict against the company, according to new legal documents.

It’s a rare example of Tesla sticking to its promise not to settle cases it thinks are unjust, and it may end up biting the company right in the pocketbook.

To catch up, the case in question is the $243 million Autopilot wrongful death case which concluded early this month. It was the first actual verdict against the company in an Autopilot wrongful death case – not counting previous settlements.

The case centered around a 2019 crash of a Model S in Florida, where the driver dropped his phone and while he was picking it up, the Model S drove through a stop sign at a T-intersection, crashing into a parked Chevy Tahoe which then struck two pedestrians, killing one and seriously injuring the other.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Tesla was also caught withholding data in the case, which is not a good look.

In the end, for the purposes of compensatory damages, the driver was found 67% responsible and Tesla was found 33% responsible. But Tesla was also slapped with $200 million in punitive damages. The plaintiffs reached a settlement with the driver separately.

Tesla plans to appeal the case, and we’re sure it will exhaust every possibility. It may or may not turn out in the company’s favor, which we’ll stay tuned for.

But today, new information came out that Tesla previously declined a $60 million settlement in the case – which, if the verdict holds, will have ended up costing the company an extra $183 million.

Tesla did not accept the settlement, and instead countered with one which included a lower amount, and also a non-disclosure agreement. The plaintiffs did not accept this counter-offer.

Today’s news came as part of a filing from plaintiffs’ attorneys requesting Tesla pay plaintiffs’ accrued legal fees since May 30, the day the settlement was proposed, which they say Florida law entitles them to.

This means denying the settlement could also cost the plaintiffs’ legal fees from continuing to fight the case, and the costs of any subsequent court appeals. Plus the setting of a legal precedent which could have been avoided through settlement.

It’s a somewhat rare example of Tesla sticking to a promise that it made years ago. Tesla CEO Elon Musk once said that the company will never settle an unjust case against it.

He said this while trying to recruit a “hardcore litigation department,” a phrase that Musk has used multiple times over Tesla’s history.

However, as mentioned above, this is a somewhat rare example of Tesla sticking to those words. Despite Musk being clear about this commitment, Tesla has settled a number of cases in the years since.

The company settled the wrongful death cases for Walter Huang and Clyde Leach, a case over excessive compensation for Tesla’s board, a UK case over false self-driving claims, and a case over solar roof pricing (which is a story that we at Electrek originally broke) – suggesting either that Tesla found those cases “just,” or that the commitment above was perhaps not as sweeping as Musk portrayed it to be.

Electrek’s Take

The commitment above is an admirable goal, suggesting a forthrightness that is rare in business and law. It’s just too bad that it’s not real, and that Musk was just running his mouth (or, fingers) when he said it.

Besides, a company seeking forthrightness in legal matters wouldn’t hide evidence, which Tesla did in this case.

More realistically… Tesla’s settlements aren’t an admission of the “justness” of the cases against it, but instead are just examples of standard legal maneuvering by a business.

Tesla has likely settled in previous cases to avoid a legal precedent that would allow future cases to be decided against it using the framework of a previous case. This is a common move for businesses, and is often the monetarily correct one, particularly if they see a reasonable chance of a verdict against them.

In this case, Tesla perhaps didn’t think there was a reasonable chance of a verdict against it, or perhaps it was relying on the hundreds of millions in bribes its CEO gave to an openly corrupt political candidate, hoping that would make its legal problems go away.

Incidentally, the date the settlement was proposed was May 30, less than a week before the famous falling out between Musk and the corrupt candidate in question. Although Tesla would have had 30 days to accept the settlement, which it did not do, even after the public breakup. So perhaps the theory of hoping for corruption is a little too conspiratorial here.

Declining the settlement in this case could suggest that Tesla finds this to be an “unjust” case, and that it wanted to continue to fight said case on moral grounds.

Or it could just be the standard calculation of the likely cost of the result of the case, multiplied by the probability that Tesla sees of the case succeeding. And have nothing to do with Musk’s high-minded tweet which the company has repeatedly shown itself not to be beholden to.

Either way, continuing with appeals is the expected move from here on out. Tesla has the cash to keep fighting this, and so it will do so, especially if it sees any chance of succeeding.

But if it continues to go poorly for the company, that could not only cost it $183 million more than the settlement would have, but also set a potentially costly legal precedent for any future wrongful death cases. And the lawyer involved in this case, Brett Schreiber, says he’s ready for round two.


The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

MP Materials CEO warns investors to approach suddenly hot rare earths industry with caution

Published

on

By

MP Materials CEO warns investors to approach suddenly hot rare earths industry with caution

MP Materials' shares slide in overtime on quarterly revenue miss

Pentagon-backed MP Materials warned investors this week to approach other rare earths projects with caution, pointing to the industry’s difficult economics.

Stocks of U.S. rare earth companies have had wild swings in recent months as investors have speculated that the Trump administration might strike more deals along the lines of its landmark agreement with MP. Smaller retail traders have gotten involved in the stocks with the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF up 60% this year.

The Defense Department in July took an equity stake in MP, set a price floor for the company, and inked an offtake agreement with the rare earth miner and magnet maker in an effort to roll back China’s dominance of the industry.

CEO James Litinsky said he didn’t want “people to get burned” amid the speculation. Litinsky cautioned investors “to just be very clear-eyed about what the actual structural economics are amidst all the excitement.”

“The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on the company’s third-quarter earnings call Thursday evening.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, YTD

MP views itself as “America’s national champion,” Litinsky said. MP is the only active rare earth miner in the U.S. and has offtake agreements with Apple and General Motors in addition to the Pentagon.

“We have structural advantage because we’re fully vertically integrated,” the CEO said. “We’re years and billions ahead of others.”

It takes years for the best rare earth producers to ramp up and stabilize their output and economics “despite what some promoters might suggest,” Litinksy said. Australia’s Lynas took about a decade and MP will reach normalized production in about three years from the start of commissioning, he said.

MP Materials CEO on U.S. government deal: We can truly solve the rare earths magnetics crisis

The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC in September.

Litinsky described the rare earth industry as close to a “structural oligopoly,” a system where there are just a few major players. The government investing in a dozens of sites and businesses wouldn’t necessarily set up a supply chain, he said.

The Trump administration should continue to encourage private capital to flow into the industry through loans, grants and other support, Litinsky said. There is room for “a lot of other players and supply” but the market will require “materially higher prices” for the industry’s structural challenges to change, he said.

“If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible,” Litinsky said.

The CEO indicated that he views MP as a forerunner that will help create the conditions for a broader market that is not dependent on China over time.

“In the very short term the administration has made sure that we have a successful national champion in MP,” Litinsky said. “We are going to sort of pave the path if you will to then figure out how there’s much broader supply coming online.”

Rare earths are crucial for making magnets that are key inputs in U.S. weapons platforms, semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, clean energy technology and consumer electronics. Beijing dominates the global supply chain and the U.S. is dependent on China for imports.

Continue Reading

Environment

Wheel-E Podcast: CA e-bike voucher dies, Zero Motorcycles scooter, VMAX review, and more

Published

on

By

Wheel-E Podcast: CA e-bike voucher dies, Zero Motorcycles scooter, VMAX review, and more

This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes a new e-bike model from Tenways, California kills off its e-bike voucher program, a review of the new VMAX VX2 Hub e-scooter, Zero launches a scooter, NIU’s got a new micro-car, and more.

The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.

As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.

After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Apple Podcasts

Spotify

Overcast

Pocket Casts

Castro

RSS

We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.

Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:

Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Google’s decade-long bet on custom chips is turning into company’s secret weapon in AI race

Published

on

By

Google's decade-long bet on custom chips is turning into company's secret weapon in AI race

Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Nvidia has established itself as the undisputed leader in artificial intelligence chips, selling large quantities of silicon to most of the world’s biggest tech companies en route to a $4.5 trillion market cap.

One of Nvidia’s key clients is Google, which has been loading up on the chipmaker’s graphics processing units, or GPUs, to try and keep pace with soaring demand for AI compute power in the cloud.

While there’s no sign that Google will be slowing its purchases of Nvidia GPUs, the internet giant is increasingly showing that it’s not just a buyer of high-powered silicon. It’s also a developer.

On Thursday, Google announced that its most powerful chip yet, called Ironwood, is being made widely available in the coming weeks. It’s the seventh generation of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, the company’s custom silicon that’s been in the works for more than a decade.

TPUs are application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, which play a crucial role in AI by providing highly specialized and efficient hardware for particular tasks. Google says Ironwood is designed to handle the heaviest AI workloads, from training large models to powering real-time chatbots and AI agents, and is more than four times faster than its predecessor. AI startup Anthropic plans to use up to 1 million of them to run its Claude model.

For Google, TPUs offer a competitive edge at a time when all the hyperscalers are rushing to build mammoth data centers, and AI processors can’t get manufactured fast enough to meet demand. Other cloud companies are taking a similar approach, but are well behind in their efforts.

Amazon Web Services made its first cloud AI chip, Inferentia, available to customers in 2019, followed by Trainium three years later. Microsoft didn’t announce its first custom AI chip, Maia, until the end of 2023.

“Of the ASIC players, Google’s the only one that’s really deployed this stuff in huge volumes,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst covering semiconductors at Bernstein. “For other big players, it takes a long time and a lot of effort and a lot of money. They’re the furthest along among the other hyperscalers.”

Google didn’t provide a comment for this story.

Google's AI chip 'Ironwood' takes on Nvidia

Originally trained for internal workloads, Google’s TPUs have been available to cloud customers since 2018. Of late, Nvidia has shown some level of concern. When OpenAI signed its first cloud contract with Google earlier this year, the announcement spurred Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to initiate further talks with the AI startup and its CEO, Sam Altman, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

Unlike Nvidia, Google isn’t selling its chips as hardware, but rather providing access to TPUs as a service through its cloud, which has emerged as one of the company’s big growth drivers. In its third-quarter earnings report last week, Google parent Alphabet said cloud revenue increased 34% from a year earlier to $15.15 billion, beating analyst estimates. The company ended the quarter with a business backlog of $155 billion.

“We are seeing substantial demand for our AI infrastructure products, including TPU-based and GPU-based solutions,” CEO Sundar Pichai said on the earnings call. “It is one of the key drivers of our growth over the past year, and I think on a going-forward basis, I think we continue to see very strong demand, and we are investing to meet that.”

Google doesn’t break out the size of its TPU business within its cloud segment. Analysts at D.A. Davidson estimated in September that a “standalone” business consisting of TPUs and Google’s DeepMind AI division could be valued at about $900 billion, up from an estimate of $717 billion in January. Alphabet’s current market cap is more than $3.4 trillion.

‘Tightly targeted’ chips

Customization is a major differentiator for Google. One critical advantage, analysts say, is the efficiency TPUs offer customers relative to competitive products and services.

“They’re really making chips that are very tightly targeted for their workloads that they expect to have,” said James Sanders, an analyst at Tech Insights.

Rasgon said that efficiency is going to become increasingly important because with all the infrastructure that’s being built, the “likely bottleneck probably isn’t chip supply, it’s probably power.”

On Tuesday, Google announced Project Suncatcher, which explores “how an interconnected network of solar-powered satellites, equipped with our Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) AI chips, could harness the full power of the Sun.”

As a part of the project, Google said it plans to launch two prototype solar-powered satellites carrying TPUs by early 2027.

“This approach would have tremendous potential for scale, and also minimizes impact on terrestrial resources,” the company said in the announcement. “That will test our hardware in orbit, laying the groundwork for a future era of massively-scaled computation in space.”

Dario Amodei, co-founder and chief executive officer of Anthropic, at the World Economic Forum in 2025.

Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Google’s largest TPU deal on record landed late last month, when the company announced a massive expansion of its agreement with OpenAI rival Anthropic valued in the tens of billions of dollars. With the partnership, Google is expected to bring well over a gigawatt of AI compute capacity online in 2026.

“Anthropic’s choice to significantly expand its usage of TPUs reflects the strong price-performance and efficiency its teams have seen with TPUs for several years,” Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said at the time of the announcement.

Google has invested $3 billion in Anthropic. And while Amazon remains Anthropic’s most deeply embedded cloud partner, Google is now providing the core infrastructure to support the next generation of Claude models.

“There is such demand for our models that I think the only way we would have been able to serve as much as we’ve been able to this year is this multi-chip strategy,” Anthropic Chief Product Officer Mike Krieger told CNBC.

That strategy spans TPUs, Amazon Trainium and Nvidia GPUs, allowing the company to optimize for cost, performance and redundancy. Krieger said Anthropic did a lot of up-front work to make sure its models can run equally well across the silicon providers.

“I’ve seen that investment pay off now that we’re able to come online with these massive data centers and meet customers where they are,” Krieger said.

Hefty spending is coming

Two months before the Anthropic deal, Google forged a six-year cloud agreement with Meta worth more than $10 billion, though it’s not clear how much of the arrangement includes use of TPUs. And while OpenAI said it will start using Google’s cloud as it diversifies away from Microsoft, the company told Reuters it’s not deploying GPUs.

Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi attributed Google’s cloud momentum in the latest quarter to rising enterprise demand for Google’s full AI stack. The company said it signed more billion-dollar cloud deals in the first nine months of 2025 than in the previous two years combined.

“In GCP, we see strong demand for enterprise AI infrastructure, including TPUs and GPUs,” Ashkenazi said, adding that users are also flocking to the company’s latest Gemini offerings as well as services “such as cybersecurity and data analytics.”

Google opens access to its most powerful AI chip

Amazon, which reported 20% growth in its market-leading cloud infrastructure business last quarter, is expressing similar sentiment.

AWS CEO Matt Garman told CNBC in a recent interview that the company’s Trainium chip series is gaining momentum. He said “every Trainium 2 chip we land in our data centers today is getting sold and used,” and he promised further performance gains and efficiency improvements with Trainium 3.

Shareholders have shown a willingness to stomach hefty investments.

Google just raised the high end of its capital expenditures forecast for the year to $93 billion, up from prior guidance of $85 billion, with an even steeper ramp expected in 2026. The stock price soared 38% in the third quarter, its best performance for any period in 20 years, and is up another 17% in the fourth quarter.

Mizuho recently pointed to Google’s distinct cost and performance advantage with TPUs, noting that while the chips were originally built for internal use, Google is now winning external customers and bigger workloads.

Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a report in June that while Nvidia’s GPUs will likely remain the dominant chip provider in AI, growing developer familiarity with TPUs could become a meaningful driver of Google Cloud growth.

And analysts at D.A. Davidson said in September that they see so much demand for TPUs that Google should consider selling the systems “externally to customers,” including frontier AI labs.

“We continue to believe that Google’s TPUs remain the best alternative to Nvidia, with the gap between the two closing significantly over the past 9-12 months,” they wrote. “During this time, we’ve seen growing positive sentiment around TPUs.”

WATCH: Amazon’s $11B data center goes live: Here’s an inside look

Amazon's $11B data center goes live: Here's an inside look

Continue Reading

Trending