Connect with us

Published

on

The vast majority of policymakers in Westminster, let alone elsewhere around the UK, have never heard of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the geopolitical grouping currently holding its summit at Tianjin, but hear me out on why we should all be paying considerable attention to it.

Because the more attention you pay to this grouping of 10 Eurasian states – most notably China, Russia and India – the more you start to realise that the long-term consequences of the war in Ukraine might well reach far beyond Europe’s borders, changing the contours of the world as we know it.

The best place to begin with this is in February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. Back then, there were a few important hallmarks in the global economy. The amount of goods exported to Russia by the G7 – the equivalent grouping of rich, industrialised nations – was about the same as China’s exports. Europe was busily sucking in most Russian oil.

But roll on to today and G7 exports to Russia have gone to nearly zero (a consequence of sanctions). Russian assets, including government bonds previously owned by the Russian central bank, have been confiscated and their fate wrangled over. But Chinese exports to Russia, far from falling or even flatlining, have risen sharply. Exports of Chinese transportation equipment are up nearly 500%. Meanwhile, India has gone from importing next to no Russian oil to relying on the country for the majority of its crude imports.

Indeed, so much oil is India now importing from Russia that the US has said it will impose “secondary tariffs” on India, doubling the level of tariffs paid on Indian goods imported into America to 50% – one of the highest levels in the world.

The upshot of Ukraine, in other words, isn’t just misery and war in Europe. It’s a sharp divergence in economic strategies around the world. Some countries – notably the members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation – have doubled down on their economic relationship with Russia. Others have forsworn Russian business.

And in so doing, many of those Asian nations have begun to envisage something they had never quite imagined before: an economic future that doesn’t depend on the American financial infrastructure. Once upon a time, Asian nations were the biggest buyers of American government debt, in part to provide them with the dollars they needed to buy crude oil, which is generally denominated in the US currency. But since the invasion of Ukraine, Russia has begun to sell its oil without denominating it in dollars.

More on Russia

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin and Xi discuss Trump talks at security summit

Read more from Sky News:
How Moscow and its allies are trying to display their immunity to Western pressure

How Trump and Modi’s bromance fell apart
Russia has made Trump look weak

At the same time, many Asian nations have reduced their purchases of US debt. Indeed, part of the explanation for the recent rise in US and UK government bond yields is that there is simply less demand for them from foreign investors than there used to be. The world is changing – and the foundations of what we used to call globalisation are shifting.

The penultimate reason to pay attention to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is that while once upon a time its members accounted for a small fraction of global economic output, today that fraction is on the rise. Indeed, if you adjust economic output to account for purchasing power, the share of global GDP accounted for by the nations meeting in Tianjin is close to overtaking the share of GDP accounted for by the world’s advanced nations.

And the final thing to note – something that would have seemed completely implausible only a few years ago – is that China and India, once sworn rivals, are edging closer to an economic rapprochement. With India now facing swingeing tariffs from the US, New Delhi sees little downside in a rare trip to China, to cement relations with Beijing. This is a seismic moment in geopolitics. For a long time, the world’s two most populous nations were at loggerheads. Now they are increasingly moving in lockstep with each other.

That is a consequence few would have guessed at when Russia invaded Ukraine. Yet it could be of enormous importance for geopolitics in future decades.

Continue Reading

Business

Nestle fires CEO after ‘undisclosed romantic relationship’ with employee

Published

on

By

Nestle fires CEO after 'undisclosed romantic relationship' with employee

Nestle shares opened down more than 2.5% after the maker of Nescafe, Cheerios, KitKat, and Rolos dismissed its chief executive after an investigation into an undisclosed romantic relationship with an employee.

On Monday night, Nestle announced that the immediate dismissal of Laurent Freixe, effective immediately, following the investigation into the relationship, with a direct employee, which had breached the company’s code of business conduct.

Money blog: ‘My best friend didn’t give me a wedding gift – what should I do?’

The replacement for Mr Freixe was announced as being Philipp Navratil, a long-time Nestle executive and former head of Nespresso, the brand of coffee machines owned by Nestle.

It’s the second CEO departure from the Swiss food giant in a year.

Nestle's chief executive, Laurent Freixe. File pic: Reuters
Image:
Nestle’s chief executive, Laurent Freixe. File pic: Reuters

Mr Freixe’s predecessor, Mark Schneider, was suddenly removed a year ago, and in June, the longstanding chair, Paul Bulcke, announced he would step down in 2026.

No further detail on the relationship was released by the company, nor was additional information on whom the person Mr Freixe had the relationship with.

Mr Bulcke, who led the investigation, said: “This was a necessary decision. Nestle’s values and governance are strong foundations of our company. I thank Laurent for his years of service at Nestle.”

Mr Freixe had been with Nestle since 1986, holding roles around the world, including chief executive of Zone Latin America.

Read more:
Thames Water creditors offer £1bn ‘sweetener’
Empty flats that developers say sum up UK’s housing crisis

Nestle’s shares, a bedrock of the Swiss stock exchange, lost almost a third of their value over the past five years, performing worse than other European stocks.

The appointment of Mr Freixe’s had failed to halt the slide, and the company’s shares shed 17% during his leadership, disappointing investors.

Continue Reading

Business

Cote restaurant’s owner cooks up fresh capital injection

Published

on

By

Cote restaurant's owner cooks up fresh capital injection

The owner of the Cote restaurant chain is exploring the option of injecting new funding into the business and retaining control after two months of talks with potential buyers.

Sky News has learnt that Partners Group, the Swiss-based private equity firm, is seriously considering providing millions of pounds of new capital to finance a turnaround plan which would be likely to involve the closure of loss-making sites.

Partners Group hired Interpath Advisory during the summer to sound out prospective bidders.

A number of those discussions are said to be ongoing.

Cote was bought out of administration by Partners Group in the autumn of 2020 in a deal reportedly worth £55m.

The chain trades from about 70 restaurants, down from close to 100 shortly before it collapsed into insolvency five years ago.

Sources close to the sale process said that Interpath had been marketing the company based on last year’s turnover of over £150m.

Roughly 60 of the sites are said to be profitable, implying there could be scope for further closures.

The sale process comes at a time when hospitality venue operators continue to face severe financial pressures, with the industry’s leading trade body recently warning of a further jobs bloodbath in the months ahead.

“If we carry on with these trends and the situation doesn’t improve – and clearly Rachel Reeves’s statements are giving a signal to consumers that it is not going to get better any time soon – then I would see this accelerating,” said Kate Nicholls, chair of UK Hospitality.

“Unless there is a change of tack by the government, we are looking at 150,000-200,000 fewer workers in hospitality during the first full year of [employer national insurance contribution] changes.”

Partners Group and Interpath declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Thames Water creditors offer £1bn ‘sweetener’ in rescue deal

Published

on

By

Thames Water creditors offer £1bn ‘sweetener’ in rescue deal

Thames Water’s largest group of creditors is to offer an additional £1bn-plus sweetener in a bid to persuade Ofwat and the government to pursue a rescue deal with them that would head off the nationalisation of Britain’s biggest water utility.

Sky News has learnt that the senior creditors, which account for roughly £13bn of Thames Water‘s top-ranking debt, will propose this month that they inject hundreds of millions of pounds of new equity and write off a substantial additional portion of their existing capital.

In total, the extra equity and debt haircut are understood to total roughly £1.25bn, although the precise split between them was unclear on Monday evening.

Money latest: The £80 toy topping Christmas list

The numbers were still subject to being finalised as part of a comprehensive plan to be submitted to Ofwat, according to people close to the process.

Thames Water has about 16 million customers and serves about a quarter of the UK population.

The creditor group, which includes funds such as Elliott Management and Silver Point Capital, is racing to secure backing for a deal that would avoid seeing their investments effectively wiped out in a special administration regime (SAR).

More on Thames Water

Sky News revealed last month that Steve Reed, the environment secretary, had authorised the appointment of FTI Consulting, a City restructuring firm, to advise on contingency planning for a SAR.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Last month: Is Thames a step closer to nationalisation?

On Monday, The Times reported that Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, had reaffirmed the government’s desire to see a “market-based solution” to the crisis at Thames Water.

The company’s main group of creditors had already offered £3bn of new equity and roughly £2bn of debt financing, which, alongside other elements, represented a roughly 20pc haircut on their existing exposure to Thames Water.

On Tuesday, the creditors are expected to set out further details of their operational plans for the company, in an attempt to allay concerns that they are insufficiently experienced to take on the task of running the UK’s biggest water company.

Continue Reading

Trending