The prime minister has said the migrant who was mistakenly released from prison and found again will be deported following an error that Reform UK likened to a “Monty Python sketch”.
Sir Keir Starmer said police officers had worked “quickly and diligently to bring him back into custody” and that the government had “ordered an investigation to establish what went wrong”.
Hadush Kebatu, who was found guilty in September of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl and a woman in Epping, was freed in error from HMP Chelmsford in Essex on Friday instead of being handed over to immigration officials for deportation.
Image: Hadush Kebatu, was jailed for two sexual assaults in Epping. Pic: Essex Police / PA
His accidental release sparked widespread alarm and a manhunt that resulted in him being found and arrested by the Metropolitan Police in the Finsbury Park area of London at around 8.30am on Sunday.
Opposition parties have said the government has “serious questions” to answer over the incident.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:24
Exclusive: Watch moments after Hadush Kebatu is arrested
Speaking on Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, said that while he was “relieved” Kebatu had been re-arrested, the case was a sign of Britain’s “descent into a Monty Python sketch”.
“This is a man who the eyewitnesses said was actively trying to go back into prison after being accidentally let go,” Mr Yusuf said.
He said the case was “absolutely shocking” and questioned how victims of sexual assault could have confidence in the government.
Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said Kebatu should “never have been released in the first place” and called on the home secretary and justice secretary to apologise.
Pressed on the state of the prison system during the Conservatives’ 14 years in power, Mr Philp said: “They’ve been in charge now for almost a year and a half, so I think they do have to take responsibility for the system.
“This failing with the release of this man by accident happened under the Labour government and, as I say, I think the justice secretary and home secretary should apologise.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
8:18
‘He should never have been released’
Their concerns were echoed by Marie Goldman, the Liberal Democrat MP for Chelmsford, who told Sky News the incident was a sign of “systemic failure”.
She said she had spoken to the prison service and had been told to expect the initial findings into what went wrong “pretty quickly”.
“We had figures from His Majesty’s Prison Probation Service saying that 262 prisoners were released in error in the year leading to March of this year,” she said.
“That shows that it’s a systemic failure. This is happening all over the country.”
Commander James Conway praised the “diligent and fast paced investigation” that led to Kebatu’s arrest and revealed it was information from the public that led officers to Finsbury Park, where he was discovered.
Speaking on Sky News before Kebatu was found, Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Trevor Phillips that Justice Secretary David Lammy had commissioned an investigation into what had gone wrong.
“We know that one prison officer has been suspended already, but there does need to be accountability for such an egregious failure,” he added.
The two-child benefit cap: To scrap or not to scrap?
There is an ongoing row in the Labour Party about welfare spending and how to cut it while maintaining protections for the most vulnerable.
Those on the left are suspicious of anything that may look or smell like balancing the books on the backs of the poorest in society.
Those on the other side point to an unsustainable welfare bill that has been allowed to balloon under the Conservatives and looks set to continue under Labour.
Rachel Reeves will have to weigh up finding between £3bn and £4bn to scrap the cap, or face the wrath of Labour MPs on small majorities who believe they were elected to deliver on ‘Labour values’ like lifting this very cap.
But perhaps there is a compromise the chancellor could opt for, which may placate the left of her party while needing less cash.
For example, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lifting the cap from two to three children would cost £2.6bn; or a tapered system, where parents got the full amount for the first two kids and then half the amount for any subsequent children, would cost around £1.8bn.
But Labour big beast David Blunkett – the only senior Labour figure against lifting the cap – wants to see a more nuanced approach.
Blunkett believes the cap ought to remain, but he wants there to be exemptions for disabled children and parents who have been widowed, and he would prefer the government to focus on anti-child poverty measures and improving pathways to work for parents, all paid for by a tax on gambling – something former prime minister Gordon Brown has been agitating for.
At a time when the government perpetually reminds us of how little money it has and how much strain public finances are under due to austerity, finding several billion to scrap a policy that is broadly popular with the public may seem like an unwise move.
According to the latest polling from YouGov, 59% of the public are in favour of keeping the cap in place, and only 26% thought it should be abolished.
But politically, the chancellor is aware of the strength of feeling within her party about reducing child poverty as soon as possible, and her colleague, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, has stressed the party has a “moral mission” to tackle child poverty.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:37
Why did Labour delay their child poverty strategy?
Irrespective of what Reeves chooses, her political woes do not end there.
Taxes are set to go up in the budget later this month, and Reeves has refused to rule out breaking her manifesto promise of not raising taxes on working people.
This combined with persistently disappointing voter intention polling for Labour, could spell deep dissatisfaction among the public.
A decision to lift the two-child benefit cap may boost morale among Labour MPs, but if it’s not enough to prevent the loss of hundreds of political foot soldiers in May’s local elections, Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer will need to find more red meat to throw to their party before too long.