Connect with us

Published

on

Originally published on NRDC Expert Blog.
By Sarah Dougherty,  Tom Zimpleman, & Gabriel Daly 

G7 leaders met in the UK last week, and climate was high on the agenda, as it must be. One of the areas of agreement among the leaders of the world’s largest economies might seem new but has been in the works for years: mandatory climate disclosures from companies.

The US has broad disclosure laws, which allow the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as a regulator of stock exchanges and stock sales, to require companies to provide the public with information that can help us make decisions, like about a company’s finances, operations, how it compensates executives, and how it is run. Climate change is an issue on which the SEC needs to require more disclosure — and the Chair of the SEC has indicated he and the Commission intend to require companies to disclose how climate change affects the risks and opportunities they face. The SEC is expected to issue a rule later this year. We think it is about time: NRDC has been pushing for more disclosure on environmental issues since 1971. And, it matters to investors with a recent CFA Institute survey finding 40 percent of investment professionals already incorporating climate risk to inform their investment decisions.

As part of our advocacy for mandatory climate disclosure, NRDC submitted comments to the SEC’s recent request for information. Only mandatory disclosures will allow the SEC to meet its mandate: “to protect investors; maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation.” If investors do not know the climate risks — and opportunities — that the companies they are invested in may face, it’s hard to see how investors can be protected and markets can function efficiently.

As we explained in our comments, new rules need to require each company to disclose:

  • the full scope of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This includes GHG emissions from assets that it owns, like factories, buildings, or transportation fleets; GHG emissions from the power is uses to run its factories and buildings; and GHG emissions from using the products it makes (in the case of manufacturers) or the investments it makes (in the case of banks or investment companies).
  • the company’s projections about how realistic climate change scenarios will affect the company. Climate change is likely to result in more widespread flooding, wildfires, and more powerful hurricanes. Those events can damage property, disrupt supply chains, and hurt employees. But climate change may also lead to a shift to more sustainable products, alternative energy sources, and new business opportunities. Investors need to know how companies are planning for these possibilities.
  • how the company’s operations affect communities vulnerable to climate change.

These disclosures would give investors information that’s useful for their decisions, allowing investors to identify companies (and industries) taking the risks of climate change seriously and planning accordingly. Investors would be better able to allocate capital efficiently to companies that are responsibly planning for the physical risks climate change is already creating — like wildfires and sea-level rise — as well as the transitions risks — changes in policy, consumer preferences, prices, and the like — that our collective response to climate change is likely to impose. And as we know, the costs of climate change will be — and are already — borne disproportionately by low-income communities and communities of color. Disclosures could provide information and insights into how different stakeholders may be impacted by climate change, including vulnerable communities. Additionally, shifting financial incentives away from climate-harming investments is one step towards alleviating those burdens on vulnerable communities.

A voluntary system, which has been in effect for about 15 years, was a good start. But voluntary disclosure has not generated important information nor made it easy to compare between companies. Requiring that companies disclose the risks their businesses face from, and contribute to, climate change will produce information comparable across companies and industries, allowing investors and the public to make better-informed decisions.

In their communique summarizing the G7 meeting, the G7 leaders highlighted their agreement on the importance of climate disclosures:

“We emphasise the need to green the global financial system so that financial decisions take climate considerations into account. We support moving towards mandatory climate-related financial disclosures that provide consistent and decision-useful information for market participants and that are based on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, in line with domestic regulatory frameworks.”

Ensuring that investors know the climate risks of the companies they own or may consider purchasing is an obvious first step to greening the global financial system. We are glad the G7 leaders agree and are working to make it happen in the world’s largest economies.

Polaris Ranger EV supports security operations at G7 Summit: “The G7 Summit was the largest operation in Devon and Cornwall Police history, with a total of 6,500 officers and staff on duty from all over the UK. We worked extremely hard to minimise the impact on the community around Cornwall, and as part of those efforts, we enlisted a fleet of electric Polaris Ranger vehicles to patrol and monitor the beaches and other hard to reach areas. Being completely electric off-road vehicles, they were the perfect choice for use on sand and provided our officers with the ideal solution for maintaining security without noise, pollution or disruption to the local community.” Image courtesy of Polaris.


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.


 



 


Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Continue Reading

Environment

Oil prices shed 2% as Iran-Israel ceasefire eases concerns over supply, Strait of Hormuz closure

Published

on

By

Oil prices shed 2% as Iran-Israel ceasefire eases concerns over supply, Strait of Hormuz closure

Brent crude prices pared gains from the previous session and fell nearly $2 on Friday after the White House delayed a decision on U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, but they were still poised for a third straight week in the black.

Ilan Rosenberg | Reuters

Oil futures fell sharply on Tuesday as a freshly announced Iran-Israel ceasefire began to allay investor concerns over supply and shipping disruptions in the oil-rich Middle East.

The Ice Brent contract with August expiry was trading at $69.76 per barrel at 09:09 a.m. London time, down 2.41% from the previous session. The front-month August Nymex WTI contract was at $66.85 per barrel, 2.42% lower from the Monday settlement.

Oil prices had added roughly 10% over the mid-June start of Iran-Israel hostilities that were exacerbated in recent days by U.S.’ direct military involvement and Iran’s retaliatory strike against an American base in Qatar. Crude futures eased following U.S. President Donald Trump’s overnight announcement of an Iran-Israel ceasefire despite lingering questions over implementation and the future of Tehran’s nuclear program — the key cause of the recent hostilities cited by Israel and the U.S.

At risk throughout the offensives were supply in both Iran — which produced 3.3 million barrels per day in May, according to OPEC’s monthly oil market report released in June, which cites independent analyst sources — and the broader Middle East region, if the conflict spilled over.

Throughout the hostilities, investors also watched whether Iran would proceed with closing the Strait of Hormuz linking the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman — a key route for Iranian and other Middle Eastern shipments, including those of the world’s largest crude exporter Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Kuwait and Bahrain.

Iran’s parliament on Sunday approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, according to a report from Iran’s state-owned Press TV that CNBC could not independently verify, though a final decision rested with the country’s national security council.

“The potential closure of Strait of Hormuz remains a tail risk in our view, but we maintain that oil prices would race past $100/b in such a scenario, due to limited avenues to bypass the narrow passage and the constraints it would pose to the marketability of spare capacity,” Barclays analysts said in a Tuesday note, just as Trump announced a tentative ceasefire.

They further added that oil prices came under pressure “as the threat of wider regional conflagration did not materialize despite the US action against Iranian nuclear sites.”

Amid risk to supply, the International Energy Agency previously reassured it had 1.2 billion barrels of emergency stockpiles it could resort to. As part of a strategy decided prior to the Iran-Israel escalations, some producers from the influential OPEC+ alliance have also been raising output and have additional spare volumes that could be brought online.

Continue Reading

Environment

Smart new Raleigh ONE e-bike unveiled with GPS, anti-theft, & fast charging

Published

on

By

Smart new Raleigh ONE e-bike unveiled with GPS, anti-theft, & fast charging

Raleigh is rolling out a new chapter in its long legacy of bicycle design with the launch of the Raleigh ONE, a sleek, smart e-bike aimed squarely at the European urban mobility market. Officially unveiled today, the Raleigh ONE combines classic British cycling heritage with modern connected tech, delivering what the company calls “the only e-bike you’ll need in the city.”

Taking a page out of Big Tech’s playbook, Raleigh is also offering a membership program to unlock extra features. But will riders pay up, or will they balk?

While it’s debuting first in Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK, the Raleigh ONE seems clearly designed for global appeal. It’s a one-size, one-speed, minimalist-style urban e-bike built with high-quality components and a suite of smart features accessed via an app and membership system.

Think of it as a mix between a timeless European utility bike and a Silicon Valley tech platform.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

We’ll get to that tech, but first let’s dive into what makes it an e-bike. On the powered side of things, the Raleigh ONE sports a 360Wh removable battery that offers up to 80 km (50 mi) of range in eco mode and around 50 km (31 mi) in boost. That battery powers up a 250W Mivice rear hub motor, one of the nicer and more sophisticated hub motors on the market. The maximum assisted speed is 25 km/h (15.5 mph), keeping with European e-bike regulations.

The bike uses a Gates carbon belt drive for low-maintenance, grease-free operation and includes hydraulic disc brakes for confident stopping power.

Lighting is fully integrated and smart-enabled, with wraparound rear lights and a dual front beam. The riser bars, wide tires, and upright geometry give the Raleigh ONE a comfortable ride posture designed for all-day city use, even over rough pavement.

The bike is equipped with an SP Connect mount for the rider’s phone, allowing for hands-free use of Raleigh’s new app, which acts as a digital control hub for both ride data and security features.

Raleigh is leaning heavily into connectivity with the Raleigh ONE. Once registered through the app, users can enable auto-unlocking, journey tracking, alarm features, GPS location, and theft alerts. The system supports wireless updates, and security functions are controlled via handlebar buttons or the app itself.

Joining a growing trend among some connected e-bikes in 2025, the Raleigh ONE introduces a membership model to use some of its more desirable features such as sharing digital unlock access.

  • Base (free) with essential features including Ride dashboard, “basic security,” Bluetooth updates, and manual stolen mode.
  • Core (€7.99/month) with expanded services including automatic stolen mode activation, smart maintenance, and bike sharing access for one additional rider.
  • Icon (€14.99/month) includes all of the above plus over-the-air updates, bike sharing access for up to four other riders, remote arming, and full insurance coverage (provided by Hepster).

Memberships are optional, but the more advanced functionality (especially security and insurance) lives behind a paywall. Just like your friendly neighborhood dealer, Raleigh offers the Icon plan with a free trial (30 days) to help get you hooked. For those ready to jump in with two feet, the paid plans also have lower annual rates.

With a €2,699 / £2,399 price tag, the Raleigh ONE positions itself competitively among other premium urban e-bikes like those recently unveiled by VanMoof, especially considering its inclusion of fast charging (50% in 1 hour, full in just over 2 hours), built-in lights, belt drive, and theft protection ecosystem.

One of the standout value points is Raleigh’s dealer network and after-sales service, a major advantage over many online-only e-bike startups. Add in Raleigh’s 130+ year reputation in the cycling world, and the ONE looks like an interesting option for urban riders who want a worry-free, future-proof ride.

Accessories like front carriers, baskets, and integrated AXA locks round out the ecosystem, with more to come.

Selin Can, EVP of Mobility at Accell Group (Raleigh’s parent company), called the Raleigh ONE “a bold fusion of heritage and innovation.” That seems to be the goal here: take Raleigh’s deep cycling roots and plug them into a modern electric, digital, app-connected future.

With the launch of the ONE, Raleigh isn’t just releasing a new e-bike, it’s making a play to reclaim relevance in a world of smartphones, theft alerts, and mobility-as-a-service. The inclusion of basic tech features for free is important to prevent alienating its customers completely, though many riders may feel frustrated at having to pay extra to access hardware or features already designed into the bike.

What do you think? Is the Raleigh ONE an e-bike of the future, or a warning of what could be coming in a future walled garden? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comment section below.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

CNBC Daily Open: A confusing ceasefire forged by missile attacks

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: A confusing ceasefire forged by missile attacks

Supporters of regime change in Iran rally outside the Wilshire Federal Building on June 23, 2025 in Los Angeles, California, U.S.

Mario Tama | Getty Images News | Getty Images

It’s a strange thought that launching attacks on other countries could lead to peace, but that seems to be the logic behind the abrupt escalation in conflict in the Middle East beginning Saturday. And now there’s a confusing ceasefire.

“Very confusing! Does Israel have 12 more hours to strike based on his [Trump’s] first announcement? Or are they supposed to be in ceasefire now? Even after the deaths in Beersheva and Iran’s barrage after the deadline? No one knows!” Dan Shapiro, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, posted on X.

Here’s a quick recap.  

On Saturday, U.S. President Donald Trump authorized air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, pushing America into Israel’s war with Tehran.

On Sunday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran “reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.”

On Monday, Iran launched a retaliatory strike against America, targeting a U.S. military base in Qatar. Later that evening stateside, Trump announced a ceasefire.

On Tuesday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi denied that the country had agreed to a ceasefire — but said Iran was open to halting its military operations if Israel, which has yet to respond publicly to Trump’s statement, stopped its “aggression against the Iranian people.”

Trump, on Tuesday morning stateside, declared the ceasefire was in effect.

While Iran continued striking Israel on Tuesday morning local time, Tehran’s state-aligned media reported them as “the last round of Iranian missile attacks … before the ceasefire began.” CNBC, however, was unable to independently verify the claim.

Iran also gave the U.S. “early notice” of its attack on the military base in Qatar, according to Trump. It was a “retaliation that was expected,” Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Qatar also received advanced warning from Iran, according to The New York Times, which cited three Iranian officials familiar with the matter.

This, essentially, is “the peace through strength strategy,” Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC.

In other words, there’s a small chance tensions in the Middle East might truly cool down following a carefully calibrated and symbolic exchange of strikes that projects strength from all parties, while also providing Iran an off-ramp to de-escalate tension.

Judging by stock markets worldwide and oil prices — which rose and fell, respectively — investors are indeed hopeful this missiles-led peace will likely stay.

What you need to know today

Iran says it’s prepared to stop attacks
Trump
said early Tuesday morning stateside that the ceasefire between Israel and Iran — which he had announced Monday evening — was “now in effect.” Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi had earlier said there was “NO ‘agreement’ on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations,” but signaled that Tehran had “no intention” to continue armed conflict. Israel has not publicly confirmed that they have accepted Trump’s ceasefire timeline.

Iran strikes Israel and U.S. military base in Qatar
Iran on Tuesday fired a “final round” of missiles at Israel before the 12 a.m. ET ceasefire with Israel came into effect, Iranian state-aligned media announced Tuesday. CNBC was unable to independently verify the claim. On Monday, Iran launched an airstrike on United States’ Al-Udeid military base in Qatar, the largest American military installation in the Middle East, with around 10,000 service members.

Prices of oil post a huge drop
Oil prices fell sharply Tuesday during Asia hours on news that Iran was prepared to halt military operations. As of 1:30 p.m. Singapore time, U.S. crude oil was down 3.04% at $66.43 per barrel, while Brent had shed 2.99% to $69.34, with both benchmarks adding to the previous day’s losses of more than 7%. Trump on Monday demanded that “everyone” keep oil prices down or they would play “into the hands of the enemy.” Trump didn’t specify who he was referring to, but he seemed to be addressing U.S. oil producers.

Markets in U.S. rise on de-escalation hopes
U.S. stocks rose Monday as investors seemed hopeful of de-escalation in the Israel-Iran war. The S&P 500 climbed 0.96%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.89% and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.94%. Tesla shares popped 8.2% after the company launched its robotaxis in Austin, Texas, on Sunday — but regulators are looking into reports of robotaxis driving erratically. Asia-Pacific markets climbed Tuesday, with South Korea’s Kospi index jumping 2.73% at 2:40 p.m. local time.

[PRO] Wall Street’s thoughts on robotaxis
Wall Street closely watched Tesla’s robotaxi launch in Texas over the weekend. Analyst outlooks on the event vary widely. While Wedbush’s Dan Ives, who rode in the robotaxis over the weekend, said it “exceeded our expectations,” Guggenheim’s Ronald Jewsikow called the event “baby steps.” Here’s what analysts think about what the robotaxis mean for Tesla’s stock.

And finally…

An Airbus A350-941 commercial jet, operated by Emirates Airline, at the Paris Air Show in Paris, France, on Monday, June 16, 2025.

Matthieu Rondel | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Airlines divert, cancel more Middle East flights after Iran attacks U.S. military base

Airlines diverted more Middle East flights on Monday after Iran’s armed forces said the country launched a missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar, as the region’s military conflict continued to disrupt airlines’ operations.

Dubai-based Emirates said that some of its aircraft rerouted on Monday and told customers that delays or longer flights were possible as it would take “flight paths well distanced from conflict areas,” while operating its schedule as planned.

Air India said it had halted all flights in and out of the region and to and from the east coast of North America and Europe “until further notice.”

Earlier, major international airlines including Air France, Iberia, Finnair and others announced they would pause or further postpone a resumption of service to some destinations in the Middle East.

Continue Reading

Trending