Connect with us

Published

on

Formula E’s season finale is coming up this weekend in Berlin with a doubleheader of races at the Tempelhof Airport Street Circuit. It’s another two-race weekend, but this one is a little different – for the second race, the cars will go the opposite direction around the track to shake things up a bit.

Last year, the second half of the season was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic and Formula E ended up salvaging the season with six races in Berlin over the course of just nine days. They did something similar then – changing the track between three separate configurations, with one being clockwise and two counter-clockwise.

We’ll get into a little Formula E news and a preview of what’s to come this weekend, but first a quick recap of what happened last time out in London.

We started the London ePrix weekend with ominous forecasts of thunderstorms all weekend long, which would have really shaken up the race, especially due to the novel indoor-outdoor circuit design.

But alas, as often happens in Formula E, these forecasts did not turn out. Despite Formula E’s “street” tires, which are capable of running in the wet, there have been scarce few wet races so far, which is a shame since this can shake things up and add excitement to the racing. The track was a little wet during pre-race sessions, but stayed mostly dry during both races (just a sprinkle or two, nothing much).

We also had ominous forecasts that there wouldn’t be much passing or excitement at the race, because energy use would be low at this track and therefore drivers would be able to drive flat-out the whole time, without needing to save energy, which means there would be less strategic complexity to the race. This forecast, too, did not come to pass.

Saturday’s race started with Alex Lynn and Jake Dennis on the front row for their home race. It ended up being a rather standard affair with some solid racing, but none of the crazy drama we often see in Formula E.

Both front row drivers quickly managed to get quite far ahead of the rest of the pack and were mostly battling each other. Sebastian Buemi, Andre Lotterer, and Nyck de Vries were in the next pack, and then the rest of the field was even farther back.

Dennis got in front of Lynn and managed to hold the lead quite well. Lynn attempted to activate attack mode to get past, but Dennis managed to hold him behind even without being on attack mode. Once Dennis activated his attack mode, he pulled several seconds ahead of Lynn.

Eventually Lynn started dropping back due to his tires being worn out, and near the end of the race de Vries managed to pass him for second place while using FanBoost. It felt like the pass was inevitable anyway, but it always feels a little weird for a driver to gain a place because of fan votes.

The race ended with Dennis winning, standing at the top of the podium at his home race in his rookie season. This made him one of three drivers to win more than one race this season, with de Vries and Sam Bird. De Vries and Lynn rounded out the podium positions.

Unfortunately the other British drivers didn’t do nearly as well on home soil. Sam Bird, previous championship leader, retired from the race along with Tom Blomqvist and Alexander Sims, while Oliver Rowland (along with teammate Buemi) was disqualified because Nissan screwed up their energy limiting software. Oliver Turvey was the only other British driver to finish, in 15th place.

The second race was significantly more lively. Stoffel Vandoorne started on pole, but Rowland and Lynn started second and third – another good qualifying session for the Brits. De Vries started in fourth.

The Mercedes cars started off strong, with Vandoorne leading and de Vries managing to get past the Brits, leaving Mercedes in positions 1-2 for the first half of the race. Rowland and Lynn stayed in the fight but Mercedes looked the strongest.

But then, well… things started getting a little silly.

The London track features a tight turn complex that has drivers going through two hairpin turns back-to-back. Prior to the race, many thought that this would cause a lot of crashes, though Saturday’s race was mostly clean through there. But on Sunday’s race this was not the case, and there were crashes galore. Race commentator Dario Franchitti said it succinctly: “and now they’re just driving into each other.”

The crashes didn’t just happen in the double hairpin complex, but various other parts of the track as well. After the halfway point of the race there was so much spare carbon fiber strewn about the track that you’d never imagine all but only two cars were still in the race.

One of those two retirements was Antonio Felix da Costa, who was shoved into the wall on the pit straight by Andre Lotterer. This forced the safety car to come out, and that’s when it got really weird.

Lucas di Grassi, who had been running in ninth place, and was never a factor in the race yet, somehow ended up in first place behind the safety car. It soon became clear that, while the safety car was proceeding slowly down the pit straight (the site of the collision), di Grassi dove into the pit lane, drove at normal pit lane speed, and exited the pits ahead of all the other cars, which he was able to do because of the slow pace of the safety car. He was the only driver to do so.

When the safety car came in, di Grassi was still leading the race, and largely held the lead as questions flew over what would be done about this obviously unsporting conduct. A penalty was handed down to di Grassi, and Audi team principal Allan McNish was spotted sprinting down the pit lane to complain about it.

Di Grassi still held the lead, refusing to serve the penalty, and he was finally black flagged (disqualified mid-race and told to enter the pits) on the final lap, but refused to enter the pits and took the checkered flag despite having been disqualified.

The eventual final podium was Alex Lynn on top making it 2 for 2 in home-race wins for the Brits this weekend. De Vries and Evans rounded out the podium, with Vandoorne having been taken out by Rowland in the hairpin that ruined both of their races. De Vries in particular had a great race, having broken steering since the very beginning but still managing to podium.

The win was plucky team Mahindra’s first since 2019, and their inimitable team leader Dilbagh Gill celebrated by accidentally suplexing Formula E cofounder Alberto Longo.

Bird had a particularly disappointing weekend, going from a win in New York to double retirements at his home race in London. Going into the weekend his main goal was “not to get any more 0-point rounds,” but ended up retiring into both races due to collision damage. And de Vries’s excellent weekend should be noted as well, landing second place in each race – very much a rarity in Formula E to have such a stellar weekend.

So this was another tale of two races – a normal motor race on Saturday, and some sort of insane nonsense on Sunday. Such is Formula E. It’s why we love it.

Formula E News

The most unsurprising news is that Formula E has adopted a rule change to ensure that the pit stop situation from Sunday’s race does not happen again. There will now be a traffic light at the pit exit, which goes red while the safety car is passing by the pits, then turns green once the cars on track have passed the pit lane exit. This is a standard feature of many motorsports and a welcome change.

Audi’s explanation for the situation is that they thought di Grassi had a puncture, but once he entered the pits, they realized he was fine. He was required to stop in his pit box, though, and when he pulled through the box he did not come to a complete stop – but only barely.

We’ve also started to see teams announcing their driver lineups for next year, with a few teams confirming the same lineup and a few drivers moving from team to team. However, since we’re still early in this process, there’s not much to say yet. Jaguar and Porsche are retaining their lineups, Robin Frijns will be back at Virgin, Andretti (which will race without BMW’s involvement next year) will retain Dennis, and Rowland is moving from Nissan to Mahindra. Otherwise, everything is still wide open.

2021 Berlin ePrix race preview

And now we come down to it – the final races of the season. And yet, as we’ve said so many times before: We still don’t know what’s going to happen.

Going into the final race weekend, there are 18 drivers who are mathematically within reach of the championship. Leader de Vries is 6 points ahead of Frijns, who is 8 points ahead of Bird, and then there are eight more drivers within 10 points of Bird.

We could even theoretically see a champion who hasn’t won a single race this season – Frijns, in second place in the championship, has managed two second-place podiums but no wins yet. But he’s finished in every race with no retirements or disqualifications, and that quiet consistency has left him high in the standings.

The teams’ race has been getting closer too. All season it looked like Virgin, Techeetah, and Jaguar were the teams to watch, but after a weekend that wasn’t great for any of them but was very good for both BMW and Mercedes, the race has gotten a lot closer. Virgin is still up top, but with all the points available from two races it’s still too early to call. As far as mathematical possibilities though, all but one team, NIO, still has a chance to win it.

And this win is a big one, because this year Formula E has been granted “World Championship” status by the FIA. This puts it in the upper echelon of motorsports, the highest level of racing according to the FIA. Formula E is only the second single-seater series to earn World Championship status, behind Formula One. Previous Formula E champions are still champions, but this will be the first Formula E World Champion.

As for the track, it’s pretty much the same layout we’ve seen before in previous seasons:

It’s perhaps not the prettiest or most interesting track, driving between a bunch of artificial barriers on a pancake-flat airport tarmac. This offers a lot of freedom to the course designers to come up with something, but it also feels a little bit soulless. It’s a neat idea, though, racing at an airport.

The unique part about this race is that we won’t be seeing the exact same track both days – we’re going to do the track backwards on Sunday. Instead of going counter-clockwise, cars will drive around the track clockwise.

Drivers (those who aren’t rookies, anyhow) have a lot of experience on this track, having raced here six times last season due to COVID-19. The configurations changed between those races, but they’ll still be familiar with the venue, many of the corners, and how the surface reacts and evolves.

No rain is currently forecast for the weekend, though it’s supposed to be wet after the weekend. It’s entirely possible we might see a little something, but let’s be honest, this is is probably just wishful thinking.

This season we’ve seen a lot of wild developments in Formula E – we visited a real racing circuit (rather than a street track) in Valencia where a new rule meant half the cars ran out of their energy allowance, raced on the full historic Monaco circuit in the most exciting Monaco race of any series for several years, raced on an oval track in Puebla, and did the world’s first indoor-outdoor race in London. All along the racing has been tight and the competition for the championship has been fierce.

So as usual with Formula E, we might not know what to expect, but we know to expect something interesting. There’s always something interesting. Tune in for the season finale this weekend and find out what it will be.

There will be two races this weekend, with Sunday’s race starting 90 minutes later than Saturday’s. Saturday’s race starts at 5 a.m. PDT/8 a.m. EDT, 12 p.m. UTC, and 2 p.m. local Berlin time. Sunday’s race starts at 6:30 a.m. PDT/9:30 a.m. EDT, 1:30 p.m. UTC, and 3:30 p.m. local Berlin time. Races will be aired on CBS Sports Network in the US, or if you’re elsewhere, head over to Formula E’s website to find out how to watch the race in your country. Unfortunately, Formula E will no longer upload races to their YouTube channel, though you should be able to find highlights there sometime after the race.


Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Powerful individuals’ at BBC making lives of colleagues ‘unbearable’, says chairman

Published

on

By

'Powerful individuals' at BBC making lives of colleagues 'unbearable', says chairman

“Powerful individuals” at the BBC are making the lives of their colleagues “unbearable”, the corporation’s chairman has said, after a review into its workplace culture.

The independent report, sparked by the Huw Edwards scandal, was carried out by Change Associates, the same management consultancy that led a similar review in 2013, following the Jimmy Savile scandal.

BBC chairman Samir Shah told staff ahead of the report’s release on Monday morning: “There is a minority of people whose behaviour is simply not acceptable. And there are still places where powerful individuals – on and off screen – can abuse that power to make life for their colleagues unbearable.”

He said the report made recommendations to “prioritise action over procedural change”, as well as addressing “deep-seated issues” including staff not feeling confident enough to speak up.

Mr Shah added: “In the end, it’s quite simple: if you are a person who is prepared to abuse power or punch down or behave badly, there is no place for you at the BBC.”

While the review, which heard from around 2,500 employees and freelancers from 19 different countries, found no evidence of a toxic culture within the corporation, some staff said there was “a minority of people at the BBC – both on and off-air – who were able to behave unacceptably without it being addressed”.

The report said: “Even though they are small in number, their behaviour creates large ripples which negatively impact the BBC’s culture and external reputation.”

More on Bbc

It said these people were “dotted across the organisation in different functions and departments”, and were “often in positions where power could be abused”.

While no specific names were mentioned in the report, it did note “some names were mentioned several times”.

Former BBC broadcaster Huw Edwards leaves Westminster Magistrates' Court, London, where he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment suspended for two years after pleading guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children. Picture date: Monday September 16, 2024.
Image:
Huw Edwards was handed a six-month suspended jail sentence in September. Pic: PA

Some considered ‘indispensable’

One example of poor behaviour given included an “untouchable” presenter being “called out for exceptionally inappropriate language”. It said that while “a report was made” and sanctions promised, a senior manager who was in the room at the time of the incident was “perceived as deferring so as not to rock the boat”.

It said a blind eye could be turned to poor behaviours “when productions were award winning or attracting large audiences”.

The report went on to warn that, “at its worst”, the corporation “rewards” such individuals “by providing little or no consequence to their actions”.

It recognised that some of those displaying “unacceptable behaviour” were perceived as “indispensable” to the corporation, and that by moving “potentially vexatious issues” to formal grievance without appropriate due diligence, the BBC was “tolerating” the problem.

It also said that by keeping those who formally raised an issue “in the dark about progress and outcomes,” it was unfairly punishing them.

The BBC board has fully accepted the report and its findings, as has BBC management.

BBC chairman Samir Shah answering questions at the Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
Pic: PA
Image:
BBC chairman Samir Shah. Pic: PA

BBC director-general Tim Davie called the report “an important moment for the BBC and the wider industry”.

He said the corporation would implement the recommendations “at pace”, making sure that BBC values are “lived and championed by the whole organisation each and every day.”

Actions being taken include:

• A strengthened code of conduct, with specific guidance for on-air presenters
• A more robust disciplinary policy, with updated examples of misconduct and clear consequences
• All TV production partners must meet Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) industry standards
• A new “Call It Out” campaign to promote positive behaviour, empower informal resolution and challenge poor conduct
• Clear pledges for anyone raising concerns, setting out what they can expect from the BBC

Further actions include succession planning for the most senior on-air roles, a new “resolving concerns helpline”, more training for managers and clearer behaviour expectations for freelancers.

A difficult year for the BBC

The BBC has been under pressure to act after a string of complaints against some of its top talent over the last 12 months.

In September, Edwards, who was the BBC’s lead news presenter, pleaded guilty to three counts of “making” indecent images of children. He was given a six-month suspended jail sentence and will be on the sex offenders’ register for seven years.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Huw Edwards leaves court after sentencing

Earlier this month, following a CPS review, Russell Brand, was charged with rape and sexual assault.

Brand, who worked for BBC Radio 2 and 6 Music between 2006 and 2008, denies all allegations against him and says all his sexual encounters were consensual.

The BBC also apologised in January after a review found it “did not take adequate action” upon learning about concerns over former Radio 1 DJ Tim Westwood following claims of “bullying and misogynistic behaviour”.

Other allegations of misconduct against BBC talent include accusations of a toxic environment on Strictly Come Dancing and the firing of The One Show presenter Jermaine Jenas after he admitted sending inappropriate messages to female colleagues.

And late last year, Greg Wallace stepped down from his presenting role on MasterChef after multiple historical allegations of misconduct.

Wallace’s lawyers have said it is “entirely false that he engages in behaviour of a sexually harassing nature”. Wallace has since said he is seeking “space to heal”.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Badenoch demands prosecution of rap group Kneecap over ‘dead Tory’ remark

Published

on

By

Badenoch demands prosecution of rap group Kneecap over 'dead Tory' remark

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has demanded the prosecution of rap trio Kneecap after video emerged of the band allegedly advocating for the death of Tory MPs.

Footage of the group at a November 2023 gig appears to show one member saying: “The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.”

Downing Street has described the alleged comments as “completely unacceptable”.

Police are investigating – and are also assessing footage reportedly from a gig a year later in London’s Kentish Town Forum.

In the November 2024 video, a member of the band appears to shout “up Hamas, up Hezbollah” – referencing groups which are banned as terrorist organisations in the UK.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: “We were made aware of a video on 22 April, believed to be from an event in November 2024, and it has been referred to the counter-terrorism internet referral unit for assessment and to determine whether any further police investigation may be required.

“We have also been made aware of another video believed to be from an event in November 2023.”

Mrs Badenoch said it was “good” the police were looking into the allegations, adding: “Kneecap’s glorification of terrorism and anti-British hatred has no place in our society.

“Now footage shows one of them saying: ‘The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP’.

“After the murder of Sir David Amess, this demands prosecution.”

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch speaking at their local election campaign launch at The Curzon Centre in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire. Picture date: Thursday March 20, 2025.
Image:
Kemi Badenoch. Pic: PA

Conservative MP Sir David was stabbed to death while meeting constituents in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, in 2021.

Kneecap, made up of Liam Og O Hannaidh, Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh, have said they are facing a “co-ordinated smear campaign” after speaking out about “the ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people”.

Mrs Badenoch and Kneecap are already known to each other.

Read more from Sky News:
UK temperatures could hit 29C this week
M&S tells agency staff to stay at home

The Tory leader blocked a government grant to the bilingual Belfast group while she was business secretary.

But last November, Kneecap won a discrimination challenge over the decision to refuse them a £14,250 funding award after the UK government conceded it was “unlawful”.

Downing Street condemned the alleged comments.

“We do not think individuals expressing those views should be receiving government funding,” the prime minister’s official spokesman said.

Asked if the money should be returned, the spokesman added: “That’s up to the group, but clearly the PM rejects the views expressed … does not shy away from condemning them.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kim Kardashian’s Paris robbery trial: Everything you need to know

Published

on

By

Kim Kardashian's Paris robbery trial: Everything you need to know

In October 2016, Kim Kardashian was robbed at gunpoint – with jewellery worth millions of dollars stolen during the audacious heist in Paris.

It was the biggest robbery of an individual in France for more than 20 years – and made front pages around the world.

Now, almost a decade on, the case is finally coming to court.

Why has it taken so long? Will Kardashian give evidence? And who exactly are the “grandpa robbers” facing trial?

Here’s everything you need to know.

Pic: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock
Image:
Kardashian at the Siran Presentation on the day of the robbery. Pic: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock

What happened?

Two years after Kardashian and rapper Kanye West tied the knot in an ostentatious week-long celebration spanning Paris and Florence, the Kardashian-West clan were back in the French capital for Paris Fashion Week.

Her then husband had returned to the US to pick up his Saint Pablo tour – but Kardashian, along with her sister Kourtney and various members of their entourage, remained in Paris, staying in an exclusive set of apartments so discreet they’ve been dubbed the No Address Hotel.

Nestled on Tronchet Street, just a stone’s throw from Place de l’Opéra, and close to the fashionable Avenue Montaigne, the Hotel de Pourtalès is popular with A-list stars staying in the French capital.

A stay in the Sky Penthouse, the suite occupied by Kardashian, will currently set you back about £13,000 a night.

Kardashian was staying at the Hotel de Pourtales
Image:
Kardashian was staying at the Hotel de Pourtales

On the evening of 3 October, after attending a fashion show with her sister, Kardashian remained in the apartment alone while the rest of her convoy – including her bodyguard Pascal Duvier – went out for the night.

At about 2.30am, three armed men wearing ski masks and dressed as police forced their way into the apartment block – and according to investigators, they threatened the concierge at gunpoint.

Two of them are alleged to have forced the concierge to lead them to Kardashian’s suite. He later told police they yelled at him: “Where’s the rapper’s wife?”

Kardashian said she had been “dozing” on her bed when the men then entered her room.

She has said she believes her social media posts provided the alleged robbers with “a window of opportunity”.

“I was Snapchatting that I was home, and that everyone was going out,” she said in the months after the incident.

The Keeping Up With The Kardashians star vividly described the attack in a police report, as reported in the French weekly paper Le Journal Du Dimanche.

“They grabbed me and took me into the hallway. They tied me up with plastic cables and taped my hands, then they put tape over my mouth and my legs.”

She said they pointed a gun at her, asking specifically for her ring and also for money.

Police guard the entrance to the building where Kim has been staying
Image:
Police guard the entrance to the Hotel de Pourtalès the day after the robbery

Kardashian says they carried her into the bathroom and put her in the bathtub. She said she was wearing only a bathrobe at the time.

She had initially thought the robbers “were terrorists who had come to kidnap me”, according to a French police report taken in New York three months after the robbery.

Kardashian told officers: “I thought I was going to die.”

According to police, the robbers – who left the room after grabbing their haul, escaped on bicycles with items estimated to be worth about $10m (£7.5m), including a $4m (£3m) 18.88-carat diamond engagement ring from West.

After they had left, Kardashian said she escaped her restraints and went to find help. After speaking to detectives, she immediately returned to the US on a private jet and later hired a completely new security team.

Kim Kardashian shows off a ring on Instagram
Image:
Kardashian shows off her $4m ring on Instagram

What was stolen?

As well as her engagement ring, Kardashian said the thieves took her large Louis Vuitton jewellery box, which she said contained “everything I owned”.

In police reports given to the French authorities at about 4.30am on the night of the alleged robbery, Kardashian listed these items as having been stolen:

• Two diamond Cartier bracelets
• A gold and diamond Jacob necklace
• Diamond earrings by Lauren Schwartz
• Yanina earrings
• Three gold Jacob necklaces
• Little bracelets, jewels and rings
• A Lauren Schwartz diamond necklace
• A necklace with six little diamonds
• A necklace with Saint spelt out in diamonds
• A cross-shaped diamond-encrusted Jacob cross
• A yellow gold Rolex watch
• Two yellow gold rings
• An iPhone 6 and a BlackBerry

Police recovered only the diamond-encrusted cross that was dropped by the robbers while leaving.

It’s likely the gold in the haul was melted down and resold, while the diamond engagement ring that is now so associated with the robbery would be far too recognisable to sell on the open market.

Kardashian at the Siran Presentation on the day of the robbery. Pic: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock
Image:
Kardashian at the Siran Presentation on the day of the robbery. Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock

What will happen in court?

The hearing will begin at the Court of Appeal of Paris – the largest appeals court in France – on 28 April and is scheduled to last a month.

It will consist of a presiding judge, two professional assessors, and six main jurors.

The hearing involves more than 2,000 documents and there are four civil parties.

Kardashian at the Balenciaga show on the day of the robbery. Pic: Pixelformula/Sipa/Shutterstock
Image:
Kardashian at the Balenciaga show on the day of the robbery. Pic: Pixelformula/Sipa/Shutterstock

Who is being tried?

There were initially 12 defendants in the case, but one person has died and another has a medical condition that prevents their involvement. This means 10 people – nine men and one woman – are standing trial.

Five of them, who were all aged between 60 and 72 at the time of the incident, face armed robbery and kidnapping charges. They are:

• Yunice Abbas
• Aomar Ait Khedache
• Harminv Ait Khedache
• Didier Dubreucq
• Marc-Alexandre Boyer

Abbas, 72, has admitted his participation in the robbery. In 2021, he published a book about the robbery, titled I Kidnapped Kim Kardashian. In 2021, a court ruled he would not benefit financially from the book.

Aomar Ait Khedache, 69, known to French crime reporters as “Old Omar”, has also admitted participating in the heist but denies the prosecution’s accusation that he was the ringleader.

The remaining five defendants are charged with complicity in the heist or the unauthorised possession of a weapon. They are:

• Florus Heroui
• Gary Madar
• Christiane Glotin
• François Delaporte
• Marc Boyer

Among those, Mader was a VIP greeter who worked for the car company Kardashian used in Paris, and Heroui was a bar manager who allegedly passed on information about Kardashian’s movements.

With many of the accused now ageing and with various serious health conditions, and some having spent time in jail following their arrest, all are currently free under judicial supervision.

If found guilty, those accused of the more serious crimes could face 10 years to life imprisonment.

Pic: Photo Image Press/Shutterstock
Image:
Kardashian at the Off-White show three days before the robbery. Pic: Photo Image Press/Shutterstock

Will Kardashian give evidence?

Yes, Kardashian will face the robbers in court in May.

Lawyer Michael Rhodes said Kardashian has “tremendous appreciation and admiration for the French judicial system” and “wishes for the trial to proceed in an orderly fashion in accordance with French law and with respect for all parties to the case”.

A trainee lawyer herself, Kardashian has become a high-profile criminal justice advocate in the US in recent years.

(R-L)Kanye West, Kim Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Kris Jenner. Pic: Caroline Blumberg/EPA/Shutterstock
Image:
(R-L) Kanye West, Kim Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Kris Jenner in the front row three days before the robbery. Pic: Caroline Blumberg/EPA/Shutterstock

Why has it taken so long to come to court?

There was initially a manhunt after the robbery, with French police under pressure to prove that Paris’s security was not in question.

Just the year before in 2015, the capital had been shaken by terrorist attacks by Islamic militants, in which 130 people were killed, including 90 at a music event at the Bataclan theatre.

French police initially arrested 17 people in the Kardashian case in January 2017 – three months after the robbery – assisted by DNA traces found on plastic bands used to tie her wrists. Twelve people were later charged.

It was ordered to be sent to trial in 2021 – at a time when limited court proceedings were happening due to multiple COVID lockdowns, and France was holding its largest ever criminal trial over the November 2015 terror attacks.

Kardashian at the Givenchy show on the day of the robbery. Pic: Bukajlo Frederic/Sipa/Shutterstock
Image:
Kardashian at the Givenchy show on the day of the robbery. Pic: Bukajlo Frederic/Sipa/Shutterstock

What has Kardashian said about the incident?

Kardashian has described the robbery as a “life-changing” moment. She took three weeks away from filming her reality TV show Keeping Up With the Kardashians, and took a three-month break from social media.

In a March 2017 episode titled Paris, Kardashian first spoke publicly about her ordeal.

She described first hearing a noise in her apartment, and calling out, thinking it was her sister and assistant: “At that moment when there wasn’t an answer, my heart started to get really tense. Like, you know, your stomach just kind of like, knots up and you’re like, ‘OK, what’s going on?’ I knew something wasn’t quite right.”

She went on: “They asked for money. I said, ‘I don’t have any money’. They dragged me out to the hallway on top of the stairs. That’s when I saw the gun, clear as day. I was looking at the gun, looking down back at the stairs. I was like, I have a split second in my mind to make this quick decision.

“Either they’re going to shoot me in the back or if I make it [down the stairs] and the elevator does not open in time or the stairs are locked, there’s no way out.”

Three months later, she told a Forbes Power Women’s Summit she had changed her approach to posting on social media: “They had followed my moves on social media, and they knew my every move and what I had.”

She added: “It was definitely a huge, huge, huge lesson for me to not show off some of the things that I have. It was a huge lesson to me to not show off where I go.

“It’s just changed my whole life, but I think for the better.”

West and Kardashian at the Off-White show three days before the robbery. Pic: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock
Image:
West and Kardashian at the Off-White show three days before the robbery. Pic: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/Shutterstock

In October 2020, Kardashian told US interviewer David Letterman she feared she would be raped and murdered during the heist, and that her sister had been at the forefront of her mind during the incident.

Speaking on My Next Guest Needs No Introduction, Kardashian said: “I kept on thinking about Kourtney, I kept on thinking she’s going to come home and I’m going to be dead in the room and she’s going to be traumatised for the rest of her life if she sees me… I thought that was my fate.”

When speaking to French police about the impact the robbery had had on her three months after it, Kardashian said: “I think that my perception of jewellery now is that I am not as attached to it as I used to be. I don’t have the same feeling about it. In fact, I even think that it has become a bit of a burden to have the responsibility of such expensive jewels.

“There is nothing of sentimental value to compare with the act of going home and finding one’s children and one’s family.”

She went on to describe Paris as “not the right place” for her, and didn’t return to the French capital for two years following the robbery.

Kardashian has since said in a 2023 episode of Keeping Up With The Kardashians that she did not purchase any jewellery in the seven years following the robbery, kept no jewellery at her home and only wore items that are either borrowed or fake.

She said the realisation that material items don’t matter has made her “a completely different person in the best way”.

Continue Reading

Trending