Connect with us

Published

on

The UK’s competition watchdog has warned PCR test providers to “immediately review their practices” or face enforcement action if they treat customers unfairly.

In an open letter, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) warns companies within the sector that their actions could breach consumer protection law and suggests the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) “could consider to address concerns over the price and reliability of PCR test and the quality of service people receive”.

It follows a review into the PCR testing market by the regulator which found evidence of customers facing additional charges which were not advertised, not receiving their tests or results at all and failing to receive refunds when a quality service was not provided.

A medical worker performs a mouth swab on a patient to test for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in a new tent extension of Danish National Hospital Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark April 2, 2020
Image:
Earlier this month, Health Secretary Sajid Javid announced that the price of PCR COVID tests provided for travel would fall by £20 for one test to £68

It comes as holidaymakers have expressed concerns about excessive costs for tests during the August high season.

The government announced earlier this week that it would be warning 82 companies that they could be removed from the Gov.uk list of authorised providers if they advertise misleading prices.

The letter, published on Wednesday, instructs PCR COVID test providers to review their policies to make sure they are in line with the requirements of consumer law and to make any changes where necessary.

The “practices of concern” to the CMA include:

More on Coronavirus

• Advertising up-front prices for PCR tests which do not include additional charges that everyone must pay

• Advertising cheap PCR tests which are only actually available in very small quantities or are not available at all

• Failing to deliver PCR tests or provide results within stated timescales, or at all

• Refusing to provide consumers with refunds where tests are not provided within advertised and/or agreed timescales, or at all

The letter lists 11 steps providers should take to improve their practices, and includes not focusing their advertising on cheap tests which are only available in small numbers, showing the full cost of tests including all compulsory charges and providing “honest, accurate and clear” timescales on when tests will be received.

COVID testing
Image:
The government says the tests are needed for travellers to protect public health

The CMA add that PCR test providers should also ensure that both tests and results are provided within the advertised timescales.

CMA general counsel Sarah Cardell said: “PCR test providers should be in no doubt that they need to get on the right side of the law. If they don’t, they risk enforcement action.

“Our advice today will also help people by setting out exactly what they should expect for their money.

“This warning goes hand-in-hand with action taken by government this week and is the latest step in our work to tackle rip-off prices and bad service.

“We continue to work closely with DHSC in reviewing this market and will be providing further advice to DHSC on action that can be taken.”

A separate investigation by consultancy Fideres found the cheapest travel test providers on the government’s official list have the biggest gap between advertised and actual prices.

It also discovered that many providers listed did not have tests to order.

Earlier this month, Health Secretary Sajid Javid announced that the price of PCR COVID tests provided for travel would fall by £20 for one test to £68.

The sum would decrease by £35 for two tests, making the total £138.

But Conservative MP Henry Smith, chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on aviation, said private PCR tests should be capped at £40.

The health secretary had asked the competition watchdog to investigate the market for PCR tests due to concerns about “exploitative practices” and inadequate service.

The government say the tests are needed for travellers to protect public health.

Continue Reading

Business

Chelsea co-owner Boehly goes into bat with Lords cricket bid

Published

on

By

Chelsea co-owner Boehly goes into bat with Lords cricket bid

The joint owner of Chelsea Football Club has joined forces with one of his fellow board members to bid for the most valuable team in English cricket’s Hundred competition.

Sky News has learnt that Todd Boehly is backing a bid spearheaded by Jonathan Goldstein, a British property entrepreneur, in an offer for a large stake in London Spirit, the Lords-based franchise.

The bid represents the latest move by Mr Boehly, a billionaire financier, to gatecrash the British sporting elite, following his takeover of Chelsea in 2022 alongside Behdad Eghabli, the founder of Clearlake Capital.

Read more: Chelsea FC lender Ares wants to bowl over Oval Hundred franchise

Recent reports suggest the pair have fallen out and are looking at ways to buy each other out of the club.

Mr Boehly’s interest in the London Spirit franchise puts him and Mr Goldstein on a shortlist of a handful of bidders for – at least – a 49% stake in it.

Sources said this weekend that the other contenders to buy the interest as part of a process run by the England and Wales Cricket Board were Sanjiv Goenka, an Indian billionaire who owns the Indian Premier League’s (IPL) Lucknow Super Giants; the owners of the IPL’s Chennai Super Kings; India’s ultra-wealthy Ambani family; and possibly members of the Glazer family, which retains the largest stake in Manchester United Football Club.

More on Cricket

The London Spirit franchise is expected to command the highest price of the eight teams being auctioned, with one of Chelsea’s lenders, Ares Management, plotting the purchase of a stake in the Oval Invincibles, Sky News revealed on Friday.

Read more from Money:
Investment giant KKR wades into Thames Water survival battle
Reynolds to hold talks with bosses amid business budget backlash
Markets react on second day after budget

CVC Capital Partners, one of the most prolific backers of global sport with stakes in the men’s professional tennis tour and rugby union’s Six Nations Championship, is also bidding for the Oval Invincibles.

Insiders said CVC had also submitted offers for two other Hundred franchises.

In total, roughly 35 bids are said to have been shortlisted for the eight teams, with the respective host counties able to decide whether they offload part of their 51% stake in order to give new investors control of the franchise.

Those 35 proposals are, in turn, said to have come from 15 separate investor groups.

Money blog: Should you give money directly to a homeless person?

The teams are in aggregate understood to have been valued at more than £600m in the first round of the auction, with the proceeds distributed across the recreational game, the 18 first-class counties and the MCC, which owns Lords.

The eight host venues play home to teams including the Northern Superchargers, Manchester Originals and Southern Brave.

A bigger-than-expected windfall from the process could offer a financial lifeline to a number of cash-strapped counties, with part of the proceeds likely to be used to pay down debt.

Concerns have been raised, however, that windfalls from the Hundred auction will not deliver a meaningful improvement in counties’ long-term financial sustainability.

The outcome of the auction, which will become clear in the coming months, is also likely to intensify other searching questions about the future of cricket, as the Test format of the game struggles for international commercial relevance against shorter-length competition.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The Hundred auction is being handled by Raine Group, which also oversaw the sale of Chelsea to Mr Boehly and Mr Eghbali two years ago after Roman Abramovich was sanctioned by the government.

Mr Goldstein, CVC and the ECB declined to comment on the process.

Continue Reading

Business

Investment giant KKR wades into Thames Water survival battle

Published

on

By

Investment giant KKR wades into Thames Water survival battle

One of the world’s largest investment firms has waded into the fight over the future of Thames Water, the water utility which is racing to stay afloat.

Sky News has learnt that KKR is in talks with Thames Water and its advisers about participating in a £3bn share sale which forms part of a wider recapitalisation plan.

City sources said this weekend that KKR, which has more than $550bn of assets under management, was among a handful of parties which had accessed a data room for potential investors.

Rothschild, the investment bank, is running a process to raise around £3bn from the sale of an equity stake in Thames Water, which is grappling with a debt mountain of as much as £19bn.

Other investors which have expressed interest in acquiring newly issued shares in the water company include Carlyle and Castle Water, the latter of which is controlled by Graham Edwards, the Conservative Party treasurer.

Global Infrastructure Partners, which is owned by BlackRock, Brookfield and Isquared are also reported to have lodged an interest, although sources said that the latter two were unlikely to play any further role in the process.

The crisis at Thames Water is presenting Sir Keir Starmer’s administration with a challenge as the debt-laden company attempts to avert temporary nationalisation.

More on Thames Water

Insiders said that KKR was “a serious player” in the equity process being run by Thames Water, although its outcome hinges on a final determination by Ofwat, the industry regulator, which is due by January at the latest.

Thames Water – and other suppliers across Britain – wants to hike bills and is demanding leniency from Ofwat on fines for past transgressions.

One obstacle to KKR buying a big stake in Thames Water, which has more than 15m customers, may be its 25% holding in Northumbrian Water.

Money blog: Should you give money directly to a homeless person?

Under Ofwat’s mergers regime, the Competition and Markets Authority would need to review the deal, although there would not be an automatic prohibition.

The share sale process is being run in parallel to an attempt to raise up to £3bn in debt financing from hedge funds and other investors.

A battle has broken out between the holders of Thames Water’s class A bonds, which account for the bulk of its borrowings, and its riskier class B debt.

Both sets of bondholders have submitted proposals to the company, with the class A’s arguing that theirs is more certain and the class B’s arguing that theirs will save the company £380m or more in fees and interest over a 12-month period.

Thames Water has already endorsed the class A group’s offer, with an initial £1.5bn of funding to be delivered immediately.

The class A bondholders are now trying to secure backing for their proposal within the next fortnight.

Their group, which includes the American hedge funds Elliott Advisers and Silverpoint, would earn in the region of £650m during the first year of the financing.

One area of controversy is likely to be any incentive plan for Thames Water bosses, led by chief executive Chris Weston, as part of a deal to give the company a stay of execution.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

September: Thames Water boss says he can ‘save’ company

Last month, the environment secretary, Steve Reed, established an independent review of the industry that will look at far-reaching reforms.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

It was unclear this weekend which of KKR’s funds was participating in the Thames Water equity-raise.

The firm owns John Laing, an infrastructure investor, which it took private in 2021.

It has also owned South Staffordshire, another water company, selling its 75% interest in 2018.

KKR declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Reynolds to hold talks with bosses amid business budget backlash

Published

on

By

Reynolds to hold talks with bosses amid business budget backlash

The business secretary will next week hold talks with dozens of private sector bosses as the government contends with a significant corporate backlash to Labour’s first fiscal event in nearly 15 years.

Sky News has learnt that executives have been invited to join a conference call on Monday with Jonathan Reynolds, in what will represent his first meaningful engagement with employers since Wednesday’s budget statement.

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, unsettled financial markets with plans for billions of pounds in extra borrowing, and unnerved business leaders by saying she would raise an additional £25bn annually by hiking their national insurance contributions.

An increase in employer NICs had been trailed by officials in advance of the budget, but the lowering of the threshold to just £5,000 has triggered forecasts of a wave of redundancies and even insolvencies across labour-intensive industries.

Sectors such as retail and hospitality, which employ substantial numbers of part-time workers, have been particularly vocal in their condemnation of the move.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

On Friday, the Financial Times published comments made by the chief executive of Barclays in which he defended Ms Reeves.

“I think they’ve done an admirable job of balancing spending, borrowing and taxation in order to drive the fundamental objective of growth,” CS Venkatakrishnan said.

More on Budget 2024

His was a rare voice among prominent business figures in backing the chancellor, however, with many questioning whether the government had a meaningful plan to grow the economy.

Mr Reynolds held a similar call with business leaders within days of general election victory, and over 100 bosses are understood to have been invited to Monday’s discussion.

A spokesman for the Department for Business and Trade declined to comment ahead of Monday’s call.

Continue Reading

Trending