Connect with us

Published

on

Football fans in England are set to be allowed to stand at games before the end of the current season, in a reversal of the 30-year rule requiring all-seater stadiums.

Many clubs in the Premier League – including Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United – have recently installed “safe standing” areas, with rail seating, ahead of an anticipated law change.

It has been reported that an official government announcement on plans to lift the ban on standing at Premier League and Championship games could come as soon as next month.

And, according to the BBC, some grounds will be able to use designated safe standing areas before the end of this season.

Fans in the new rail seating section made for safe standing during the pre-season friendly match at Old Trafford, Manchester. Picture date: Wednesday July 28, 2021.
Image:
A new rail seating section has recently been installed at Manchester United’s Old Trafford stadium

In an interview with The Times on Saturday, Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden confirmed that legal standing would be seen at top games this season – at least in pilot form.

“It’s the sensible thing to do because fans are standing all the way through [games] anyway, and you can do it in a safer way,” he told the newspaper.

“We’ve got terrible experience in the past and more recent experience with things like the Euros, which just means we need to make sure we get this right.

More on Football

“We’re engaging with the police and others, but we’ll get to the stage this season where we’ll see safe standing, at least in pilot form.”

Stadiums in England’s top two leagues have had to be all-seater since laws were introduced in 1989, in the wake of the Hillsborough disaster.

But, in recent years, pressure has grown among supporter groups for a rethink of the ban, while in Scotland, Celtic have allowed a safe standing area for a number of years.

This includes the use of rail seating, which is designed to allow fans to stand during games without the risk of falling on top of each other.

Persistent standing in all-seater stadiums has been a problem for many clubs in recent years, with many fans thinking the introduction of designated areas for standing would both be safer and boost the atmosphere at grounds.

Britain's Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Oliver Dowden arrives in Downing Street in London, Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2020. U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock on Wednesday thanked scientists from Pfizer and BioNTech after the approval of their COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use by the country's drugs regulator. Speaking earlier Hancock gave details of how the vaccine would be distributed from the beginning of next week. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Image:
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said ‘safe standing’ would be seen this season

In their 2019 general election manifesto, the Conservatives promised to “work with fans and clubs towards introducing safe standing” – a vow that was also made by Labour.

The Sports Grounds Safety Authority (SGSA) – a regulatory body funded by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport – recently commissioned independent research into the safe management of standing at football.

In a final report published in June, the SGSA found that “installing barriers has had a positive impact on spectator safety in these areas, particularly in mitigating the risk of progressive crowd collapse”.

They also concluded “there has been no reported negative impact on the behaviour of spectators in either tolerated standing areas or areas where barriers have been installed”.

However, they warned that allowing standing in some parts of stadiums could see fans attempt to move from other non-standing areas of grounds.

And the report also warned of the risks of fans climbing on barriers in standing areas.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

Published

on

By

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

As crypto goes mainstream, regulation is no longer a distant threat or bureaucratic detail — it’s the new foundation.

Continue Reading

Politics

NATO will force the UK to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP to keep US on side, Sky News understands

Published

on

By

UK will be forced to increase defence spending to 3.5% to keep US on side, Sky News understands

The UK will be forced to agree this month to increase defence spending to 3.5% of national income within a decade as part of a NATO push to rearm and keep the US on side, Sky News understands.

The certainty of a major policy shift means there is bemusement in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) about why Sir Keir Starmer‘s government has tied itself in knots over whether to describe an earlier plan to hit 3% of GDP by the 2030s as an ambition or a commitment, when it is about to change.

The problem is seen as political, with the prime minister needing to balance warfare against welfare – more money for bombs and bullets or for winter fuel payments and childcare.

Follow live updates: Does the UK need an ‘Iron Dome’ system?

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stands next to a New Zealand soldier during a visit to a military base during a visit to a military base training Ukrainian troops in the West of England. Picture date: Tuesday April 22, 2025. PA Photo. See PA story POLITICS Ukraine. Photo credit should read: Finnbarr Webster/PA Wire
Image:
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a visit to a military base training Ukrainian troops in April. File pic: PA

Sir Keir is due to hold a discussion to decide on the defence spending target as early as today, it is understood.

As well as a rise in pure defence spending to 3.5% by 2035, he will also likely be forced to commit a further 1.5% of GDP to defence-related areas such as spy agencies and infrastructure. Militaries need roads, railway networks, and airports to deploy at speed.

This would bolster total broader defence spending to 5% – a target Mark Rutte, the head of NATO, wants all allies to sign up to at a major summit in the Netherlands later this month.

It is being referred to as the “Hague investment plan”.

Asked what would happen at the summit, a defence source said: “3.5% without a doubt.”

Yet the prime minister reiterated the 3% ambition when he published a major defence review on Monday that placed “NATO first” at the heart of UK defence policy.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What’s in the UK Strategic Defence Review?

The defence source said: “How can you have a defence review that says NATO first” and then be among the last of the alliance’s 32 member states – along with countries like Spain – to back this new goal?

Unlike Madrid, London presents itself as the leading European nation in the alliance.

A British commander is always the deputy supreme allied commander in Europe – the second most senior operational military officer – under an American commander, while the UK’s nuclear weapons are committed to defending the whole of NATO.

Even Germany, which has a track record of weak defence spending despite boasting the largest economy, has recently signalled it plans to move investment towards the 5% level, while Canada, also previously feeble, is making similar noises.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is the UK battle ready?

The source signalled it was inconceivable the UK would not follow suit and said officials across Whitehall understand the spending target will rise to 3.5%.

The source said it would be met by 2035, so three years later than the timeline Mr Rutte has proposed.

Defence spending is currently at 2.3%.

A second defence source said the UK has to commit to this spending target, “or else we can no longer call ourselves a leader within NATO”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM challenged on NATO, defence and Gaza

Read more:
UK to build weapons factories
Russian-linked hackers targeted MoD

Sky News’s political editor Beth Rigby challenged the prime minister on the discrepancy between his spending ambitions and those of his allies at a press conference on Monday.

Sir Keir seemed to hint change might be coming.

“Of course, there are discussions about what the contribution should be going into the NATO conference in two or three weeks’ time,” he said.

“But that conference is much more about what sort of NATO will be capable of being as effective in the future as it’s been in the last 80 years. It is a vital conversation that we do need to have, and we are right at the heart of that.”

New Sky News podcast launches on 10 June – The Wargame simulates an attack by Russia to test UK defences

Mr Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, said last week he assumes alliance members will agree to a broad defence spending target of 5% of gross domestic product during the summit in The Hague on 24 and 25 June.

NATO can only act if all member states agree.

“Let’s say that this 5%, but I will not say what is the individual breakup, but it will be considerably north of 3% when it comes to the hard spend [on defence], and it will be also a target on defence-related spending,” the secretary general said.

The call for more funding comes at a time when allies are warning of growing threats from Russia, Iran, and North Korea as well as challenges posed by China.

But it also comes as European member states need to make NATO membership seem like a good deal for Donald Trump.

The leaders of all allies will meet in The Hague for the two-day summit.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

The US president has repeatedly criticised other member states for failing to meet a current target of spending 2% of national income on defence and has warned the United States would not come to the aid of any nation that is falling short.

Since returning to the White House, he has called for European countries to allocate 5% of their GDP to defence. This is more than the 3.4% of GDP currently spent by the US.

Mr Rutte is being credited with squaring away a new deal with Mr Trump in a meeting that would see allies increase their defence spending in line with the US president’s wishes.

The NATO chief is due to visit London on Monday, it is understood.

Continue Reading

Politics

Texas Representative Gill under fire over late $500K Bitcoin disclosures

Published

on

By

Texas Representative Gill under fire over late 0K Bitcoin disclosures

Texas Representative Gill under fire over late 0K Bitcoin disclosures

Texas Representative Brandon Gill faces scrutiny after filing late disclosures for $500,000 in Bitcoin trades, as questions over timing and STOCK Act violations arise.

Continue Reading

Trending