Rising wages and huge demand for HGV drivers has led to unprecedented numbers of people seeking training for licences, according to Britain’s largest private driver training company.
Hughes Driver Training, based in Leicestershire, told Sky News it’s sending around 100 for HGV Class I and II testing per week, including many sent directly by haulage firms seeking to fast-track applicants.
Demand for drivers has seen major employers including Tesco, Amazon and John Lewis, offering four-figure ‘joining bonuses’ to drivers, fuelling rapid wage inflation.
“I think it’s going through the roof,” said managing director Carl Hughes.
Image: Adam Squire is among the trainees at Hughes hoping to capitalise on the driver shortage
“There are drivers I know that are working for companies and have been there for years, they’ve had two or three pay rises this year without even asking for it, because it’s had to adjust to supply and demand.
Advertisement
“There are people, newly-qualified drivers who are on over £35,000 a year now at some companies and they’re getting a signing-on bonus as well. It’s really good for them.”
Major high street chains McDonald’s, KFC and Nando’s have been forced to cut menu items or close restaurants in recent weeks because of supply problems, and manufacturers and non-food retailers have also warned that the logistics crisis could deepen in the run-up to Christmas.
More from Business
A shortage of an estimated 100,000 HGV drivers is at the heart of a growing supply chain crisis that business leaders and economists warn may be slowing the UK’s post-pandemic recovery.
Almost half of those have left the industry in the last two years, a trend blamed on long hours, low esteem and wages that had been falling relative to other low-skilled jobs, accelerated by a combination of Brexit and the pandemic.
Some of the many European Union drivers crucial to the UK haulage industry returned home during lockdowns and have been unable to work here under new immigration rules since 1 January.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 31,000 UK-based drivers have left the road since 2019, almost double the 14,000 European truckers who have departed, though the latter represent a larger proportion of the total EU workforce.
Despite repeated pleas from employers and business groups, the government has ruled out temporarily reinstating visas for European drivers to ease the current challenges.
They argue that employers should seek homegrown workers to fill the gap, making the haulage crisis a live exercise in one of the central arguments of Brexit; that cutting the number of low-skilled European workers would increase opportunities and wages for British employees.
Others argue that far from reducing opportunity, overseas workers help grow the economy through their own spending and activity.
And while as workers we all want the best pay and conditions, as consumers we may privately admit to enjoying the low prices and convenience delivered by a large, low-skilled, often insecure pool of workers.
By helping to create a supply crisis in haulage, the combination of Brexit and COVID has at least temporarily driven up driver rewards, particularly through bonus schemes that may not persist.
Whether it can reverse the long-term trend of declining interest in what remains hard and often anti-social graft remains to be seen.
And even if the government is right, the short-term pain of waiting for local workers to fill the void may be significant for the consumer economy.
As manufacturers and retailers prepare for the busiest period of the year, the build up to Christmas and the return of schools, they insist their warnings of disruption and price rises are genuine.
Even those benefiting from the clamour for drivers like Carl Hughes say filling the gap will take time, and the government should act.
“We can train our way out of this crisis, there are really good opportunities for people who want to develop a career, but it will take time and we still need the temporary visas to get the drivers hauliers need now,” he said.
The economy is stagnating and job losses are mounting. Now is the time to cut interest rates again.
That was the view of the Bank of England’s nine-member rate setting committee on Thursday.
Well, at least five of them.
The other four presented us with a different view: Inflation is above target and climbing – this is no time to cut interest rates.
Who is right? All of them and none of them.
Central bankers have been backed into a corner by the current economic climate and navigating a path out is challenging.
The difficulty in charting that route was on display as the Bank struggled to decide on the best course of monetary policy.
The committee had to take it to a re-vote for the first time in the Bank’s history.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:40
Bank of England is ‘a bit muddled’
On one side, central bankers – including Andrew Bailey – were swayed by the data on the economy. Growth is “subdued”, they said, and job losses are mounting.
This should weigh on wage increases, which are already moderating, and in turn inflation.
One member, Alan Taylor, was so worried about the economy he initially suggested a larger half a percentage point cut.
On the other side, their colleagues were alarmed by inflation.
In a blow to the chancellor, the September figure is used to uprate a number of benefits and pensions. The Bank lifted it from a previous forecast of 3.75%.
In explaining the increase, the Bank blamed higher utility bills and food prices.
Food price inflation could hit 5.5% this year, an increase driven by poor harvests, some expensive packaging regulations as well as higher employment costs arising from the Autumn Budget.
Image: Rachel Reeves on Thursday. Pic: PA
When pressed by Sky News on the main contributor to that increase – poor harvests or government policy – the governor said: “It’s about 50-50.”
The Bank doesn’t like to get political but nothing about this is flattering for the chancellor.
The Bank said food retailers, including supermarkets, were passing on higher national insurance and living wage costs – the ones announced in the Autumn Budget – to customers.
Economists at the Bank pointed out that food retailers employ a large proportion of low wage workers and are more vulnerable to the lowering of the national insurance threshold because they have a larger proportion of part-time workers.
Of all the types of inflation, food price inflation is among the most dangerous.
Households spend 11% of their disposable income, meaning higher food price inflation can play an outsized role in our perception of how high overall inflation in the economy is.
When that happens, workers are more likely to push for pay rises, a dangerous loop that can lead to higher inflation.
So while the chancellor is publicly celebrating the Bank’s fifth interest rate cut in a year, behind the scenes she will have very little to cheer.
The Bank of England has cut the interest rate for the fifth time in a year to 4% but warned that climbing food prices will cause inflation to jump higher in 2025.
In a tight decision that saw members of the rate-setting committee vote twice to break a deadlock, the Bank cut the rate to the lowest level in more than two-and-a-half years. Households on a variable mortgage of about £140,000 will save about £30 a month.
Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, said: “We’ve cut interest rates today, but it was a finely balanced decision. Interest rates are still on a downward path, but any future cuts will need to be made gradually and carefully.”
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), the nine-member panel that sets the base interest rate, voted in favour of lowering borrowing costs by 0.25 percentage points.
However, rate-setters failed to reach a unanimous decision, with four members of the committee voting to keep it on hold and another four voting for a 0.25 percentage point cut.
Alan Taylor, an external member of the committee, initially called for a larger 0.5 percentage point cut but after a second vote reduced that to 0.25% to break the deadlock. Had they failed to reach a decision, Mr Bailey, the governor, would have had the decisive vote.
More on Bank Of England
Related Topics:
It is the first time the committee has gone to a second vote and highlights the difficulty policymakers face in navigating the current economic climate, in which economic growth is stagnating, with at least one rate-setter fearing a recession, but inflation remains persistent.
Although the central bank voted to cut borrowing costs, it also raised its inflation forecasts on the back of higher food prices.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:41
‘We’ve got to get the balance right on tax’
The bank predicted that the headline rate of inflation would hit 4% in September, up from a previous estimate of 3.75%.
The September inflation rate is used to uprate a range of benefits, including pensions.
The increase was driven by food, where the inflation rate could hit 5.5% this year. About a tenth of household spending is devoted to food shopping, which means it can have an outsized impact on inflation.
The Bank said this risked creating “second round effects”, whereby a sense of higher inflation forces people to push for pay rises, which could push inflation even higher.
Economists at the Bank blamed poor harvests, weather conditions, and changes to packaging regulations but also, in a blow to the chancellor, higher labour costs.
It pointed out that a higher proportion of workers in the food retail sector are paid the national living wage, which Rachel Reeves increased by 6.7% in April.
Economists at the Bank also blamed higher employment taxes announced in the autumn budget. “Furthermore, overall labour costs of supermarkets are likely to have been disproportionately affected by the lower threshold at which employers start paying NICs… these material increases in labour costs are likely to have pushed up food prices.”
There is also evidence that employers’ national insurance increases are causing businesses to curtail hiring, the Bank said. It comes as unemployment in the UK rose unexpectedly to a fresh four-year high of 4.7% in May. Separate data shows the number of employees on payroll has contracted for the fifth month in a row,
The Bank said the unemployment rate could hit 5% next year and warned of “subdued” economic growth, with one member – Alan Taylor – warning of an “increased risk of recession” in the coming years.
Donald Trump has announced 100% tariffs on computer chips and semiconductors made outside the US.
The move threatens to increase the cost of electronics made outside the US, which covers everything from TVs and video game consoles to kitchen appliances and cars.
The announcement came as Apple chief executive Tim Cook said his company would invest an extra $100bn (£74.9bn) in US manufacturing.
Soon, all smartwatch and iPhone glass around the world will be made in Kentucky, according to Mr Cook, speaking from the Oval Office.
“This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in the United States of America are also made in America,” said Mr Trump.
“Today’s announcement is one of the largest commitments in what has become among the greatest investment booms in our nation’s history.”
Mr Cook also presented the president with a one-of-a-kind trophy made by Apple in the US.
Image: Trump seen through the trophy given to him by Tim Cook. Pic: AP
Trump’s tariffs hit India hard
Mr Trump has previously criticised Mr Cook and Apple after the company attempted to avoid his tariffs by shifting iPhone production from China to India.
The president said he had a “little problem” with Apple and said he’d told Mr Cook: “I don’t want you building in India.”
India itself felt Mr Trump’s wrath on Wednesday, as he issued an executive order hitting the country with an additional 25% tariff for its continued purchasing of Russian oil.
Indian imports into the US will face a 50% tariff from 27 August as a result of the move, as the president seeks to increase the pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine.
Mr Trump told reporters at the White House he “could” also hit China with more tariffs.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:14
‘Good chance’ Trump will meet Putin soon
Apple’s ‘olive branch’
Apple, meanwhile, plans to hire 20,000 people in the US to support its extra manufacturing in the country, which will total $600bn (around £449bn) worth of investment over four years.
The “vast majority” of those jobs will be focused on a new end-to-end US silicon production line, research and development, software development, and artificial intelligence, according to the company.
Apple’s investment in the US caused the company’s stock price to hike by nearly 6% in Wednesday’s midday trading.
The rise may reflect relief by investors that Mr Cook “is extending an olive branch” to Mr Trump, said Nancy Tengler, chief executive of money manager Laffer Tengler Investments, which owns Apple stock.