Treasury tells Michael Gove not to expect lots of new cash for levelling up

Published

3 years ago

September 17, 2021

admin

Michael Gove’s new levelling up department is being warned not to expect a large injection of new cash in the spending review hours after Boris Johnson called levelling up “our fundamental project”, Sky News understands.

Mr Gove‘s department, which covers housing, the Union, local government and elections, will be expected to negotiate its three-year budget on the basis of the bid put together by Robert Jenrick, who was sacked on Wednesday.

Although there is some scope for changes, Sky News has learnt the Treasury is playing down the ability of incoming cabinet ministers to radically rewrite their departmental spending bids or ask for dramatically more.

One Whitehall source told Sky News that Mr Gove should therefore not be expecting an above average settlement.

A leading Tory MP, Jack Berry, said that the Treasury needed a new approach to levelling up or the Tories risk losing voters in the North.

Sky News has learned that the Treasury asked cabinet ministers to submit bids for the spending review at the start of the week, hours before the reshuffle was due to begin.

Now they are telling all departments they are still expecting to negotiate in some cases on the basis of bids submitted by cabinet ministers who lost their jobs or changed roles – which include Dominic Raab from the Foreign Office, Robert Buckland who has gone from Justice and Mr Jenrick from the Ministry of Housing.

This has caused surprise in parts of Whitehall, who point out there is a long way to go until the October 26 review and the arrival of a new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Simon Clark, may change calculations.

Mr Gove may also benefit from machinery of government changes, such as the possible move of the Union unit to Mr Gove’s new ministry, which means Mr Jenrick’s budget submission cannot be adopted completely like for like.

Having only been in place 48 hours, it is thought to be too early for Mr Gove to have decided what his budget needs and priorities will be.

This morning the prime minister used the first post-reshuffle cabinet meeting to emphasise the importance of levelling up.

He said: “By cutting crime, by making our streets safer across the country, by improving the quality of people’s lives, putting in fibre optic gigabit broadband sprouting through everybody’s homes, by tackling the skills deficit across our country, by giving people opportunity across the whole of the UK… combined with local leadership – we are going to fulfil our fundamental project of uniting and levelling up the entire country… because that is what our mission is.”

Departments are already facing a squeeze.

Overall departmental spending will rise 4% a year in real terms (which is a 6% rise in cash terms before accounting for inflation) but a large share of this will be taken up by the Health and Social Care spending meaning other departments will get less.

Whitehall was braced for a tricky settlement as Rishi Sunak attempts to reclaim the mantle of fiscal discipline for the Conservative party after spending hundreds of billions on the pandemic.

Jake Berry, chairman of the Northern Research Group of Tory MPs who want greater commitment to levelling up, told Sky News: “I think what we’re learning is that the Treasury is yet to be convinced that levelling up is a government priority.

“Levelling up is about devolving power away from London, that tends not to be an agenda that the Treasury backs.”

Asked why there is resistance, he said: “They regard it as expensive.

Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts or Spotify.

“Many of these projects in the North don’t stack up on traditional value for money spending.

“It’s just for that exact reason these communities need investment.

“The Treasury doesn’t need to so much tweak the Green Book.

“As they’ve done over the last few years – they need to rip it up, throw it in the shredder, and then chuck the waste away.

“They need a whole new approach.

“In all fairness to Mr Gove he has a track record of delivering… he has a track record of taking on what he’d call ‘the blob’ – and in this case the Treasury is the blob.”

Politics

Parliament urged to begin mandatory DBS criminal record checks on new MPs and peers

Published

6 hours ago

January 4, 2025

admin

Parliament urged to begin mandatory DBS criminal record checks on new MPs and peers

MPs and peers could be forced to submit to criminal record checks under proposals submitted by a new Labour MP.

In a letter seen by Sky News, Jo White urged the leader of the Commons to examine whether a new committee set up to modernise parliament should force all new members to have checks due to their access to young and vulnerable people.

She suggests in-depth background checks by the Disclosure and Barring Service – commonly known as DBS checks – as the initial stages of introducing MPs to parliament.

Candidates are currently banned from running to be an MP if they have been jailed for more than a year in the UK.

However, there is no requirement for DBS checks, something most other jobs require when applying for positions working with vulnerable people.

Ms White previously submitted an early-day motion on this issue, with cross-party signatures including 13 other Labour MPs supporting her motion.

In her letter to the committee, the Bassetlaw MP writes: “It is a privilege that, as parliamentarians, we can work with local schools, care homes and hospitals, but we must be proactive in preserving this trust.

“Implementing a mandatory check would protect both the people we visit and ourselves. It would be key to maintaining public trust and high workplace standards across the estate and in our constituencies.”

DBS checks are standard practices for GPs, nurses, teachers and other professions. They let potential employers know if a candidate has a criminal record or is banned from working with children or vulnerable adults.

Many local authorities already run DBS checks on elected officials but it’s not standard practice in parliament.

Prospective MPs can stand for election despite having a criminal record or appearing on the child-barred list or adult-barred list unless they have served a prison term over 12 months.

In fact, they do not need to disclose any criminal behaviour to the public prior to becoming a candidate.

The main vetting process before entering the House of Commons is done through political parties, who set their own rules for carrying out any such checks.

None of the Reform UK MPs have signed the early-day motion and leader Nigel Farage said last election there was “no vetting” of candidates.

This has already caused some controversy.

One Reform MP, James McMurdock, was jailed 19 years ago for repeatedly kicking his then girlfriend, according to court documents disclosed by The Times.

The South Basildon and East Thurrock MP attacked her in 2006 while drunk outside a nightclub and spent 21 days in a young offenders’ institution.

He had not publicly disclosed the conviction and described it as a “teenage indiscretion” when asked about the incident last year.

Under new rules, new MPs might have to fully disclose their criminal past.

The creation of a modernisation committee was a Labour manifesto promise and now sits as a cross-party group tasked with reforming House of Commons procedures and improving standards.

The committee said it would not be commenting on submissions until it’s had time to fully consider all options, but is due to publish an initial report early this year.

Politics

Nigel Farage rejects Tommy Robinson after support from Elon Musk

Published

6 hours ago

January 4, 2025

admin

Nigel Farage rejects Tommy Robinson after support from Elon Musk

Nigel Farage has said Tommy Robinson “won’t be” joining Reform UK after Elon Musk showed support for the jailed far-right activist on social media.

The billionaire owner of X, who has spoken positively about Reform UK and is reportedly considering making a donation to the party, has been critical of the government’s handling of child sexual exploitation across a number of towns and cities more than a decade ago.

While the Reform UK leader described the billionaire owner of X as “an absolute hero figure, particularly to young people in this country”, he distanced himself and his party from Robinson, who is currently serving an 18-month prison sentence for contempt of court.

Mr Musk endorsed the far-right activist and claimed Robinson was “telling the truth” about grooming gangs, writing on X: “Free Tommy Robinson”.

Speaking to broadcasters ahead of the start of Reform UK’s East Midlands Conference tonight, party leader Mr Farage did not directly address Mr Musk’s comments, but said: “He has a whole range of opinions, some of which I agree with very strongly, and others of which I’m more reticent about.”

He went on to say that having Mr Musk’s support is “very helpful to our cause”, describing him as “an absolute hero figure, particularly to young people in this country”.

He continued: “Everyone says, well, what about his comments on Tommy Robinson? Look, my position is perfectly clear on that. I never wanted Tommy Robinson to join UKIP, I don’t want him to join Reform UK, and he won’t be.”

Later on GB News, Mr Farage added that Mr Musk “sees Robinson as one of these people that fought against the grooming gangs”.

“But of course the truth is Tommy Robinson’s in prison not for that, but for contempt of court,” he said.

Mr Farage added: “We’re a political party aiming to win the next general election. He’s not what we need.”

How did Elon Musk become involved?

The online campaign from Mr Musk began after it emerged that Home Office minister Jess Phillips had denied requests from Oldham Council to lead a public inquiry into child sexual exploitation in the borough, as the Conservatives had done in 2022.

In a letter to the authority in Greater Manchester, Ms Phillips said she believes it is “for Oldham Council alone to decide to commission an inquiry into child sexual exploitation locally, rather than for the government to intervene”.

An Oldham Council spokesman previously said: “Survivors sit at the heart of our work to end child sexual exploitation. Whatever happens in terms of future inquiries, we have promised them that their wishes will be paramount, and we will not renege on that pledge.”

Mr Musk posted on X multiple times about the scandal, and claimed Sir Keir Starmer had failed to bring “rape gangs” to justice when he led the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). In 2013, Sir Keir introduced new guidelines for how child sexual abuse victims should be treated and how a case should be built and presented in court.

The SpaceX and Tesla boss also endorsed posts about Robinson.

Robinson, who is 42 years old and whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, admitted at Woolwich Crown Court in October to breaching an injunction banning him from repeating libellous allegations against a Syrian refugee schoolboy, after he was successfully sued for libel in 2021.