US President Joe Biden will welcome Boris Johnson to the White House later.
The prime minister will travel from the UN General Assembly in New York to Washington for the Oval Office meeting which would, in all likelihood, have happened well before now had it not been for the pandemic.
It has been just three months since the Prime Minister and the President last met at the G7 in Cornwall. But what a long tricky summer it has been since then.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Kerry ‘confident’ of $100bn climate target
Trans-Atlantic relationships have been strained. The worth of NATO has been questioned by the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The pandemic endures, with global vaccination efforts faltering. And November’s high stakes Climate Change summit in Glasgow is ever closer with the risk of it falling short of the pledges made.
Advertisement
The prime minister will arrive in the West Wing of the White House with two unexpected boosts.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
PM: Rich countries must ‘step-up’
And the hints by President Biden’s climate envoy to Sky News that America will commit to funds for developing countries, as called for by Mr Johnson, is a positive move.
“It will make a huge difference and I think it will send a massively powerful signal to the world that we in the industrialised west really do take it seriously,” Mr Johnson said.
With Mr Johnson and Mr Biden both in New York, their meeting could easily have been there too.
But holding it at the White House, in the Oval Office, carries much more weight.
The so-called special relationship looks that much more convincingly special with the Oval Office backdrop.
Image: The last time a UK Prime Minister was hosted at the White House was in 2017
The optics of these monuments through the years are of course important, but it is the results that matter.
On climate, Mr Johnson may get something to take with him to the Glasgow conference he is hosting.
But on that all-important post Brexit US/UK trade deal, do not hold your breath.
Before the Oval Office meeting, there will be other key diplomatic moments to watch through the day too.
President Biden has numerous strained relationships to mend following the Afghanistan withdrawal and he is expected to hold talks with France’s President Macron amid the most extraordinary spat over the supply of nuclear powered submarines to Australia.
Consumer confidence has tumbled amid rampant speculation about what the chancellor will announce in the budget, figures show.
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) blamed “strong hints” from the government of income tax hikes for the public’s falling expectations of how much they’ll spend over the next three months – even as Christmas beckons.
BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said months of uncertainty had “heightened public concern about their own finances and the wider economy”.
Consumer expectations for the state of the economy over the next three months have fallen significantly to minus 44, down from minus 35 in October, according to data from the BRC and Opinium.
Ms Dickinson said action was needed from Rachel Reeves to “bring down the spiralling cost burden facing retailers”, which she said would “keep price rises in check”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:13
Is chancellor to blame for food price rises?
Signs of ‘fragile’ recovery in jobs market
In slightly more encouraging news for Ms Reeves ahead of her statement next Wednesday, new research suggests the jobs market may be on the up.
The Recruitment and Employment Confederation said the number of new job adverts last month was 754,359, up by 2.1% from September, taking the total to more than 1.6 million.
Ms Reeves’s decision to hike national insurance contributions for employers in last year’s budget was blamed for a slowdown in the market, and a rising unemployment rate.
The report said there has been an increase in adverts for medical radiographers, delivery drivers and couriers, and further education teaching professionals.
But it warned the apparent recovery was “fragile”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
7:38
PM challenged on budget leaks
Reeves set to back DLR extension
One man looking forward to the budget is Sir Sadiq Khan, who has welcomed reports that London’s DLR is set to be given funding for an extension.
According to the Press Association, the chancellor will back an extension to the Docklands Light Railway to Thamesmead at a cost of £1.7bn – unlocking thousands of new homes.
Thamesmead has been notoriously short of public transport links ever since it was developed in the 1960s.
Image: Thamesmead in southeast London straddles the boroughs of Bexley and Greenwich. Pic: PA
The plan would see the line extended from Gallions Reach, near London City Airport, and include a new station at Beckton as well as in Thamesmead itself.
Sir Sadiq said the DLR extension “will not only transform travel in a historically under-served part of the capital but also unlock thousands of new jobs and homes, boosting the economy not just locally but nationally”.
It is also expected to unlock land for 25,000 new homes and up to 10,000 new jobs, along with almost £18bn of private investment in the area.
Michael Selig, who serves as chief counsel for the crypto task force at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, faced questions from lawmakers on the Senate Agriculture Committee for his nomination to be the next chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
On Wednesday, Selig appeared before the committee and addressed questions and concerns from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle regarding his potential conflicts of interest, policy views and experience as the next CFTC chair, succeeding Caroline Pham.
In his opening statement, Selig said he had advised a wide range of market participants, including digital asset companies, and warned against the agency taking a regulation-by-enforcement approach, stating that it would drive companies offshore.
“We’re at a unique moment in the history of our financial markets,” said Selig. “A wide range of new technologies, products, and platforms are emerging […] the digital asset economy alone has grown from a mere curiosity to a nearly $4 trillion market.”
The confirmation of Selig, whom US President Donald Trump nominated to chair the CFTC following the removal of his first pick, Brian Quintenz, is expected to head for a vote soon. According to the Senate calendar, the Agriculture Committee is scheduled to discuss his nomination on Thursday.
Addressing DeFi, crypto enforcement, roles of agency
The prospective CFTC chair responded to questions from the committee chair, Senator John Boozman, who advocated for the agency to take a leading role in regulating spot digital commodity markets. The senator’s remarks came as the committee is expected to consider a market structure bill that would give the CFTC more authority to regulate crypto.
“The CFTC, and only the CFTC, should regulate the trading of digital commodities,” said Boozman.
The Arkansas senator questioned Selig about his potential approach to decentralized finance if he were to be confirmed, an issue that reportedly divided many lawmakers on the market structure bill.
“When we’re thinking about DeFi, it’s something of a buzzword, but really we should be looking to onchain markets and onchain applications and thinking about the features of these applications as well as where there’s an actual intermediary involved […]” said Selig.
He added that it was “vitally important that we have a cop on the beat” in response to a question on regulating crypto, specifically spot digital asset commodity markets.
Democratic concerns about CFTC leadership
Senator Amy Klobuchar, the Democratic ranking member of the Agriculture Committee, pressed Selig and other lawmakers on the leadership at the CFTC. Since September, acting Chair Caroline Pham has been the sole commissioner at the agency, which usually has five members. Pham is expected to resign should the Senate confirm Selig.
“The CFTC has operated much of the last year without a full complement of bipartisan commissioners, and has been operating for months with only an acting chairman,” said Klobuchar. “This uncertainty surrounding the leadership at the CFTC has only created more chaos for people who rely on the CFTC.”
Selig said it was “very valuable to have a diversity of viewpoints,” and would “work with whoever the president chooses to appoint.” As of Wednesday, Trump had not announced any additional nominations for the CFTC commissioners, leaving four open seats if Selig were to be confirmed and Pham were to leave.
China’s foreign ministry has hit back at what it called “unfounded” accusations of spying in Westminster, saying it has “no interest” in gathering intelligence on the UK.
Yesterday, the security service MI5 sent a warning to MPs and peers about two recruitment headhunters who are working for Chinese security services.
They are Amanda Qiu of BR-YR Executive Search and Shirly Shen of the Internship Union.
But speaking in response to a question by Asia correspondent Helen-Ann Smith, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning replied: “China has repeatedly made clear its solemn position on this matter.
“We firmly oppose such unfounded allegations and the exaggerated portrayal and sensationalism that project one’s own biases onto others.
“Judgements based on erroneous information will only lead astray.
More on China
Related Topics:
Ms Mao added: “China never interferes in the internal affairs of other countries, nor does it have any interest in gathering so-called intelligence on the British parliament.”
Chinese spying accusations may signal thorny period ahead
It is China’s standard playbook to outright deny allegations of spying.
But given that it’s common knowledge countries spy on each other, and given the recent spate of allegations of this nature, it might feel a little far-fetched for China to stick so rigorously to the position that the UK is just making it all up.
Not so, says Mao Ning, the spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
When I put it to her, she said that these allegations are, in fact, a “projection of one’s own biases on to others”, and that China doesn’t “have any interest in gathering so-called intelligence on the British parliament”.
That is almost certainly not true. China is commonly understood to run a highly sophisticated espionage operation.
But, in a way, the truth or untruth might be immaterial to the impact on the bilateral relationship.
While the UK government may seek to send strong signals amidst criticism that it’s being too soft, China really does not appreciate this type of laundry being aired in public.
It may well signal a thorny period ahead.
In a message seen by Sky News about parliamentary staff, MPs and peers were warned that the MI5 alert “highlights how the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS) is actively reaching out to individuals in our community”.
The message continued: “Their aim is to collect information and lay the groundwork for long-term relationships, using professional networking sites, recruitment agents and consultants acting on their behalf.”
Security minister Dan Jarvis later said in a statement to parliament that “China has a low threshold for what information is considered to be of value, and will gather individual pieces of information to build a wider picture”.
He added: “Let me speak plainly. This activity involves a covert and calculated attempt by a foreign power to interfere with our sovereign affairs in favour of its own interests, and this government will not tolerate it.”
The government made a statement in the House of Commons following the revelations, saying it would take all “necessary measures” to protect the UK.
Westminster employees were warned that two individuals were both known to be reaching out on LinkedIn to “conduct outreach at scale on behalf of MSS”.
This latest warning comes after the collapse of a prosecution of two people suspected of spying on behalf of China.
The previous spying allegations led to controversy over how the government under Labour responded to the Crown Prosecution Service’s requests for evidence.
Sir Keir Starmer sought to blame the previous Conservative government for the issues, which centred on whether China could be designated an “enemy” under First World War-era legislation.
Sir Keir has sought to keep relationships with Beijing somewhat warm, highlighting the value of China as a trading partner.