Nine armed Ethiopian factions have joined forces in a bid to remove Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed from power.
The newly-formed United Front of Ethiopian Federalist and Confederalist Forces aims to form a transitional government “by force or by negotiation”.
“There is no limit for us… Time is running out”, said Tigray official and former foreign minister Berhane Gebre-Christos at a news conference in Washington.
Mr Gebre-Christos said members of the alliance would “cooperate in all areas with no limits” but conceded, “we are not here to form a government”.
The Ethiopian government described the new alliance as “a publicity stunt” and claimed some of the groups involved had been responsible for “ethnic cleansing”.
Advertisement
Prime Minister Abiy declared a state of emergency on Tuesday. The Ethiopian Army has asked former servicemen to re-join to help defeat opposition forces.
With increasing anxiety in the capital Addis Ababa about approaching rebel forces, the US Embassy has advised its citizens to leave the country.
More on Ethiopia
Related Topics:
“The security environment in Ethiopia is very fluid,” they said in a statement.
A war between government forces and the northern-based Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) and its allies has led to thousands of deaths and the displacement of more than two million people in the country.
Abiy Ahmed has been in power since 2018, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2019. But there are now calls for it to be revoked after claims of genocide in the region.
On Wednesday, UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet used the phrase, “extreme brutality” to describe horrifying incidents during the year-long war in the region of Tigray.
The authors of a report compiled by the UN, and the state-appointed Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, found: “All the parties to the conflict in Tigray have… committed violations of international human rights, humanitarian and refugee law, some of which may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity”.
Two Australian brothers and a US tourist who went missing in Mexico were shot dead by thieves who wanted their truck’s tyres, according to prosecutors.
Relatives of Jake and Callum Robinson and Jack Carter Rhoad have identified the three bodies.
They were dumped in a remote 15m-deep (50ft) well.
The trio went missing a week ago while on a surfing trip near the northern city of Ensenada – not far from the US border – and had posted photos on social media of isolated beaches.
Thieves likely saw their truck and tents and wanted their tyres but the men probably resisted, said prosecutor María Elena Andrade Ramírez.
She said the bodies were taken to “a site that is extremely hard to get to” in Baja California state.
The well, near where their truck and tent were found on Thursday, also contained a fourth body that had been there much longer.
It took two hours to winch the bodies out, said Ms Andrade Ramírez.
She said the same thieves may also have dumped the fourth body there.
After the bodies were found, surfers gathered in Ensenada, the nearest city, to protest at what they say is a lack of safety in the state.
“They only wanted to surf – we demand safe beaches,” said a sign held by one woman.
Some of them later took part in a ‘paddle-out’ ceremony in remembrance of the three men, forming a circle with their boards in the sea and throwing flowers.
In a Facebook message last week, Jake and Callum’s mother said she hadn’t been in touch with them since 27 April.
The post, on 1 May, said they were meant to check into an Airbnb in the resort town of Rosarito but “did not show up”.
Australian media reported Callum had been living in the US to try to become a professional lacrosse player, while his brother had only flown out to visit him two weeks ago.
It could be a scene from centuries ago. In the Nevada desert, Native Americans are protesting over a mining project they say desecrates sacred land.
They are riding to Sentinel Mountain, which their ancestors once used as a lookout in times gone by. Here, they say, more than 30 of their people were massacred by US cavalry in 1865.
Today, the land is at the heart of America’s electric car revolution and Joe Biden’s clean energy policy
Native American tribal members say the mine neglects their interests and offends their history.
The route of the “Prayer Horse Ride”, a journey on horseback through mining-affected communities in Northern Nevada, is designed to publicise their objections.
“Being the original inhabitants of the land means we have cultural ties and roots to these landscapes,” says Gary McKinney, a member of the Duck Valley Shoshone Paiute tribe.
“To me, it’s sacred ground,” says Myron Smart. His grandmother survived the massacre of 1865 as a baby. Industrialising this place, he says, offends her memory and reflects the story of Native Americans through time.
“We’re people too. We have red blood just like everybody in the United States.”
However, a US judge has rejected their complaints and the project is going ahead.
The open mine, which is on public land, will source lithium to power up to a million electric vehicles a year and will create 1,800 jobs in its construction phase.
President Biden aims to make the United States a world leader in electric vehicle technology and reduce reliance for lithium supply on countries like China.
The Thacker Pass project has supporters as well as opponents.
Lithium Americas, the company behind the project, insists the mine is not located on a massacre site. This was supported by a judge in 2021 who ruled the evidence presented by tribes “does not definitely establish that a massacre occurred” within the proposed project area.
Tim Crowley, the company’s VP of Government and External Affairs, said in a statement to Sky News: “Lithium Americas is committed to doing this project right, which is why we have a community benefits agreement in place with the local Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribe that ensures benefits from Thacker Pass accrue to them.
“Concerns about cultural and environmental resources were thoroughly addressed in the BLM’s (Bureau of Land Management) approved Environmental Impact Statement, which withstood comprehensive reviews by the Federal District and Circuit Courts.”
However, members of different Nevada-based Native American tribes continue to oppose the mining project. They say their evidence of the 1865 massacre, and a separate inter-tribal conflict, is rooted in the oral history passed on from their ancestors, through generations – not collated with a court case in mind, but compelling nonetheless.
“Back in our ancestors’ days, they didn’t write any documentation down, they didn’t send letters, they didn’t write in journals,” says Gary. “So there was no way that the United States government could know our story.
“These stories have been passed down generation to generation, so we have direct lineage from survivors of these massacres, which is how these stories remain in our families.”
The courts have also rejected complaints by tribal members and conservationists on the environmental impact and planning consultation.
The project throws a focus onto the issues surrounding the pursuit of clean energy.
“First off, we have to acknowledge that we need electric vehicles,” says Amanda Hurowitz of Mighty Earth, a global environmental non-governmental organisation.
They are more efficient than petrol and diesel cars, she says, and they are needed for the US to hit its climate targets.
But they also need more mined minerals – like lithium – and getting those materials out of the ground has an impact.
“All mining operations need to get consent from the local people,” she adds, “and the more consent, the better.”
Joe Biden’s dog – which has bitten US Secret Service staff several times – should be put down, a political opponent, who wrote about shooting her own dog, has suggested.
In her memoir, due to be published this week, the Republican reportedly details how she killed the “extremely dangerous” puppy after the animal attacked and killed a neighbouring family’s chickens.
In an interview on Sunday, she suggested the US president‘s German shepherd, Commander, should meet the same fate.
She told CBS News’ Face The Nation: “Joe Biden’s dog has attacked 24 Secret Service people. So how many people is enough people to be attacked and dangerously hurt before you make a decision on a dog and what to do with it?”
When asked by host Margaret Brennan, who pointed out the animal no longer lived at the White house, whether she was suggesting the dog should be shot, Ms Noem said: “That what’s the president should be accountable to.”
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
In her book, Noem reportedly describes Cricket as “less than worthless” and “untrainable”.
Advertisement
After having shot her dog, she reportedly killed her family’s goat, which she called “nasty and mean”, The Guardian, which had an early copy of the book, reported.
The governor, who has often defended her actions, despite widespread criticism, again justified her decision in Sunday’s interview, saying: “I made a difficult choice. I think you’re a mother, too. And you have little kiddos.
“Would you make a choice between your children or a dangerous animal? And I think I would ask everybody in the country to put themselves in that situation.”
Asked why she did not take the dog to a shelter instead of killing it, she said Cricket was “a working dog” who “had come from a family that had already had issues with this dog”.
“I didn’t ask somebody else to take that responsibility for me… I had to make that decision myself,” she added.