LONDON — U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm has called on oil-producing nations to immediately increase crude supplies to mitigate the surging cost of living.
Oil prices have recently hit their highest levels since 2014, and crude-importing countries are feeling the pain. It’s boosted gasoline prices and has added to surging inflation rates around the globe, with consumers already paying more due to supply bottlenecks in the economy.
Asked by CNBC about the U.S.’s relationship with Saudi Arabia, the de-facto leader of OPEC, after the output decision, Granholm said: “In some places, we have strong relationships and in some places we wish our allies would move a little faster.”
“The message is we need to increase supply at this moment so that people will not be hurt during the winter months,” she told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on Friday at the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland.
President Joe Biden has squarely blamed the reluctance of OPEC and its allies, known as OPEC+, to pump more oil for the sharp rise in energy prices in the U.S. and around the world.
“The idea that Russia and Saudi Arabia and other major producers are not going to pump more oil so people can have gasoline to get to and from work, for example, is not right,” Biden said Sunday at the G-20 meeting in Rome.
OPEC+ decided to rollover its August plan to gradually increase oil production by 400,000 barrels per day each month. Ministers attending the meeting on Thursday said the group was maintaining market balance and remaining wary of potential changes in demand.
Several of the ministers also pointed to the skyrocketing prices of other commodities such as gas and coal to argue that oil markets are lucky to have OPEC+ regulating supply.
International oil benchmark Brent crude was trading at $80.80 per barrel at 7:30 a.m. ET on Friday, up 27 cents from the previous day.
It was also put to Granholm that domestic oil production in the U.S. had abated over the last couple of years, even prior to the Covid pandemic, due to a lack of investment incentives.
“I don’t know why at $80 a barrel those incentives are not there,” she said.
“During Covid, it was down — they backed off because demand was not there because people were staying home, we know that. Now that things are back up, the production should be meeting that [demand], there has been rigs that have been added but not fully,” she added.
—CNBC’s Natasha Turak and Anmar Frangoul contributed to this article.
Tesla (TSLA) is reintroducing Full Self-Driving (FSD) transfers and offering $2,000 loyalty discounts on the new Model Y to existing owners amid a demand surge.
Now, Tesla has pulled new demand levers to drive sales of these vehicles.
First, last night, Tesla began sending emails to early Model Y owners in the US, offering them a $2,000 discount on upgrading to the new Model Y.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
This is an unusual type of discount for Tesla and a significant one.
On top of the direct loyalty discount, Tesla also announced that it is bringing back “FSD transfer” on all vehicles in the US:
‘Vox populi, Vox Dei’. Tesla says that it’s by popular demand that it is coming back, but that’s true. It’s because Tesla needs it.
If it were by popular demand, FSD transfer would always be available to Tesla owners as long as Tesla hasn’t delivered on its promise of delivering unsupervised full self-driving. That would simply be the right thing to do and what most owners, who are not also Tesla shareholders, have been asking for years.
But instead, Tesla is using its own inability to deliver a product it promised and sold as a way to create more demand for its newer vehicles.
In the summer of 2023, CEO Elon Musk finally agreed to allow FSD transfers after owners had asked him for years, but not because it was the right thing to do. Instead, he said it would be a “one-time amnesty” for a single quarter. Tesla used this to boost sales in the quarter.
Tesla ended up bringing back the incentive four more times when it needed to boost orders, making Musk a liar for saying it would only be for a quarter. By claiming it’s only for this one time, Tesla is creating urgency in trying to get people to upgrade – instead of doing the right thing and offering everyone who bought FSD the ability to transfer until Tesla actually delivers on its promise.
Electrek’s Take
‘Vox populi, Vox Dei’. That’s funny. It’s Latin for “the voice of the people, the voice of God.” But it should be more “vox necessitatis, vox pecuniae,” which is “the voice of necessity, the voice of money.”
That’s not by popularity. If Tesla were doing what owners wanted and what is right, FSD transfer would be permanent and available to any Tesla owner who purchased the FSD package, until Tesla delivers on what it promised.
Tesla is doing this now because it needs it. It already has no backlog of orders for the new Model Y in the US and it is testing out these incentives before going back to offering 0% financing, likely in the coming weeks.
Something interesting to note is that these incentives are both technically loyalty incentives, as they apply to existing owners.
Tesla used to have incredible customer loyalty, but that has changed in the last few months due to Elon Musk.
I’d be curious to see how successful they are and if it can convince some people who swore off Tesla because of Musk to actually get another one.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional electric vehicles. This time, that includes a new cargo e-bike launch from Tenways, Lime bringing its new e-bike and e-moped to its larger fleets, testing a 100 mile e-bike, California’s e-bike vouchers are set to open again in another lottery round, a new electric unicycle from InMotion, and more.
Today’s episode is brought to you by retrospec—makers of sleek, powerful e-bikes and outdoor gear built for everyday adventure.Electrek listeners can get 10% off their next ride until May 8th with the exclusive code ELECTREK10 only atretrospec.com.
The Wheel-E podcast returns every two weeks on Electrek’s YouTube channel, Facebook, Linkedin, and Twitter.
As a reminder, we’ll have an accompanying post, like this one, on the site with an embedded link to the live stream. Head to the YouTube channel to get your questions and comments in.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
After the show ends, the video will be archived on YouTube and the audio on all your favorite podcast apps:
We also have a Patreon if you want to help us to avoid more ads and invest more in our content. We have some awesome gifts for our Patreons and more coming.
Here are a few of the articles that we will discuss during the Wheel-E podcast today:
Here’s the live stream for today’s episode starting at 9:00 a.m. ET (or the video after 10:00 a.m. ET):
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
This one’s pretty simple, kids – it’s exactly what it says on the tin: a Polestar 2 owner took to the Polestar subreddit this week claiming that the window glass in his new EV actually stopped a bullet from hitting him. Plus, he says he’s got the pictures to prove it. (!)
The brand may be evolving into its own, but the OG Polestar 1 and Polestar 2 were little more than hot electric versions of Volvo cars – and Volvo cars are known throughout the world for their secure, planted feel on the road and absolutely bananas high-tensile steel safety cages. As such, it should come as no surprise that the Polestar 2 is one of the safest sedans on the road today … but is the car really bulletproof?
That’s what one redditor is claiming after his window was hit by what they believed to be a stray bullet just five days after taking delivery.
Now, that was fun, sure – but it’s worth noting that a number of commenters claiming alternately that there’s no way this was a .22 caliber bullet (certainly not a .22 WMR) or that it was a stray shot from very far away. The consensus seems to be that a .177 caliber air gun pellet is most likely to blame, but my money is on a small piece of stone or gravel kicked up at a weird angle from a nearby vehicle.
Regardless, it seems like CptMerica29 is A-OK, and their Polestar 2 hardly seems worse for wear, either. Here’s hoping it’s the last time we have to have a debate about what kind of bullet was being fired at an EV driver for a long time.
If you’d like to try your hand at driving a Polestar 2 through a volley of flying debris and other assorted projectiles and letting us know how you do, click the link below to score a great deal on one near you (while you still can):
Disclaimer
I would like to believe this is obvious, but there’s a “do not use batteries as toothpaste” sticker on this pack of Duracell batteries for a reason, so I’m going to err on the side of caution here and tell any of you reading the above and taking it seriously that: I am kidding. That was a joke.
To be clear, it is my position that NO VEHICLE this side of a Mercedes-Benz EQS GUARD or Inkas Armored S Class is actually bulletproof – and that, yes, a .22 is a real gun with plenty of lethal stopping power and, also yes, a pellet gun can and has killed a lot of people. DO NOT SHOOT AT CARS, and do not sit in your cars and let others shoot at you if you can at all avoid it.