Connect with us

Published

on

MPs have backed the government’s approach to curbing MPs’ outside interests, after Labour’s proposals were voted down in the Commons.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer used one of his party’s designated opposition day debates in the Commons to put forward a motion setting out his party’s plans for banning MPs from paid political consultancy work.

But in a bid to steal a march on the opposition, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced he backed such a ban and put down an amendment setting out the government’s own approach.

This has now been passed, by 297 votes to zero, after Labour and other opposition MPs chose not to vote against the government amendment on Wednesday night. Labour’s own motion was earlier defeated by 282 votes to 231.

This turn of events has sparked a furious response from Labour, which accused ministers of “watering down” the party’s original motion and effectively making it non-binding.

And the move from the prime minister also risks inflaming tensions with his Tory backbenchers, amid questions and concerns at the scope of such a ban and which roles will be affected.

Labour’s motion said MPs should be banned from holding second jobs involving acting as a parliamentary strategist, adviser or consultant.

More on Boris Johnson

It also would have instructed the Committee on Standards to come up with plans to implement this move and to report back to the Commons by the end of January.

And it said MPs should have been able to force a debate on the contents of such a report if the government did not schedule a debate on it within 15 days of the recommendations being received.

The prime minister set out his own plans on Tuesday, at the same time as Sir Keir was holding a news conference on the issue.

Unlike Labour’s motion, it does not explicitly endorse the findings of a 2018 report on MPs’ second jobs from the independent Committee on Standards in Public Life.

The government says this report – and its recommendation of a consultancy ban – forms the “basis of a viable approach which could command the confidence of parliamentarians and the public” and believes that its recommendations “should be taken forward”.

In addition, the motion expresses support for “cross-party work”, including from the Committee on Standards, to bring forward proposals to update the MPs’ code of conduct by the end of January.

However, there is no provision for a debate in the Commons on such proposals.

And the amendment makes no mention of a proposal Mr Johnson included in a letter to Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle to investigate and punish MPs who prioritise outside interests.

Speaking in the Commons debate, Labour’s shadow Commons leader Thangam Debbonaire accused the government of trying “to gut” the party’s motion.

She said: “At the moment I don’t see the government coming up with anything strong.

“All the government’s done is try to gut our motion, that would put in train the recommendation of the Committee on Standards in Public Life that was made three years ago that the government could have done any time.”

Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg said MPs’ expertise should “not be for sale”, but expressed the government’s view that it is an “historic strength” of the parliamentary system that there are MPs “with a broader range of talents and professional backgrounds”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Oklahoma senator introduces Bitcoin Freedom Act for BTC payments

Published

on

By

Oklahoma senator introduces Bitcoin Freedom Act for BTC payments

“If Washington D.C. can ruin something, it likely will. And it is certainly ruining the US dollar,” said Senator Deevers after introducing the bill.

Continue Reading

Politics

Elon Musk’s abuse of Jess Phillips has pushed real victims into game of political point scoring

Published

on

By

Elon Musk's abuse of Jess Phillips has pushed real victims into game of political point scoring

The treatment of Jess Phillips over recent days tells me all I need to know about the epidemic of misogyny, abuse and violence against women and girls that still plagues our culture.

The domestic violence campaigner-turned politician, who has spent her career fighting for victims, has found herself the subject of abuse on an industrial scale over the past week that has put her in danger.

In dark moments, it has left her wondering whether she should give up frontline politics for good and go back to the women’s hostels where her work with vulnerable women and girls began.

Outspoken and a women’s campaigner, Phillips has long been a lightning rod.

But when the world’s richest man, who owns a social media platform with 211m followers, starts trolling you as a “rape genocide apologist” – complicit in a what he claims is a cover-up of the most disgusting and sickening abuse – that’s a different order of attention, and danger.

This week, the female politician charged with trying to protect the actual victims of these unspeakable crimes became subject to an avalanche of abuse – and threats – herself.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Abuse of me nothing compared to that of victims

It was undoubtedly horrific for Phillips, who tells me she felt physically sick and hunted as the tweets came raining down.

More on Jess Phillips

And, as everyone piled in with their outrage and indignation, where were the voices of the actual victims themselves?

It has been so vicious, noisy and fraught as the very serious matter of grooming gangs and the exploitation, rape and torture of young victims turned into a political battleground of finger pointing and point scoring.

Imagine for a moment you’re a victim of grooming, rape, or torture and you’re seeing your own trauma being bandied around. Let down once before, how might this furore feel for those victims now?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jess Phillips: Musk’s comments are ‘ridiculous’

The Conservatives are now calling for a national inquiry into grooming gangs.

Labour shout hypocrisy, but find themselves on the receiving end of an online movement criticising safeguarding minister Jess Phillips and Keir Starmer’s record as the country’s former chief prosecutor.

It prompted The Times’ investigative reporter Andrew Norfolk – who revealed the wide scale abuse of young white girls predominately by Asian men of Pakistani descent back in 2012 – to this week to defend Starmer, who he said had been instrumental in making more prosecutions possible.

He added that there was a “huge increase in convictions” when Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions back in the early 2010s.

This is a scandal that has run for decades and was properly exposed by Norfolk, who’s reporting led to a string of independent inquiries, resignations, police investigations and successful prosecutions.

But it was re-ignited last week by a decision by Philips, revealed by GB News, not to hold a government-led inquiry of grooming gangs in Oldham.

This is because previous investigations, in towns including Telford, Rochdale and Rotherham, were all independent investigations led by the local authority.

That’s not to say Phillips doesn’t want a inquiry in Oldham – she’s encouraged the council leader to set one up. However, the evidence is clear that victims are more likely to come forward when it’s a local inquiry rather than a national one.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: A sky News investigation

But somehow this lit the touch paper for Elon Musk – a tech billionaire strong on tweeting, but light on knowledge of the actual situation in the UK – who launched an avalanche of claims over grooming.

He galvanised opposition politicians to call for action and created a storm that has brought movement from the government too.

This week, Labour committed to implementing some of the recommendations of the Jay Review into child sexual exploitation.

The Jay Review was published in 2022 under the Conservative government, but its suggestions were not enacted by the relevant ministers.

Read more:
Victims of grooming gangs can have inquiry if they want one, Jess Phillips says
What happened in the grooming gangs scandal?
Grooming gangs scandal timeline

Phillips is also setting up a victims’ board that will sit in the Home Office and advise and give feedback on changes that need to be made to get the truth and justice for victims.

There remain questions about whether there should be more? Reform and the Conservatives want a national inquiry into the specific question of grooming gangs – what is their prevalence, their root causes and the institutional failings that let tens of thousands of victims down?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sir Keir Starmer hits back at those who criticised his handling of child grooming gangs.

Andrew Norfolk, while stopping short of calling for a national public inquiry, does believe the root causes of grooming gangs have not been properly examined.

He believes they will never be fully stamped out until there’s proper research into what allowed these gangs to flourish.

In her 2022 report into child sexual exploitation, referencing her 2014 inquiry into grooming gangs in Rotherham, Professor Alexis Jay noted “the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by their victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors didn’t engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discussion how they could jointly address the issue”.

Norfolk, in The Times this week, puts it like this: “It is very difficult to talk about this stuff without being accused of being Islamophobic. That is not going to change.

“Why one very small sub-section of one minority ethnic community was so overwhelmingly, disproportionately responsible for these crimes – that is work that would be vital in bringing about understanding that could enable changes to take place.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chief executive of The Survivors’ Trust, Fay Maxted says she wants to see action now.

Jess Phillips argues that another inquiry is not what is needed, pointing to the Jay Review, and a string of other independent investigations.

She tells me she wants to get on with getting justice for victims and stamping out sexual abuse.

“There is nothing I will not consider going forward,” she told me, be it prevention programmes, working on community relations, tackling peer-on-peer abuse. And, if the victims want it, a national inquiry.

More on this story:
Jess Phillips hits back at Elon Musk
Why is Musk so interested in UK politics?

You have probably read the headlines over recent days, and you might have felt battered by the noise.

You might be confused about what is going on as politicians trade blows in the Commons and Musk rants online.

You have perhaps read some of the court transcripts of historic cases circulating online that document crimes against young girls so disgusting and barbaric that it makes you want to weep.

That’s why on this week’s Electoral Dysfunction we try to take a step back and spend quite a bit of time talking to Jess Phillips about not just the events of the past few days, but the long shadow of grooming gangs and child abuse.

We talk about Phillips’ own feelings when those Musk tweets landed and what being in the eye of the storm meant for her safety. We talk about the criticisms levelled at her and the prime minister.

I ask her about accusations of cover-ups in order not to stoke racial tensions in local communities, why she doesn’t support a national inquiry and her frustrations at those in positions of authority – be it councillors, social workers, police officers – who failed to protect girls and still haven’t faced a reckoning.

After all the heat and noise, I hope it can offer a bit of explanation and a little light too.

You can listen to Beth’s full interview with Jess Phillips in a special episode of Electoral Dysfunction released on Thursday.

Continue Reading

Politics

FTX says Backpack acquisition of EU arm has not been approved by court

Published

on

By

FTX says Backpack acquisition of EU arm has not been approved by court

FTX says that Backpack has not been authorized to return funds to creditors despite the Solana exchange saying it would take over creditor repayments from FTX.

Continue Reading

Trending