Grant Shapps has said promises the government made to the North on rail are “absolutely being fulfilled” despite the eastern leg of HS2 to Leeds being scrapped and plans for Northern Powerhouse Rail being downgraded.
The transport secretary told Sky News that the government’s new £96bn Integrated Rail Plan for the North and the Midlands will deliver “faster” train journeys both earlier and cheaper than the original HS2 plans would have done.
But ministers have been widely criticised – including by individuals within the Conservative Party – for reneging on promises to upgrade links and instead proposing a scaled-back plan for the region.
Image: Passengers had hoped the time of rail journeys from Bradford would be cut
One senior Tory criticised the government for “selling perpetual sunlight” and delivering “moonlight” for people in the north of England.
Advertisement
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said: “The north of England has been betrayed.”
And speaking to Sky News on Friday, shadow Northern Ireland secretary and MP for Sheffield Heeley said: “For this transport secretary to pretend to the people of the North that they are delivering what they promised is quite frankly nothing less than an insult to their intelligence.”
More on Boris Johnson
Related Topics:
Addressing reporters on Thursday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson described the announcement as “a much better plan” and said it was “total rubbish” to suggest he was breaking his former promises on rail connections.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:45
‘North of England has been betrayed’
Unveiling the new plan in the Commons, Mr Shapps confirmed that the eastern leg of HS2 will no longer go all the way to Leeds. It will instead stop in the East Midlands near Nottingham.
But on Friday morning, the transport secretary denied plans for the eastern leg are being scrapped, telling Sky News that to say otherwise is “not accurate reporting”.
He claimed some complaints were from “largely Labour leaders who are completely misleading people” – despite several Tory MPs also expressing their disappointment with the plan.
Image: The government unveiled its new Integrated Rail Plan on Thursday
Plans for HS2 were originally meant to connect London with the city centres of Birmingham, Manchester, and Leeds.
The transport secretary told MPs the new £96bn rail plan will instead deliver three high-speed lines – HS2 Crewe to Manchester, Birmingham to East Midlands Parkway, Warrington to Manchester – but not HS2 to Leeds or Northern Powerhouse Rail Leeds to Manchester.
Image: The government’s own chart shows rail times will be improved but will fall short on original plans in some areas
Justifying the revised project, Mr Shapps said it “will bring benefits at least a decade or more earlier”, adding that under the original scheme, HS2 would not reach the North until the early 2040s.
“We will provide a journey time of 33 minutes from Leeds to Manchester, a significant, a very significant, improvement,” he told MPs, adding that the new project “will provide a better service than the outdated plan for HS2 a decade ago”.
But Conservative chairman of the Transport Select Committee Huw Merriman told the Commons the government’s new plan “compromises some fantastic projects that will slash journey times and better connect our great northern cities”.
Image: The prime minister said the announcement on rail links in the North is the greatest thing to happen ‘this century’
Another Conservative MP, Craig Tracey, said it is “really difficult” to share the optimism in the announcement because it is “very disappointing to hear that HS2 will not be scrapped in full”.
Fellow Tory MP Robbie Moore pointed out that Bradford – the seventh-largest city in the UK – will still not have a mainline station under the new plans.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:21
New rail plan ‘a monumental achievement’
Conservative MP for Thirsk and Malton in Yorkshire, Kevin Hollinrake, added that the original HS2 project could have been a great economic boost for Bradford.
But Mr Shapps said the “landmark” programme would still deliver and promised work will start “by Christmas”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:36
Labour: ‘Great train robbery’ for North
Mr Shapps said the government will “study how best to take HS2 trains into Leeds”.
Northern political leaders had warned the government will pass up huge economic benefits and betray promises to voters if, as expected, it cancelled the eastern leg of HS2 and a new Manchester-Leeds line.
There is “considerably more doubt” over when future interest rate cuts can take place, the governor of the Bank of England has said.
Andrew Bailey told a committee of MPs that the risks around inflation had gone up and he was “more concerned” about weakness in the labour market.
Bank staff projections expect the main consumer prices index measure of inflation to rise to 4% this year – double the 2% target rate – from its current level of 3.8%. Food prices are proving the main driver currently, with part of the increases blamed on government tax rises on employers.
On the prospects for further interest rate reductions this year, Mr Bailey said: “There is now considerably more doubt about when and exactly how quickly we can make those further steps.”
Interest rates are elevated to help ease the pace of price growth and cut, when able, to help maintain inflation at the 2% target level.
The governor was speaking after the Bank’s split vote last month that resulted in a quarter point reduction for Bank rate to 4%.
More from Money
At that time, the governor said that while he still believed that the future path for borrowing costs was still downwards gradually over time, financial markets had since understood that the outlook for the pace of cuts was more murky.
“That’s the message I wanted to get across”, he told the Treasury select committee.
“Now, I think actually, judging by what’s happened, certainly to market pricing since then, I think that message has been understood.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:25
Inflation up: the bad and ‘good’ news
A further quarter point cut to 3.75% is no longer fully priced in for this year, according to LSEG data on market expectations.
He was speaking as financial markets continued to see a widespread sell-off of long-dated bonds, largely over fears of rising government debt levels in many western economies including the US and UK.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:30
Why did UK debt just get more expensive?
The activity has taken the yield – the effective interest rate demanded by investors – in 30-year gilts to a 27-year high this week. Other shorter dated bonds have also risen sharply.
But Mr Bailey urged less of an emphasis on the long-term gilts, as headlines point out that any increase in the cost of servicing government debt is a headache chancellor Rachel Reeves can well do without as she battles to balance the books.
He told the MPs: “It’s important not to … over focus on the 30-year bond rate. Of course, it’s a number that gets quoted a lot, it’s quite a high number. It is actually not a number that is being used for funding at all at the moment.”
Mr Bailey also waded into the continuing row across the Atlantic that sees the independence of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, threatened by Donald Trump and his quest for interest rate cuts.
He has moved to fire a Fed governor over alleged mortgage fraud and make a new appointment but Lisa Cook, who was appointed to the board by Joe Biden, is fighting his bid to oust her in the courts.
“This is a very serious situation”, Mr Bailey said.
“I am very concerned. The Federal Reserve… has built up a very strong reputation for independence and for its decision making,”, adding that trading central bank independence against other government decisions would be a “very dangerous road to go down”.
After hitting the highest level this century on Tuesday, the cost of long term UK government borrowing has now hit a fresh 27-year high.
The interest rate demanded by investors on the state’s long-dated borrowing (30-year bonds) rose to just below 5.75%, surpassing the 5.72% peak reached on Tuesday, pushing it to a high not seen since May 1998.
It comes as the government auctioned off these long-term loans on Tuesday and was forced to pay a premium to do so.
Issuing bonds is a routine way states raise money.
As well as meaning the state has to pay more to borrow money, high interest rates on debt can signify reduced investor confidence in the ability of the UK to pay back these loans.
As the trading session continued, the interest rates on long-term government bonds, known as gilt yields, fell back to just above 5.66%, not enough to erase two days of rises.
The benchmark for state borrowing costs, the interest rate on 10-year bonds, also saw rises. The yield rose above 4.8% for the first time since January, before slightly falling back
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:30
Why did UK debt just get more expensive?
The spiked borrowing cost also continued to cause a weakening in the pound.
After an initial fall to a month-long low against the dollar, one pound again buys $1.34.
It means sterling goes less far in dollars than before the latest peak in interest rates on government bonds. On Monday, sterling could buy $1.35.
Sterling dropped to equal €1.14 before easing up to €1.15. Just a few months earlier, a pound could buy €1.19 before Donald Trump’s April country-specific tariff announcements.
So why has this happened?
Government borrowing costs have been rising across the world amid a sell-off in bonds – which prompts investors to look for a higher return to hold them.
High inflation and national debts have increased concern about whether states can pay back the money.
Japan’s long-term borrowing cost hit a record high, while the yield on the US’s benchmark 10-year bond hit the 5% mark for the first time since July.
Key to easing UK borrowing costs was the announcement of the date of the budget on Wednesday morning.
UK public finances had been a worry for markets as Chancellor Rachel Reeves struggles to stick to her fiscal rules to bring down the debt and balance the budget.
Disquiet around comparatively low growth in the UK economy also played a role.
The American investors who have agreed to become the new owners of The Daily Telegraph have edged closer to gaining control of the newspaper by formally notifying the government of the deal.
Sky News understands that lawyers acting for RedBird Capital Partners, which will own a majority stake in the publisher if the deal is approved, submitted their detailed proposals to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) in the last few days.
The filing means that Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, must decide whether to issue a new Public Interest Intervention Notice (PIIN) which would trigger further investigations into the takeover.
The notification by RedBird Capital’s lawyers should pave the way for the lifting of an interim enforcement order (IEO) imposed by Lucy Frazer, the then Conservative culture secretary, in December 2023, which prevented the acquirers from exerting any control over the Telegraph.
Insiders believe that the removal of the IEO will result in the DCMS issuing a new PIIN, which would prompt investigations by Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority into the £500m takeover.
A previous PIIN was issued in January 2024 when RedBird intended to buy the Telegraph titles in conjunction with Abu Dhabi state-controlled investor IMI.
Following a fraught legislative battle, IMI is now restricted to owning a maximum 15% stake in the newspapers – which it intends to acquire as part of the RedBird-led consortium.
Sky News has already revealed that Sir Leonard Blavatnik, owner of the DAZN sports streaming platform, and Daily Mail proprietor Lord Rothermere are preparing to buy minority stakes as part of the RedBird-led transaction.
RedBird said in May that it was “in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph”.
The Telegraph’s ownership has been in a state of limbo for nearly two-and-a-half years after its parent company was forced into insolvency by Lloyds Banking Group, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, the newspaper’s long-standing owner.
RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m in 2023 to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine.
The Spectator was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor.
In July, the House of Lords approved legislation that will allow IMI, which is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the vice-president of the United Arab Emirates and ultimate owner of Manchester City Football Club, to hold a minority stake.
Other bidders had tried to gatecrash the Telegraph deal, with the field of rival contenders led by Dovid Efune, the owner of The New York Sun.
His key backer – the hedge fund founder Jeremy Hosking – recently told Sky News their bid was “ready to go” if the RedBird-led transaction fell apart.
Announcing its agreement to acquire the Telegraph titles in May, Gerry Cardinale, founder of RedBird Capital, said it marked the “start of a new era” for two of Britain’s most prominent newspapers.
Mr Cardinale said after the Lords vote: “With legislation now in place, we will move quickly and in the forthcoming days work with DCMS to progress to completion and implement new ownership for The Telegraph.”
Senior Telegraph executives and journalists are said to be frustrated at the pace of the process.
None of the parties involved in the Telegraph ownership situation would comment, while the DCMS declined to comment.