Connect with us

Published

on

Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google
Anindito Mukherjee | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Several hundred Google employees have signed and circulated a manifesto opposing the company’s vaccine mandate, posing the latest challenge for leadership as it approaches key deadlines for returning workers to offices in person.

The Biden administration has ordered U.S. companies with 100 or more workers to ensure their employees are fully vaccinated or regularly tested for Covid-19 by Jan. 4. In response, Google has asked its more than 150,000 employees to upload their vaccination status to its internal systems by Dec. 3, whether they plan on coming into the office or not, according to internal documents viewed by CNBC. The company has also said that all employees who work directly or indirectly with government contracts must be vaccinated — even if they are working from home.

“Vaccines are key to our ability to enable a safe return to office for everyone and minimize the spread of Covid-19 in our communities, wrote Chris Rackow, Google VP of security, in an email sent near the end of October.

Rackow stated the company was already implementing requirements, so the changes from Biden’s executive order were “minimal.” His email gave a deadline of Nov. 12 for employees to request exemptions for reasons such as religious beliefs or medical conditions, and said that cases would be decided on a case-by-case basis.

The manifesto within Google, which has been signed by at least 600 Google employees, asks company leaders to retract the vaccine mandate and create a new one that is “inclusive of all Googlers,” arguing leadership’s decision will have outsized influence in corporate America. It also calls on employees to “oppose the mandate as a matter of principle” and tells employees to not let the policy alter their decision if they’ve already chosen not to receive the Covid-19 shot.

The manifesto comes as most of the Google workforce approaches a deadline to return to physical offices three days a week starting Jan. 10. The company’s notably outspoken employees have previously debated everything from government contracts to cafeteria food changes. 

A spokesperson for Google said the company stands behind its policy. “As we’ve stated to all our employees and the author of this document, our vaccination requirements are one of the most important ways we can keep our workforce safe and keep our services running. We firmly stand behind our vaccination policy.”

The mandate dilemma

Vaccination is a dilemma not only for Google, but for corporate America in general. The Covid-19 virus has contributed to 772,570 deaths in the U.S., according to Johns Hopkins data. Despite proven effectiveness in providing a high level of protection against hospitalization and death, the country is struggling to persuade millions of people to get their first dose, as more than 60 million Americans remain unvaccinated.

In July, CEO Sundar Pichai announced the company would require vaccinations for those returning to offices. In October, Pichai said that the San Francisco Bay Area offices, near its headquarters, are up to 30% filled while New York is seeing nearly half of its employees back. He added at that time that employees who don’t want to get vaccinated would be able to continue working remotely. 

The company has taken other steps to convince employees to get vaccinated as well. For instance, Joe Kava, vice president of data centers at Google, announced a $5,000 vaccination incentive spot bonus for U.S. data center employees, according to the manifesto.

In an email cited in the manifesto and viewed by CNBC, Google VP of global security Chris Rackow said that because of the company’s work with the federal government, which “today encompasses products and services spanning Ads, Cloud Maps, Workspace and more,” all employees working directly or indirectly with government contracts will require vaccinations — even if they are working from home. Frequent testing is “not a valid alternative,” he added.

The authors of the manifesto strongly disagree.

“I believe that Sundar’s Vaccine Mandate is deeply flawed,” the manifesto states, calling company leadership “coercive,” and “the antithesis of inclusion.” 

In a subhead titled “Respect the User,” the authors write that the mandate of “barring unvaccinated Googlers from the office publicly and possibly embarrassingly exposes a private choice as it would be difficult for the Googler not to reveal why they cannot return.”

The author also argues the mandate violates the company’s principles of inclusiveness.

“Such Googlers may never feel comfortable expressing their true sentiments about a company health policy and other, unrelated sensitive topics. This results in silenced perspective and exacerbates the internal ideological ‘echo chamber’ which folks both inside and outside of Google have observed for years.”

The manifesto also opposes Google having a record of employees’ vaccination status.

“I do not believe Google should be privy to the health and medical history of Googlers and the vaccination status is no exception.” Google has asked employees to upload their vaccination proof to Google’s “environmental health and safety” team even if they already uploaded it to One Medical, one of Google’s benefits providers, according to internal documentation.

The author then tries to argue the vaccine mandate may be the start of a slippery slope, paving the way for other intrusive measures — a common line of argument among people opposed to the mandates.

“It normalizes medical intervention compulsion not only for Covid-19 vaccination but for future vaccines and possibly even non-vaccine interventions by extension. It justifies the principle of division and unequal treatment of Googlers based on their personal beliefs and decisions. The implications are chilling. Due to its presence as an industry leader, Google’s mandate will influence companies around the world to consider these as acceptable tradeoffs.”

The group has sent these concerns in an open letter to Google’s chief health officer Karen DeSalvo, the document states.

In Google’s most recent all-hands meeting, called TGIF, some employees attempted to bring more attention to the vaccine question by getting fellow employees “downvote” other questions in an internal system called Dory, according to an internal email chain viewed by CNBC. The goal was to ensure their questions would gain enough votes to qualify for executives to address them.

Google’s health ambitions

The pushback against vaccine mandates poses a new challenge for Google’s leadership at a time when it is trying to target the healthcare industry among its growing business ambitions — particularly for its cloud unit. 

In August, Google disbanded its health unit as a formalized business unit for the health-care sector and Dr. David Feinberg, who spent the past two years leading the search giant’s health care unit, left the company. Nonetheless, Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian has routinely mentioned healthcare sector as a key focus area and DeSalvo, an ex-Obama administrator whom Google hired as its first health chief in 2019, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” last month the tech giant is “still all in on health.”

The company has tried to capitalize on the broader fight against Covid in several ways. In the first half of 2021, the company spent nearly $30 million on at-home Covid tests for employees from Cue Health, which went public in September at a $3 billion valuation. Shortly after, the company announced a separate partnership with Google’s cloud unit to collect and analyze Covid-19 data with hopes of predicting future variants. Google also teamed up with Apple for an opt-in contract tracing software in hopes of tracking Covid-19.

Continue Reading

Technology

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s annual pay jumps to $96.5 million

Published

on

By

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's annual pay jumps to .5 million

Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” outside the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22, 2025.

Gerry Miller | CNBC

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is getting a big bump in his compensation, as the company’s stock price has continued to rally, propelled by the boom in artificial intelligence.

Nadella’s total pay for fiscal 2025 climbed 22% to $96.5 million from $79.1 million last year, Microsoft said in a proxy filing after the close of regular trading on Tuesday. That includes more than $84 million in stock awards and over $9.5 million in Nadella’s cash incentives.

The pay plan is largely tied Microsoft’s share performance. So far in 2025, Microsoft’s stock price has risen by 23%, topping the S&P 500’s 15% gain. The shares have more than doubled in valued over the past three years.

Microsoft is scheduled to report results for the fiscal first quarter next week. In its fourth-quarter disclosure in July, the company reported better-than-expected earnings and revenue, with sales climbing 18%, the fastest growth in more than three years. Microsoft Azure business is driving expansion as companies’ cloud infrastructure needs grow to meet AI demand.

In fiscal 2024, Nadella’s pay jumped 63% from 48.5 million the prior year, with 90% of his compensation coming from stock awards. Nadella was eligible for a $10.66 million cash incentive last year, but he asked the board’s compensation committee to reduce that number to $5.2 million as a result of a series of cyberattacks that the company endured.

Despite Microsoft’s strong financial and stock performance, the company has seen turmoil among its workforce in recent months. In July, Nadella penned a memo to employees saying that the company’s elimination of more than 15,000 employees in 2025 had “been weighing heavily” on him.

Microsoft has also terminated several activist employees who protested the company’s work with the Israeli military.

WATCH: Microsoft is trending toward a $5T market cap, says Wedbush’s Dan Ives

Microsoft is trending toward a $5T market cap, says Wedbush's Dan Ives

Continue Reading

Technology

Meta partners with Blue Owl Capital on $27 billion AI data center project

Published

on

By

Meta partners with Blue Owl Capital on  billion AI data center project

Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms Inc., during the Meta Connect event in Menlo Park, California, US, on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Meta said Tuesday that it formed a joint venture agreement with Blue Owl Capital in a deal worth $27 billion to fund and develop the social media company’s massive Hyperion data center in rural Louisiana.

As part of the deal, the asset management firm will own 80% of the joint venture, while Meta will retain a 20% stake and oversee the construction and property management services of the data center, which is being built in Richland Parish, Louisiana. Blue Owl contributed about $7 billion in cash as part of the joint venture, while Meta received a one-time payout of $3 billion.

The partnership provides the “the speed and flexibility” Meta needs to build the data center and support its “long-term AI ambitions,” the social media company said in a statement.

Meta in December announced that it chose Louisiana to host what would be its largest data center. Construction of that facility, which is being built on a site the size of roughly 1,700 football fields, is expected to finish by 2030.

Local utility Entergy told CNBC in June that the new data center could consume about twice as much electricity as the city of New Orleans on a peak day.

Meta has been spending heavily on artificial intelligence amid a broader race with other tech giants like Alphabet and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, which are also developing gigantic data centers to power future AI models.

OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank in January formed the Stargate joint venture that will see the companies invest $500 billion to develop data centers over the coming years. The first Stargate data center site came online in September 180 miles west of Dallas in Abilene, Texas.

Last week, Google said that it would invest $15 billion on a data center project in southern India that will be the search giant’s largest AI hub in the world outside of the U.S.

WATCH: A rotation out of the US is a bet against the AI trade.

A rotation out of the US is a bet against the AI trade: Morgan Stanley's Andrew Slimmon

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC exclusive: First look at Shield AI’s new AI-piloted military fighter drone

Published

on

By

CNBC exclusive: First look at Shield AI's new AI-piloted military fighter drone

Shield AI is trying to shake up the defense industry. 

The company, which is valued at $5.3 billion after securing $240 million in its latest round of funding, is set to unveil its next generation, autonomous fighter jet known as the X-Bat on Wednesday. 

CNBC got exclusive access to the company’s headquarters ahead of the launch.

Shield AI says the unmanned aircraft has a jet engine, will have a 2,000 mile range, can fly up to 50,000 feet and has the ability to take off and land vertically, enabling it to operate in remote locations without a runway — like on a ship in the middle of the ocean. 

The X-Bat will be piloted by an AI software developed by Shield AI called Hivemind. The company is now hinging a lot of its future on artificial intelligence development.

“The software is a cornerstone and foundation for everything we do,” said Shield AI CEO Gary Steele. “It will ultimately be the long term growth driver of this business because it enables the development of this next generation aircraft.”

Shield AI ranks number 38 on the 2025 CNBC Disruptor 50 list.

X-Bat combines some of the defense industry’s most advanced technologies into one fighter jet. There have been experimental aircrafts built as early as the 1950s with vertical takeoff and landing capabilities but they required pilots. Shield AI has also used Hivemind to fly the F-16, one of the most widely used modern fighter jets, autonomously.

“But those two things — AI piloted and vertical takeoff launch and land — have never come together in the form of a next generation aircraft,” said Brandon Tseng, Shield AI president and co-founder.

The company says its on track to produce the X-Bat for around $27 million, which is a fraction of what advanced military aircrafts typically cost. For example, the F-35 fighter jet that’s currently in use by the U.S. government and allies, costs more than $100 million to produce.

Unlike Shield AI’s previous aircrafts, the X-Bat is designed for combat and can be equipped with missiles.

“We fundamentally believe we can save service members’ lives by reducing the risk that you have of putting people in danger,” ” said Steele. “What I’m particularly excited about is the mission we’ve been on, and the opportunity that it unlocks from a business perspective.”

Shield AI has been around since 2015 and has already landed some major defense contracts. In 2024, the company secured a nearly $200 million contract with the U.S. coast guard for a drone it produces called the V-Bat.

But the startup is still proving itself in a competitive industry. Although it has grown quickly, the company is relatively small compared to defense primes like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman and its biggest startup competitor, Anduril, which is valued at over $30 billion. 

Despite generating billions of dollars in revenue, Shield is not yet profitable. In 2023, Forbes reported that the company was on track to reach profitably by 2025. However, those targets were thrown off track when a U.S. service member had his fingers partially severed during a Shield AI drone landing demonstration in 2023.

“Through that process, there were some loss of confidence from customers,” Steele said. “But I think we’ve done a phenomenal job of recovering from that and rebuilding momentum. And today as we sit here, we’re very confident in our ability to deliver great products that are safe.”

Drones have been used in war zones as early as World War I, but their prevalence has grown dramatically in recent years. The war in Ukraine has helped show the general public the scale and prevalence of drone usage on the battlefield today.

“What we see from the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, they are tactically, operationally and strategically absolutely important weapons,” said Oleksandra Molloy, a drone expert and senior aviation lecturer at UNSW Canberra. “We have seen a lack of those systems from the U.S., and particularly, we have not really seen the presence of many American companies in the real battlefield.”

But the U.S. government is now trying to change that. In June 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order called Unleashing American Drone Dominance that aims to accelerate commercialization of drone technologies and integrate them into the National Airspace System. Although no direct dollar amount was attached to that order, the Big Beautiful Bill has allocated billions of dollars in unmanned aerial systems and AI development. 

“We have to empower the defense industrial base with the exact same development tools, infrastructure and pipelines that Shield AI has used to make AI autonomy,” Tseng said. “We work directly with the major defense prime contractors of the world. We want to see them wildly successful building AI and autonomy, because at the end of the day, that’s what the warfighter needs. That’s what the United States and our allies need.”

Watch the video to learn more about how Shield AI is making a name for itself in the defense sector.

Continue Reading

Trending