
How Igor-mania swept New York
More Videos
Published
3 years agoon
By
adminNew York has seen athletes like Igor Shesterkin before. They come to the city heralded by years of hype. Their arrival marks a new era for their teams. Unfortunately, these young stars get chewed up and spit out by an unrelenting, impatient monster of a market. But some, like Shesterkin, exceed those expectations, enchant the city and become sensations.
Which is why, after just 108 career NHL games, “Igor-mania” is running wild in NYC.
The 26-year-old was the NHL’s top goaltender last season, winning the Vezina Trophy and finishing third in the MVP race. He has become the most popular member of the New York Rangers, despite playing only four seasons. He has quickly entered that pantheon of elite New York sports stars, sliding into the spot vacated by Henrik Lundqvist — one icon comfortably taking over for another, like the Mario Lemieux era fading into the Sidney Crosby years in Pittsburgh.
“I am amazed that you can go from the Garden chanting ‘Hen-rik’ to ‘I-gor.’ He’s as good as advertised,” Mike Richter told me this week.
Richter is second to Lundqvist in wins and games played as a Ranger but cemented his legacy by breaking a 54-year curse for the franchise in back-stopping them to the 1994 Stanley Cup championship. His number hangs from the Madison Square Garden rafters, right next to Lundqvist’s. Perhaps the only flaw in his career was that he didn’t have a chantable first name.
“Yeah, you need that two syllable thing,” he said, with a laugh. “They went with ‘Rich-ter.’ It was fine. I’ll take anything.”
They chanted “Ed-die!” and “Beez-er!” too. Perhaps it has been obscured by their lack of Stanley Cup success — one Stanley Cup since 1940, as any Islanders or Devils fan can quote from memory — but the Rangers have one of the NHL’s strongest goaltending legacies.
Starting in 1953, the Gump Worsley era led to the Ed Giacomin era; John Davison was the bridge to the John Vanbiesbrouck era, which overlapped with the Richter era; Richter retired in 2003, and Lundqvist arrived in 2006; Lundqvist’s last season with the Rangers was 2020, which is when Shesterkin arrived.
“Different personalities and different styles, but the common denominator is that we’re all competitors,” Richter said. “I think it’s a testament to how good their drafting is. You know, you don’t pull Henrik Lundqvist out of the seventh round without doing a little homework. Sometimes you get lucky, but there’s a pattern there.”
Richter spent all 14 years of his NHL career with the Rangers. He has been in Shesterkin’s skates before as a highly hyped novice goalie, finishing third in the Vezina voting as a rookie in 1990-91.
“Sometimes there’s an eyeroll about how much media coverage there is for New York teams. But with that comes a lot of challenges,” he said. “That’s part of the kind of bargain of playing in New York. And I wouldn’t have it any other way.
“I know lots of athletes are hesitant to come to New York. Once they do, they recognize what an incredible place it is to play and to live. And that the people, you know, surprisingly don’t eat their babies or whatever. These are great people that have a lot of demand of their teams and are passionate. Good or bad, they’re going to let you know how they feel.”
So far, it has been a honeymoon for Shesterkin in New York. He earned his “I-gor!” chants by winning 68 of his first 108 NHL games. His .935 save percentage and 2.07 goals-against average last season led the NHL en route to the Vezina. He followed that with a playoff performance that dragged the Rangers to the Eastern Conference finals, with a .929 save percentage.
“He stole some games last year that we had no business being in,” Rangers forward Ryan Reaves told me. “You need a goalie like that for deep playoff runs.”
Reaves played four years with Marc-Andre Fleury and said Shesterkin is “up there with him” when it comes to those mind-boggling saves you see when they’re locked into a game. He said that effort starts well before those games.
“I always say that you’ve got a good goalie when he’s battling on second and third pucks in practice,” Reaves said. “I’ve played with goalies where you take the first shot, the rebound goes in front and he really doesn’t care. Shesty will battle. I think that’s why he’s so good. He treats every puck like it’s never going in his net.”
If there’s one common rejoinder about Shesterkin from his Rangers teammates, it’s that competitive fire. Good goalies don’t want opponents to score on them. Elite goalies truly believe that opponents never should.
“He does take it personally,” Reaves said.
The Rangers have learned to live with that intensity. There’s a Jekyll and Hyde aspect to Shesterkin, based on whether or not he’s playing.
“Depends on the day, I guess,” Reeves said, smiling. “No, he’s a great guy. It’s just on game days, he’s definitely quiet. He’s a goalie that needs to focus. Don’t talk to him. Stay out of his way. Don’t be yelling at him or anything like that. Unless you’re releasing him.”
Reaves is referring to a ritual built around Shesterkin as the Rangers are ready to hit the ice. It was a bit the veteran winger started in Vegas that he carried over to New York. Shesterkin stands in front of his teammates as they wait inside the locker room hallway. Reaves then screams, “SHESTY: RELEASE USSSSSSSS!” and the goalie leads the Rangers to the rink.
Whoops ? pic.twitter.com/unzjycmpuZ
— New York Rangers (@NYRangers) October 17, 2022
Naturally, it has inspired its own T-shirt.
“Igor-mania” isn’t just about his stats. It has also been sparked by the panache with which he plays and the inherent goofiness he inspires from teammates.
“He’s awesome. His personality is awesome in and around the rink,” defenseman K’Andre Miller said. “He’s a quiet guy obviously — doesn’t speak that much English. But he’s opened up a good amount the last couple of years.”
Miller said the language barrier — Shesterkin’s English has improved, but he still uses a team-provided interpreter — make him more endearing.
“I think that adds to his goofiness, not knowing those social cues or a couple of words,” he said.
For defenseman Ryan Lindgren, who has played with Shesterkin in the Rangers organization since the goalie arrived in North America, Shesterkin’s good nature has allowed him to thrive in a difficult market.
“It’s a big thing for goalies. Don’t overstress. Be big on game days, and on off days, you let it go,” he said. “There’s a lot of pressure being a goalie and then playing in New York as well. That’s why it’s good that he’s having fun, not putting too much pressure on himself.”
But personality didn’t primarily make Shesterkin a star. Don La Greca, co-host of “The Michael Kay Show” on ESPN Radio in New York, draws a comparison with another local athlete in that regard: New York Mets ace Jacob deGrom.
“I don’t believe their personalities made them stars,” La Greca told me. “Both did it with their play. Both went from zero to 60 in a millisecond. Both did well in the postseason early in their careers.”
I asked La Greca how Shesterkin might surpass the accomplishments of Richter and Lundqvist, the two best Rangers goalies of the past 30 years.
“He has to win. Richter got the Cup. Hank had his looks and leadership along with his play to win people over,” La Greca said. “However, another way for Igor is his play with the puck. Mark my words: He will score a goal.”
Hopefully he does, and hopefully it happens at the Garden. In full disclosure, I was infected by “Igor-mania” while covering the Rangers’ playoff run last season. I’d put him right there with Connor McDavid, Cale Makar and Alex Ovechkin as players I’d pay to watch for their sheer entertainment value. It’s the way he makes those saves. It’s the way he handles the puck. It’s all the things that earn him those “I-gor!” chants echoing through the rafters where many of his predecessors in the Rangers’ crease have their numbers hanging.
You can feel it when an athlete has forged a bond with New York City. When they’re on a first-name basis with fans. When everyone knows that as long as they’re in the lineup, good things are possible.
“You go into every game knowing that you have a shot,” Reaves said. “If you’re in the middle of the game and he’s getting shelled and the boys don’t have it that night, then you’re like, ‘OK, we’ve gotta pick it up. But Shesty’s got us right now.'”
And New York’s got “Igor-mania” right now, too.
Jersey Foul of the week
From Jeff Veillette:
I guess they couldn’t decide pic.twitter.com/WsaQCx68nV
— Jeff Veillette (@JeffVeillette) November 1, 2022
This P.K. Subban nameplate with a Carey Price number might be a confusing foul. But given their tight friendship as Montreal Canadiens teammates — remember the triple low-five? — perhaps this is a tribute jersey to the duo’s legacy for the bleu, blanc et rouge.
Video of the Week
the PAUSE on “father” ? pic.twitter.com/JdG7g1Roq0
— katie (@itsmitchmarney) November 1, 2022
If you’re not familiar with the Paul Marner discourse, he’s the father of Toronto Maple Leafs star Mitch Marner and has been a participant in several Toronto media news cycles.
In 2018, he spoke with The Athletic about Mitch and said, “It drives our family nuts when we hear you guys all talk about who should be the captain of the Toronto Maple Leafs and Mitch never hardly gets any consideration,” while comparing his on-ice temperament to that of Hockey Hall of Famer Doug Gilmour.
He was prominently mentioned by fans during Mitch Marner’s contract talks with the Leafs, as they believed he was feeding information to local media.
With that context, I loved this aside from Mitch Marner on Tuesday, as the Leafs continued to struggle. When asked if friends and family know not to inundate the players with what has been said about them in the media, Marner said, “None of us really kind of read it. … I mean, I guess my father does.”
This video demands a 40-minute podcast by psychology and body language experts, immediately.
Winners and losers of the week
Winner: Erik Karlsson
It might not last and it’s around three years too late for the San Jose Sharks, but it’s really awesome to see Karlsson playing at his Norris Trophy-level, point-per-game dominance again.
Jeff Marek asked me during a radio hit if Karlsson is a Hall of Famer. He had a six-year stretch that was Hall of Fame-worthy. As Eric Lindros showed, that might be all you need to earn your plaque.
Loser: St. Louis Blues
GM Doug Armstrong felt the need to answer for his team’s 3-5-0 start, which has inexplicably seen the NHL’s third-best scoring team from last season (3.77 goals per game) become the NHL’s worst-scoring team this season (2.38). Ryan O’Reilly has one point in eight games — think he misses David Perron? Jordan Kyrou has three goals but has gone scoreless in six of eight games and is a minus-13.
The Western Conference is too good to stumble around for too long. See also: Predators, Nashville.
Winner: Lindy Ruff
Has a coach ever gone from having fans chanting for his firing at the start of the season to being a Jack Adams Award finalist by the end of the season? Because if the New Jersey Devils keep rolling, that could be Ruff’s tale for 2022-23.
Loser: Barry Trotz’s intentions
Trotz let it be known that he would be open to a return to coaching by December and told the “Cam and Strick” podcast that he would be interested in coaching an Original Six team. Given that four of those six have first-year head coaches and the Rangers have Gerard Gallant. … Well, needless to say, Trotz sent Toronto into a tizzy.
He clarified his comments with Bob McCown, saying that he just never had the chance to coach an Original Six team before and that it wasn’t a Toronto-specific comment.
Which meant he forgot the No. 1 rule in hockey media: Everything is about the Leafs.
Winner: Boston Bruins Winter Classic logo
The @penguins and @NHLBruins Winter Classic logos have dropped.
The BOSTON wordmark is “a custom typeface created by adidas and inspired by the original spoked-B worn in 1948.”
Penguins’ logo is inspired by city’s original NHL franchise, the 1925 Pittsburgh Pirates. pic.twitter.com/Jia95CtZxb
— Greg Wyshynski (@wyshynski) November 1, 2022
The wordmark is cool and unique. But as many Boston fans told me, the reason to celebrate this Fenway Classic logo is the return of … ahem … “meth bear.”
Loser: Pittsburgh Penguins Winter Classic logo
While I respect the history behind using the 1925 Pittsburgh Pirates logo as inspiration for the Penguins, their previous outdoor game jerseys have featured a tiny penguin in a little scarf. Anything else is a letdown.
Winner: Mullett Arena
Say what you will about the temporary home of the Arizona Coyotes — a college hockey arena on the campus of Arizona State University — but all the players who have competed there rave about the quality of the ice and the liveliness of the boards. “The ice was great. It was unbelievable. Even for warm-ups. It was awesome,” Winnipeg’s Cole Perfetti said.
Loser: Remaining at Mullett Arena
With the Tempe arena issue likely headed to the voters after the city council, and with the specter of potential litigation always looming, it’s looking like the Coyotes are going to have to pick up that optional fourth year in a college arena. Which is rough.
Puck headlines
-
The Sportico NHL franchise valuations were an interesting read. There are 10 teams valued at over a billion dollars. I would not have expected the Jets to be more valuable than 10 other NHL teams, but here we are.
-
John Tortorella has Sheldon Keefe’s back against the Toronto media: “I hope he jams it to you all, quite honestly.” Ouch!
-
What is going on with Shane Wright and the Seattle Kraken? “Given Wright’s main obstacle seems his lack of experience facing fully grown men, it’s tough to see how another season against players mostly 19 and under would help his development.”
-
Good piece by Stephen Whyno on how Bruce Boudreau has adapted through the years as an NHL head coach.
-
Getting to know PHF MVP Kennedy Marchment of the Connecticut Whale.
-
The Ottawa Senators are for sale, and the LeBreton Flats arena project holds the key to their future.
-
Really liked this piece on the current state of the Maple Leafs. “I can’t remember the last time I looked forward to watching this team. I still do watch, and sometimes I don’t even end up regretting it. But these days, with this team and its history, it feels like a slog. It’s duty, or force of habit. The wins don’t matter and the losses all blend together, so what are we doing here?”
-
How the Vancouver Canucks snagged Cobie Smulders for their pregame hype video. This reminds us of our favorite “How I Met Your Mother” moment, when Robin brags about meeting Mason Raymond and Barney proclaims is “the opposite of name dropping.”
From your friends at ESPN
Yours truly and Arda Ocal have taken our preview show “The Drop” and turned it into a weekly YouTube streaming show. Check out our Phil Kessel celebration, Roman Josi interview and much more.
You may like
Sports
Breaking down Aaron Judge’s early playoff performance: A productive start or another October disappointment?
Published
1 hour agoon
October 7, 2025By
admin
-
Kiley McDanielOct 7, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- ESPN MLB Insider
- Kiley McDaniel covers MLB prospects, the MLB Draft and more, including trades and free agency.
- Has worked for three MLB teams.
Co-author of Author of ‘Future Value’
In case you hadn’t heard, Aaron Judge entered the 2025 MLB playoffs with a checkered history of October results compared with his stellar regular-season résumé.
For his career, Judge’s OPS is 250 points lower in the postseason than in the regular season (the average regular-season-to-playoff OPS dropoff for hitters in 2024 was 18 points), and his struggles on the biggest stage have become a talking point nearly every October.
After his .184/.344/.408 slash line during the Yankees’ 2024 postseason run, Judge is hitting objectively well in the playoffs this year — posting a 1.024 OPS and collecting an MLB-leading eight hits in his first five games. But he isn’t hitting for much power, with just one extra-base hit (a double) in 21 plate appearances, and his team enters Game 3 of the American League Division Series on the brink of elimination.
As the Yankees try to battle back against the Toronto Blue Jays, we dug deep into each of Judge’s first 18 at-bats (and three walks) to see what we can learn about his October so far.
How is Judge being pitched in the playoffs? Is it different from the regular season? Why isn’t he hitting for power? Is it bad luck? And where could his postseason go from here — if the Yankees can stick around long enough for him to find his home run stroke?
How left-handed pitchers are approaching Judge
Judge vs. lefties in playoff career: 42 PA, .400/.500/.714, 19% K, 17% BB, 3 HR
Judge vs. lefties this postseason: 8 PA, .500/.500/1.125, 13% K, 0% BB, 0 HR
Each pitcher has different strengths, but there are some clear trends that lefties are following when attacking Judge this month.
The game plan goes something like this: throw hard stuff (four-seam fastballs, sinkers, cutters) on his hands, largely down, then mix in softer stuff to keep him honest, locating those pitches down and on the corners — where he is least likely to do damage. If you miss, miss outside of the zone, not toward the middle. Don’t be afraid to nibble around the outside of the zone and live to fight another day.
That’s a solid plan against almost any hitter, but in this case, it means going hard inside against a 6-foot-7 slugger whose relative weaknesses will always include covering the plate against good stuff.
It’s telling that the two softer-throwing lefties Judge faced (Boston’s Connelly Early and Toronto’s Justin Bruihl) threw two fastballs out of their 10 total pitches and both missed off the plate inside, one missing so far inside that it hit Judge. Garrett Crochet, Aroldis Chapman, and Brendon Little were much more aggressive, likely because of their better fastballs.
How right-handed pitchers are approaching Judge
Judge vs. righties in playoff career: 241 PA, .192/.304/.409, 34% K, 13% BB, 13 HR
Judge vs. righties this postseason: 13 PA, .400/.538/.400, 23% K, 15% BB, 0 HR
Judge has faced eight different righties this postseason, and those pitchers vary vastly in their pitch mix and the quality of their stuff, but right-handed pitchers seem to be using a decision tree to craft their game plan against him.
If the righty’s top offspeed pitch is a breaking ball (slider, sweeper, curve) then he is throwing that as often as he can while locating it down and away — and mixing it with fastballs inside to keep Judge from leaning over the plate. Here’s a look at Judge vs. breaking balls only.
If the righty’s top secondary pitch is a splitter — such as Toronto’s Kevin Gausman and Trey Yesavage in the first two games of the ALDS — then he is mixing splitters and sliders away with some fastballs that are mostly targeted inside.
But no matter their style, one common goal for all of these pitchers is not to make a mistake over the plate!
How does Judge’s regular-season history factor into this plan?
Though Judge’s October struggles have become a narrative over his career, any team setting up its pitching strategy for a series will game plan for the two-time American League MVP with a career 1.028 OPS and 368 home runs rather than treating him like the player with a .223 average and .787 OPS in 63 career playoff games.
And that starts with keeping the ball away from where Judge can do the most damage.
During the 2025 regular season, Judge faced 176 pitches (essentially one pitch every four plate appearances) that qualified as in the middle-middle zone — or, in more general speak, right down the middle.
Against those pitches, Judge had a 1.630 OPS and 15 homers, both figures were second best in baseball.
This is where Judge ranked, among all qualified hitters in MLB this season, measured by xwOBA:
-
Second best vs. middle-middle pitches
-
Best vs. pitches in the heart of the zone (a larger part of the strike zone than middle-middle)
-
Best per pitch vs. fastballs, second in overall value
-
Best per pitch and overall vs. sinkers
-
Best per pitch and overall vs. cutters
Imagine getting this scouting report as a pitcher before you face Judge in a playoff game. I wouldn’t throw him anything down the middle, either.
How Judge is handling pitches he should crush
Now for the twist: Judge has faced seven pitches in the playoffs that were in the middle-middle zone (one pitch every three plate appearances, so slightly more frequently than the regular season).
So far this postseason, Judge hasn’t put one of those pitches in play. He swung at five — fouled off four and whiffed at another — and took two middle-middle pitches for strikes.
This isn’t a trend I tried to identify in my research because the small sample means one home run on a center-cut ball would poke a hole in it, but in watching all of his playoff at-bats, I made too many of this sort of note: “target was [zone direction] corner, missed target to the middle of the zone, [nothing bad happened to the pitcher].”
So, yes, it’s a small sample, but October baseball is won and lost on small samples. Judge is getting pitched roughly how he was in the regular season (actually even a bit more hitter-friendly), but he hasn’t replicated his regular-season damage, especially when it comes to punishing mistakes thrown down the middle. Judge has performed basically the same (chase rate, xwOBA, etc.) as the regular season against noncenter-cut pitches, so not taking advantage of these mistakes is accounting for his dip in power in the playoffs this year.
Over 162 games, anyone putting up an OPS over 1.000 is having a very productive season — even if it’s all coming from singles and a few doubles — but the heat has been turned up with the Yankees facing elimination, and the offense needs to deliver, with Judge at the heart of it. This team needs Judge to punish mistakes and create some souvenirs or he is at risk of having another October disappointment added to his résumé.
Sports
‘Let the kid play for a little bit’: Assessing the hype and reality for Arch Manning
Published
2 hours agoon
October 7, 2025By
admin
-
Adam RittenbergOct 7, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- College football reporter; joined ESPN in 2008. Graduate of Northwestern University.
ARCH MANNING HAS been taunted and has clapped back. The Texas quarterback has been booed by road and home fans alike, and has also brought snippets of joy to those wearing Burnt Orange, but not enough for his or their liking.
Longhorns coach Steve Sarkisian has noted the “out of control” expectations placed upon the third-year player, and last month responded to a question about Manning grimacing after a throw by speculating about the bathroom faces of reporters. The whole Arch thing has been intense, exhausting and, at times, weird.
And we’re only five games into this season.
“He throws a bad pass, he’s the worst quarterback in the world, he throws a good pass, he’s gonna win the Heisman,” an SEC coordinator said. “Like, goodness gracious, just let the kid play for a little bit.”
The first chunk of game action has provided a legitimate sample size to truly evaluate Manning, which really didn’t exist before. He only made two starts in 2024, against a Group of 5 opponent (UTSA) and an SEC bottom-feeder (Mississippi State), and saw little time as a change-of-pace quarterback behind Quinn Ewers during Texas’ run to the conference title game and the College Football Playoff semifinal. While coaches set to face Manning this fall acknowledged his talent and potential, they qualified their assessments by noting his lack of meaningful playing time.
Now, there’s something to truly judge. Through five games, Manning has completed 60% of his passes for 1,158 yards with 11 touchdowns and five interceptions, while adding a team-high 160 rushing yards and five touchdowns for a ground game that ranks 55th nationally in rushing. He has had tough games, namely the opener at Ohio State, where Texas did not score until the final minutes, and an 11-of-25 passing performance against a UTEP team that now sits at 1-4. Manning showcased a mix of promise and frustrating moments in Saturday’s 29-21 loss at Florida, finishing with 263 yards on 55.2% completions with two touchdowns and two interceptions. He also led Texas with 37 rushing yards.
The general view of Manning, both within and outside the program, is that his outlook remains promising despite some clear bumps, which are common for new starting quarterbacks. “Just going through it man,” a Texas source said of Manning, echoing how many are viewing his first month-plus as QB1 for the Longhorns. While he hasn’t met the elevated expectations placed on him, coaches still think he has all the ingredients to shine in the long run.
“When you’re the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys or the University of Texas, you’re one of the most scrutinized people in the world,” said a coach who faced Texas this season. “I just truly believe that that kid is going to be fine, if mentally he can weather the storm of the media and all these things.
“He’s a [five-game] starter and getting his wings under him.”
There are also other factors involved, including a supporting cast on offense that has dealt with injuries and underachievement. Manning undoubtedly needs some refinement, too, especially in areas like footwork, and will be tested again this week as Texas faces rival Oklahoma in the Allstate Red River Rivalry at the Cotton Bowl. Oklahoma coach Brent Venables has made a career out of tormenting inexperienced quarterbacks, and he will get his first crack at Manning, who didn’t face the Sooners this past season.
“For Arch, it’s continue to be him,” Sarkisian said last week. “That’s one of the things that we’ve been harping on here. As much as the attention swirls around him, he doesn’t have to play to that attention, whether it’s positive, negative, whatever it may be. Focus on his teammates, focus on what he needs to do to prepare, focus on having fun, playing football.
“That’s when he’s at his best.”
DAVID MORRIS HAS known Arch Manning his entire life and has trained him since the fifth grade. Morris backed up Manning’s uncle, Eli, at Ole Miss, and is best friends with Eli and close to the family.
He also has a global view of the quarterback position as the founder of QB Country, a quarterback training and development program.
“The first season, and particularly the first half of the first season, when you’re a starter, there’s a natural progression, it just takes a little time to get to playing your best football,” Morris said, adding of Arch Manning, “He’s on the right track, and I’m excited for him.”
Morris noted how even Eli Manning had a bumpy start to his career as an NFL starter. Although some first-year starters immediately excel, an adjustment period almost always follows before they grasp the demands of playing quarterback at a high level.
Trevor Lawrence helped Clemson to a national title after taking over the starting job midway through the year in 2018, but he began his first full season as QB1 by throwing five interceptions in the first three games of the 2019 season.
Manning’s first start of the season, at an Ohio State team with a new-look defensive front, under the direction of new coordinator Matt Patricia, was far from perfect. He was 0-for-5 with an interception on passes of longer than 5 yards during the first three quarters before a nice surge in the fourth. He finished with an off-target percentage of 37%, the worst by a Texas quarterback during the past decade, per ESPN Research.
But Ohio State has turned out to be dominant defensively throughout the first portion of the season, leading the FBS in the fewest points allowed (5 points per game).
“You couldn’t have a much more challenging game than the Ohio State on the road opener for a first-time starter,” Florida coach Billy Napier said before facing Texas.
Manning’s other road start came against Napier’s defense that, despite the team’s 2-3 record, is allowing just 17 PPG.
“People expect these miracle things from these [first-year starting] quarterbacks,” said an opposing defensive coordinator. “Very few can do that. He doesn’t have game experience yet. He looks like a tough kid.”
Sarkisian on Monday said Manning “fought his ass off” in the Florida game.
Arch Manning benefits from having been around the quarterback position since birth. He has direct access to his uncles, Eli and Peyton, and grandfather, Archie, who all played quarterback on the biggest stages. He also can lean on Morris and the in-season coaching from Sarkisian and AJ Milwee, who has coached Texas’ quarterbacks since 2021.
Morris lists several qualities that jump out about Arch Manning, describing him as “a whole athlete” who “historically, can make a lot happen in small spaces.” Manning has good instincts, both within the pocket and in extending it. Coaches highlighted Manning’s athleticism this past season, and those who have faced him or scouted him this fall point out how effective he is on the move, even when his passing has fluctuated.
At 6-foot-4 and 219 pounds, Manning has had at least one run of 14 yards or longer in four of five contests.
“Hard as hell to tackle,” an opposing coach said. “They will have a chance to win a lot of games because if he ain’t beating you with his arm, Sark does a great job with the zone-read and the designed quarterback runs. His feet and his size give him all the ability in the world, so he can beat you in a number of ways.”
MANNING HAS BEEN under the brightest spotlight from the moment Texas lost in the CFP semifinal. That’s what happens with highly anticipated new starting quarterbacks, especially one named Manning.
But has there been enough attention paid to who is surrounding him? Texas had two offensive players selected in the first round of April’s NFL draft, left tackle Kelvin Banks Jr. (No. 9) and wide receiver Matthew Golden (No. 23), who led the team with 987 receiving yards and nine touchdowns this past season. The Longhorns also lost Gunnar Helm, a fourth-round draft pick and one of the nation’s most productive tight ends with a team-high 60 catches for 786 yards and seven scores. Texas said goodbye to No. 2 wide receiver Isaiah Bond and Jaydon Blue, the team’s second-leading rusher, who went in the fifth round.
One of the nation’s best offensive lines saw three players drafted and another land a free agent deal, with right guard DJ Campbell as the lone returning starter. The new-look line has had clear struggles, especially in Saturday’s loss at Florida, which sacked Manning six times and hurried him 10 times. Texas’ offensive line pressure rate is 40.9%, the worst in the SEC and 124th in the FBS. Last year, the Longhorns’ line ranked 15th in the FBS at 27%.
Texas seemingly made a spring portal splash by adding Cal tight end transfer Jack Endries, who led the Bears with 623 receiving yards on 56 receptions in 2024. But Endries has only nine receptions for 108 yards and two touchdowns through five games at Texas.
“I was expecting more,” said a coach who scouted Texas. “People are looking at Texas, like: ‘Where did they put their money?’ They’re a good team, but it wasn’t like, ‘Oh my gosh,’ like some of the better Ohio State teams.”
A defensive coordinator who faced Texas noted that sophomore wide receiver Ryan Wingo is “kind of freakish.”
“They’ve got some good guys around [Manning], good tight ends, but they haven’t really seemed to really click on all cylinders,” the coach said.
Although Texas brought back leading rusher Quintrevion Wisner, he sustained a hamstring injury in the opener at Ohio State and had only 11 yards on eight carries in the Florida loss. CJ Baxter, who missed all this past season with a knee injury, was hurt on Sept. 13 during the first play against UTEP and has not returned.
“It’s kind of like running back by committee with them right now. The receivers are just OK,” an opposing coach said. “That, to me, is the bigger story. I don’t think the pieces around him are elite.”
“The biggest difference is the surrounding cast,” Napier said of Texas before their game. “Not only is [Manning] a new starter, but there’s a lot of players on that side of the ball who are playing in that system for the first time.”
The sense within the program is that Manning will be more fairly judged once the team gets healthier at both running back and wide receiver. Stanford transfer Emmett Mosley V, who had 525 receiving yards and six touchdowns in just nine games as a true freshman this past fall, made his Longhorns debut against Florida and had two catches for 40 yards after being limited with a lower-leg injury since his arrival this summer.
“He’s going to play better,” a Texas source said of Manning, “but everybody around him has got to play better too. The quarterback should get a little help. It doesn’t have to all be on him.”
A HEALTHIER GROUP of backs and receivers will help Manning, but he also must continue to make strides and overcome some of the problems that surfaced in the first few games.
He ranks 119th nationally in catchable pass rate (71.9%) and 128th in third-down conversion percentage on pass plays (19.4%). Perhaps most alarming: Manning is 130th in percentage of off-target passes (17.9%).
“The throws he missed, I’ve seen him on tape the previous year make way harder throws,” said a coach who scouted Manning. “He’s just putting so much pressure on himself. There are three or four hitches or out-cuts that he overstrides and just panics and rips it and goes in the dirt or is inaccurate. His feet are everywhere.”
Footwork is the area several coaches cited that Manning must finetune and should with more starts under his belt. Although Manning has the arm strength to make throws from several different slots, which is increasingly more common, he “throws it a little more sidearm than I thought,” said a coach who scouted Manning.
“It led to some inaccuracies,” the coach said. “I don’t know if he’s trying to be cute, having that whipping motion. That just didn’t look natural to me.”
Manning clearly has some areas to sort out, but also is capable of delivering, as he showed by avoiding the rush from Florida’s Tyreak Sapp and launching a 38-yard touchdown to Wingo.
“I think he’ll be good,” said a defensive coordinator who faced Texas. “He sees pictures, he does a good job extending plays. He’s still young, really hasn’t started a bunch of games. He’s been there, but it’s his fifth game starting.”
Those around him think he has the mental toughness to make corrections, even amid constant scrutiny.
“The kid’s a rock mentally,” said a source close to the program. “They raised him to be a quarterback.”
Texas ultimately needs Manning to be a better quarterback — and lead a better offense — to salvage a season that began with a No. 1 ranking and talk of a national championship and a Heisman Trophy. Any further stumbles likely would mean the Longhorns would miss the CFP for the first time since 2022.
The challenge is magnified this week against No. 6 Oklahoma, which leads the FBS in the fewest yards allowed by more than 10 per game (193 YPG) and ranks second in fewest passing yards allowed (118.4 YPG). The Sooners have already terrorized Michigan freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood (9-of-24, 142 yards). Venables’ scheme is known for making things particularly hard on first-year starting QBs.
“There’s always going to be growing pains,” Sarkisian said last week. “Whether you get those growing pains early, in the middle, late, whatever. … In the end, it’s kind of like, ‘Well, I’d much rather have those growing pains early than later.’ And we got ’em, and now he can get back to being the player he wants to be and is capable of being.”
Sports
Sark defends culture at Texas after latest flop
Published
2 hours agoon
October 7, 2025By
admin
Steve Sarkisian once again is the target of widespread scrutiny after Texas‘ latest high-profile loss.
But despite the Longhorns’ narrow championship path and their overall lack of big-game success during his coaching tenure in Austin, Sarkisian defended the culture at Texas and praised his team’s mindset ahead of Saturday’s showdown with Oklahoma in the Allstate Red River Rivalry.
“Probably wouldn’t be fair to these guys to say, you know, our culture is perfect right now,” Sarkisian said Monday. “They’re all — they’re due to do the right things. They were great today. They came in, they were coachable. They took to the tough coaching from Saturday.
“So their mindset is all there, so that tells me the culture’s right. But at the end of the day, we got to play together as a team Saturday.”
Sarkisian’s comments came two days after Texas fell to 3-2 with Saturday’s 29-21 loss at struggling Florida.
The Longhorns, the preseason No. 1-ranked team, fell out of the Associated Press poll with the loss and saw their chances of reaching the College Football Playoff drop to just 22%, according to ESPN Analytics.
Texas is just 3-8 against AP top-10 teams all time under Sarkisian, who raised more eyebrows Monday when asked whether he was surprised by the Longhorns’ struggles this season.
“I don’t know if I’m stunned,” he responded. “I mean, take the other — how many teams are there in college football? One hundred and thirty-six. Take the other 135 and have them go play at Ohio State and at The Swamp. See how they do.”
Texas reeled off three consecutive victories after its season-opening loss at Ohio State, but the loss at Florida renewed criticism of Sarkisian, who accepted responsibility for the Longhorns’ slow start.
“We don’t have time for the ‘poor me.’ We don’t have time for the ‘woe is us,'” he said Monday. “We’ve got to come to work, and I think I have to exemplify that. I can’t let my actions betray my words, and if I’m going to say those things, well, I have to be a model of that, and that’s in our preparation.”
According to ESPN Analytics, Texas has a 3% chance of running the table and reaching the College Football Playoff as a two-loss team.
Beating the sixth-ranked Sooners (5-0) on Saturday would vault the Longhorns back in the thick of the SEC title chase, the first step toward the 12-team playoff. Sarkisian said he didn’t like the “noise around how we’re playing,” but acknowledged that he can’t control the narrative about Texas struggling to meet lofty expectations.
“I can’t control things outside of our building and outside of our team,” he said. “But I can control [our preparation for Oklahoma] and I can control our mindset and I can control our approach. And then, ultimately, the staff and the players follow suit that way. So I have to look at me first, and I can’t let my actions betray my words. If I want our players to act a certain way, I surely better model that.”
Trending
-
Sports3 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years ago
Button battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year ago
Here are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024