Electricals retailer Currys has cut its annual profit outlook after diving into the red during the first half of its financial year.
The UK-based group, which has more than 800 stores alongside its online operation, reported an adjusted pre-tax loss of £17m for the six months to 29 October compared to a profit of £48m a year earlier.
It blamed the performance on its international business, mainly located on the continent, where it said that fierce discounting by rivals had hammered margins and revenues.
A fall in sales within its UK and Ireland (UK&I) division, on the other hand, was offset by cost-cutting and higher gross margins.
Business was harmed across the group by the cost of living crisis with like-for-like sales down 8% on the same period last year.
Currys chief executive, Alex Baldock, said in a statement that the international business was particularly hurt by heavy promotional activity among domestic competitors with excess stocks.
“It’s a tough environment, and we are planning for that to continue.
More on Retail
Related Topics:
Image: Alex Baldock is planning further cost-cutting to offset inflationary pressures and boost margins
“Still, we expect to maintain the trajectory of improving UK&I profitability and a robust recovery in International profits.
“Our ever-improving customer experience and strong Services give us confidence in improving margins. And we will continue our excellent progress on cost efficiency.”
Advertisement
Currys said it now expected full year profit before tax to be between £100m-£125m – down from the previously guided £130m-£150m range.
Shares, down by more than 40% ahead of the trading update, fell 7% at the open.
John Moore, senior investment manager at RBC Brewin Dolphin, said: “Currys was always going to struggle in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, with demand for its products pushed artificially higher during lockdowns.
“Added to that is the fact that the company’s international markets are going through structural changes, forcing it to heavily discount – but much of this is reflected in the share price, which is down more than -40% on a year ago.
“Still, Currys is showing its survival bias yet again. The company is willing and able to take the measures necessary to weather these tough periods and stay relevant to its customers.”
For all the brinkmanship, for all the high stakes and attempts to wield maximum leverage, in the end, there was clear recognition from both the US and China that a degree of stabilisation was necessary.
The fact that some progress has been made on a relatively wide range of issues speaks to that.
But there are real questions about how deep that progress runs and how easily, in the hands of two leaders who staked both their reputations on being strong and unyielding, it could all come crashing down.
From the very outset, the differences in style could not have been more stark.
As the two posed for the introductory handshake, Donald Trump moved quickly to dominate the space – leaning in, doing all the talking, even quipping to the gathered reporters that Xi Jinping is “a very strong negotiator, and that isn’t good”.
That didn’t raise as much as an eyebrow from the Chinese leader.
Xi doesn’t like or respond well to unscripted moments; Trump, on the other hand, lives for them.
It might seem like a relatively inconsequential detail, but it speaks to how difficult it has been for two such opposing systems to see eye to eye, and how many stumbling blocks remained.
But it seems today, at least some of that was overcome.
Image: Donald Trump and Xi Jinping held talks in Busan, South Korea. Pic: Reuters
Indeed, there appears to have been an agreement on key issues such as the movement of rare earth minerals, the purchase of soybeans, the reduction of tariffs and the crackdown on the trade of fentanyl and the chemicals used to make it.
There was further consensus to keep talking about the sale of high-end US chips and to work together to try to end the war in Ukraine.
None of this is insignificant, but Trump’s assessment of it all as a “12 out of 10” likely brushes over many much thornier issues.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:02
Trump scores meeting with Xi a ’12 out of 10′
The reality is that there is still a great gulf between them; there are many more barriers to trade than there were at the start of the year, there are still a raft of deep political and structural issues that divide them and the levels of distrust the trade war has left will take more than just one meeting to fix.
Disagreements, such as the future status of Taiwan, for example, weren’t even mentioned today.
Image: There is still a gulf between the two leaders, despite the pair agreeing on key issues at the summit. Pic: Reuters
There also doesn’t appear to be any guarantees baked in, and thus, there is nothing to prevent either party from reneging on what has been agreed and ramping pressure back up as soon as another issue arises.
And, given the characters involved, that feels all too likely.
Indeed, both sides, for different reasons, have found political advantage in the “maximum pressure” style brinkmanship we’ve seen in recent months.
Donald Trump has described crucial trade talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping as “amazing” – and says he will visit Beijing in April.
The leaders of the world’s two biggest economies met in South Korea as they tried to defuse growing tensions – with both countries imposing aggressive tariffs on exports since the president’s second term began.
Aboard Air Force One, Mr Trump confirmed tariffs on Chinese goods exported to the US will be reduced, which could prove much-needed relief to consumers.
It was also agreed that Beijing will work “hard” to stop fentanyl flowing into the US.
Semiconductor chips were another issue raised during their 100-minute meeting, but the president admitted certain issues weren’t discussed.
“On a scale of one to 10, the meeting with Xi was 12,” he told reporters en route back to the US.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:08
‘Their handshake was almost a bit awkward’
Xi a ‘tough negotiator’, says Trump
The talks conclude a whirlwind visit across Asia – with Mr Trump saying he was “too busy” to see Kim Jong Un.
However, the president said he would be willing to fly back to see the North Korean leader, with a view to discussing denuclearisation.
Mr Trump had predicted negotiations with his Chinese counterpart would last for three or four hours – but their meeting ended in less than two.
The pair shook hands before the summit, with the US president quipping: “He’s a tough negotiator – and that’s not good!”
It marks the first face-to-face meeting between both men since 2019 – back in Mr Trump’s first term.
Image: Donald Trump and Xi Jinping. Pic: AP
There were signs that Beijing had extended an olive branch to Washington ahead of the talks, with confirmation China will start buying US soybeans again.
American farmers have been feeling the pinch since China stopped making purchases earlier this year – not least because the country was their biggest overseas market.
Chinese stocks reached a 10-year high early on Thursday as investors digested their meeting, with the yuan rallying to a one-year high against the US dollar.
Analysis: A fascinating power play
Sky News Asia correspondent Helen-Ann Smith – who is in Busan where the talks took place – said it was fascinating to see the power play between both world leaders.
She said: “Trump moved quickly to dominate the space – leaning in, doing all the talking, even responding very briefly to a few thrown questions.
“That didn’t draw so much as an eyebrow raise from his counterpart, who was totally inscrutable. Xi does not like or respond well to unscripted moments, Trump lives for them.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:43
Will Trump really run for a third term?
On Truth Social, Mr Trump had described the summit as a gathering of the “G2” – a nod to America and China’s status as the world’s two biggest economies.
While en route to see President Xi, he also revealed that the US “Department of War” has now been ordered to start testing nuclear weapons for the first time since 1992.
Some of the world’s biggest tech giants reported quarterly earnings on Wednesday – with a mixed bag of results as fears grow that a bubble is forming in artificial intelligence.
Microsoft revealed that its spending on AI infrastructure hit almost $35bn (£26.5bn) in the three months to the end of September, a sharp rise compared with the year before.
Despite revenue jumping 18% and net income rising 12%, shares plunged by close to 4% in after-hours trading, with investors concerned about the mounting costs of sustaining the boom.
Image: Microsoft is now a $4trn company thanks to its stake in ChatGPT maker OpenAI. AP file pic
Microsoft’s vice president of investor relations Jonathan Neilson said: “We continue to see demand which exceeds the capacity we have available.
“Our capital expenditure strategy remains unchanged in that we build against the demand signal we’re seeing.”
Big Tech is facing increasing pressure to show returns on the massive AI investments they’re making, against a backdrop of soaring valuations and limited evidence of productivity gains.
Microsoft became the world’s second most valuable company this week thanks to its 27% stake in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT.
Its market capitalisation surged beyond $4trn (£3trn) at one point, but that psychologically significant threshold is now in doubt because of recent selloffs.
Image: iStock file pic
Alphabet makes history
Last night’s results weren’t all doom and gloom – with shares in Google’s parent company surging by 6% in after-hours trading.
Alphabet has also set out aggressive spending ambitions, but placated investors thanks to an impressive set of results that surpassed analysts’ expectations.
Total revenue for the quarter stood at a staggering $102.35bn (£77bn), with the search giant’s advertising unit remaining robust despite growing competition.
But concerns linger that Alphabet’s dominance in search could be undermined by AI startups, with OpenAI recently unveiling a browser designed to rival Google Chrome.
Hargreaves Lansdown’s senior equity analyst Matt Britzman shrugged off this threat – and believes the company is “gearing up for long-term AI leadership”.
He said: “Alphabet just delivered its first-ever $100bn quarter, silencing the doubters with standout performances in both Search and Cloud.
“AI Overviews and AI Mode are clearly resonating with users, helping to ease fears that Google’s core search business is under threat from generative AI.
“With ChatGPT’s recent browser demo falling short of a game-changer, Google looks well-placed to put up a strong defence as gatekeeper to the internet.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:16
Browser could ‘change the way we use the internet’
Meta faces a mauling
Meta – the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – saw its shares tumble by as much as 10% in after-hours trading.
Mark Zuckerberg’s tech empire anticipates “notably larger” capital expenses next year as it ramps up investments in AI and goes on a hiring spree for top talent.
Net income in the third quarter stood at $2.7bn (£2bn) and suffered an eye-watering $16bn (£12bn) hit because of Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill”.
Meta was late to the party on AI but has now doubled down on this still-nascent technology – setting an ambition to achieve superintelligence, a milestone where machines could theoretically outthink humans.
The social networking giant continues to benefit from its massive user base, and expects fourth-quarter revenues of up to $59bn (£44bn).