Good riddance, 2022. Tuesday officially marked the start of a new year on Wall Street, and while there is no guarantee 2023 will be a great one for stocks, for now it’s nice to turn the page on the worst year since 2008 . After recently highlighting Club holdings that analysts tapped as their top picks for 2023, we wanted to take the Street’s temperature on our stocks in a different way. So, we screened our portfolio to find the holdings that are rated buy or overweight by at least 75% of relevant analysts, and also have a 15% upside to those analysts’ average price target based on where the stock closed on the final trading day of 2022. These are the 10 stocks that match our specific criteria, according to data from FactSet, in order from the highest-to-lowest percentage of buy or overweight ratings: Amazon (AMZN) Alphabet (GOOGL) Microsoft (MSFT) Halliburton (HAL) Walt Disney (DIS) Humana (HUM) Wells Fargo (WFC) Salesforce (CRM) Constellation Brands (STZ) Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Amazon Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 92% Upside to average price target: 60.9% Analysts expect Amazon to bounce back in a big way after shares tumbled nearly 50% last year. We’ve continued to stay invested in the ecommerce and cloud-computing giant, but have been clear about what we need to see from management in the coming months — namely, more robust discipline on costs. That’s key for Amazon shares to make a meaningful move higher in the face of growing recession fears. Alphabet Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 92% Upside to average price target: 40.1% Like with Amazon, the Street continues to stand with Google parent Alphabet, despite a 39.1% decline in its share price in 2022. Similar to Amazon, we want to see Alphabet rationalize its hiring and spending because its main source of revenue — advertising — remains pressured by mounting economic headwinds. Microsoft Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 92% Upside to average price target: 22.2% Microsoft — the third mega-cap tech stock to make the list — is also well-liked by analysts following a year in which shares tumbled nearly 29%. Microsoft is one of the best-run companies out there, which allows us to see through any near-term macroeconomic challenges and focus on its long-term growth prospects, particularly in enterprise cloud computing. We may be looking to book some profits if the stock climbs toward the $300 level, after ending 2022 around $240 per share. Halliburton Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 86% Upside to average price target: 16.8% Halliburton was a big winner last year, climbing 72% in 2022, and the vast majority of analysts who cover the company believe it can go even higher, even if gains are more muted this year. While day-to-day oil price fluctuations may at times test our conviction in our energy investments — West Texas Intermediate crude closed down more than 3.7% Tuesday — Halliburton’s multiyear growth story remains intact. We also believe it boasts pricing power, a key attribute for this current economic environment . Walt Disney Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 82% Upside to average price target: 37.7% Analysts expect some magic to return to Disney following a miserable 44% slide in 2022. We hope so, too, now that Bob Iger is back as CEO . Iger should help steady the ship, especially on Disney’s money-losing streaming side. Humana Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 80% Upside to average price target: 19.5% Humana is the only Club holding besides Halliburton to post share gains in 2022 and land on Tuesday’s top-10 screen. Many of the same factors that fueled Humana’s outperformance last year, with the stock rising 10.4%, are still relevant and explain why we added to our position in the health insurer earlier Tuesday . Those reasons include a lack of economic sensitivity and limited exposure to the strong U.S. dollar . Wells Fargo Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 79% Upside to average price target: 30.9% Despite fears of a U.S. recession on the horizon, most analysts view Wells Fargo favorably. The bank’s shares outperformed the S & P 500 last year, falling only 13.9% compared with the index’s roughly 19% slide. Even as we await the full dissipation of the regulatory cloud that hovers over Wells Fargo , it’s one of the best-capitalized banks in the U.S. and poised to benefit from higher interest rates. Salesforce Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 78% Upside to average price target: 47.2% Add Salesforce to the list of beaten-up tech stocks that most analysts expect to recover in 2023. Salesforce shares fell almost 48% last year, a steep decline we admittedly didn’t expect. We’ll be looking to see if the value-creation potential that activist investor Starboard sees in Salesforce starts to materialize in 2023, while Mark Benioff resumes his prior role as sole CEO . Constellation Brands Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 78% Upside to average price target: 18.8% The maker of Corona and Modelo beer also held up much better than the S & P in 2022, declining only 7.7%. We still believe Constellation’s business should prove relatively durable in an economic slowdown, and added to our position right before the holidays. Advanced Micro Devices Percentage of analysts with a buy/overweight rating: 76% Upside to average price target: 35.7% Of the 10 stocks on this list, AMD saw the biggest decline in 2022. The chipmaker’s shares sank 55%. However, most analysts expect its fortunes to improve this year, after having been weighed down by soft demand in end markets like PCs. The chip industry does not seem to be out of the woods yet , but we’re continuing to back AMD over the long term. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Packages move along a conveyor belt at an Amazon Fulfillment center on Cyber Monday in Robbinsville, New Jersey, on Monday, Nov. 28, 2022.
Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Good riddance, 2022.
Tuesday officially marked the start of a new year on Wall Street, and while there is no guarantee 2023 will be a great one for stocks, for now it’s nice to turn the page on the worst year since 2008.
On today’s road-ready episode of Quick Charge, Tesla released data hinting that its Autopilot ADAS solution may be less safe to use than before. We’ve also got some news from inside the Tesla diner experience, plus a 250,000 mile Ford Mustang Mach-E that still has more than 90% of its battery capacity left!
We also cover Lucid’s plans to reinvigorate American EV manufacturing WITHOUT help from Washington by forging stronger bonds between automakers, mineral miners, and battery recyclers – plus: Optimus breaks down.
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (most weeks, anyway). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Got news? Let us know! Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Renewables continued to dominate fossil fuels on price in 2024, according to a new report from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). The big takeaway: Clean energy is the cheapest power around – by a wide margin. So it’s pretty bad business that the biggest grid upgrade project in US history just got kneecapped by Trump’s Department of Energy to stop the “green scam.”
On average, solar power was 41% cheaper than the lowest-cost fossil fuel in 2024, and onshore wind was 53% cheaper. Onshore wind held its spot as the most affordable new source of electricity at $0.034 per kilowatt-hour, with solar close behind at $0.043/kWh.
IRENA’s report says global renewables added 582 gigawatts (GW) of capacity last year, which avoided about $57 billion in fossil fuel costs. That’s not a small dent. Even more impressive: 91% of all new renewable power projects built in 2024 were cheaper than any new fossil fuel option.
Technological innovation, strong supply chains, and economies of scale are driving the cost advantage. Battery prices are helping too: IRENA says utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are now 93% cheaper than they were in 2010, with prices averaging $192/kWh in 2024.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
But it’s not all smooth sailing. The report flags short-term cost pressures from trade tensions, material bottlenecks, and rising costs in some regions. North America and Europe feel more squeezed than others due to permitting delays, limited grid capacity, and higher system costs.
Meanwhile, countries in Asia, Africa, and South America could see faster cost drops thanks to stronger learning rates and abundant solar and wind resources.
One big challenge is financing. In developing countries, high interest rates and perceived investor risk inflate the levelized cost of electricity of renewables. For example, wind power generation costs were about the same in Europe and Africa last year ($0.052/kWh), but financing made up a much larger share of project costs in Africa. IRENA estimates the cost of capital was just 3.8% in Europe but 12% in Africa.
And even if projects are affordable to build, many are getting stuck in grid connection queues or stalled by slow permitting. Those “integration costs” are now a major hurdle, especially in fast-growing G20 and emerging markets.
Tech is helping with some of that – hybrid solar-wind-storage setups and AI-powered tools are improving grid performance and project efficiency. But digital infrastructure and grid modernization still lag in many places, holding renewables back.
“Renewables are rising, the fossil fuel age is crumbling,” said UN Secretary-General António Guterres. “But leaders must unblock barriers, build confidence, and unleash finance and investment.”
IRENA’s bottom line is that the economics of renewables are stronger than ever, but to keep the momentum going, governments and markets need to reduce risks, streamline permitting, and invest in grids.
Electrek’s Take
Speaking of unblocking barriers and investment, the opposite just happened today in Trump World. The Department of Energy just canceled a $4.9 billion conditional loan commitment for the 800-mile Grain Belt Express Phase 1 transmission project, the biggest transmission line in US history.
It’s a high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission line connecting Kansas wind farms across four states. It will connect four grids, improving reliability. It will be able to power 50 data centers and create 5,500 jobs. Phase 1 is due to start next year.
The new grid will also connect all forms of energy, not just renewables, and it’s super pathetic that Invenergy had to stoop to put up a map on the project’s home page today showing how it will transmit fossil fuels, the “existing dispatchable generation source,” and felt it had to leave renewables off the map entirely. Sorry, Kansas wind farms, you get no mention because this administration doesn’t like you.
Chicago-based Invenergy plans to build the 5 GW Grain Belt Express in phases from Kansas to Illinois. The company says the project will save customers $52 billion in energy costs over 15 years. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) complained to Trump about the project, calling it a “green scam,” and got the government loan canceled based on a lie, claiming it would cost taxpayers “billions.” This was Invenergy’s response on X:
This is bizarre. Senator Hawley is attempting to kill the largest transmission infrastructure project in U.S. history, which is already approved by all four states and is aligned with the President’s energy dominance agenda. Senator Hawley is trying to deprive Americans of… pic.twitter.com/ZLwTNUGZxA
As usual, Trump was swayed by the last person in the room, and Hawley shot an entire region in the foot when an upgraded grid and more renewables are needed more than ever. Hopefully, this project can continue despite the ignorant shortsightedness coming from the Republicans (who ironically released an AI Action Plan today).
It beggars belief that this political party is this isolated from the rest of the world – well, besides our besties Iran, Libya, and Yemen, who aren’t part of the Paris Agreement either – and being that the US is the world’s No 2 polluter, the world will suffer for its arrogance.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Earnings are down 23% on falling electric vehicle sales and lower margins, but Tesla’s stock is not crashing because CEO Elon Musk is promising a return to earnings growth through autonomous driving and humanoid robots.
We previously reported on how Tesla’s Robotaxi effort is a major shift in strategy for Tesla, which has been promising unsupervised self-driving in its customer vehicles for years.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Instead, the Robotaxi service consists of an internal fleet operating within a geo-fenced area, currently only in Austin, Texas, and powered by teleoperation and in-car supervisors with a finger on a kill switch at all times.
“I believe half of the population of the US will be covered by Tesla’s Robotaxi by the end of the year.”
He added that he believes that regulatory approval will be the biggest hurdle, even though Tesla’s current service requires a Tesla employee in each car, which is a major hurdle to scaling.
Musk and Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s head of self-driving, both claimed that the Bay Area will be the first market where Tesla plans to expand its Robotaxi service. However, Elluswamy added that the program will initially have a driver in the driver’s seat.
This is laughable. Who believes that? How can Elon say that with a straight face when Tesla only has a joke of a system that requires supervision at all times?
For context, Tesla currently only operates in a little over half of Austin, Texas. Here’s the list of all the metro areas Tesla would need to launch Robotaxi by the end of the year to cover half of the US population:
Rank
Metro Area
Population
Cumulative Total
1
New York
19.15 M
19.15 M
2
Los Angeles
12.68 M
31.83 M
3
Chicago
9.04 M
40.87 M
4
Houston
6.89 M
47.76 M
5
Dallas–Fort Worth
6.73 M
54.49 M
6
Miami
6.37 M
60.86 M
7
Atlanta
6.27 M
67.13 M
8
Philadelphia
5.86 M
72.99 M
9
Washington, DC
5.60 M
78.59 M
10
Phoenix
4.83 M
83.42 M
11
Boston
4.40 M
87.82 M
12
Seattle
3.58 M
91.40 M
13
Detroit
3.54 M
94.94 M
14
San Diego
3.37 M
98.31 M
15
San Francisco
3.36 M
101.67 M
16
Tampa
3.04 M
104.71 M
17
Minneapolis–St. Paul
2.62 M
107.33 M
18
St. Louis
2.80 M
110.13 M
19
Denver
2.99 M
113.12 M
20
Baltimore
2.83 M
115.95 M
21
Orlando
2.76 M
118.71 M
22
Charlotte
2.75 M
121.46 M
23
San Antonio
2.60 M
124.06 M
24
Austin
2.42 M
126.48 M
25
Pittsburgh
2.43 M
128.91 M
26
Sacramento
2.42 M
131.33 M
27
Las Vegas
2.32 M
133.65 M
28
Cincinnati
2.26 M
135.91 M
29
Kansas City
2.19 M
138.10 M
30
Columbus
2.14 M
140.24 M
31
Cleveland
2.16 M
142.40 M
32
Indianapolis
2.12 M
144.52 M
33
San José
1.99 M
146.51 M
34
Virginia Beach–Norfolk
1.76 M
148.27 M
35
Providence
1.68 M
149.95 M
36
Milwaukee
1.57 M
151.52 M
37
Jacksonville
1.60 M
153.12 M
38
Raleigh–Durham
1.45 M
154.57 M
39
Nashville
1.43 M
156.00 M
40
Oklahoma City
1.42 M
157.42 M
41
Richmond
1.30 M
158.72 M
42
Louisville
1.28 M
160.00 M
43
Salt Lake City
1.26 M
161.26 M
44
New Orleans
1.23 M
162.49 M
45
Hartford
1.20 M
163.69 M
46
Buffalo
1.11 M
164.80 M
47
Birmingham
1.10 M
165.90 M
This is ridiculous. The lies are becoming increasingly larger and more brazen. We know what that means.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.