Connect with us

Published

on

Lots of Great Choices But One Size Wont Fit All A full-size 1911, decked out with many of today’s popular features. This example is a stainless .45 ACP Kimber Eclipse, factory equipped with adjustable night sights.

The U.S. Military is now into their second generation of standard-issue pistols since the Government Model 1911 was phased out. Replaced by the M-9 (Beretta M-92 FS) in 1985, the M17/18 (Sig P320) came next during 2017. Thus, except for those long in the tooth with military handgun experience, the 1911 is probably regarded more as an abstract relic by many veterans.

That may be true, but the Government Model is still a strong contender in the civilian market. Available in numerous calibers and sizes, many are true eye candy.

Polymer pistols enjoy strong sales, but the seemingly immortal Model 1911 Government Model still soldiers on. In fact, nowadays, old slab-sides has even been hybridized, one recent example being Springfield Armorys high-capacity Prodigy. And like the majority of todays single-stacks, this high-cap rendition incorporates features that were previously custom extras.

Prior to (and even well into) the debut of the Glock, many commercial Government Models started life pretty much as their military counterparts had. Three nearly obligatory upgrades were extended (beavertail) grip safeties, larger thumb safety pads, and a better set of sights the latter the topic of this post. 1911 Sights – Many Options Basic G.I. Sights

A genuine U.S. issued Government Model is a Spartan example of todays possibilities. In fact, for those of us old enough to have carried one, the forty-five was already dated, the most recent issued specimens dating to World War II.

Lord knows mine had certainly seen its share of hard knocks, as evidenced by its appearance – and interesting history. Captured (actually recaptured) from an opponent no longer in need of its use, unlike some other battlefield pickups we frequently encountered, it was still configured as issued at some point during its murky past. I wish Id recorded its markings, but priorities were different at the time.

After giving my new acquisition a thorough going over, it became my constant companion. Through some creative scrounging, I eventually accumulated a large stash of .45 Hardball rounds and magazines. The .45 is arguably one of several useful calibers to own, but one remaining loose end was the pistols bore, which showed heavily worn rifling. That problem was solved through dumb luck when, during a trip to the rear, I managed to score a new barrel. Today Id obsess over its fitting and confirm the results via careful range testing.

Ignorance being bliss, I simply dropped in the replacement barrel and proceeded to ventilate an ammo can from around twenty paces. More luck: A satisfying seven-round group formed directly above the pistols sights and, from that point on, the old G.I. .45 performed admirably.

Back to the subject at hand, I never remotely considered its sights a hindrance. I attribute this to the following: At the time, my eyes were a whole lot younger. When I finally handed my trusty old Government Model off to a buddy, they, along with the rest of me, were only 21 years old. Related to the above, Im a product of the era preceding computers, tablets and blue screens. During my pre-military days, phones had rotary dials and cords. Most households had televisions (initially black & white), but programming was limited to three networks received via rabbit ears or roof antennas. The expectation was, kids would either be in school or outdoors during daylight hours, with evenings reserved for homework. Result: My tender baby blues hadnt been fried by steady exposure to electronics.

Earlier on, both of my parents were Word War II veterans who grew up without any visually based electronics other than incandescent lighting – still a novelty in many regions of the U.S. when they were kids. And the Model 1911 predates them both.

Im betting the sights of my Grandfathers Navy-issued World War I version were perfectly adequate for his non-light-polluted eyes. Lots of other old handguns from that period have seemingly rudimentary sights. True enough by todays standards, but maybe their owners could actually see! The fabled U.S. Government Model .45 as it appeared in 1911. Produced by Colt and configured as issued prior to the A-1 version, this example may have been through World War 1. By today’s standards its sights are rudimentary appendages but, during that era, many shooters may have had better eyes.

Anyhow, those days are long gone. And on a personal note, the issued sights of my old 1911 would be close to useless for my now aged eyes.

Good news: Due to the ongoing popularity of this pistol, there are lots of great aiming choices today almost too many. The options include fixed or adjustable sights configured as three-dot versions, fiber optics, night sights, and even small battery-powered red dot units. Where to begin? Red Dot Sights

Today, the aiming system for many shooters young and old is a miniaturized red dot sight (MRDS). These small electronic sights have advanced from novelty status to mainstream – to the point where many currently produced pistols are now offered with optics ready slides, or as fully decked-out packages. However, pickings are still lean among traditional 1911 offerings. And, as far as Im concerned, thats okay. Heck, even with an aluminum frame a standard-size 5-inch version is already quite a handful.

Previous size issues have been addressed through todays genre of carry-friendly pistols, many of which are striker-fired compact 9mms. Thus, manufacturers of 1911s, aiming to please, now offer a number of competing smaller versions chambered for not only .45 ACP, but also 9mm. However, unlike the growing list of other compact pistols, optics-ready versions are conspicuously absent.

The reason probably boils down to reliable function. As originally designed, the Government Model was engineered to fire .45 Automatic Colt Pistol cartridges. The platform has since been adapted to fire a number of other calibers, but function-wise, the .45 ACP has always been the gold standard.

And, across the board, reliability becomes increasingly problematic commensurate with decreasing size, due to greater slide velocities and steeper unlocking angles. Fortunately, thanks to stiff demand and the ensuing R&D, most of these issues have now been overcome, and most of todays smaller 1911s will run reliably – in their factory form.

But, when it comes to MRDS offerings, among Kimbers extensive line, the only listed option is a Custom Shop 10mm version, (equipped with a Leupold Delta Point Pro). Likewise, Springfield Armory has a generous listing of 1911s, however, their MRDS platform is the high-cap Prodigy. 

That said, the 1911 has been adapted to accommodate small optical systems. Beyond MRDS base adapters, existing slides can be machined (at considerable expense), or they can be purchased pre-machined from reputable sources such as Ed Brown: Ed brown 1911 Government Slide.

The great feature of Browns full-sized slide is, its machined for Trijicons 1911 RMR Mount, which ships with an integral night-sight and a dovetailed (NS green) front. The sights are tall enough to co-witness (lower 1/3) with Trijicons excellent RMR dot sights, providing the best of both worlds.

Playing it safe, a satisfactory installation will likely require the services of a competent gunsmith possessing the correct sight fixtures. Attempt to install a dovetailed night sight with a hammer and brass drift and you may discover its Tritium lamp is suddenly kaput. Also, theres the associated expenses. Labor aside, the slide costs around $352, and the RMR mount is $211. Factor in more money for slide components.

Alternate solutions include small aftermarket bases designed to fit factory rear sight slots, something Id just as soon skip – at least for defensive purposes. Durable Iron Sight Options

Jumping back in time, if I ould only add one upgrade to my battle-worn G.I. .45, it would have to be a foolproof set of iron sights, effective in all lighting conditions to include darkness. In fight-mode, durability would take top-billing over precise aiming.

Based on good results with two sight sets on a pair of small S&W polymer pistols (a 9mm Shield and .380 Bodyguard), Id look hard at XD Sights Big Dots for a 1911. The front sight is humongous, but its express design nevertheless affords more precision than one might expect and its also fast. An XS Big Dot Sight set shown here atop an S&W .380 Bodyguard. Although highly visible, they almost look too basic to provide any degree of accuracy. But in reality, they work surprisingly well.

Another route, circling back to Kimber, their Rapide comes factory-equipped with a set of TRUGLO TFX Pro Day/Night Sights. As for the sights themselves, if you log on to TRUGLOs site, you can peruse Truglo’s 1911 offerings. While youre at it, note the slide cuts which are listed as Novak LoMount patterns. Kimber’s full-size .45 ACP Rapide (top) ships with TRUGLO’s TFX Pro Day/Night Sights featuring fiber-optic & Tritium elements. Its smaller 9mm cousin, the 9mm Micro 9 ESV, is sold with Kimber’s low-profile night sights. Sights & Slides

The above is no more than a tiny sampler of the myriad sight possibilities. Nowadays, more 1911s are probably produced with slides machined to accept sights other than those of the original Colt/ Government Model. Rear Sights

Todays more common 1911 slide cuts correspond with the following sights:

Novak LoMount Introduced by Novak Designs in 1985, these streamlined low profile rear sights quickly caught on for defensive use, to the point where they became factory-issue for a number of pistol manufacturers. The line has since expanded to include versions for standard G.I. slides, as well as adjustable Novak models. See the variety of Novak sights.

As originally conceived by Novak, the sloping rear sight can sit low in a slide because it nests in a proprietary cut. But it wasnt the first designed for use in an altered slide. The Novak rear sight (L) is a night-sight version equipped with Tritium inserts that glow 24/7. Elevation is fixed but windage adjustments can be made after loosening the sight’s central setscrew. The fully adjustable BoMar (R) has softened blade corners but it’s really more of a target sight.

Elliason For many years the 1911 has been brought to a fine level of accuracy through careful fitting of its barrel, bushing, slide and frame, etc. Better sights were part of the package so, when Colt introduced a factory Gold Cup National Match version, it was sold with an adjustable rear sight. Recessed into its slide via a proprietary longitudinal slot, several iterations progressed to include a 1965 Eliasson design secured with a somewhat fragile cross-pin.

BoMar BMCS The emergence of the BoMar design provided a stronger low-mounted alternative to the Gold Cups sights. Although BoMar is no longer in business, fortunately for us, the design continues to thrive. Its offered by several manufacturers, using a unique inset crosswise slide cut. Commonly seen atop serious competition 1911s, its also adaptable to defensive roles through the use of melted sight blades featuring Tritium inserts. A closeup view of a Bo-Mar sight. The serrated windage and elevation screws provide precise clicks permitting regulated adjustments. It sits low on the slide thanks to its unique “dovetail” pattern. Sometimes referred to as a “BoMar”, the firm is no longer in business, but a number of other manufacturers now produce it.

LPA TRT Similar to the BoMar pattern, the elevation screw is located differently, another proprietary design.

The takeaway: Particularly when upgrading to todays great rear sight options, much like MRDS footprints, there is no universal size. But, thanks to the Internet, the necessary information is only a click away. Front Sights

The 1911s original front sight was staked, using a stem that protruded through the slide. Done right its secure enough (not all of em are). Two 1911 front sight examples. The sight on the Government Model slide to the right is attached via the original staking system. The dovetailed version is mounted to a “melted” slide, softened for snag-free holster use.

Replacements are available, but today, more slides feature horizontal dovetail cuts compatible with numerous useful designs. Beyond the various aiming options, different heights will usually correct elevation errors. However, because many are super-tight fits, as noted above, a properly designed fixture is the ticket to a damage-free installation. Also, since dovetail cuts can vary, matching combinations are required. There’s no missing this Remington 1911’s highly visible fiber-optic front sight – at least, not during daylight hours! Although less durable than an all-steel type, if the element breaks the sight’s body will probably survive. A new element can easily be installed (including one of a different color) with a nail-clipper and Butane lighter. Lasers

Today, most lights and lasers are mounted to pistols via their integral accessory rails. The process is simple, but a new holster will probably be necessary. Say you already have an older pistol, possibly a 1911 of vintage stock. Assuming it runs reliably, one easy-to-install aiming upgrade is a laser.

As long as the pistol is built to spec, its grip panels can be exchanged a set of Crimson Trace Laser grips. Its a simple kitchen table job requiring no more than a screwdriver. The laser can be zeroed off the iron sights without firing a shot (verify through some shooting), and a standard holster will probably work just fine. A holster friendly set of Crimson Trace Laser Grips attached to a compact Kimber Covert .45 ACP 1911. The laser’s emitter is located in the upper front corner of the grip panel. Activation is per the pressure pad below the pistol’s trigger guard.

If a rail is preferred you can buy a 1911 so equipped, but the pistol will gain weight and need a different holster. Parting Shots

For precise shooting, my hands-down favorite set of 1911 sights consist of a black BoMar adjustable rear (0.115 wide notch) paired with a narrow (0.110), highly visible green fiber-optic front. But, with defense as a top priority, durability should lead, followed closely by fast acquisition in all lighting conditions. And if the rear sight incorporates a shelf permitting a single-handed slide rack, so much the better. Generally, these designs will be fixed, but some adjustable versions can be reasonable picks. BoMar type night sight variations: The Kimber Eclipse set (L) has a horizontal bar, useful insurance against alignment mix-ups during low light situations. Wilson’s “pyramid” design is less likely to snag but still presents a clean sight picture.

A Wilson KZ-9 on hand here is such an example: Like the STI (now Stacatto 2011), this 4-inch 1911 is an earlier hybrid high-cap design. I ordered it with Wilsons BoMar-type Tritium pyramid rear (0.125 notch) and, because it’s a defensive pistol, its Tritium front sight is a bolder 0.125 fast to pick up on the move. The night-sights of a 4 single-stack Kimber I owned produced high hits. That issue was resolved by replacing its Novak-type fixed rear with an adjustable Miniature Machine unit. An example of a small retrofitted rear sight. Initially equipped with a fixed Novak-type night-sight rear, this 4″ Kimber 9mm shot high. Point of impact was corrected via the adjustable Miniature Machine unit, complete with Tritium elements.

If starting from scratch, the simplest route is a 1911 already set up to meet personal needs. If it may serve more as a foundation for future upgrades, a factory-dovetailed front sight is worthwhile. Stick with mainstream domestic manufacturers and the dovetails will offer no surprises.

And beliee me, Im only scratching the surface! Google 1911 Sights and fasten your seatbelt. Maybe, sit on your wallet, too! For more information about the 1911 and other handguns, here’s a link to Handguns: A Buyer’s and Shooter’s Guide. Handguns: A Buyer’s and Shooter’s Guide (Survival Guns) Markwith, Steve (Author)English (Publication Language) $19.95 Buy on Amazon

Continue Reading

World

Musk sued over buying Twitter shares at artificially low prices by US finance regulator

Published

on

By

Musk sued over buying Twitter shares at artificially low prices by US finance regulator

Elon Musk is being sued for failing to disclose his purchase of more than 5% of Twitter stock in a timely fashion.

The world’s richest man bought the stock in March 2022 and the complaint by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said the delay allowed him to continue buying Twitter stock at artificially low prices.

In papers filed in Washington DC federal court, the SEC said the move allowed Mr Musk to underpay by at least $150m (£123m).

The commission wants Mr Musk to pay a civil fine and give up profits he was not entitled to.

In response to the lawsuit a lawyer for the multi-billionaire said: “Mr Musk has done nothing wrong and everyone sees this sham for what it is.”

An SEC rule requires investors to disclose within 10 calendar days when they cross a 5% ownership threshold.

The SEC said Mr Musk did not disclose his state until 4 April 2022, 11 days after the deadline – by which point he owned more than 9% of Twitter’s shares.

More on Elon Musk

Twitter’s share price rose by more than 27% following Mr Musk’s disclosure, the SEC added.

Mr Musk later purchased Twitter for $44bn (£36bn) in October 2022 and renamed the social media site X.

Read more: Majority of public says Musk having a negative impact on British politics

Since the election of Donald Trump, Mr Musk has been put in charge of leading a newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy.

The president-elect said the department would work to reduce government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures and restructure federal agencies.

Continue Reading

World

Hamas accepts Gaza peace deal as Israeli official says agreement is close but ‘not there yet’

Published

on

By

Hamas accepts Gaza peace deal as Israeli official says agreement is close but 'not there yet'

US president-elect Donald Trump has suggested Israel and Hamas could agree a Gaza ceasefire by the end of the week.

Talks between Israeli and Hamas representatives resumed in the Qatari capital Doha yesterday, after US President Joe Biden indicated a deal to stop the fighting was “on the brink” on Monday.

A draft agreement has been sent to both sides. It includes provisions for the release of hostages and a phased Israeli troop withdrawal from Gaza.

Qatar says Israel and Hamas are at their “closest point” yet to a ceasefire deal.

Two Hamas officials said the group has accepted the draft agreement, with Israel still considering the deal.

An Israeli official said a deal is close but “we are not there” yet.

More than 46,500 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since Israel launched its ground offensive in the aftermath of the 7 October attacks, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry.

Read more:
What’s in the proposed deal?

Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on beachfront cafe in Deir Al-Balah.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on beachfront cafe in Deir al Balah. Pic: Reuters

Biden hails possibility of agreement

President Biden said it would include a hostage release deal and a “surge” of aid to Palestinians, in his final foreign policy speech as president.

“So many innocent people have been killed, so many communities have been destroyed. Palestinian people deserve peace,” he said.

“The deal would free the hostages, halt the fighting, provide security to Israel, and allow us to significantly surge humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians who suffered terribly in this war that Hamas started.”

Qatari mediators have sent Israel and Hamas a draft proposal for an agreement to halt the fighting.

Analysis:
Deal might be close, but there are many unanswered questions

U.S. President Joe Biden delivers a speech at the State Department in Washington, U.S. January 13, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Trump: ‘We’re very close’

President-elect Donald Trump has also discussed a possible peace deal during a phone interview with the Newsmax channel.

“We’re very close to getting it done and they have to get it done,” he said.

“If they don’t get it done, there’s going to be a lot of trouble out there, a lot of trouble, like they have never seen before.

“And they will get it done. And I understand there’s been a handshake and they’re getting it finished and maybe by the end of the week. But it has to take place, it has to take place.”

Read more:
Pope Francis honoured by Joe Biden
Donald Trump’s inauguration 2.0

President-elect Donald Trump talks to reporters after a meeting with Republican leadership at the Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Image:
Pic: AP

Israeli official: Former Hamas leader held up deal

Speaking on Tuesday as negotiations resumed in Qatar, an anonymous Israeli official said that an agreement was “close, but we are not there”.

They accused Hamas of previously “dictating, not negotiating” but said this has changed in the last few weeks.

Yahya Sinwar was the main obstacle for a deal,” they added.

Sinwar, believed to be the mastermind of the 7 October attacks, led Hamas following the assassination of his predecessor but was himself killed in October last year.

Under Sinwar, the Israeli official claimed, Hamas was “not in a rush” to bring a hostage deal but this has changed since his death and since the IDF “started to dismantle the Shia axis”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Biden: ‘Never, never, never, ever give up’

Iran ‘weaker than it’s been in decades’

Yesterday, President Biden also hailed Washington’s support for Israel during two Iranian attacks in 2024.

“All told, Iran is weaker than it’s been in decades,” the president said.

Mr Biden claimed America’s adversaries were weaker than when he took office four years ago and that the US was “winning the worldwide competition”.

“Compared to four years ago, America is stronger, our alliances are stronger, our adversaries and competitors are
weaker,” he said.

“We have not gone to war to make these things happen.”

The US president is expected to give a farewell address on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

World

Gaza ceasefire: What does the draft agreement say and how many hostages would be released?

Published

on

By

Gaza ceasefire: What does the draft agreement say and how many hostages would be released?

A draft ceasefire deal on the table between Israel and Hamas would see 33 hostages set free and a phased withdrawal of IDF forces from parts of Gaza.

President Joe Biden said an agreement to stop the fighting was “on the brink” and high level negotiations between the two sides resumed in Qatar on Tuesday.

The deal would see a number of things happen in a first stage, with negotiations for the second stage beginning in the third week of the ceasefire.

It would also allow a surge in humanitarian aid into Gaza, which has been devastated by more than a year of war.

Details of what the draft proposal entails have been emerging on Tuesday, reported by Israeli and Palestinian officials.

Relatives and supporters of Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza hold photos of their loved ones during a protest calling for their return, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)
Image:
Relatives and supporters of Israeli hostages hold photos of their loved ones during a protest on 8 January. Pic: AP

Hostages to be returned

In the first stage of the potential ceasefire, 33 hostages would be set free.

These include women (including female soldiers), children, men over the age of 50, wounded and sick.

Israel believes most of these hostages are alive but there has not been any official confirmation from Hamas.

In return for the release of the hostages, Israel would free more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees.

People serving long sentences for deadly attacks would be included in this but Hamas fighters who took part in the 7 October attack would not be released.

An arrangement to prevent Palestinian “terrorists” from going back to the West Bank would be included in the deal, an anonymous Israeli official said.

Read more:
A timeline of events since the 7 October attacks
The hostages who still haven’t returned home

Smoke billows as buildings lie in ruin in Beit Hanoun in the Gaza Strip.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Smoke billows as buildings lie in ruin in Beit Hanoun in Gaza. Pic: Reuters

Phased Israeli withdrawal from Gaza

The agreement also includes a phased withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, with IDF troops remaining in the border perimeter to defend Israeli border towns and villages.

Security arrangements would be implemented at the Philadelphi corridor – a narrow strip of land that runs along the border between Egypt and Gaza – with Israel withdrawing from parts of it after the first few days of the deal.

The Rafah Crossing between Egypt and Gaza would start to work gradually to allow the crossing of people who are sick and other humanitarian cases out of Gaza for treatment.

Unarmed North Gaza residents would be allowed to return to their homes, with a mechanism introduced to ensure no weapons are moved there.

“We will not leave the Gaza Strip until all our hostages are back home,” the Israeli official said.

What will happen to Gaza in the future?

There is less detail about the future of Gaza – from how it will be governed, to any guarantees that this agreement will bring a permanent end to the war.

“The only thing that can answer for now is that we are ready for a ceasefire,” the Israeli official said.

“This is a long ceasefire and the deal that is being discussed right now is for a long one. There is a big price for releasing the hostages and we are ready to pay this price.”

The international community has said Gaza must be run by Palestinians, but there has not been a consensus about how this should be done – and the draft ceasefire agreement does not seem to address this either.

In the past, Israel has said it will not end the war leaving Hamas in power. It also previously rejected the possibility of the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited governing powers in the West Bank, from taking over the administration of Gaza.

Since the beginning of its military campaign in Gaza, Israel has also said it would retain security control over the territory after the fighting ends.

Continue Reading

Trending