A writer, whose “candid” and “unsparing” diaries have become the first to ever win the prestigious Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction. has told Sky News she is “delighted” to see the literary format recognised rather than dismissed.

Helen Garner, an acclaimed Australian author and diarist whose celebrity fans include singer Dua Lipa and fellow writer David Nicholls, said that diaries, often written by women, tended to be given “short shrift” in the literary industry.

She has now won the Baillie Gifford award for How To End A Story, a collection which charts 20 years of her life, from publishing her debut novel while raising a young daughter in the 1970s to the disintegration of her marriage in the 1990s.

Judges hailed her as a “brilliant observer and listener” and described the diaries as a “recklessly candid, unsparing, occasionally eye-popping account of the implosion of a marriage”.

Speaking to Sky News’ Sophy Ridge and Wilfred Frost on the new Mornings with Ridge and Frost programme, Garner, 82, said: “My main reason to be delighted is that I think diaries have been given short shrift in literature. I think they are literature.

“Because they were often written by women, they used to be dismissed as just sort of verbal sludge that people… sort of lazily wrote down, but in actual fact to keep a decent diary involves as much hard work as writing a full-on book – in my experience, anyway. So I’m really glad that it’s been recognised.”

Garner was named winner of the £50,000 prize at a ceremony in London on Tuesday, and accepted her award via video link from Melbourne, Australia.

Journalist Robbie Millen, who chaired the prize jury, said her “addictive” book was the unanimous choice of the six judges.

“Garner takes the diary form, mixing the intimate, the intellectual, and the everyday, to new heights,” he said, comparing her to Virginia Woolf in the canon of great literary diarists. “There are places it’s toe-curlingly embarrassing. She puts it all out there.”

‘The mess my life became is not unique’

Garner, who has published novels, short stories, screenplays and true crime books, told Sky News she has been surprised to hear from so many readers who have related to her words and most intimate thoughts.

“People have said to me, ‘this could be my marriage’,” she said. “I found that rather shocking because it’s quite a painful story of a marriage collapsing, starting off with love, but then developing over the years into something painful and destructive.

“I’ve been glad to find that I’m not unique in that way, that the mess that I made in my life, the mess that my life became, it’s not unique. In fact, it’s archetypal. It’s something that’s happened to gazillions of people in the history of the world.”

Asked by Ridge if the book would have been a “difficult read” for her ex-husband, Garner replied: “I don’t know, I haven’t spoken to him for approximately 25 years. We won’t be speaking to each other again, I imagine. And if you’ve read the diary, you’ll see why.”

How To End A Story is the first set of diaries to win the Baillie Gifford Prize, which was founded in 1999 and recognises English-language books in current affairs, history, politics, science, sport, travel, biography, autobiography and the arts.

It was selected from more than 350 books published between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2025.

Face it. You’ve thought about this at home or at work. You’ve done it when you’re with family and friends. You’ve even thought about it before bed and when you should be watching your favorite team.

Who is going to make the national team for [insert nation] at the Olympics?

Every national team is facing tough personnel decisions. Some more than others. But it all comes with the caveat that so much can change until it’s time to submit their final rosters at the end of December.

Until then, here’s a projection examining what the teams for Canada, Czechia, Finland, Sweden and the United States might look like ahead of the Winter Olympics men’s hockey tournament that begins Feb. 11 in Milan-Cortina.

Jump to a roster:
United States
Canada
Sweden
Finland
Czechia

United States

Note: Players in bold were the first six selected.

Names to watch: G Joey Daccord, F Alex DeBrincat, G Thatcher Demko, D Lane Hutson, F Patrick Kane, F Chris Kreider, F Frank Nazar, F Shane Pinto, F Jason Robertson, F Vincent Trocheck, F Trevor Zegras

From the point: Finding options isn’t going to be a problem for Team USA. Within this projected roster, the Americans can field a lineup that possesses balance and versatility in many areas.

Yet it appears that the two players who could impact Team USA’s roster selection process might be Patrick Kane and Vincent Trocheck. Kane is currently injured and has been out of the lineup since mid-October. Before the injury, he had five points in as many games, which allowed him to present an early case for making the roster in what’s a crowded field at winger.

Trocheck was injured in the second game of the season and began practicing with the New York Rangers on Monday. A fully healthy Trocheck would give Team USA another two-way center who can be trusted to play in numerous situations — as well as one more selection discussion for what makes the most sense down the middle.

How does Thatcher Demko factor into the goaltending discussion?

The U.S. is believed to have the strongest set of goalies of any team eligible for the Olympics. But should its group of three include Demko?

The Vancouver Canucks goaltender was a Vezina Trophy finalist in the 2023-24 season before an injury-riddled 2024-25 season saw him struggle to attain consistency. As of Tuesday, Demko’s save percentage (.911) and goals-against average (2.57) were significantly better than Jeremy Swayman‘s marks (.896, 3.14). He is also fourth in goals saved above average, according to Natural Stat Trick.

Canada

Note: Players in bold were the first six selected.

Names to watch: F Connor Bedard, F Sam Bennett, G Mackenzie Blackwood, D Evan Bouchard, F Anthony Cirelli, D Noah Dobson, F Bo Horvat, F Zach Hyman, D Mike Matheson, F John Tavares

From the point: A wealth of options is Canada’s greatest strength while simultaneously being its biggest challenge. With this particular projection, there is a two-way element with many of the forwards, while the defensive setup has puck movers partnered with stay-at-home options who have size. There are remaining questions:

• What happens if Zach Hyman returns from his wrist injury and provides consistent production?

• How does Canada’s goalie situation change if Mackenzie Blackwood, who has also been injured to start the season, can find consistency?

• Can any of the players who missed the cut in this projection get back on the radar with a strong next month?

Could Canada take Connor Bedard and Macklin Celebrini?

Speed — and those who know how to use that speed in tight spaces — played a big role in Canada’s success at the 4 Nations Face-Off. Although Canada has numerous players like that in this projection, is it possible it could add more by bringing in Bedard and moving Celebrini into the active lineup?

Both provide another offensive dimension, and Celebrini has shown he can handle the demands of being a two-way center. Either way, expect both to be heavily in the mix in 2030.

Sweden

Note: Players in bold were the first six selected.

Names to watch: F Mikael Backlund, F Andre Burakovsky, D Philip Broberg, D Simon Edvinsson, G Samuel Ersson, D Oliver Ekman-Larsson, D Adam Larsson, F Victor Olofsson

From the point: Sweden appears to have balance throughout its lineup in this projection, although there could still be certain adjustments. Namely, what makes the most sense for Sweden at left wing?

Lucas Raymond and Jesper Bratt have had starts that justify them being on the top two lines; it’s at the bottom two lines where the questions begin. Gabriel Landeskog has three points through his first 13 games though his average ice time is seventh among forwards on the Colorado Avalanche. Before Rickard Rakell broke his hand, he had eight points in nine games; he’ll return sometime in December. And of course, there’s the discussion about whether Sweden should use Elias Pettersson down the middle or on the wing.

Sweden also could be facing questions related to Linus Ullmark‘s struggles to start the season, and if the team could be inclined to take a look at Edvinsson after his start.

Are Simon Edvinsson and Victor Olofsson becoming too hard to ignore?

Playing for two of the top teams in the NHL entering November usually attracts attention, which is the case for Edvinsson and Olofsson.

Edvinsson has continued to carve out his place as one of the Red Wings’ most important players. He has played a top-pairing role, is second on the team in average ice time and 5-on-5 minutes, and is fourth in short-handed minutes.

Olofsson is operating in a top-nine role for the Avs and has used that opportunity to be fifth on the team in points. He’s on pace for a career-high 63 points this season.

Finland

Note: Players in bold were the first six selected.

Names to watch: F Kasperi Kapanen, G Joonas Korpisalo, F Patrik Laine, F Jani Nyman, F Juuso Parssinen, C Aatu Raty, F Eeli Tolvanen, D Juuso Valimaki

From the point: Finland’s potential roster has been — and will likely continue to be — impacted by major injuries this season.

Aleksander Barkov, who was one of Finland’s “first six,” tore an ACL and MCL in training camp, and was the first domino to fall. Finland has seen other players — such as Kaapo Kakko, Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen and Rasmus Ristolainen — miss the start of the regular season while recovering from injuries. Kakko played his first game Nov. 1, Luukkonen made his debut Oct. 25, and Ristolainen is expected to be out until December with a triceps injury.

Patrik Laine sustained a core muscle injury in late October, which could see him miss at least three months — and potentially place his Olympic chances in jeopardy.

What does Finland’s plan look like should more injuries arise?

It’s possible that Finland could find some relief should Laine be cleared to play at the Olympics. But in the event he’s not, Finland could be tempted to turn to some of its younger players in the NHL such as Nyman, Parssinen and Raty at forward. All three entered Nov. 3 with either the same or slightly more points than Jesperi Kotkaniemi in a similar number of games. There’s also the possibility that Finland could opt for more experienced forwards such as Kasperi Kapanen or Eeli Tolvanen.

Another option for Finland’s defense is Valimaki. He was named to Finland’s 4 Nations Face-Off roster but didn’t play. He tore an ACL in March and is expected to return sometime around November or December. He could be an option, given there have been only seven Finnish defensemen who have played in the NHL this season entering November.

Czechia

Note: Players in bold were the first six selected.

Names to watch: F Filip Chlapik, F Jakub Lauko, F Adam Klapka, D Jan Kostalek, F Tomas Nosek, F Michael Spacek, F Matej Stransky, F Simon Stransky, G Karel Vejmelka, F Adam Zboril

From the point: Tomas Hertl, Martin Necas, David Pastrnak and Pavel Zacha have had the sort of starts to the season that strengthen the notion Czechia’s top-six forward corps could make a significant impact at the Games.

Now it’s a matter of determining what Czechia could receive from its supporting cast — with a number of them playing outside of the NHL.

In the most recent men’s IIHF World Championship, Roman Cevenka and Lukas Sedlak finished second and third on the team in points. They’ve continued to produce in the Czech Extraliga, the nation’s top professional league. Jakub Flek has opened the season with 15 goals and 22 points through 21 games.

Which two goalies will join Lukas Dostal on the Czechia roster?

There was a time when Czechia seemed poised to take Dostal, Vejmelka and Dan Vladar as its three goalies. But that appears to have changed — or at least merited a conversation.

The expectation is that Dostal, who was among the first six players named to Czechia’s provisional roster, will be the starter. As for the rest of the field? Jakub Dobes has won his first six games, while his GSAA ranks third in the NHL, per Natural Stat Trick. Vladar entered Tuesday ranked third in goals-against average (2.11) and save percentage (.924) while being 14th in GSAA.

Although Vejmelka has the same number of wins (six) as Dobes, he was 25th in goals-against average, 34th in save percentage and 55th in GSAA.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A federal judge on Tuesday issued a key victory for two race teams, one owned by Michael Jordan, that further pressures NASCAR to settle the antitrust lawsuit filed against it by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports.

NASCAR commissioner Steve Phelps said last week the series is “trying our hardest” to settle the federal antitrust lawsuit with the two teams suing in the most expansive comments yet from the defendants.

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell ruled Tuesday in favor of 23XI, owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, and Bob Jenkins-owned Front Row, on an argument over the market definition of “premier stock-car racing.” Bell found that NASCAR controls the market and NASCAR’s argument that teams can race in other series is moot.

The teams said in alleging the relevant market for premier stock car racing teams that “NASCAR’s Cup Series is currently the only buyer.” The argument was backed by the the expert opinion of Dr. Daniel Rascher, who concluded that “premier stock car racing” is a distinct form of automobile racing, and other types of motorsports like Formula 1 and IndyCar, and all lower levels of stock car racing, are not an equal substitute to NASCAR.

NASCAR in a counterclaim said the teams unlawfully conspired in banding together for negotiations on new charter agreements, but Bell found “NASCAR deliberate(ly), clear(ly) and unambiguous(ly)” alleged that the relevant market is “the market for entry of cars into NASCAR Cup Series races in the United States and any other location where a Cup Series race is held.”

“The same transaction — the sale and purchase of premier stock car racing services — cannot be a different relevant market depending only on which side is complaining,” Bell wrote. “Most simply put, NASCAR made a strategic decision in asserting its Counterclaim and must now live with the consequences.”

The lawsuit was filed a year ago by 23XI Racing and Front Row Racing when they were the only two organizations out of 15 to not sign extensions on new charter agreements.

The new charter agreements were presented to the teams at the start of the 2024 playoffs with a deadline for them to sign. It followed more than two years of tense negotiations over the charters, which are at the heart of NASCAR’s business model as they guarantee revenue and access to weekly races.

23XI and Front Row likely will go out of business without them and are racing this season unchartered, which comes with significantly reduced prize money.

Other teams have called for a settlement to move forward, but mediation sessions and private negotiations have not worked. The trial is scheduled for Dec. 1.

“We are very pleased with the Court’s decision today, ruling in our favor. Not only does it deny NASCAR’s motion for summary judgment, but it also grants our partial summary judgment motion, finding that NASCAR has monopoly power in a properly defined market,” said Jeffrey Kessler, the attorney representing 23XI and Front Row.

“This means that the trial can now be focused on whether NASCAR has maintained that power through anticompetitive acts and used that power to harm teams. We’re prepared to present our case to the jury and are focused on obtaining a verdict that benefits all of the teams, partners, drivers, and the fans.”

NASCAR in its own statement touted the commitment it has shown into building NASCAR into the top motorsports series in the United States since its 1948 formation. Phelps did the same last week while reading from a statement that ran more than six minutes; he defended the Florida-based France family who founded and controls NASCAR and most of the tracks the series uses for events.

“NASCAR looks forward to proving that it became the leading motorsport in the United States through hard work, risk-taking, and many significant investments over the past 77 years,” NASCAR said in a statement. “The antitrust laws encourage this — and NASCAR has done nothing anticompetitive in building the sport from the ground up since 1948.

“While we respect the Court’s decision, we believe it is legally flawed and we will address it at trial and in the Fourth Circuit if necessary. NASCAR believes in the charter system and will continue to defend it from 23XI and Front Row’s efforts to claim that the charter system itself is anticompetitive.”

Most of the organizations that did sign the new charter agreements last year submitted declarations to the court in support of the charter system and calling for a settlement to the case. All the teams want the charters to become permanent, which NASCAR refused to budge on during negotiations for the current agreement.

Should a settlement not be reached before the trial and NASCAR loses, the entire charter system is at risk of being disbanded or overhauled. Teams are frustrated by that threat, and it is understood that NASCAR has since agreed to make the charters permanent and the snag in settlement talks is the amount of money 23XI and Front Row is demanding in damages and legal fees.

Teams are concerned that NASCAR’s entire framework could be torn apart by a loss and are aggravated that it would be over the monetary demands being made by 23XI and Front Row.

Bell last week issued another win for 23XI and Front Row when he dismissed NASCAR’s countersuit against Curtis Polk, the longtime business manager for Jordan and one of 23XI’s owners.