BAE Systems: UK arms maker enjoys record year for new orders as West’s defence spending rises amid Ukraine war
BAE Systems, the UK’s biggest engineering company, has enjoyed a record year for new orders as western governments stepped up defence spending in response to Russia’s attack on Ukraine..
Britain’s premier defence contractor saw a record order intake of £37.1bn – taking its order backlog to £58.9bn.
BAE, whose current work includes building type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy, making electronic warfare systems for the F-35 jet fighter and making the Beowulf unarmoured all-terrain vehicle for the US Army, said it was expecting order growth this year to be better still.
Underlying operating profits for 2022 came in at £2.5bn – up 12.5% on 2021 – as top line sales grew by 4.4% to £23.3bn.
BAE, one of the biggest suppliers to the US Pentagon, also enjoyed a tailwind from the strength of the US dollar against the pound.
The results allowed the company to raise its dividend to shareholders for the 19th consecutive year.
But it was that big increase in the size of the order book that really caught the eye.
The biggest portion of the new orders came in air, driven by new orders from Saudi Arabia and for MBDA, the European missiles systems business in which BAE is a partner.
Pic: BAE Systems
Maritime, driven by orders for the type 26 frigate and the UK’s dreadnought submarine programme, also contributed a big chunk of new business.
However, the other three key product and service areas – electronic systems, platforms and services and cyber and intelligence – all enjoyed growth in new orders as well.
The latter, while still the smallest part of BAE in terms of sales and profits, is among its most profitable businesses in terms of returns.
‘Tremendous potential ahead’
Charles Woodburn, the chief executive, said: “This is just the start. I still see tremendous potential ahead. We are investing in the business to support the future. We have leading technology solutions for our customers.”
He said BAE’s diverse geographic footprint, its deep customer relationships in the US, Europe and the Middle East and the multi-year nature of many contracts would create numerous opportunities in the future.
Mr Woodburn said it was not widely enough appreciated that BAE’s ability to export from the US, UK, Australia and Sweden meant it was “uniquely well equipped” to compete in multiple markets.
Re-equipping ammo stocks amid Ukraine war
He highlighted the urgent need to re-equip armed forces with ammunition – much of which has been diverted to Ukraine by its western allies – as one area where BAE’s strengths would stand it in good stead.
Read more: War in Ukraine helps boost earnings outlook at BAE Systems
BAE, which has two major Swedish subsidiaries in Hagglunds and Bofors, is also seen as a potential beneficiary if Sweden and Finland’s applications to join NATO are approved and the two countries raise defence spending accordingly.
Interestingly, while some of the sales growth is coming from BAE passing on inflation to customers, the vast majority comes from actually growing sales.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Nov 2022: MD of BAE Systems’ naval ships business, speaks on Ian King Live
Only around a third of contracts are linked to the rate of inflation – a headwind that Mr Woodburn said BAE was increasingly comfortable with managing.
Cognisant of past criticisms of BAE for being too heavily dependent on Saudi defence orders, Mr Woodburn also stressed that no one programme represents more than 10% of group revenues.
UK-Australia security pact
Disappointingly, though, there was little news around the potential benefits for BAE from AUKUS, the new security pact between Australia, the UK and the US, which was announced 18 months ago.
Mr Woodburn said there was little he could say publicly but pointed to some work already being done around submarines – Australia’s decision to switch from French-made to British-made submarines created fury in Paris – cyber security and quantum computing.
The governments of the three countries are due to provide an update next month on the agreement and Mr Woodburn said he had no reason to think that would not be delivered.
There was, though, an update on the work BAE is doing as the lead contractor in the future combat air system programme, aimed at building Tempest, the sixth-generation jet fighter.
The project recently won a boost as Japan joined the Anglo-Italian programme. The company said work was progressing well and reiterated – as was announced before Christmas – that there are plans for the UK to lead the development of a new flying combat air demonstrator set to fly within the next five years.
The overall picture is one of a business that is diversified both in terms of its geographic footprint, customer base and its products and services.
Crucially, a major criticism often levelled at BAE in the past – that it fails to generate enough cash from its activities – also appears to be being addressed.
Shares of BAE, which with an increase of 48% have been the best performer in the FTSE 100 over the last 12 months, fell by just over 1% having hit an all-time high on Wednesday evening.
Rolls-Royce takes City by surprise
Elsewhere, another of the UK’s big prestige engineering companies, Rolls-Royce, was taking the City by surprise with appreciably better results than expected.
The aircraft engine maker reported an underlying operating profit for 2022 of £652m – up 57% on 2021 – thanks to a better performance in its civil aerospace and power systems operations.
The shares were ahead by as much as 20% at one stage as investors digested not only this news but guidance that the company is expecting operating profits of £800m-£1bn for 2023.
Tufan Erginbilgic, the new chief executive, said Rolls had benefitted from a 35% increase in flying hours for its engines and highlighted new large engine orders received from Malaysia Aviation Group, Norse Atlantic Airways and Qantas.
He said Rolls was assuming large engine flying hours this year would come in at 80-90% of the 2019 level.
Underperforming for extended period
However, in his assessment or the company’s prospects, Mr Erginbilgic – a former BP executive who succeeded the long-running Warren East at the start of the year – pulled no punches.
He said Rolls had been underperforming for an extended period.
He added: “This is not just a COVID issue. Cash generation is unsatisfactory and our debt is too high.”
Mr Erginbilgic said too much of the company’s resources were simply covering its costs and interest payments and stifling its ability to invest.
He said it had a relatively high fixed cost base and lower profit margins than its rivals: “In the last five years, even excluding the COVID year of 2020, we have averaged a return on capital employed of just 3.5%.”
Arguing that Rolls had in the past lacked strategic clarity and tried to keep too many options open, he added: “I believe we have the potential to be a much higher quality and much more competitive company.
“We must only invest in new technologies where we are differentiated, where the market opportunity is sufficiently large and where there are synergies with our existing operations.”
‘Monumental uncertainties’
It will be tempting to suggest that, with massive demand still pent-up for flying, a strong 2023 for Rolls is all but guaranteed.
But Mr Erginbilgic warned there were “monumental uncertainties and challenges” in the guidance he was offering for the year, including inflation, potential supply chain disruption, interest rate rises and possible recessions around the world.
Investors also have other questions.
One is that, with civil aerospace set to continue growing in 2023, how easily they will be able to discern how well Rolls has done due to its own self-help measures – as opposed to just a general improvement in market conditions.
Looming redundancies but good potential to generate cash
Another is that with big a round of redundancies looming, Rolls may lose some people it would rather hang onto, due to the tight labour market.
Mr Erginbilgic said: “When we engage with our people, they are very excited about the future. Who doesn’t want to work for a successful company? And who wants to work for an underperforming company? Everybody has a role and we need to mobilise the whole workforce.
“Starting with clarity, why we need to change, and a very clear strategy, everybody knows their role.”
Rolls also still has net debt of £3.3bn and there is a degree of scepticism among investors that the company will be able to get that down by self-help measures and increased cash generation rather than by a sale of new shares.
This business, if it is managed the right way, has good potential to generate cash.
“We are already into our performance improvement agenda. We are looking to drive performance improvement as we speak. There is a huge sense of urgency there. Strategic clarity will follow that and then we will combine the two. Both of them will come together.”
After the near-death experience that the company went through during the pandemic, that will be music to the ears not only of investors but also the government, which is looking to Rolls to play a key role in the energy transition with the delivery of small modular nuclear reactors.
You probably recall the stories about Leicester’s clothing industry in recent years: grim labour conditions, pay below the minimum wage, “dark factories” serving the fast fashion sector. What is less well known is what happened next. In short, the industry has cratered.
In the wake of the recurrent scandals over “sweatshop” conditions in Leicester, the majority of major brands have now abandoned the city, triggering an implosion in production in the place that once boasted that it “clothed the world”.
And now Leicester faces a further existential double-threat: competition from Chinese companies like Shein and Temu, and the impending arrival of cheap imports from India, following the recent trade deal signed with the UK. Many worry it could spell an end for the city’s fashion business altogether.
Gauging the scale of the recent collapse is challenging because many of the textile and apparel factories in Leicester are small operations that can start up and shut down rapidly, but according to data provided to Sky News by SP&KO, a consultancy founded by fashion sector veterans Kathy O’Driscoll and Simon Platts, the number has fallen from 1,500 in 2017 to just 96 this year. This 94% collapse comes amid growing concerns that British clothes-making more broadly is facing an existential crisis.
A trade fair tries to reignite enthusiasm for the local clothing industry
More on this story:
The modern slaves making our clothes in Leicester
How Leicester’s textile workers are being exploited
Boohoo failed in Leicester supply chain malpractice
In an in-depth investigation carried out over recent months, Sky News has visited sites in the city shut down in the face of a collapse of demand. Thousands of fashion workers are understood to have lost their jobs. Many factories lie empty, their machines gathering dust.
The vast majority of high street and fast fashion brands that once sourced their clothes in Leicester have now shifted their supply chains to North Africa and South Asia.
And a new report from UKFT – Britain’s fashion and textiles lobby group – has found that a staggering 95% of clothes companies have either trimmed or completely eliminated clothes manufacturing in the UK. Some 58% of brands, by turnover, now have an explicit policy not to source clothes from the UK.
Seamstresses in one of the city’s former factories
Clothing industry workers in Leicester
Jenny Holloway, chair of the Apparel & Textile Manufacturers Association, said: “We know of factories that were asked to become a potential supplier [to high street brands], got so far down the line, invested on sampling, invested time and money, policies, and then it’s like: ‘oh, sorry, we can’t use you, because Leicester is embargoed.'”
Tejas Shah, a third-generation manufacturer whose family company Shahtex used to make materials for Marks & Spencer, said: “I’ve spoken to brands in the past who, if I moved my factory 15 miles north into Loughborough, would be happy to work with me. But because I have an LE1, LE4 postcode, they don’t want to work for me.”
Shahtex in Leicester used to make materials for Marks & Spencer
Tejas Shah, of Leicester-based firm Shahtex
Threat of Chinese brands Shein and Temu
That pain has been exacerbated by a new phenomenon: the rise of Chinese fast fashion brands Shein and Temu.
They offer consumers ultra-cheap clothes and goods, made in Chinese factories and flown direct to UK households. And, thanks to a customs loophole known as “de minimis”, those goods don’t even incur tariffs when they arrive in the country.
An online advert for Chinese fast fashion company Shein
According to Satvir Singh, who runs Our Fashion, one of the last remaining knitwear producers in the city, this threat could prove the final straw for Leicester’s garments sector.
“It is having an impact on our production – and I think the whole retail sector, at least for clothing, are feeling that pinch.”
Inside one of the city’s remaining clothesmakers
While Donald Trump has threatened to abolish the loophole in the US, the UK has only announced a review with no timeline.
“If we look at what Trump’s done, he’s just thinking more about his local economy because he can see the long-term effects,” said Mr Singh. “I think [abolishing de minimis exceptions] will make a huge difference. I think ultimately it’s about a level playing field.”
A spokesperson for Temu told Sky News: “We welcome UK manufacturers and businesses to explore a low-cost way to grow with us. By the end of 2025, we expect half our UK sales to come from local sellers and local warehouses.”
Thames Water, the UK’s biggest water provider, has been hit by a record fine by regulator Ofwat.
The company has been fined £122.7m following Ofwat’s “biggest and most complex” investigation.
It follows two investigations related to Thames Water’s wastewater operations and dividend payouts.
Of the total fine, £104.5m – 9% of Thames Water‘s turnover – has been levied for breaches of wastewater rules – just below the maximum 10% of turnover that Ofwat could have applied.
Money blog: Inside the booming one-bed flat market
Pic: istock
Another £18.2m penalty will be paid for breaches of dividend payment rules.
It is the first time Ofwat has fined a company for shareholders’ payments which do not “properly reflect” its performance for customers and the environment.
The fine will be paid by Thames Water and its shareholders, Ofwat said, rather than customers.
‘Unacceptable’ environmental impact
The regulator was highly critical of Thames Water’s handling of wastewater, describing it as having an “unacceptable” impact on the environment.
Its investigation of treatment works and the wider wastewater network uncovered failings which “amounted to a significant breach of the company’s legal obligations” and caused that unacceptable environmental impact.
The company announced a 40% spike in sewage spills in December for the period from January to September 2024.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Thames Water boss can ‘save’ company
The fine was so large because Ofwat’s chief executive, David Black, said Thames Water “failed to come up with an acceptable redress package that would have benefited the environment”.
“This is a clear-cut case where Thames Water has let down its customers and failed to protect the environment,” Mr Black said.
“Our investigation has uncovered a series of failures by the company to build, maintain and operate adequate infrastructure to meet its obligations.”
As a result, Thames Water is required to agree to a remediation plan with Ofwat within six months.
Another investigation by the Environment Agency into environmental permits at sewage treatment works is ongoing.
Bad news for Thames Water finances
Thames Water serves 16 million customers across London and the South East and has just about fended off effective nationalisation, having secured an emergency £3bn loan. Its debts now top £19bn.
These fines were not factored into Thames Water’s financial planning for the next five years. The company’s chief executive, Chris Weston, told a recent sitting of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee that Thames Water’s future was dependent on Ofwat being lenient with fines.
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
A Thames Water spokesperson said: “We take our responsibility towards the environment very seriously and note that Ofwat acknowledges we have already made progress to address issues raised in the investigation relating to storm overflows.
“The dividends were declared following a consideration of the company’s legal and regulatory obligations. Our lenders continue to support our liquidity position and our equity raise process continues.”
You probably recall the stories about Leicester’s clothing industry in recent years: grim labour conditions, pay below the minimum wage, “dark factories” serving the fast fashion sector. What is less well known is what happened next. In short, the industry has cratered.
In the wake of the recurrent scandals over “sweatshop” conditions in Leicester, the majority of major brands have now abandoned the city, triggering an implosion in production in the place that once boasted that it “clothed the world”.
And now Leicester faces a further existential double-threat: competition from Chinese companies like Shein and Temu, and the impending arrival of cheap imports from India, following the recent trade deal signed with the UK. Many worry it could spell an end for the city’s fashion business altogether.
Gauging the scale of the recent collapse is challenging because many of the textile and apparel factories in Leicester are small operations that can start up and shut down rapidly, but according to data provided to Sky News by SP&KO, a consultancy founded by fashion sector veterans Kathy O’Driscoll and Simon Platts, the number has fallen from 1,500 in 2017 to just 96 this year. This 94% collapse comes amid growing concerns that British clothes-making more broadly is facing an existential crisis.
More on this story:
The modern slaves making our clothes in Leicester
How Leicester’s textile workers are being exploited
Boohoo failed in Leicester supply chain malpractice
In an in-depth investigation carried out over recent months, Sky News has visited sites in the city shut down in the face of a collapse of demand. Thousands of fashion workers are understood to have lost their jobs. Many factories lie empty, their machines gathering dust.
The vast majority of high street and fast fashion brands that once sourced their clothes in Leicester have now shifted their supply chains to North Africa and South Asia.
And a new report from UKFT – Britain’s fashion and textiles lobby group – has found that a staggering 95% of clothes companies have either trimmed or completely eliminated clothes manufacturing in the UK. Some 58% of brands, by turnover, now have an explicit policy not to source clothes from the UK.
Seamstresses in one of the city’s former factories
Clothing industry workers in Leicester
Jenny Holloway, chair of the Apparel & Textile Manufacturers Association, said: “We know of factories that were asked to become a potential supplier [to high street brands], got so far down the line, invested on sampling, invested time and money, policies, and then it’s like: ‘oh, sorry, we can’t use you, because Leicester is embargoed.'”
A trade fair tries to reignite enthusiasm for the local clothing industry
Tejas Shah, a third-generation manufacturer whose family company Shahtex used to make materials for Marks & Spencer, said: “I’ve spoken to brands in the past who, if I moved my factory 15 miles north into Loughborough, would be happy to work with me. But because I have an LE1, LE4 postcode, they don’t want to work for me.”
Shahtex in Leicester used to make materials for Marks & Spencer
Tejas Shah, of Leicester-based firm Shahtex
Threat of Chinese brands Shein and Temu
That pain has been exacerbated by a new phenomenon: the rise of Chinese fast fashion brands Shein and Temu.
They offer consumers ultra-cheap clothes and goods, made in Chinese factories and flown direct to UK households. And, thanks to a customs loophole known as “de minimis”, those goods don’t even incur tariffs when they arrive in the country.
An online advert for Chinese fast fashion company Shein
According to Satvir Singh, who runs Our Fashion, one of the last remaining knitwear producers in the city, this threat could prove the final straw for Leicester’s garments sector.
“It is having an impact on our production – and I think the whole retail sector, at least for clothing, are feeling that pinch.”
Inside one of the city’s remaining clothesmakers
While Donald Trump has threatened to abolish the loophole in the US, the UK has only announced a review with no timeline.
“If we look at what Trump’s done, he’s just thinking more about his local economy because he can see the long-term effects,” said Mr Singh. “I think [abolishing de minimis exceptions] will make a huge difference. I think ultimately it’s about a level playing field.”
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway