Connect with us

Published

on

Candidates vying to replace Nicola Sturgeon clashed over independence in their fiery first TV debate, with Ash Regan claiming Scotland had “lost its way” on the issue “despite the worst UK governments of all time”.

Ms Regan kicked off the event with some harsh words for the outgoing first minister, from whose government she resigned in protest over gender reforms.

“There’s been no progress on independence in the last few years, despite the worst UK governments of all time,” she said in her opening remarks.

“We used to grow support for independence by governing wisely, and it worked.

“At every election going forward, we will make it crystal clear that a majority of votes for the SNP will be a democratic mandate for independence.”

Asked how and when she would achieve independence, Ms Regan said the party has spent years seeking a “moral mandate” and “begging” Westminster for a referendum but with no success.

She argued that a referendum “is not the gold standard”, saying the SNP could use the ballot box at elections to try to leave the UK.

More on Snp

Leadership rival Kate Forbes said independence would only happen when a majority of Scots had been persuaded it was the best course of action, which means “putting the economy front and centre”.

Scotland
Image:
The candidates clashed over their plans for how Scotland could become independent

Humza Yousaf also stressed the need to “build popular support” for the cause.

Ms Regan accused her rivals of “going cap in hand to Westminster”, saying: “This hasn’t worked so far, why should it work now?”

But Mr Yousaf insisted Downing Street would tell Ms Regan “where to go” under her plan if she was first minister.

He said a majority of votes in a Scotland election would not bring politicians in London to the table as “there is no common decency with the UK Government”.

“We are talking about a government in the UK that literally sends refugees on planes to Rwanda. They are not going to sit down with us just because we win an election,” he said.

Would an independent Scotland keep the monarchy?

Questions on independence also turned to whether the candidates would keep the monarchy, with Ms Forbes saying there were “bigger issues facing Scotland”.

She added: “I am pretty relaxed, I would see us as part of the Commonwealth.”

But both Mr Yousaf and Ms Regan declared themselves to be republicans.

Mr Yousaf said he would “keep the monarchy for a period of time”, but added: “I would hope an independent Scotland would be a republic in the future.”

Ms Regan said her preference would be to have an elected head of state for an independent Scotland.

She said in the “new circumstances” after the death of the Queen last year it might be time for the SNP conference to debate if retaining the monarchy was still the right policy for the party “or whether we should move to a policy of having an elected head of state”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How will the SNP select their new leader?

Ministers clash on government record and social issues

The harshest exchanges on Tuesday evening came between Finance Secretary Ms Forbes and Health Secretary Mr Yousaf, considered to be the two frontrunners for the top job.

Ms Forbes attacked Mr Yousaf’s record in government – suggesting there would be a place for him in her cabinet but “maybe not at health” – while her record on social issues was scrutinised.

“Humza, you’ve had a number of jobs in government,” she said in a portion of the STV debate which allowed for cross examination between candidates.

“You were a transport minister and the trains were never on time, when you were justice secretary the police were stretched to breaking point, and now as health minister we’ve got record-high waiting times. What makes you think you can do a better job as first minister?”

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has a cup of tea after giving a press conference in Bute House in Edinburgh where she announced that she will stand down as First Minister of Scotland after eight years. Picture date: Wednesday February 15, 2023.
Image:
The leadership debate has been triggered by the shock resignation of Nicola Sturgeon

Mr Yousaf said he “built new roads and railways”, delivered the Queensferry Crossing under budget, “extended protections for domestic abuse victims” and “delivered the fastest ever COVID booster programme”.

Asked if he is the “continuity candidate” and if that means he is the “no change candidate”, Mr Yousaf shot back: “If change means lurching to the right, Kate, if it means rolling back on progressive values, that’s not the right change.”

Read more:
SNP accused of infringing press freedoms amid hustings U-turn
Yousaf’s absence from key vote on gay marriage being ‘dragged up for political reasons’

Forbes ‘burdened’ by hurt caused by religious views but fights on in race
The controversies which piled pressure on Sturgeon

He told his rival her comments early in the campaign, when Ms Forbes said she would not have voted for same-sex marriage if she had been an MSP when the legislation passed, saw “many people, particularly from our LGBTQ community, say they wouldn’t vote for independence” if she is leader.

Mr Yousaf added: “Forget persuading ‘no’ voters, you can’t even keep ‘yes’ voters.”

Ms Forbes said she made a “solemn and honest pledge when it comes to upholding and defending the right of every Scot”.

There were points of agreement during the debate, with Ms Regan and Mr Yousaf hitting out at the UK government’s immigration plans and all three candidates committing to increase the Scottish Child Payment.

Mr Yousaf has previously announced he would look to increase the benefit, but said on Tuesday he would look to push it to £30 per week from £25 in his first budget if elected first minister.

Ms Regan said she would see “what more we could do on that”, while Ms Forbes suggested any increase would “have to reflect what inflation is at the time”.

Continue Reading

World

Starmer and Zelenskyy discuss ending Russia’s ‘brutal war’ – as Putin says says he is open to bilateral talks on longer ceasefire

Published

on

By

Starmer and Zelenskyy discuss ending Russia's 'brutal war' - as Putin says says he is open to bilateral talks on longer ceasefire

Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke about ending Russia’s “brutal war” on Ukraine in their latest phone call on Easter Monday, as Vladimir Putin said he was open to bilateral talks.

The prime minister and Ukrainian president spoke on Monday afternoon, when Sir Keir “reiterated his iron-clad support for Ukraine“.

A Downing Street spokesperson added that the prime minister “said that the UK supports Ukraine’s calls for Russia to commit to a full ceasefire and that now is the time for Putin to show he is serious about ending his brutal war”.

“They discussed the latest developments on the Coalition of the Willing, and looked forward to further progress towards a just and lasting peace,” the spokesperson added.

Mr Zelenskyy later said on social media that he had a “good and detailed conversation” with the prime minister, and added Ukrainian officials will be in London for talks on ending the war with Russia on Wednesday.

“We are ready to move forward as constructively as possible, just as we have done before, to achieve an unconditional ceasefire, followed by the establishment of a real and lasting peace,” he added.

The Ukrainian president added that the 30-hour Easter truce, which both Kyiv and Moscow accuse the other of violating, showed that Russia “are prolonging the war”.

It comes as Mr Putin proposed bilateral talks with Ukraine on a longer ceasefire, which would mark the first time Russia held such talks since a failed peace deal soon after the invasion in 2022.

Speaking to a state TV reporter, the Russian president said: “We always have a positive attitude towards a truce, which is why we came up with such an initiative (the Easter truce), especially since we are talking about the bright Easter days.”

When asked about Mr Zelenskyy’s calls to extend the 30-hour ceasefire into a 30-day pause on civilian targets, he added: “This is all a subject for careful study, perhaps even bilaterally. We do not rule this out.”

The Ukrainian president said on Sunday evening that the Russian army had “violated Putin’s ceasefire more than 2,000 times” during the day, and accused Russia of “failing” to “uphold its own promise of a ceasefire”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From Saturday: Why Putin offered an Easter truce?

It also comes after Donald Trump has said he hopes Russia and Ukraine “will make a deal this week,” after he and his secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that the US will walk away from efforts to broker a peace deal unless there are clear signs of progress soon.

The US president said on his Truth Social platform that both countries would “start to do big business” with the US after ending the war.

Read more from Sky News:
Murder arrest after woman stabbed to death
Who could be the next pope?

Last month, Ukraine accepted Mr Trump’s proposal for a 30-day truce, but Mr Putin refused to back a full 30-day ceasefire, saying crucial issues of verification had not been sorted out.

He then said he would agree not to target Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. However, both sides have accused each other of breaking the moratorium on attacks on energy targets and at sea.

Continue Reading

World

Royal Navy’s flagship HMS Prince of Wales begins eight-month deployment

Published

on

By

Royal Navy's flagship HMS Prince of Wales begins eight-month deployment

The Royal Navy’s flagship HMS Prince of Wales is to begin an eight-month deployment to send a “powerful message” of the UK’s naval and air power.

Operation Highmast will take in joint exercises and visits with 40 countries across the Mediterranean, Middle East, southeast Asia, Japan and Australia.

The £3bn aircraft carrier is scheduled to sail from Portsmouth on Tuesday, accompanied from the navy base by Type 45 destroyer HMS Dauntless, to join a formation of warships, supply ships and aircraft off the coast of Cornwall.

HMS Prince of Wales, as the biggest class of ship in the Royal Navy, is leading Carrier Strike Group 25 (CSG25) with the involvement of around 2,500 personnel from the Royal Navy, 592 from the Royal Air Force and 900 from the Army.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

King Charles visited the aircraft carrier in March

Later during the deployment, as many as 4,500 military personnel will be involved in exercises in the Indo-Pacific region. Forces from Norway, Canada and Spain are among 12 other nations taking part in operations.

The CSG’s first task will be to join a NATO exercise off France testing aerial defences before the ships move on to the Mediterranean to work with an Italian-led carrier force and then head east via the Red Sea.

HMS Prince of Wales sails from Portsmouth Naval Base for preparations before a planned deployment of a carrier strike group to the Indo-Pacific region later this year. Picture date: Monday February 24, 2025.
Image:
HMS Prince of Wales pictured at Portsmouth Naval Base in February. Pic: PA

Other military assets include a contingent of up to 24 Royal Air Force F-35B Lightning fighter jets, Merlin Mk2 anti-submarine helicopters, Merlin Mk4 Commando and Wildcat helicopters along with T-150 Malloy and Puma drones.

More on Military

Read more from Sky News:
UK forced into action on defence
PM visits nuclear-armed sub
UK: Views on conscription

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Royal Navy exercises on HMS Dauntless

Commodore James Blackmore, CSG commander, said the deployment would send a “powerful message” of the UK’s naval and air power.

He said: “It’s about supporting key trade routes that exist from the Indo-Pacific region to the UK, and supporting partners and allies in the region, showing that we are there as a capable and credible force should it be required.

“Operation Highmast will demonstrate credible deterrence and our support to NATO and the rules-based international order.”

Defence Secretary, John Healey MP, called it an “immensely complex operation” which sends “a powerful message of deterrence to any adversary”.

“This is a unique opportunity for the UK to operate in close coordination with our partners and allies in a deployment that not only shows our commitment to security and stability, but also provides an opportunity to bolster our own economy and boost British trade and exports,” he added.

Continue Reading

World

JD Vance and his family arrive in India after Trump called country ‘big abuser’ on trade

Published

on

By

JD Vance and his family arrive in India after Trump called country 'big abuser' on trade

US vice president JD Vance has arrived in Delhi for a four-day visit to India as the countries look to negotiate on tariffs, a bilateral trade deal and strengthen their ties.

Mr Vance was accompanied by his wife Usha – whose parents moved from India to the US – their three children Ewan, Vivek and Mirabel and fellow government officials as he landed on Monday morning.

The visit comes weeks after US President Donald Trump imposed and then paused a sweeping tariff regime against around 60 countries, including India.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance arrive in New Delhi, India.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
JD and Usha Vance landed in New Delhi. Pic: Reuters

In a statement after their meeting in New Delhi, Prime Minister Narendra Modi‘s office said he “welcomed the significant progress” in negotiations for an expected trade deal between the US and India.

It added that he and Mr Vance “noted continued efforts towards enhancing cooperation in energy, defence, strategic technologies and other areas”, and also “exchanged views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest, and called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward”.

Mr Modi also “conveyed his warm greetings to President Trump” ahead of his visit to India later this year.

JD Vance and Narendra Modi in New Dehli. Pic: AP
Image:
JD Vance and Narendra Modi in New Delhi. Pic: AP

An announcement was expected on the countries’ TRUST (Transforming Relationship Utilising Strategic Technology) partnership, a programme aimed at strengthening their cooperation in defence, critical minerals, AI, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, energy and space.

The Trump administration is also pushing India to buy defence equipment.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance reviews troops, upon his arrival in New Delhi, India, April 21, 2025. Kenny Holston/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
JD Vance walks past troops after arriving in New Delhi. Pic: Reuters

The US is India’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade valued at $190bn, with a trade deficit of about $46bn in India’s favour.

Both countries are engaged in negotiating a bilateral trade agreement and aim to double trade to $500bn by 2030.

Mr Trump has previously labelled India a “tariff king” and a “big abuser” on trade. He also recently shared a report which stated Indian tariffs on agricultural products were among the highest in the world.

The US president had slapped a 26% tariff on India, calling it a discounted rate against an average 52% duty on American products.

Over the weekend, Mr Vance met Pope Francis in one of the pontiff’s last public appearances before his death on Easter Monday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

JD Vance and Pope ‘exchange Easter greetings’

Visit comes amid rising tensions with China

Mr Vance’s visit is also aimed at strategically balancing China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region, with India seen as a counterweight of the two most populous countries.

China has warned it will take “resolute and reciprocal” countermeasures against countries that strike deals with the US at the expense of Chinese interests.

Relations between India and China have been tense over the years.

Dancers wearing traditional attires stand in front of a poster depicting U.S. Vice President JD Vance, on the day of his arrival, in New Delhi, India, April 21, 2025. Kenny Holston/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
Dancers wearing traditional attire stand in front of a poster of Mr Vance. Pic: Reuters

The two countries, separated by the Himalayan mountain range, share a 2,000-mile border, most of which is not demarcated.

In 2020, in Galwan, soldiers of both countries had a face-off in which 20 Indian soldiers were killed. There was a national uproar and since then diplomatic relations have been low.

High-level military talks have been taking place to sort the border disputes, but have so far been inconclusive.

India’s move to strengthen ties with the US will increase friction with its northern neighbour, as China sees itself being isolated and targeted by the Trump administration.

Last week, China’s President Xi Jinping embarked on a tour of Vietnam, Malaysia and Cambodia, and said: “There are no winners in trade wars and tariff wars.”

Meanwhile, India has raised concerns over the treatment of Indian students who have received visa revocation notices in the US.

A survey by the American Immigration Lawyers Association found 50% of those reporting revocations were Indian. The US government has denied targeting Indians specifically with its actions.

Continue Reading

Trending