Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak’s plan to crackdown on Channel migrant crossings will face the scrutiny of MPs and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer today, as he faces his first Prime Minister’s Questions since the announcement of the new Illegal Migration Bill.

The Conservative leader backed the “tough but fair” policy on Tuesday, after the proposed legislation was unveiled by Home Secretary Suella Braverman.

But the plans immediately came under fire from Labour, with the party describing it as a “con” that was no more likely to be successful than prior Tory efforts to tackle small boat migration across the Channel.

The UN Refugee Agency also criticised the proposals, which it said would “amount to an asylum ban”.

The Prime Minister will go head-to-head with Labour leader, Sir Keir, at PMQs on Wednesday, when he could be challenged over how the legislation will work in practise and how it might stand up to anticipated legal challenges.

The government has admitted the bill might not be compatible with international human rights laws – but the prime minister told the press conference he is “up for the fight” in the courts “and we are confident we will win”.

The new legislation will mean people arriving on small boats in the UK will be detained and removed and banned from ever returning.

A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover, Kent, onboard a Border Force vessel, following a small boat incident in the Channel. Picture date: Tuesday February 7, 2023.

Mr Sunak confirmed that the rules would apply retrospectively, affecting everyone arriving in the UK illegally from Tuesday.

Speaking earlier in Dover to mark the announcement, he said removals could happen “within weeks”.

“We have tried it every other way, and it hasn’t worked,” Mr Sunak said.

“This will always be a compassionate and generous country… but the current situation is neither moral nor sustainable, it cannot go on. It is completely unfair on the British people.”

Speaking about the bill, he said: “We will detain those who come here illegally and then remove them in weeks, either to their own country if it is safe to do so or to a safe third country like Rwanda.”

Responding to a question by Sky News about where predecessors went wrong and why this policy is different, Mr Sunak said: “This is not about dwelling on the past because the situation has just got far worse.

“In the last two years the numbers of people crossing the Channel illegally has more than quadrupled. That is the scale of what is happening.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Ali Fortescue questions Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on his plans to stop migrant boats crossing the English Channel illegally

“It’s not just us, this is happening across Europe… that’s because globally this is a challenge.”

When pressed on what success would look like, the prime minister refused to set specific targets, saying it is “us stopping the boats” and “having a system where people coming here illegally are returned”.

“And if we can get that working… we will see the numbers come down,” he said.

Home secretary accused of ‘inflammatory language’ – live politics updates

Under the proposed plan:

  • People arriving on small boats will be detained within the first 28 days without bail or judicial review and can be detained after that if there is a reasonable prospect of removal
  • The onus to remove those who enter illegally will be on the home secretary – to “radically” narrow the number of challenges and appeals
  • Only those under 18, those medically unfit to fly or at “real risk” of serious harm in the country they are removed to will be able to lodge an appeal to stop them from being deported
  • Any other claims, including the right to private or family life, will be heard remotely after they have been removed
  • People will be prevented from using modern slavery laws to oppose their removal
  • Deportation can only be deferred for modern slavery when a person is cooperating with law enforcement agencies in trafficking investigations
  • An annual cap on the number of people entering via safe routes – to be set by parliament – will “ensure an orderly system”
  • A lifetime ban on settlement, citizenship and re-entry to the UK for those removed under the scheme.

UN: ‘Bill amounts to asylum ban’

The bill has attracted a wave of criticism from charities, opposition MPs and human rights lawyers.

The UN’s refugee agency, the UNHCR, said in a lengthy statement that if the legislation is passed it “would amount to an asylum ban – extinguishing the right to seek refugee protection in the United Kingdom for those who arrive irregularly, no matter how genuine and compelling their claim may be, and with no consideration of their individual circumstances”.

The statement said this would “be a clear breach of the Refugee Convention and would undermine a longstanding humanitarian tradition of which the British people are rightly proud”.

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, suggested the plans were “more akin to authoritarian nations” such as Russia and insisted the proposals would not stop desperate people crossing in small boats but would instead leave “traumatised people locked up in a state of misery being treated as criminals and suspected terrorists without a fair hearing on our soil”.

He added the new legislation “ignores the fundamental point that most of the people in small boats are men, women and children escaping terror and bloodshed from countries including Afghanistan, Iran and Syria”.

Read more:
Do refugees have a ‘safe and legal’ route to the UK?
PM will hope trying to stop Channel crossings will show voters Tories are tough on immigration

Earlier, Ms Braverman told the Commons that she “can’t say definitively” if the new bill complies with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which the UK is part of.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Asylum seeker says new Illegal Migration Bill will have ‘negative effect’

Mr Sunak insisted there is “absolutely nothing improper or unprecedented” about pursuing legislation with a warning that they may not be compatible with the ECHR, adding: “We believe we are acting in compliance with international law, in compliance with the ECHR, and if challenged… we will fight that hard because we believe we’re doing the right thing and it is compliant with our obligations.”

Officials indicated hopes of the bill being passed by the end of the year, which could see it in force ahead of any anticipated 2024 election.

Mr Sunak has staked his premiership on curbing Channel crossings, among four other priorities.

In 2022, a record 45,755 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel, while more than 3,000 have made the journey so far this year.

Continue Reading

World

Deadline-day release of Epstein files has White House media management written all over it

Published

on

By

Deadline-day release of Epstein files has White House media management written all over it

Can it be a coincidence that US planes attacked Syria around the very time the Epstein files were released?

It would be cynical – but then again, it would be how politics works.

The deadline-day release of the Epstein files had White House media management written all over it, unredacted.

Initial searches for Trump’s name within the Department of Justice search function returned nothing, while the presence of former president Bill Clinton, on the other hand, was everywhere.

It is PR strategy 101 – front-load the release of documents with the Democrat stuff and save any possible Trump content for a soft landing sometime between Christmas and New Year.

Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Pic: NBC
Image:
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Pic: NBC

Epstein files latest: What we found inside – as critics accuse ‘document dump’ of breaking law

By that time, the public will have softened its focus on the story – it’s what the festive season does.

The presence of celebrity in the latest release might also feather Trump’s bed.

It’s clear that iconic superstars like Mick Jagger and Diana Ross were courted by Epstein as innocents, ignorant of his criminality. To see them in the files cements a narrative of a monster who lured the unsuspecting into his orbit.

We support Jagger and Ross as treasured icons, so we remind ourselves that simply being included in the files doesn’t equate to wrongdoing or knowledge of it. In turn, it shapes an empathy around the predicament that will extend to Trump and, perhaps, the benefit of any doubt.

Of course, not everyone will see it that way – the people who see a cynical exercise in delay and obfuscation, constituting a gross insult to the Epstein survivors at the heart of the story.

Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Jackson. Pic: US DoJ
Image:
Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Jackson. Pic: US DoJ

Read more:
Mystery text quoting price for ‘girl’ included in new pictures
Trump administration criticised over partial Epstein files release

For all the talk (by the Trump administration) of a tight time scale and a willingness to act transparently, survivors and their supporters point out that Donald Trump could have published all the Epstein files long ago, never mind drip feed them with wide-ranging redactions.

Not to have done so is an affront to them and an attempt to evade accountability.

For all the talk about the release of the files, their significance is undermined by the lack of context. We are shown pictures and documents that reflect the life of a thoroughly unpleasant individual who inflicted suffering on an industrial scale. But with redactions, and without explanations, we are left having to join the dots in an effort to establish criminal behaviour and blame.

It is a level of uncertainty surrounding the Epstein files and a source of dissatisfaction to survivors, for whom justice further delayed is justice further denied.

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine ‘hits Russian tanker in Mediterranean Sea for first time’

Published

on

By

Ukraine 'hits Russian tanker in Mediterranean Sea for first time'

Ukraine has struck a Russian tanker in the Mediterranean Sea for the first time, a Kyiv intelligence source has said.

The ship, called the Qendil, suffered “critical damage” in the attack, according to a member of the SBU, Ukraine’s internal security agency.

The tanker is said to be part of Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet” – a group of ageing vessels that Kyiv alleges helps Moscow exports large quantities of crude oil despite Western sanctions.

The ‌SBU source said Ukrainian ​drones hit the ship in neutral waters more than 2,000 kilometres (1,243 miles) ‌from Ukraine.

They said: “Russia used this tanker to circumvent sanctions and earn money that went to the war against Ukraine.

“Therefore, from the point of view of international law and the laws and customs of war, this is an absolutely legitimate target for the SBU.

“The enemy must understand that Ukraine will not stop and will strike it anywhere in the world, wherever it may be.”


Michael Clarke discusses Ukraine’s strike on the tanker

The vessel ‍was empty at the time of the attack, the Ukrainian source added.

Speaking during a live TV event, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, claimed the attack would not disrupt supplies, but vowed that Russia would retaliate nonetheless.

He added that Russia regularly responded with “much stronger strikes” against Ukraine.

Putin also warned against any threat to blockade Russia’s coastal exclave Kaliningrad, which he said would “just lead to unseen escalation of the conflict” and could trigger a “large-scale international conflict”.

Read more:
The mercenaries fighting for Russia
British man who fought for Ukraine jailed

Sky military analyst Michael Clarke said Ukraine’s claim about causing significant damage to the ship was “probably true”.

He added: “The Ukrainians obviously feel that they can legitimise this sort of operation.”

The Qendil, pictured near Istanbul last month. Pic: Reuters
Image:
The Qendil, pictured near Istanbul last month. Pic: Reuters

The attack comes after the European Union announced it would provide a €90bn (£79bn) interest-free loan to Ukraine.

Oleksandr Merezhko, the chairman of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian parliament, told Sky News that the money would “tremendously enhance” Kyiv’s defensive capabilities.

However, he said the International Monetary Fund estimated that Ukraine needed $137bn to “keep running”.

“The aggressor should be punished”, Mr Merezhko added, as he argued that frozen Russian assets in Europe should be used to help fund his country’s defence.

He vowed that Ukraine would “continue to fight” for the move, adding that it was “a matter of justice”.

Continue Reading

World

Trapped journalists rescued after mob sets fire to Bangladesh newspaper offices

Published

on

By

Trapped journalists rescued after mob sets fire to Bangladesh newspaper offices

Protesters have stormed the headquarters of two major newspapers in Bangladesh, amid widespread unrest following the death of a political activist. 

A mob set fire to the offices of the Bengali-language Prothom Alo daily newspaper and the English-language Daily Star in the capital Dhaka, leaving journalists and other staff stuck inside.

The Bengali-language Prothom Alo daily  was one of the two newspapers that were targeted. Pic: AP.
Image:
The Bengali-language Prothom Alo daily was one of the two newspapers that were targeted. Pic: AP.

One of the Daily Star’s journalists, Zyma Islam, wrote on Facebook: “I can’t breathe anymore. There’s too much smoke.”

Both dailies stopped updating their online editions after the attacks and did not publish broadsheets on Friday.

Troops were deployed to the Star building and firefighters had to rescue the journalists trapped inside. The blaze was brought under control early on Friday.

The latest protests erupted a year after the July Revolution ousted PM Sheikh Hasina. Pic: PA.
Image:
The latest protests erupted a year after the July Revolution ousted PM Sheikh Hasina. Pic: PA.

Political activist Sharif Osman Hadi died in hospital late on Thursday, six days after the youth leader was shot while riding on a rickshaw in Dhaka.

Bangladesh’s interim government urged people on Friday to resist violence as police and paramilitary troops fanned out
across the capital and other cities following the protests overnight. They have sparked concerns of fresh unrest ahead of national elections, which Mr Hadi had been due to stand in.

More on Bangladesh

He was a prominent activist in the political uprising last year that forced the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee the country. Mr Hadi spent six days on life support in a hospital in Singapore before he succumbed to his injuries.

Mr Hadi died a week after he was shot by a man on a motorbike. Pic: PA.
Image:
Mr Hadi died a week after he was shot by a man on a motorbike. Pic: PA.

Hundreds of protesters took to the streets following news of Mr Hadi’s death on Thursday night, where they rallied at Shahbagh Square near the Dhaka University campus, according to media reports.

A group of demonstrators gathered outside the head office of the Muslim-majority country’s leading Bengali-language Prothom Alo daily, before vandalising the building and setting it on fire.

A few hundred yards away, another group of protesters pushed into the Daily Star offices and set fire to the building. The protesters are believed to have targeted the papers for their alleged links with India and closeness to Bangladesh‘s interim leader, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus.

Read more:
Ex-Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina sentenced to death
UK MP Tulip Siddiq sentenced by Bangladeshi court

Although calm had returned to much of the ⁠country on Friday morning, protesters carrying national flags and placards
continued demonstrating at Shahbagh Square in Dhaka, chanting slogans and vowing not to return until justice was served.

👉 Tap here to follow The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Last year’s mass uprising erupted from student protests against a quota system that awarded 30% of government jobs to relatives of veterans.

The July 2024 protest, which resulted in as many as 1,400 deaths according to the United Nations, was dubbed the first “Gen Z” revolution.

Bangladesh’s former prime minister Sheikh Hasina Wazed was forced to resign in August 2024 and fled to India. She was later sentenced to death in absentia.

Sheikh Hasina was sentenced to death in absentia. Pic: AP
Image:
Sheikh Hasina was sentenced to death in absentia. Pic: AP

Dr Yunus was then sworn in as interim leader.

The country’s Islamists and other opponents of Ms Hasida have accused her government for being subservient to India.

Mr Hadi was a fierce critic of Ms Hasina and neighbouring India.

He had planned to run as an independent candidate in a constituency in Dhaka at the next national elections due to be held in February.

Authorities said they had identified the suspects in Mr Hadi’s shooting, and the assassin was also likely to have fled to India. Two men on a motorbike followed Hadi and one opened fire before they fled the scene.

Continue Reading

Trending