Connect with us

Published

on

Ford has issued a recall related to its production halt of the F-150 Lightning over battery issues discovered during production. But the recall will only affect 18 vehicles which slipped through the cracks during its stop-shipment order.

The issue was originally found during standard post-production inspections, when one vehicle displayed a battery issue. Ford put a stop-shipment on all vehicles currently being shipped to customers and dealers, and paused production, but did not initiate a stop-sale. So trucks that were already at dealers could still be released to customers.

We later found out that the issue was that one vehicle caught fire in a holding lot at Ford’s manufacturing facility. Ford hasn’t heard any reports of a similar issue happening from trucks already in the hands of customers, or any injury or property damage as a result.

While investigating the issue, Ford stopped production and tracked it down to battery cell production from SK On’s Georgia plant. Affected vehicles seem to have been built throughout most of the month of January, with the problem discovered on February 4th.

After ironing out the problems and getting some fresh battery packs, Ford said it plans to restart production on March 13.

But it looks like a few trucks got away from them, or were affected and reached customers before the stop-shipment order could go into place. Ford has identified 18 affected trucks which made their way into the hands of customers, and is recalling those vehicles to make sure the batteries are in proper shape.

Ford will inform affected customers as soon as possible and those customers will have their high voltage battery packs replaced by their dealer. Ford says affected customers can continue to drive their vehicles but are encouraged to make an appointment for the repair at their earliest convenience.

Here’s Ford’s statement today informing us of the recall:

Ford is recalling 18 F-150 Lightnings due to a battery cell manufacturing defect, which occurred over a four-week period starting at the end of last year. We recently established that 18 vehicles containing cells from that four-week period had made it to dealers and customers. 

On Feb. 4, during a standard quality check, one vehicle displayed a battery issue and caught fire. The root cause identified was related to battery cell production at the SK On plant in Georgia. Ford is not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this recall. Together with SK On, we have confirmed the root causes and have implemented quality actions. Production is on track to resume Monday with clean stock of battery packs. 

Electrek’s Take

Well, 18 vehicles isn’t really much of a recall, but since we have a few concerned customers who have been emailing us about this, we figured we should write it up.

As far as recalls go, this seems like a pretty benign one, given the limited scope. It might take more work than a software update, but 18 trucks is pretty minimal, especially since it sounds like those trucks maybe shouldn’t have been released to customers in the first place.

So far, this is the only issue we’ve heard of with batteries from SK On, so hopefully this is transitory and only affected a couple batches of battery cells. SK On also supplies batteries for the VW ID.4, and has partnered with Hyundai as well.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Japan’s Nippon expected to close acquisition of U.S. Steel at $55 per share, sources say

Published

on

By

Japan's Nippon expected to close acquisition of U.S. Steel at  per share, sources say

Sen. Dave McCormick on Nippon-U.S. Steel deal: A win-win situation for both sides

Japan’s Nippon Steel is expected to close its acquisition of U.S. Steel for $55 per share, sources familiar with the matter told CNBC’s David Faber.

President Donald Trump cleared Nippon’s bid for U.S. Steel on Friday, referring to the deal as a “partnership.” Trump said Nippon will invest $14 billion over the next 14 months. U.S. Steel’s headquarters will remain in Pittsburgh, the president said.

U.S. Steel shares were up more than 1% on Tuesday. The $55 per share bid for U.S. Steel is the offer that Nippon originally made for the company before the deal was blocked in January.

President Joe Biden had blocked Nippon’s bid for U.S. Steel on national security grounds, arguing that the deal will potentially jeopardize critical supply chains. But Trump ordered a new review of the proposed acquisition in April, despite his previous opposition to Nippon acquiring U.S. Steel.

The United Steelworkers union had opposed the Nippon’s bid to acquire U.S. Steel. USW President David McCall said Friday that the union “cannot speculate about the impact” of Trump’s announcement “without more information.

“Our concern remains that Nippon, a foreign corporation with a long and proven track record of violating our trade laws, will further erode domestic steelmaking capacity and jeopardize thousands of good, union jobs,” McCall said in a statement.

Trump told reporters on Sunday that the deal is an “investment, it’s a partial ownership, but it will be controlled by the USA.” Pennsylvania Senator Dave McCormick told CNBC on Tuesday that U.S. Steel will have an American CEO and a majority of its board members will be from the U.S.

“It’s a national security agreement that will be signed with the U.S. government,” McCormick told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “There’ll be a golden share that will essentially require U.S. government approval of a number of the board members and that will allow the United States to ensure production levels aren’t cut.”

The $14 billion that Nippon will invest includes $2.4 billion that will go to U.S. Steel’s operations at Mon Valley outside Pittsburgh, McCormick said. The deal will save 10,000 jobs in Pennsylvania and add another 10,000 jobs in the building trades to add another arc furnace, the senator said.

When asked what Nippon gets from the deal, McCormick said the Japanese steelmaker will “have certainly members of the board and this will be part of their overall corporate structure.”

“They wanted an opportunity to get access to the U.S. market — this allowed them to do so and get the economic benefit of that,” McCormick said of Nippon. “They’ve negotiated it, it was their proposal.”

Trump said Friday he will hold a rally at U.S. Steel in Pittsburgh on May 30.

Continue Reading

Environment

Kia announces 2026 EV9 pricing with discounts on multiple trims

Published

on

By

Kia announces 2026 EV9 pricing with discounts on multiple trims

Kia has posted details of its 2026 model year EV9 SUV, including updated pricing. Most of the EV9’s third model year carries over from the 2025 version, but there are some cool new customizations and configurations. Additionally, several of the 2026 trims of the Kia EV9 are priced at their lowest to date.

The Kia EV9 has entered its third model year after establishing itself as a slam-dunk of a three-row BEV and a flagship model for the Korean automaker. During its production run, the EV9 has garnered several awards and steady sales as it transitioned production of the BEV to its US plant in Georgia.

As such, the 2025 versions of the Kia EV9 qualify for federal tax credits (while they’re still around). The 2026 versions of the Kia EV9 may also briefly qualify for credits, but the pricing of multiple trims will save consumers a little cash.

We shared how those model-year prices compare below.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Kia-EV6-EV9-production

Kia lowers a majority of EV9 trim pricing for 2026

Kia shared all the details of its 2026 EV9 models today, including its latest pricing. As mentioned above, most of the updates for the third model year are cosmetic, but there are some (slight) increases to range compared to the 2025 versions.

For example, the Light Long Range EV9 gained a whole extra mile (305 mi), while the Wind and Land trims jumped from 280 miles in 2025 to 283 for 2026. Lastly, the top-tier GT-Line increased the most, gaining 10 miles of range for 2026 (280 miles).

Before we get to EV9 pricing, here are some additional updates, per Kia:

  • New Nightfall Edition available on Land trim
    • Design and performance enhancements
    • Exclusive 20-inch gloss black wheels, black badging, and gloss black trim
    • New Roadrider Brown exclusive exterior color
    • Exclusive interior seat stitching pattern and design elements
    • Offered with both 6-passenger and 7-passenger seating configurations at no extra cost
  • All AWD trims (Wind/Land/GT-Line) gain Terrain Mode (Mud/Snow/Sand), which replaces 4WD
  • 2026 GT-Line gains two new two-tone exterior color options:
    • Glacial White Pearl with Ebony Black roof
    • Wolf Gray with Ebony Black roof

Okay, as promised, here’s the 2026 model-year Kia EV9 pricing. For comparison, we’ve included MSRPs for the first three model years of the EV9’s existence so you can see how prices have changed (or held steady). Note that these MSRP’s exclude destination and handling, taxes, title, license fees, options and retailer charges:

Kia EV9 Trim 2024 Price 2025 Price 2026 Price
Light Standard Range $54,900 $54,900 $54,900
Light Long Range $59,200 $59,900 $57,900
Wind $63,900 $63,900 $63,900
Land $69,900 $69,900 $68,900
GT-Line $73,900 $73,900 $71,900

As you can see, the Light SR trim of the EV9 held steady at $54,900 for a third consecutive year. The only other RWD option, the Light LR, saw a $2,000 price drop after going up $700 in 2025. The AWD Wind trim once again held steady while the EV9 Land saw a $1,000 decrease.

Last but not least, the 2026 Kia EV9 GT-Line’s pricing dropped $2,000 and is now below $72,000 before taxes and fees. Add the potential for federal tax credits to these drops in 2026 pricing, and now is as good a time as ever to get a shiny new Kia EV9.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla (TSLA) keeps getting worse in Europe despite electric car sales surging

Published

on

By

Tesla (TSLA) keeps getting worse in Europe despite electric car sales surging

Tesla’s (TSLA) situation in Europe continues to deteriorate, despite electric car sales surging and the new Model Y now being available.

The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) released the latest complete data for European vehicle sales for April 2025 today, and it confirmed that Tesla’s total sales in EU, EFTA, and UK amounted to 7,261 units – down 49% year-over-year:

Tesla’s deliveries in Europe are now down 38.8% year-over-year for the first four months of the year.

During that same period, battery-electric vehicle sales grew 26.4% in the market and 34.1% in April alone.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Last week, we reported that Tesla CEO Elon Musk claimed “every manufacturer” is experiencing demand problems in Europe, with “no exception.”

As we can see from the ACEA data, that’s not true. The Volkswagen Group, Renault, BMW, and SAIC are all up year-to-date and in April.

Tesla’s problems persist into May. The data coming from European markets that report daily car registration shows that Tesla’s Q2 is still tracking barely above Q1 and significantly below Q2 2024:

In Q1 2025, Tesla blamed its poor performance on the Model Y changeover, but it doesn’t have this excuse in Q2.

The automaker is currently offering record discounts and incentives to buy in most markets, including Europe. It also has its new Model Y available, but it is clear that Tesla is suffering from demand problem as its sales are down in virtually all markets.

Electrek’s Take

The narrative that everyone is having demand problems in Europe is not true, mainly when you focus on battery-electric vehicles.

Sales are way up. Tesla is the exception in BEVs.

It’s true that the Model Y changeover had an impact in Q1, but it wasn’t fair to blame the full decline on it. A significant portion of Tesla’s issues in Q1 was related to brand damage, primarily due to its CEO, Elon Musk, and this is now becoming clear in Q2.

There’s room to get worried as competition is only going to get tougher.

The brand damage occurring just as customers are gaining more options is not positive for Tesla.

At this point, it’s not clear what Tesla can do to turn things around in Europe. Distancing itself from Musk could help, but even then, it looks like Tesla would need a lot more to get out of an almost 50% drop.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending