Tempting as it is to believe that the chaos with Silicon Valley Bank and its British arm are of interest only to members of the tech community and financial nerds, it has already had a very real bearing on all our lives.
For evidence, look no further than the money markets, where investors bet on the future path of interest rates.
Up until last Friday, they were expecting UK interest rates to peak at around 4.75% – possibly even a little bit higher.
But the shock of the bank collapse caused a sudden reappraisal. By Monday evening, they were pricing in a peak of only 4.25% – a very big fall by the scheme of these things. It was a similar story in the US, where the expected peak for rates dropped by around half a percentage point.
Why are these two stories – interest rates and an obscure bank collapse – colliding?
In large part it’s because they were always intertwined – not that anyone paid much attention before last week.
Part of the reason Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) suffered its demise was because over the past 18 months rising interest rates had caused a sharp fall in the value of bonds held by the bank.
More on Bank Of England
Related Topics:
It was, in large part, those losses and the impact on SVB’s balance sheet that prompted depositors to run from the bank late last week (which in turn triggered the UK branch’s collapse).
In other words, one of the consequences of SVB’s implosion is that the Federal Reserve and Bank of England might become a little more wary of raising interest rates in future.
Advertisement
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Everyone knew there were unexploded bombs in the financial system which would begin to explode when money got more expensive; the fear now is that there may be more explosions to come.
This isn’t the only explanation for why rate expectations have come down. There’s also the fact that the chaos at SVB, Signature bank (which also failed) and across much of the US banking system might dampen economic growth or even precipitate a recession.
And, for the most part, central banks tend to cut rates rather than raise them in the face of a recession. And we were already getting close to the potential peak in borrowing costs.
Even so, this interplay between an extremely nervous financial system and interest rates is a big part of the story.
Which brings us to some of the consequences.
‘Things could get pretty gritty’
Let’s assume the Fed and the Bank of England are indeed going to allow interest rates to peak at a lower rate than previously expected.
Does that mean that we have to expect higher inflation in future? What if inflation turns out to be considerably more sticky than most central banks expect (they mostly think it’ll come down pretty quickly)?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:20
Biden on Silicon Valley Bank collapse
The short answer is that things could get pretty gritty: the Bank of England is duty bound to try to keep inflation low and to try to keep the financial system stable, but among the many things illustrated by the SVB episode is that those two objectives can sometimes clash with each other.
In this case, higher interest rates (to fight inflation) contributed to financial instability. Yes, there was lots else going on besides – there’s a strong case to say the Fed wasn’t doing enough to monitor the risk posed by unusual banks like SVB – but the rising cost of money is a big part of the story.
There’s good news and bad news
If inflation does stay a lot higher than the central banks expect, then we could be in for a more turbulent time.
And how worried should we be about that? The next few months will tell, but for the time being there’s good and bad news.
The good is that the headline consumer price index in both the UK and US seems to have been faring more or less as the central banks expected – gradually coming down. Earlier today, the US CPI came in at an annual rate of 6% – bang in line with expectations.
The bad news is that when you look beneath the surface, there are some hints that inflation could prove more stubborn than expected.
In particular, core inflation – the behaviour of prices once you strip out volatile items like energy and food – is still building, especially when you ignore housing costs. That suggests there’s still upwards pressure on prices.
And sure enough, immediately after the release of those numbers, interest rate expectations rose a little, both in the UK and US.
Now, UK rates are expected to peak not at 4.25% but 4.4% (which in practical terms means a fair few people – though not everyone – expect 4.5% rates).
Once upon a time if folks wanted to pinpoint the most economically-vulnerable country in Europe – the one most likely to face a crisis – they would invariably point to Greece or to Italy.
They were the nations with the eye-waveringly high bond yields, signalling how reluctant financiers were to lend them money.
Today, however, all of that has changed. The country invariably highlighted as Europe’s problem child is France.
Indeed, look at the interest rates investors charge European nations and France faces even higher interest rates than Greece.
And these economic travails are central to understanding the political difficulties France is facing right now, with one prime minister after another resigning in the face of a parliamentary setback.
It mostly comes back to the state of the public finances. France’s deficit is among the highest in the developed world right now.
Everyone spent enormous sums during the pandemic. But France has struggled, more than nearly everyone else, to bring its spending back down and, hence, to reduce its deficit. Successive budget plans have been announced and then shelved in the face of political resistance.
France’s government spends more, as a percentage of gross domestic product, than any other developed economy.
The government’s most recent budget plans called for what most people would see as relatively minor spending cuts – barely more than a couple of percentage points off spending, after which France would still be the third biggest spender in the world.
But even these cuts were too controversial for the French people, or rather their politicians.
Yet another prime minister looks likely to fall victim to an unsuccessful bill. Deja vu all over again, you might say.
A deeper issue is that the latest worsening in France’s public finances isn’t just a sign of political resistance, or indeed of a nation that can’t bear to take the unpalatable fiscal medicine others (for instance Greece or the UK) have long been ingesting.
For years, France could rely on a phenomenon many other developed economies couldn’t: strong productivity growth.
The country’s people might not work as many hours as everyone else, but they sure created a lot of economic output when they were at their desks.
However, in recent years, French productivity has disappointed. Indeed, output per hour growth in France has dropped well below other nations, which in turn means less tax revenue and, lo and behold, the deficit gets bigger and bigger.
All of which is why so many people, including Prime Minister Francois Bayrou himself, have warned that France is at risk of a market meltdown.
In a recent speech, he pointed to the example of Liz Truss and her 2022 mini-Budget. Beware the market, he said. You never know how close you are to a crisis.
Amanda Staveley, the former Newcastle United Football Club joint-owner, will on Monday be forced to clarify her interest in bidding for Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur following veteran chairman Daniel Levy’s unexpected departure last week.
Sky News has learnt that PCP International Finance, a vehicle controlled by Ms Staveley, is expected to issue a statement following discussions with the UK takeover watchdog saying that she does not intend to make a formal offer for Spurs.
People close to the situation said on Sunday that Ms Staveley had been in discussions with prospective backers of a bid for the club in recent weeks.
Spurs’ ownership is complicated by the fact that it is subject to the UK Takeover Code – governed by the Takeover Panel.
Under the provisions in the Code, PCP could yet return with a formal takeover bid for Spurs if invited to do so by the board of Enic, or if a rival bidder announces its intention to make a firms offer for last season’s Europa League winners.
City sources pointed to these caveats as being particularly relevant to Ms Staveley’s potential ongoing interest in Spurs.
Enic owns a stake of nearly 87% in the club, with the remaining shares owned by a group of minority investors.
More from Money
Image: Daniel Levy. Pic: PA
Mr Levy reportedly owns a stake of almost 30% in Enic, while Joe Lewis, Enic’s majority-owner, transferred control of his stake in Spurs to his family trust in 2022.
A source close to the Lewis family said on Sunday evening: “The club is not for sale.”
His exit last week after nearly 25 years as Tottenham chairman was apparently driven by a desire to inject fresh momentum into the leadership of the club.
In a statement last week, it said: “Tottenham Hotspur has been transformed over the last quarter of a century.
“It has played in European competitions in the last 18 of 20 seasons, becoming one of the world’s most recognised football clubs, consistently investing in its academy, players and facilities, including a new, world-class stadium and state of the art training centre.”
Rothschild, the investment bank, had previously been engaged by Mr Levy to raise hundreds of millions of capital to invest in Spurs.
Those discussions are understood to have involved a range of parties in the past year.
Any takeover bid for Spurs, regardless of the identity of the bidder, would be likely to value at well in excess of £3.5bn for it to be deemed acceptable.
A spokesman for Ms Staveley declined to comment on Sunday evening.
Britain’s biggest high street lender is closing in on a deal to buy Curve, a provider of digital wallet technology that its new owner hopes will give it an edge in the race to build smarter online payments systems.
Sky News has learnt that Lloyds Banking Group could announce the acquisition of Curve for about £120m as soon as this week.
City sources said this weekend that the terms of a transaction had been agreed, although a formal announcement could yet slip to later in the month.
The financial services giant, which owns the Halifax brand and operates the biggest bank branch network in the UK, believes Curve’s digital wallet platform will be a valuable asset amid growing regulatory pressure on Apple to open its payment services to rivals.
Curve was founded by Shachar Bialick, a former Israeli special forces soldier, in 2016, and was hailed as one of Britain’s most promising fintechs.
Three years later, Mr Bialick told an interviewer: “In 10 years’ time we are going to be IPOed [listed on the public equity markets]… and hopefully worth around $50bn to $60bn.”
More from Money
The sale price may therefore be a disappointment to long-standing Curve shareholders, given that it raised £133m in its Series C funding round, which concluded in 2023.
That round included backing from Britannia, IDC Ventures, Cercano Management – the venture arm of Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s estate – and Outward VC.
Curve was also reported to have raised more than £40m last year, while reducing employee numbers and suspending its US expansion.
In total, the company has raised more than £200m in equity since it was founded.
Curve is being advised by KBW, part of the investment bank Stifel, on the discussions with Lloyds.
The company is chaired by the City grandee Lord Fink, who is also a shareholder in the company.
Curve has been positioned as a rival to Apple Pay in recent years, having initially launched as an app enabling consumers to combine their debit and credit cards in a single wallet.
Image: Curve Pay is a digital wallet, which combines a person’s credit and debit cards into a single wallet
Lloyds is said to have identified Curve as a strategically attractive bid target as it pushes deeper into payments infrastructure under chief executive Charlie Nunn.
In March, the Financial Conduct Authority and Payment Systems Regulator began working with the Competition and Markets Authority to examine the implications of the growth of digital wallets owned by Apple and Google.
Lloyds owns stakes in a number of fintechs, including the banking-as-a-service platform Thought Machine, but has set expanding its tech capabilities as a key strategic objective.
The group employs more than 70,000 people and operates more than 700 branches across Britain.
Curve is chaired by Lord Fink, the former Man Group chief executive who has become a prolific investor in British technology start-ups.
When he was appointed to the role in January, he said: “Working alongside Curve as an investor, I have had a ringside seat to the company’s unassailable and well-earned rise.
“Beginning as a card which combines all your cards into one, to the all-encompassing digital wallet it has evolved into, Curve offers a transformative financial management experience to its users.
“I am proud to have been part of the journey so far, and welcome the chance to support the company through its next, very significant period of growth.”
IDC Ventures, one of the investors in Curve’s Series C funding round, said at the time of its last major fundraising: “Thanks to their unique technology… they have the capability to intercept the transaction and supercharge the customer experience, with its Double Dip Rewards, [and] eliminating nasty hidden fees.
“And they do it seamlessly, without any need for the customer to change the cards they pay with.”
News of the talks between Lloyds and Curve comes days before Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to outline plans to bolster Britain’s fintech sector by endorsing a concierge service to match start-ups with investors.
Lloyds declined to comment, while Curve has been contacted for comment.