Connect with us

Published

on

Oscar-winning actress Gwyneth Paltrow is being sued by a retired optometrist who says she crashed into him on a ski slope, leaving him with a number of injuries.

Paltrow denies this – claiming that Terry Sanderson crashed into her – and on Friday she had her chance to share her side of the story with a court room in Park City, Utah.

Among the notable moments:

Terry Sanderson was making ‘strange noises that sounded male’

Paltrow said she had initially thought she was being sexually assaulted during the collision.

She said she knew a man had crashed into her because he was making “some strange noises that sounded male” and he was “large”.

She said she felt “a body pressing against me”, adding: “There was a strange grunting noise”.

More on Gwyneth Paltrow

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Paltrow describes ‘strange grunting noise’

Are you counter-suing for $1 because of a Taylor Swift case?

Paltrow was asked if she was counter-suing for $1 because US singer Taylor Swift brought a similar “symbolic” lawsuit in the past.

When asked if she knew about Swift’s case, Paltrow said: “I had not been familiar with it, but I now am.”

“It’s an actual dollar that I’m asking for – it’s symbolic because the damages would actually be more,” she added.

When asked if she and Swift are friends, she said: “I would not say we’re good friends – we are friendly, but we don’t talk very often.”

Terry Sanderson in court. Pic: AP
Image:
Terry Sanderson. Pic: AP

Recreating events in the court room

Kristin Van Orman, a lawyer for Terry Sanderson, asked if Paltrow could step away from the witness stand to demonstrate what happened at the time of the collision.

The actress’s lawyers object – an objection sustained by the judge.

Ms Van Orman instead attempted to recreate the events herself in the court room, with Paltrow directing her.

Were your children’s ski lessons expensive?

Paltrow was asked how much she had spent on ski lessons for her children Apple and Moses and her now-husband’s children who were also on the trip.

The total bill came to $8,980, a lawyer for Mr Sanderson said.

Paltrow replied: “It’s very expensive.”

Mr Sanderson’s lawyer asked the actress if she is a good tipper, and she confirmed that she is.

Gwyneth Paltrow enters the courtroom for her ski crash trial, in Park City, Utah, U.S. March 24, 2023. Rick Bowmer/Pool via REUTERS

Read more:
Paltrow accuser in ‘really negative place’ after actress ‘crashed into him’
Claim fellow skier crashed into her not ‘plausible’ because of accuser’s injuries
Star ‘never said a word after hitting fellow skier and bolting’

‘I apologise for my language’

Paltrow talked about yelling at Mr Sanderson after the ski collision, saying she was “very upset and it was still very strange to me what had happened”.

Paltrow told the jury that Mr Sanderson “mumbled” an apology after she yelled at him “you skied into my f***ing back!”.

“I apologise for my language,” she told the court.

Continue Reading

US

Trump’s new travel ban: The notable countries omitted – amid anger over ‘moral disgrace’

Published

on

By

Trump's new travel ban: The notable countries omitted - amid anger over 'moral disgrace'

Donald Trump has banned people from 12 countries entering the US, in a move he said protects against “foreign terrorists” and other security threats.

Some countries are subject to a full travel ban, while others are under a partial ban – with the order allowing countries to be removed or added from the list.

The proclamation is due to come into effect just after midnight on 9 June local time.

The ban echoes one in 2017 that Mr Trump implemented in his first term in the White House. This banned citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries – Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen – from travelling to the US.

Here is everything you need to know.

Which countries are affected?

The proclamation bans nationals from the following countries to travel to the US:

• Afghanistan
• Myanmar
• Chad
• Republic of the Congo
• Equatorial Guinea
• Eritrea
• Haiti
• Iran
• Libya
• Somalia
• Sudan
• Yemen.

The following seven countries are affected by a partial ban:

• Burundi
• Cuba
• Laos
• Sierra Leone
• Togo
• Turkmenistan
• Venezuela.

Both bans will affect foreign nationals from the designated countries who are outside the US on 9 June or do not have a valid visa.

Visas issued before 9 June when the law comes into force will remain valid, the proclamation states.

Countries affected by Trump's travel ban and restrictions
Countries affected by Trump's travel ban and restrictions
Countries affected by Trump's travel ban and restrictions

How many people come to the US from these countries?

From October 2023-September 2024 (the fiscal year), the US handed out more than 60,000 permanent visas to the 12 countries on the permanent ban list, according to data from the US Department of State.

The highest by far was to people from Afghanistan – 39,055 – with the most going to nationals who are employed by or on behalf of the US government and their immediate family members.

Under the new proclamation, Afghan nationals who hold special immigrant visas – people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there – are exempt from the ban.

The figures below do not include people who were given temporary visas.

Are there any exemptions?

Mr Trump said on Thursday that policy was a “key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil”.

His new list notably leaves out Syria, after Mr Trump met its leader recently on a trip to the Middle East.

Athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup, 2028 Olympics and other major sporting events will also be exempt.

The ban also does not apply to the following individuals:

• Diplomats travelling on valid non-immigration visas
• Immediate family members who hold immigrant visas
• People who have been adopted
• Afghan nationals holding special immigrant visas
• People who hold immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing “persecution in Iran”
• Dual nationals who have citizenship in countries not included in the travel ban

Why has the ban been introduced?

The proclamation states that America must ensure people entering don’t have “hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles” – and don’t support terror groups.

In a video posted to social media, Mr Trump said an attack in Colorado, in which eight were injured, had shown “the extreme dangers” of “foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas”.

The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Mr Trump’s restricted list, but homeland security claimed he had overstayed a tourist visa.

The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat.

The White House said some of the named countries had a “significant terrorist presence” and accused others of poor screening for dangerous individuals and not accepting deportees.

Critics, however, suggest the move is really designed to further cultivate hostility to immigrants in general, and that the president’s claim it is driven by security concerns is a lie.

What has the reaction been?

International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations have condemned the new travel ban.

“This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,” said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America.

The inclusion of Afghanistan has also angered some supporters, who have worked to resettle its people. Over a 12-month period to September 2024 there has been an estimated 14,000 arrivals from Afghanistan.

Travel ban protesters at Washington Dulles airport in 2017
Image:
Travel ban protesters at Washington Dulles airport in 2017. Pic: Reuters

Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office.

Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of the organisation #AfghanEvac, labelled the proclamation a “moral disgrace”.

“To include Afghanistan – a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years – is a moral disgrace,” he said.

“It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold.”

Meanwhile, the Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included on the list.

What happened in 2017?

Mr Trump’s first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a “Muslim ban”.

It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes – or being held at US airports when they landed.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic, despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign.

The ban faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version in June 2018, calling it “squarely within the scope of presidential authority”.

Continue Reading

US

Trump and China’s Xi have phone call amid trade war

Published

on

By

Trump and China's Xi have phone call amid trade war

Donald Trump and Xi Jinping have held a phone call amid their ongoing trade war, which the US president described as “very good”.

Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a 12 May agreement between the two countries to reduce their tariff rates while talks took place.

The call was first reported by Chinese state media and confirmed by the Chinese foreign ministry. According to Chinese state media, Mr Trump initiated the call.

In a post on his Truth Social site Mr Trump said: “I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.”

He said the call lasted around an hour and a half and “resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries”.

There “should no longer be any questions” on rare earth products, he said.

“The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine, or Iran,” Mr Trump added.

He said the two nations had agreed to more tariff talks, and both leaders invited each other to visit their respective countries.

It came a day after Mr Trump declared it was difficult to reach a deal with his Chinese counterpart.

“I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with!!!,” Mr Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.

The US president has cut his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks, while China reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%.

The trade war has produced sharp swings in global markets and threatens to damage trade between the two nations.

Read more:
Trump travel ban: The notable countries omitted
What a weakening dollar means for US president

Mr Trump’s treasury secretary Scott Bessent had suggested only a conversation between the two leaders could resolve their differences in order for talks to begin in earnest.

Mr Trump and Mr Xi last spoke in January, three days before his inauguration, where they discussed trade, as well as Mr Trump’s demand for China to do more to stop the drug fentanyl from entering the US.

Continue Reading

US

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with ‘hostile attitudes’ to the US

Published

on

By

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US

President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US.

He said Sunday’s attack in Colorado had shown “the extreme dangers” of “foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas”.

“We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” the president said.

The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

The White House said some had a “significant terrorist presence” and accused others of poor screening for dangerous individuals, as well as not accepting deported citizens.

People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will face partial restrictions.

Mr Trump’s proclamation said America must ensure people entering don’t have “hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles” – and don’t support terror groups.

More on Donald Trump

Travel ban protesters at Washington Dulles airport in 2017
Image:
Protests took place when Mr Trump announced his first travel ban in 2017. Pic: Reuters

The move echoes a controversial and chaotic order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries.

The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

President Trump said on Thursday that policy was a “key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil”.

His new list notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country’s leader recently on a trip to the Middle East.

Athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics will also be exempt, as will others such as permanent US residents and Afghans with special immigrant visas.

Trump cites ‘what happened in Europe’ to justify new ban

President Trump hailed travel restrictions imposed during his first term as “one of our most successful policies”.

It was also one of the most controversial, with what became known as “the Muslim ban” sparking widespread protest. Thousands gathered at US airports to oppose the detainment of travellers arriving from affected countries.

The then German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said the fight against terrorism didn’t justify suspicion of people based on their faith. Her French counterpart at the time, President Hollande, warned against the dangers of isolationism.

Still smarting perhaps from that criticism, Trump announced his new ban with a commitment to “not let what happened in Europe happen to America”.

In addition to restrictions on 12 countries and partial restrictions on another seven, he warned others could be added as “threats emerge around the world”.

In a second proclamation, the US president escalated his war with Harvard University, suspending international visas for new students and authorising the secretary of state to consider revoking existing ones.

Having blamed Joe Biden for “millions and millions” of “illegals” in America, he issued a third proclamation ordering an investigation into the use of autopen during Biden’s presidency.

In a memorandum, President Trump claimed his predecessor’s aides used autopen to sign bills in a bid to cover up his cognitive decline.

If we didn’t know what the Trump administration meant when they talked about “flooding the zone”, we know now.

The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat.

The ban takes effect from 9 June – but countries could be removed or added.

The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be “continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented”.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

President Trump’s first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a “Muslim ban”.

It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes – or held at US airports when they landed.

Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign.

It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version in June 2018, calling it “squarely within the scope of presidential authority”.

Continue Reading

Trending