Connect with us

Published

on

Key witness seen leaving Trump grand jury hearing Monday

The grand jury overseeing former President Donald Trump’s hush money payment investigation hearing was back to work and a key witness was seen leaving the Manhattan building on Monday. FOX 5 New York’s Morgan McKay has the latest.

A pivotal figure in the hush money payment investigation of Donald Trump was seen Monday leaving the Manhattan building where a grand jury has been meeting for months, though there was still no word on when the panel might vote on a possible indictment of the former president.

David Pecker, a longtime Trump friend and the former chief executive of the parent company of the National Enquirer, was also seen weeks ago at the same building, suggesting that his testimony could be key as prosecutors continue to push toward potential criminal charges of the ex-president.

This was the first time the panel was hearing testimony in the Trump probe since last Monday, when a witness favorable to the ex-president appeared before the grand jury. The jurors did not meet at all on Wednesday, one of the days when they ordinarily convene, and heard other matters on Thursday. Legal experts weigh in on Trump grand jury saga

It’s looking like next week will be the earliest a grand jury will vote on whether or not to indict former President Trump. So what now? FOX 5 NY’s Sharon Crowley spoke to legal experts about what comes next.

The grand jury is now back on Trump, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss secretive proceedings. The ex-president is being investigated over payments during his 2016 campaign to two women who alleged affairs or sexual encounters with him.

Trump denies being involved with either of the women, the porn actor Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal.

RELATED: Legal experts weigh in on next steps for Trump grand jury

Among the witnesses the grand jury has already heard from is Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer and fixer who has said he orchestrated the payoffs. Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to federal charges arising from the payments and has become a potentially key witness for state prosecutors.

Pecker is seen as relevant to the investigation because his company, American Media Inc., secretly assisted Trump’s campaign by paying $150,000 to McDougal for the rights to her story about an alleged affair with Trump. The company then suppressed McDougal’s story until after the election, a dubious journalism practice known as "catch-and-kill."

Federal prosecutors revealed in 2018 that they had agreed not to bring criminal charges against AMI. Pecker has since stepped away from the company.

Trump raised anticipation that criminal charges were imminent with a March 18 post on his social media platform in which he said he expected to be arrested last Tuesday. He has since used the absence of an indictment to claim, furnishing no evidence, that the investigation is somehow faltering.

RELATED: Indictment vs arrest: What's the difference? Powder, threat sent to Manhattan DA investigating Trump

A powdery substance was found Friday with a threatening letter in a mailroom at the offices of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. It’s the latest security scare as the prosecutor weighs a potential historic indictment of former President Donald Trump. The letter said, "Alvin, I am going to kill you," according to a person familiar with the matter.

The Republican former president has also escalated his rhetoric, warning that "potential death & destruction" would accompany any indictment. He also posted a photo of himself holding a baseball bat next to a picture of District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat. On Thursday, Trump referred to Bragg, Manhattan’s first Black D.A., as an "animal."

In a memo to staff Friday, Bragg thanked the nearly 1,600 people for persevering in the face of "additional press attention and security around our office" and said their safety remains the top priority.

"We will continue to apply the law evenly and fairly, which is what each of you does every single day," Bragg wrote.

Since then, former federal prosecutors have rallied to Bragg's defense, signing a letter that condemned the verbal attacks.

Continue Reading

World

Iran denies ‘direct talks’ with US over its nuclear programme

Published

on

By

Iran denies 'direct talks' with US over its nuclear programme

Donald Trump has said the US is having direct talks with Iran over its nuclear programme – stating Iran will be in “great danger” if the negotiations fail.

The president has insisted Tehran cannot get nuclear weapons.

But Iran almost immediately contradicted the president insisting the talks due to take place in Oman on Saturday would be conducted through an intermediary.

Iran had pushed back against the US president’s demand that it enter negotiations over its nuclear programme or be bombed, but speaking at the White House on Monday, Mr Trump said: “We’re having direct talks with Iran, and they’ve started.

“It’ll go on Saturday,” he continued. “We have a very big meeting, and we’ll see what can happen. And I think everybody agrees that doing a deal would be preferable.”

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei visits nuclear centrifuges in Tehran. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei visits nuclear centrifuges in Tehran. Pic: Reuters

When pressed for more details on the talks, the US president said they are taking place “at almost the highest level”, without specifying who would take part or where they would be held.

“Hopefully those talks will be successful, it would be in Iran’s best interests if they are successful,” he said. “We hope that’s going to happen.

Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Mr Trump said Iran “cannot have a nuclear weapon, and if the talks aren’t successful, I actually think it will be a very bad day for Iran”.

However, Mr Trump’s bullish comments were not matched by Tehran. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X that indirect high-level talks would be held in Oman, adding: “It is as much an opportunity as it is a test. The ball is in America’s court.”

U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt
Image:
Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Pic: Reuters

On Tuesday, Iran’s state media said the talks would be led by Mr Araghchi and US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, with Oman’s foreign minister, Badr al Busaidi, acting as intermediary.

Mr Trump’s previous warnings of possible military action against Iran heightened already tense nerves across the Middle East.

He has said he would prefer a deal over military confrontation and in March wrote to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to suggest talks. Iranian officials at the time said Tehran would not be bullied into negotiations.

Mr Netanyahu had to sit there, listen and accept it

It now seems clear why the Israelis were summoned to the White House at short notice.

The US and Iran will sit down together to directly negotiate a nuclear deal in a matter of days.

Mr Trump didn’t say who would be taking part in the talks but said it would be “almost at the highest level”.

He wouldn’t reveal the location, and he didn’t put a timeline on it, but Washington and Tehran in close dialogue is a major development in Middle East geopolitics.

Benjamin Netanyahu had to sit there, listen and accept it.

By doing it publicly, in the Oval Office, Mr Trump has asserted his power and effectively forced the Israeli prime minister to accept the outcome.

Iran is yet to respond publicly, and it’s not clear what role Britain and France might play, as nuclear states and permanent members of the UN Security Council. Maybe none at all.

Mr Trump said Iran would be “in great danger” if the talks failed, but stopped short of explicitly saying he would order military action.

Mr Trump wants a deal, Israel will not be at the table and Mr Netanyahu’s ability to influence the talks, if he doesn’t like the way they are going, will be limited.

Some in Israeli media are describing the meeting as a humiliation for the prime minister and I suspect Mr Netanyahu will have left the White House concerned and possibly angry by what he heard.

But Mr Netanyahu has long shown an ability to force himself into the conversation – he won’t sit by and watch the talks progress without finding a way to have his say.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands outside the White House. Pic: AP
Image:
Mr Trump welcoming Mr Netanyahu to the White House. Pic: AP

Direct talks would not occur without the explicit approval of Iran’s supreme leader, who said in February that negotiations with the US were “not smart, wise, or honourable”.

During his first White House term, Mr Trump withdrew the US from a deal between Iran and world powers designed to curb Iran’s nuclear work in exchange for sanctions relief.

He also reimposed US sanctions.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Iran has since far surpassed that deal’s limits on uranium enrichment.

Tehran insists its nuclear programme is wholly for civilian energy purposes but Western powers accuse it of having a clandestine agenda.

Read more from Sky News:
Social media rumour sparks markets upturn
Two charged over Trump golf resort damage

Benjamin Netanyahu’s White House visit – his second in just over two months – was also due to include a news conference but this was cancelled earlier on Monday.

Officials said the decision was made because the Israeli prime minister and Mr Trump had “two back-to-back media availabilities (the greeting in the Oval Office and the formal news conference), and they wanted to streamline things”.

Continue Reading

UK

Calls for ‘irresponsible’ UK government to follow Canada’s lead on rules for young drivers

Published

on

By

Calls for 'irresponsible' UK government to follow Canada's lead on rules for young drivers

The UK government is facing accusations of being “disingenuous” and “irresponsible” amid growing criticism for not introducing tougher licensing laws for new drivers.

Officials in countries that already use so-called Graduated Driving Licences (GDLs), major UK motoring organisations and bereaved families say reforming the way new motorists get a licence will save lives.

Sky News joined Canada’s largest road policing unit and driving school to understand how GDLs work – with evidence showing that deaths among 16 to 19-year-old drivers there have fallen by 83%.

Despite strong evidence, the UK government says it is not considering introducing them – claiming they “unfairly” penalise young drivers.

“It’s so disingenuous. You’re downplaying what an important function and responsibility it is to be behind the wheel of a car,” says Superintendent Matt Moyer, who heads up Toronto Police Traffic Services.

Supt Matt Moyer
Image:
Supt Matt Moyer

The province of Ontario was the first region of North America to introduce GDLs more than 30 years ago.

It takes at least 20 months to gain a full driving licence, with students earning certain freedoms in stages.

More from UK

Rules include new drivers not being allowed on the road between midnight and 5am, a ban on driving on high-speed roads and a limit on the number of under 19-year-old passengers.

Maria Bagdonas
Image:
Maria Bagdonas

Many of these factors have featured in fatal accidents in the UK.

As soon as GDLs were brought in 1994, there was an immediate 31% drop in collisions involving novice drivers.

Maria Bagdonas is chief operating officer of Young Drivers of Canada, the country’s largest driving school.

“It could be passenger restriction, it could be a time of day restriction, it could be a blood alcohol or drug concentration restriction – basically the idea is not to take someone who is newly licensed and say here, ‘go forth’ in this crazy mad driving world and just let them – do or die, because more often it’s the die,” she said.

She questions the UK government’s decision to not introduce GDLs.

“Is it irresponsible to allow the same thing to happen over and over again and expect a different result without any interference…or is it insane?”

We joined new learner drivers in Toronto as they get behind the wheel for the first time.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Dan Whitehead met learner drivers in Canada

Read more from Sky News:
Man and woman in court over damage to Trump golf resort
Furious row after Labour MPs denied entry to Israel

One of them is 23-year-old Bapreet Kaur.

Barpreet Kaur
Image:
Barpreet Kaur

She gasped when we told her that in the UK, learners can do an intensive course for just one week before taking your test.

“Not everything is about freedom, you have to consider others as well. It’s not just you driving, right? There are other people on the road you have to make feel safe.”

Another learner, 16-year-old Anthony Martella, admits it is frustrating how long it takes.

Antony Martella
Image:
Antony Martella

“It makes me feel safe because when you’re on the road you want that mutual respect with other people on the road as well…having that aspect of making it longer so people can drive and learn the ways of the road, it makes it better for everyone,” he added.

“It is a bit frustrating, but I completely understand why the rules are in place.”

Graduated Driving Licences are also in place in other countries, such as Australia and New Zealand.

In 2023 around a fifth of people killed or seriously injured in Great Britain in car collisions involved a young driver – and the UK government says young male drivers are four times more likely to be killed or injured compared with other motorists.

The AA, RAC, road safety charities Brake and RoadPeace, MPs and some police have spoken in favour of GDLs.

The campaign group Forget-Me-Not Families Uniting, made up of those who’ve lost loved ones in car crashes, has lobbied the government to bring in the tougher laws – and last week delivered a 100,000-strong petition to Downing Street.

‘People keep dying’

Mia Pullen, whose brother Elliot was killed when a car he was travelling in smashed into a tree at 100mph in 2023 in Oxfordshire, told Sky News he would still be alive if GDLs had been in place.

“It makes me feel really angry, and really quite disappointed and let down by our government because he would still be here and so would hundreds of other people’s sons and daughters,” Ms Pullen said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sister of crash victim: ‘I need no other families to experience what ours has experienced’

She said the number of accidents mean something needs to be done.

Toronto Police
Image:
Toronto Police

“I think they’re making a very irresponsible decision. How can you not think they’re the most important thing right now in the road safety laws.

“People keep dying. You keep seeing it on the news, ‘young person has been killed’ or another young person has killed someone else because they’re not experienced enough to drive.”

Back in Toronto, Supt. Moyer said there are challenges in enforcing the tough GDL rules.

“You need an in. We can’t just arbitrarily stop people because ‘we think’ or ‘we have suspicion of’. We have to believe an offence has been created.

“We have to be realistic – and manage the expectations of the community. I don’t have enough people to pull over everybody that looks like their young at 3 o’clock in the morning – I don’t have that,” he said.

But he is clear the system works.

“Come out to some of our fatals and find out why there’s 3,000 pounds of steel wrapped around this person and yet there was never any standard applied to them.

“I understand there are some people who feel it might be an infringement on their rights to actually introduce laws.

“These aren’t laws, they are standards – and the more people who will accept that and abide by that, you’ve just made a major contribution to public safety in Britain.”

Ontario Minister of Transportation Prabmeet Sakaria
Image:
Prabmeet Sakaria

Ontario’s minister of transport, Prabmeet Sakaria, agrees that GDLs are the safest way to learn.

“We have some of the largest highways in probably North America and so we have to be very careful putting people onto the roads.

“The data speaks for itself here, right. We’ve got 16-18 lane freeways here. Should someone who’s just picked up their licence, really be able to jump on some of the busiest, fastest roads, should they be able to do so not having the experience?”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Alice was killed and her mum and sister were both seriously injured in a crash. Watch the full interview with her father on the UK Tonight on Sky News at 8pm on Tuesday

A Department for Transport spokesperson told Sky News: “Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way.

“Whilst we are not considering Graduated Driving Licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads, and we are exploring options to tackle the root causes of this without unfairly penalising young drivers.”

Continue Reading

Politics

US to get its first XRP-based ETF, launching on NYSE Arca

Published

on

By

US to get its first XRP-based ETF, launching on NYSE Arca

US to get its first XRP-based ETF, launching on NYSE Arca

Asset manager Teucrium Investment Advisors is set to launch the first XRP-based exchange-traded fund in the US markets, a leveraged XRP (ETF) on the NYSE Arca.

The Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF will seek to offer investors two times the daily return of the XRP (XRP) token with a 1.85% management fee and annual expense ratio, according to the company’s website. The XRP-based ETF will trade under the XXRP ticker beginning April 8.

“If you have a short-term high-conviction view on XRP prices, you may consider exploring the Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF,” the alternative asset manager said.

XXRP currently has $2 million worth of net assets.

US to get its first XRP-based ETF, launching on NYSE Arca

Details of Teucrium’s soon-to-be-launched XXRP ETF. Source: Teucrium

Teucrium founder and CEO Sal Gilbertie told Bloomberg on April 7 that investors had shown strong interest in an XRP ETF and hinted that it may file to list more crypto ETFs in the future.

Gilbertie was also pleased that XXRP would launch during a market downturn driven largely by US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

“What better time to launch a product than when prices are low?” Gilbertie told Bloomberg.

Likelihood of an approved spot XRP ETF still high: Analyst

Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said it was “very odd” to see a new asset’s first ETF come in leveraged form — however, he added that the odds of a spot XRP ETF being approved remain “pretty high.”

US to get its first XRP-based ETF, launching on NYSE Arca

Source: Eric Balchunas

Several spot XRP ETF applications from the likes of Grayscale, Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, Canary Capital and 21Shares are being reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In February, Balchunas and fellow Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart attributed 65% approval odds to a spot XRP ETF in 2025.

Predictions market Polymarket states there is currently a 75% chance that the SEC will approve a spot XRP ETF in 2025.

Related: XRP price sell-off set to accelerate in April as inverse cup and handle hints at 25% decline

Up until recently, ETF issuers would have seen a different environment for filing for XRP ETFs as Ripple Labs — the creators of the XRP token — and the SEC battled out a four-year court battle over XRP’s security status.

That case came to a close last month.

Teucrium has amassed over $310 million worth of assets under management since it was founded in 2010.

It offers mostly agricultural commodities, such as ETFs tracking the likes of corn, soybeans, sugar and wheat.

Magazine: XRP win leaves Ripple and industry with no crypto legal precedent set

Continue Reading

Trending