Donald Trump is threatening to sue the BBC for $1bn (£760m) – but this is not his first legal battle with the media.

The US president has clashed with the broadcaster over edits made to one of his 2021 speeches in a Panorama documentary aired before last year’s election.

Mr Trump’s legal team has accused the BBC of using “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements”.

BBC Chair Samir Shah has apologised for an “error of judgment” over the way the speech was edited, while director-general, Tim Davie, and CEO of BBC News, Deborah Turness, have both announced their resignations.

But this is not the first time Mr Trump has taken on the media – and is in fact the latest in a recent spate of legal battles with the press.

Trump vs CNN

If past examples are anything to go by, Mr Trump’s legal threat is not an empty one.

He previously filed a $475m (£360m) defamation suit against CNN, alleging it had compared him to Adolf Hitler.

It came after CNN referred to Mr Trump’s unfounded claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him as the “Big Lie” – an expression also used by Hitler in Mein Kampf.

But the case was thrown out after US district judge Raag Singhal ruled that the term “does not give rise to a plausible inference that Trump advocates the persecution and genocide of Jews”.

Election campaign lawsuit

His election campaign in 2020 also sued the New York Times and the Washington Post over opinion pieces alleging ties between with Russia.

These cases were dismissed in 2021 and 2023, respectively.

Yet, Mr Trump has had more success in recent years.

ABC settlement

In 2024, Trump sued American broadcaster ABC and its news host George Stephanopoulos, after the anchor falsely referred to the president being found “liable for rape” in an interview.

In the civil case in question, he was actually found liable for sexual abuse and defamation – a verdict which Trump is appealing.

Given the high bar for proving defamation against public figures, experts were sceptical that he could win the lawsuit.

George Freeman, executive director of the Media Law Resource Center told CBS at the time: “I don’t know of any president who successfully sued a media company for defamation.”

Yet ABC, which is owned by Disney, agreed to settle, paying $15m (£11.4m) to Trump for his future presidential library, and a further $1m (£760,000) towards his legal fees.

Battle with CBS

In another lawsuit, the president demanded $20bn (£15.2bn) from CBS over an interview with his election rival Kamala Harris broadcast on 60 Minutes.

His team accused the broadcaster of “partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference” with its editing of the interview, saying it intended to “mislead the public and attempt to tip the scales” in the contest.

Read more:
Tim Davie resigns as BBC director-general
Trump’s lawyer threatens BBC – read the letter in full

First Amendment attorney Charles Tobin of the law firm Ballard Spahr told CNN at the time: “This is a frivolous and dangerous attempt by a politician to control the news media.”

Yet they too settled out of court, with CBS’ parent company, Paramount Global, paying $16m (£12.1m) to end the legal dispute – again towards Trump’s future presidential library.

Trump vs Meta

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, also settled with the president to the tune of $25m (£19m).

That lawsuit came after he sued over the suspension of his accounts in the wake of the 6 January riots.

Why the recent spate?

While Mr Trump has made several threats to media organisations in recent years, it is not the first time he has done so.

According to Columbia Journalism Review, he threatened to sue a journalist at New York’s Village Voice as far back as 1979, and actually sued the Chicago Tribune in 1984.

That 1984 lawsuit, which came after Mr Trump took umbrage at a column by the paper’s award-winning architecture columnist criticising his plans for a huge tower block in New York City, was thrown out as an opinion by a judge.

👉 Tap here to follow Trump100 wherever you get your podcasts👈

However, the number of lawsuits, and the size of his compensation demands, have increased of late. So what has changed?

“As president, Trump’s leverage has increased exponentially,” wrote media reporter Paul Farhi in Vanity Fair.

“It’s no coincidence that Disney and Meta have settled since Election Day, and Paramount has come to the table.”

Now that he’s turning his ire on the BBC, what will the outcome be?

Mr Freeman called his threat to the broadcaster “totally meaningless”, noting that he “has a long record of unsuccessful libel suits” intended to “threaten and scare media he doesn’t like”.

Can the BBC rely on that assessment?

With a deadline set for Friday, 10pm UK time, we may be about to find out.

The UK has reportedly stopped sharing some intelligence with the US on suspected drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean following concerns over America’s strikes against the vessels.

The US has reported carrying out 14 strikes since September on boats near the Venezuelan coast, with the number of people killed rising beyond 70.

Downing Street did not deny reporting by CNN that the UK is withholding intelligence from the US to avoid being complicit in military strikes it believes may breach international law.

Britain controls several territories in the Caribbean, where it bases intelligence assets, and has long assisted the US in identifying vessels suspected of smuggling narcotics.

That information helped the US Coast Guard locate the ships, seize drugs and detain crews, CNN cited sources as saying, but officials are concerned the Trump administration’s actions may be illegal.

The intelligence-sharing pause began more than a month ago, CNN reported, quoting sources as saying Britain shares UN human rights chief Volker Turk’s assessment that the strikes amount to extrajudicial killing.

The reports could provide an awkward backdrop for a meeting between Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper and her US counterpart Marco Rubio, expected on Wednesday at the G7 foreign ministerial summit in Canada.

A Number 10 spokesman did not deny the move when asked about the pause in intelligence sharing.

“We don’t comment on security or intelligence matters,” the official said in response to repeated questions.

“The US is our closest partner on defence, security and intelligence, but in line with a long-standing principle, I’m just not going to comment on intelligence matters.”

He added that “decisions on this are a matter for the US” and that “issues around whether or not anything is against international law is a matter for a competent international court, not for governments to determine”.

A Pentagon official told CNN the department “doesn’t talk about intelligence matters”.

Read more:
US ‘likely jammed GPS signals’ off Venezuela
‘We will treat them EXACTLY how we treated al Qaeda’

On Monday, Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, now styled as the war secretary, said on X that the previous day, “two lethal kinetic strikes were conducted on two vessels operated by Designated Terrorist Organisations”.

He said: “These vessels were known by our intelligence to be associated with illicit narcotics smuggling, were carrying narcotics, and were transiting along a known narco-trafficking transit route in the Eastern Pacific.

“Both strikes were conducted in international waters and 3 male narco-terrorists were aboard each vessel. All 6 were killed. No U.S. forces were harmed.”

The United Nations human rights chief has described the US strikes on alleged drug dealers off the coast of South America as “unacceptable” and a violation of international human rights law.

Venezuela says they are illegal, amount to murder and are aggression against the sovereign South American nation.

A possible Democratic contender for the White House says he’s at the COP summit with an “open hand not a closed fist” – as he vowed not to let China dominate the green space.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has for months been teasing a bid for the next presidential election in 2028.

Sky News asked him at COP30 in Brazil if he was using it to drum up support for his campaign.

“I’m here in the absence of leadership from Donald Trump, who’s abdicated responsibility on a critical issue,” he said.

The Republican president has ignored the meeting of tens of thousands of people in Belem, leaving the stage wide open for Democrats to swoop in and lob criticism from afar.

Mr Newsom is a longstanding political foe of US President Donald Trump – they trade insults like “Gavin Newscum” and “The Nodfather”.

He added the switch to green energy is about “more than electric power”.

“It’s about economic power,” Mr Newsom said, “and I’m not going to cede America’s economic leadership to China.”

When he took office this year, Donald Trump cancelled clean energy projects and subsidies.

Meanwhile, China is making eight in ten of the world’s solar panels and seven in ten electric vehicles – while also producing more coal than any other country.

The US president is fighting back for the domestic oil and gas industry by trying to sell more of it abroad.

But in doing so he has given China more room to dominate green markets, Democrats say.

The US and China have been locked in tariff threats and trade wars this year.

Read more:
Trump urged to involve US in climate change fight
COP30’s plea to work together – despite Trump-shaped hole
Why US may soon have real energy emergency

‘Open hand, not a closed fist’

Mr Newsom said at another event at COP30 today California was going to “lean in” and “compete in this space”.

“But we can’t do that without all of you… So we’re here with an open hand, not a closed fist.”

Democrats have been pounding the hot and humid hallways in Amazonian Belem to tout California’s “climate leadership”.

The state doesn’t have any formal say in these inter-governmental negotiations. But as the fourth-largest economy in the world, it does wield influence in energy markets.

California gets two thirds of its electricity from renewables, but also still imports 300,000 barrels of oil a year, the second-biggest provider of which is the country hosting the climate summit, Brazil.

Republican states were also faster to roll out renewable power than Democrats. Sky News put that to California senator Josh Becker yesterday, also here on a PR exercise for the state.

Mr Becker said the fact that Republican Texas had rolled out more solar and wind than California was “a good thing that shows that it’s economically competitive”.

“It’s actually cheaper. That’s really why they did it,” he said. “Not necessarily because of climate action. And that’s good news. So we’re all for that.”