SpaceX’s Starship — the largest and most powerful rocket ever built — has blasted off from its Texas launchpad. Despite exploding minutes after liftoff, the first-of-its-kind flight has been hailed as a success by the company.
Starship launched from a SpaceX launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas, today (April 20) atop the company’s Super Heavy booster rocket, whose 33 Raptor 2 engines carried the vehicle into the stratosphere with a record-breaking 16.5 million pounds (7.5 million kilograms) of thrust.
Shortly after liftoff, an issue with the separation mechanism between the rocket’s two stages caused it to enter a spin, and it exploded just minutes later.
Related: Geomagnetic storm sends 40 SpaceX satellites plummeting to Earth
“As if the flight test was not exciting enough, Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly before stage separation,” SpaceX wrote on Twitter (opens in new tab) .
The launch is the first test of the rocket system that SpaceX has said it will use to transport crews, spacecraft, satellites and cargo to locations in the solar system — both for its own purposes and on behalf of NASA. The U.S. space agency is slated to use Starship’s Human Landing System to transport humans to the moon’s surface for the first time since 1972 on the Artemis 3 and 4 missions.
Now that the spaceship has shown it can fly, SpaceX intends to send another Starship into low Earth orbit with a crew on board by the end of the year, but how much the separation mechanism issue will delay or alter these plans is unknown.
At 394 feet (120 meters) tall, Starship is roughly the length of three passenger jets and is 30 feet (10 m) taller than the Saturn V rocket that first sent the Apollo 11 astronauts to the moon in 1969. Starship is also more than twice as powerful as Saturn V, which propelled itself with 7.6 million pounds (3.4 million kg) of thrust.RELATED STORIES — Ethereal whirlpool of light grows into a giant, perfect spiral above Alaska. What was it?
— NASA announces Artemis astronauts who will fly to the moon for the 1st time in 50 years
— How long will it take for humans to colonize another planet?
Starship is designed primarily with cheap and efficient manufacturing in mind, using inexpensive stainless steel for its construction and methane (which SpaceX says can be collected on Mars) to power the rocket. It is designed to be reusable, and can carry a payload of up to 275 tons (250 metric tons) in its non-reusable state — around 10 times that of SpaceX’s current Falcon 9 rockets.
This was the rocket’s second attempt at taking off. During the first attempt, on Monday (April 17), the rocket was fueled and readied, but the launch was stopped with nine minutes left on the clock, after a frozen valve caused pressurization problems in the Super Heavy booster.
On Sunday (April 16), Musk lowered expectations for the upcoming launch, warning in a Twitter discussion that many problems could arise and that he would consider it a success if the launch just didn’t “blow up the launchpad.”
“Success is not what should be expected,” he said ahead of Monday’s scrubbed launch. “It may take us a few kicks of the can here before we reach orbit.”
Utah’s Bitcoin reserve bill could be the first of its kind to pass at the state level in the US because of its shorter legislative window to decide on bills, says a Bitcoin advocate.
Cryptocurrencies tumbled on Sunday in a risk-off move after President Donald Trump hit Canada, Mexico and China with long-threatened import tariffs.
The price of bitcoin was last lower by 7% at $93,768.66, according to Coin Metrics. The CoinDesk 20 index, which measures the largest 20 digital assets by market cap, dropped 19%. Ether slumped 20% to its lowest level since November.
The slide began Saturday night after Trump signed an order imposing 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10% duty on China, which will take effect Tuesday. The U.S. does about $1.6 trillion in business with the three countries.
Jeff Park, Bitwise Asset Management’s head of alpha strategies, said a sustained tariff war will be “amazing” for bitcoin in the long-run due to an eventual weakening of the dollar and U.S. rates.
While many believe bitcoin is a hedge against inflation and uncertainty over the long term, it trades like a risk asset in the short term — and is likely to respond negatively to any uncertainty around the trade war triggered by Trump’s tariffs.
Investors are watching $90,000 as the key support level in bitcoin, and some have warned of an even deeper pullback toward $80,000 should the cryptocurrency meaningfully break below its support.
Bitcoin is about 16% off its Jan. 20 record of $109,350.72. Seasoned crypto investors and traders have become accustomed over the years to corrections of around 30% during bull markets.
Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC Pro:
The boss of GB Energy has told Sky News it could take 20 years to deliver a Labour government pledge of 1,000 jobs for Aberdeen.
Sir Keir Starmer promised voters his flagship green initiative, which will be headquartered in the northeast of Scotland, would cut consumer energy bills by as much as £300.
It is one of Labour’s five key missions for this parliament after a manifesto commitment to “save families hundreds of pounds on their bills, not just in the short term, but for good”.
In his first broadcast interview, Juergen Maier, appointed by Downing Street as GB Energy’s start-up chairman, suggested this was a “very long-term project” spanning decades and repeatedly refused to say when household prices would be slashed.
“I know that you are asking me for a date as to when I can bring that, but GB Energy has only just been brought into creation and we will bring energy bills down,” Mr Maier said.
The state-owned company will not supply power to homes but it will invest in new renewable projects while attempting to attract private investors.
Aberdeen HQ ‘nervous’
More on Energy
Related Topics:
Labour hopes GB Energy will help workers move from oil and gas and has pledged 1,000 jobs for Aberdeen, where the initiative will be based.
Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce told Sky News the estimated 50,000 local people currently employed in the industry are “nervous”.
Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: “I think the [GB Energy] ambition is good. It needs some quick wins.
“Right now, this city is nervous. We need to give the industry more confidence that things are going to start moving more quickly.
“What we do have is not a great deal of progress. We’ve had a lot of positive meetings with GB Energy. I think we are really looking over the next six months for that to be delivered on.”
1,000 jobs in 20 years? ‘Absolutely’
It comes after Energy Minister Michael Shanks MP recently said the UK government had “not moved away” from an ambition of creating “over 1,000 jobs”.
Sky News pushed Mr Maier for clarity on this pledge given the looming crisis in the North Sea industry.
He said: “Great British Energy itself is going to create over the next five years, 200 or 300 jobs in Aberdeen. That will be the size of our team. I have said in the very long term when we become a major energy champion it may be many more than that.”
Pressed to define “long term”, he replied: “Look, we grow these companies. Energy companies grow over 10 or 20 years, and we are going to be around in 20 years.”
He said “absolutely” when asked directly if it could take two decades to fulfil the commitment of 1,000 jobs.
‘Huge risk of not delivering’
Unions told Sky News there is a risk of GB Energy over-promising and under-delivering.
Unite’s Scottish Secretary Derek Thomson said: “If you look at how many jobs are going to go in the northeast, if GB energy does not pick up the pace and start to move workers in there and start to create proper green jobs, then I’m afraid we could be looking at a desolation of the northeast.”
Prospect, which represents more than 22,000 workers across the energy industry, said the current vision seems risky.
Richard Hardy, Scotland secretary, said: “I don’t want to be accused of cynicism, but I do want to see a plan.
“If what happens is that it only creates 200 or 300 jobs, then I think most people would see that as being a failure. There is a huge risk for them in not actually delivering.
“They must understand the political risk they are taking in doing this. It has to be a success for them because otherwise it is going to be a stick to beat them with.”