Connect with us

Published

on

Tesla has decided to use a bizarre defense in a lawsuit brought by the family of a Tesla owner who died in an accident while using Autopilot a few years ago.

The automaker claimed that CEO Elon Musk shouldn’t be made available to explain some of his statements on self-driving because some of the public comments might have been “deep fakes.”

The lawsuit revolves around the death of Walter Huang, an Apple engineer who died in his Tesla Model X while driving to work in 2018.

As we previously reported, the Model X was driving on Autopilot when it entered the median of a ramp on the highway as if it was a lane and hit a barrier about 150 meters after going into the median.

The impact was quite severe because there was no crash attenuator since it was already destroyed from a previous crash. The driver was rushed to the hospital, but he died of his injuries.

NHTSA investigated the accident and confirmed that the vehicle was using Autopilot at the time of the crash, but it blamed the driver, who was playing a video game on his phone at the time of the accident, according to the phone data, and on the lack of crash attenuator.

Tesla asks drivers always to pay attention and be ready to take control when using Autopilot.

The Huang family decided to sue anyway, and they are trying to use the argument that some of Tesla’s and, more specifically, some of CEO Elon Musk’s comments about Autopilot and self-driving have led Huang to believe he could use Autopilot in the manner that led to the crash.

The lawsuit is set to go to trial in Santa Clara County Superior Court this year, but Tesla has tried to keep Musk and his statements out of the case with a quite bizarre defense.

The automaker is claiming that some of the statements that Musk is believed to have made might have been “deep fakes,” and therefore he shouldn’t be questioned on them.

Deep fakes generally mean synthetic media that have been digitally manipulated to replace one person’s likeness convincingly with that of another, but people also use the term to refer to CGI videos made to make someone say something that they didn’t actually say.

Judge Evette D. Pennypacker didn’t buy the argument. She said in her judgment (via The Telegraph):

Their position is that because Mr Musk is famous and might be more of a target for deep fakes, his public statements are immune. In other words, Mr Musk, and others in his position, can simply say whatever they like in the public domain, then hide behind the potential for their recorded statements being a deep fake to avoid taking ownership of what they did actually say and do.

She has ruled that Musk should be made available for an interview of up to three hours to discuss his statements about Tesla Autopilot and Full Self-Driving.

Electrek’s Take

That’s bizarre. If Tesla thinks some of the statements are deep fakes, it should say exactly which ones and try to prove it. But the capability to create deep fakes certainly doesn’t make anyone immune to scrutiny on their statement.

Also, it’s not like we don’t know for a fact that Musk has made some fairly ambitious statements about Tesla Autopilot and Full Self-Driving.

Is he now going to claim that he never said that Tesla would have 1 million robotaxis on the road by the end of the year three years ago? Was it a deep fake? Was it also a deep fake when he said it again the next year? That’s just ridiculous and worrying that Tesla would try such a defense. I guess that Tesla’s new “hardcore litigation team” at work.

However, in this case, the Huang family is facing an uphill battle because despite Musk’s comments about what he believes Tesla could achieve with self-driving in the future, Tesla has always been clear about how drivers should use Autopilot.

Every time you activate Autopilot, it tells the driver to keep their hands on the steering wheel and be ready to take control at all times. The data points toward the fact that Huang was playing a video game, not paying attention, and had plenty of time to react when the car went into the median and before hitting the barrier. He was clearly not using Autopilot as intended.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Toyota is ‘loading the bases’ with a wave of new hybrid, PHEV, and EVs

Published

on

By

Toyota is 'loading the bases' with a wave of new hybrid, PHEV, and EVs

With a new lineup of electrified vehicles, including plug-in hybrid (PHEV), hybrid, and EV models, Toyota is swinging for the fences. By offering every powertrain option, Toyota believes it has a better chance of hitting a home run. Will it hit it out of the park, or is Toyota setting itself up for a swing and a miss?

Toyota bets on new PHEV, hybrid, and EVs for growth

Toyota is the king of hybrids. When you see a Prius, you immediately recognize the brand. That’s because the compact hybrid has been around for over 25 years now.

As the industry shifts toward cleaner, more efficient options, Toyota is banking on PHEVs to drive growth. Plug-in hybrids are not a new thing for Toyota. The first Prius PHEV was introduced in the US in 2016.

Between Toyota and Lexus brand vehicles, the Japanese automaker offers 32 “electrified” cars in the US, which it claims to be the most of any automaker. In the first quarter, Toyota sold 112,608 electrified vehicles, accounting for nearly 50% of sales.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Over the next few years, the company anticipates a substantial increase in demand for plug-in hybrid vehicles in the US.

Toyota-hybrid-PHEV-EVs
2026 Toyota bZ electric SUV (Source: Toyota)

In a recent interview with CNBC, David Christ, Vice President of Toyota Motor North America, said the company will “grow our PHEV volume through the lineup over the next few years.”

Sources claim that Toyota plans for PHEV sales to account for around 20% of US sales by 2030, up from the current 2.4%.

Toyota-hybrid-PHEV-EVs
2026 Toyota RAV4 PHEV (Source: Toyota)

To boost the appeal, Toyota is “working to increase, perpetually increase, the amount of miles you can drive on EV-only range,” Christ explained.

The updated PHEV version of its best-selling RAV4, introduced last week, has 50 miles EV range. Although that’s up from 42 miles in the outgoing model, will it be enough?

Toyota-hybrid-PHEV-EVs
2026 Toyota C-HR electric SUV (Source: Toyota)

Christ compared Toyota’s upcoming “electrified” lineup to having bases loaded in a baseball game. “We’ve got ICE. We’ve got hybrid. We got plug-in hybrid. We got EV,” he told CNBC, adding “So, our chances of being successful in scoring runs is just a lot better than if you’re really overly committed to any one of those power trains.”

Like a handful of other automakers, Toyota believes PHEVs will act as a “bridge” to 100% electric vehicles, but they also have some major drawbacks.

Toyota-hybrid-PHEV-EVs
2026 Toyota Woodland electric SUV (Source: Toyota)

Since PHEVs are essentially a combination of an EV and a gas-powered vehicle, they require both technologies, which is significantly more costly. Toyota’s plug-in models cost thousands more than its hybrid or gas-powered vehicles.

The 2025 Toyota RAV4 PHEV ($44,265 MSRP) costs nearly $15,000 more than the base gas model and $12,000 more than the hybrid.

Toyota-C-HR-EV-US
2026 Toyota C-HR electric SUV (Source: Toyota)

While it ramps up PHEV volume, Toyota has a handful of new EVs set to launch in the US. The updated bZ electric SUV (formerly known as the bZ4X) will arrive at US dealerships later this year, featuring increased range, new styling, and an NACS port to access Tesla Superchargers. In 2026, Toyota will launch the smaller C-HR and rugged bZ Woodland electric SUVs.

Electrek’s Take

Will Toyota’s big bet on hybrids and PHEVs pay off? With so many EVs hitting the market, which are much more advanced and efficient, it could be a big swing and a miss for Toyota.

Several Japanese automakers, including Nissan and Honda, are also banking on hybrids and PHEVs over the next few years.

Nissan believes its third-gen e-Power hybrid system will be its saviour, but it will likely be too little, too late, with BYD and other Chinese EV leaders rapidly launching more affordable, efficient tech and vehicles.

Since Toyota is already ahead of the game with several PHEV models on the market, it won’t be as costly, but it’s still delaying the inevitable.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

XPeng launches its new AI-powered MONA M03 Max BEV in China for under $20,000

Published

on

By

XPeng launches its new AI-powered MONA M03 Max BEV in China for under ,000

Eight days after publicly unveiling a new Max variant of its already popular MONA M03 sedan, XPeng Motors has officially launched it in China at an insanely low price of RMB 139,800 ($19,400). For those prices, MONA M03 Max drivers will gain access to some of XPeng’s most advanced AI-centric technologies.

Less than a year ago, XPeng Motors gave the public its first hint at a new model that would become the MONA M03. After teasing us with brief images all summer, XPeng officially unveiled the MONA M03 in July 2024 before launching it in China at ultra-affordable prices.

For example, the M03 initially launched in three separate trims, priced at RMB 119,800 ($16,815), RMB 129,800 ($18,220), and RMB 155,800 ($21,870), respectively. The three variants – 515, 620, and 580 Max – refer to each MONA M03’s CLTC range (km), and the “Max” signifies the addition of XPeng’s smart driving ADAS capability.

The two lower-end trims of the MONA M03 began deliveries in August 2024 and have since propelled the model to the top-selling A-segment BEV sedan in China for eight consecutive months. By the end of March 2025, XPeng announced it had built 100,000 MONA EVs in seven months, hailing the milestone as a new record for passenger BEVs.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

During a public event in China on May 20, XPeng unveiled the new MONA M03 Max ahead of its formal launch, which began today.

  • new MONA M03
  • new MONA M03
  • new MONA M03

XPeng’s new MONA M03 variant is bang for small bucks

As we learned last year, MONA stands for “Made of new AI” and represents XPeng’s goal of delivering advanced AI technology to everyday customers. The new MONA M03 Max is a perfect example of this target, as it comes loaded with class-leading technology but at a price that most everyone can afford.

Not to mention some cool cosmetic features and functions to cater to the M03’s younger audience, 90% of which are below the age of 35, per XPeng Motors. Per XPeng Motors:

With AI innovation as its driving force, the MONA M03 Max brings industry-leading intelligent driving capabilities to the mainstream market. Combining class-leading advanced ADAS, a premium smart cockpit, and high-end smart features typically found in vehicles priced over RMB 200,000 ($27,760), the MONA M03 Max challenges conventional expectations of A-class vehicles — and ushers in a new era of truly accessible, high-level intelligent driving.

As reported earlier this month, the new MONA M03 Max features XPeng’s proprietary AI Turing Smart Driving System as a standard feature. The ADAS integrates perception, decision-making, and control into one holistic design powered by dual NVIDIA Orin X chipsets and monitored by 27 high-precision sensors and an ultra-HD surround reality display. Per XPeng, the system can accurately detect over 50 road elements and obstacles (see image above).

Unlike its MONA M03 siblings launched last year, the new Max variant also features XPeng’s AI Tianji 5.7.0 Smart Cockpit. Per the automaker:

The XPeng MONA M03 Max takes its intelligent cockpit to new heights with the debut of the upgraded AI Tianji System 5.7.0. Compared to the MONA M03 launched earlier in 2024, the new system adds over 300 new features. Empowered by XPeng’s self-developed XGPT large language model, voice interaction becomes more seamless than ever — expanding scenario coverage by 30% and enabling voice control for over 90% of the vehicle’s functions. This delivers an experience that outperforms even premium models priced above RMB 200,000.

Per XPeng, the MONA M03 will now come in four varying range options with the following pricing:

MONA M03 Trim Range Price
515 Plus 515 km (320 miles) RMB 119,800 ($16,629)
620 Plus 620 km (385 miles) RMB 129,800 ($18,017)
502 Max 502 km (312 miles) RMB 129,800 ($18,017)
600 Max 600 km (373 miles) RMB 139,800 ($19,405)

These M03 variants are all officially on the market in China. Per XPeng, there are no plans to sell this model outside of China at this time.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Tesla is losing money insuring its own cars

Published

on

By

Tesla is losing money insuring its own cars

Tesla’s insurance products are currently unsustainable, according to a new report that shows the company is losing money insuring its own cars.

Tesla vehicles have long had a reputation for being expensive to insure.

The automaker tried to address the situation on multiple fronts. It launched its own “collision centers” to try to control repair costs, and it also introduced its own insurance products.

Tesla claims that no other insurer knows more about its technology and its owners than Tesla does, so the automaker should be able to offer more precise products.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

For the last few years, Tesla has been offering its own car insurance in some US states. The automaker utilizes its capacity to collect real-time driving data from its vehicles to create what it calls a “Safety Score. ” This score is based on how and when drivers drive, and the company increases or decreases their monthly premium accordingly.

The use of Tesla’s ADAS systems, Autopilot and Supervised Full Self-Driving, can also affect premiums.

Tesla owners have been reporting mixed results when trying to obtain lower quotes from Tesla compared to other insurers.

Now, data from S&P Global points to Tesla Insurance having significant problems:

An insurance company’s loss ratio is a key metric, as it represents the percentage of premiums paid out to customers. The higher it is, the more likely an insurer is likely to lose money.

Based on S&P Global’s latest data, Tesla’s was at 92.5% in 2023. This means that Tesla Insurance paid out 92.5 cents in claims for every dollar it collected in premiums. 

After accounting for overhead costs, it means that Tesla was likely losing money on its insurance products.

In recent months, data suggests that insurance is becoming more expensive for Tesla vehicles in 2025.

Electrek’s Take

This is quite interesting, as it directly contradicts Tesla’s claim that its vehicles are involved in crashes at a significantly lower rate than other vehicles and are relatively inexpensive to repair.

Neither of those claims can be true if insurance premiums are expensive.

If it were the case, insurance costs on Tesla vehicles would be going down, and Tesla would be making money with its insurance products.

Now, S&P claims that even the latter is not valid.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending