AfterElon Muskannounced that anyone making false statements would be Community Noted on the platform, theTwitterCEO received an ironic dose of scrutiny.
What Happened:Musk took to Twitter to announce that anyone including him, civilian users, advertisers, head of state, orTucker Carlsonwho recently parted ways with Fox News, will get Community Noted if found making materially false statements on the microblogging site.
See Also:How A Fake Disney Account Convinced Elon Musks Twitter It Was Legit
While theres nothing wrong with this tweet at first glance, the Community Notes note on this tweet seems to make the whole situation somewhat ironic.
Making slight adjustments to Musks original tweet, Community Notes stated that some tweets with false claims might not get flagged by the feature. The system is limited in reach by participation.
Anyone making materially false statements on this platform will get Community Noted, including you, me, Tucker, advertisers, head of state, etc. No exceptions.
Convince the people and let the chips fall where they may. @CommunityNotes https://t.co/GLK8o7D2FS Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 27, 2023
Why Its Important:Community Notes wasformerly known as Birdwatch, which Musk-owned Twitter reintroduced in December 2022. The feature enables users to add notes to tweets that might be misleading.
Musk previously praised the featureafter it flagged his post containing a doctored headline attributed to CNN.
In March earlier this year, Musk faced severe backlash for his tweet pertaining to Community Notes, which also raised concerns regarding its authenticity and visibility. At the time, Musk tweeted thatTwitter is seeking only the least wrong truth.
Under Musks leadership, Twitter has faced severebacklash from usersandadvertisers alike for allegedlyendorsinghate speech and misinformation.
Check out more of Benzingas Consumer Tech coverage byfollowing this link.
Read Next:We May Have Found Elon Musks Secret Twitter Account And Its Weird
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:20
Gaza deal could be agreed within 24-36 hours
Yet Hamas – the group still holding the 20 or so living hostages in captivity – is still not entirely defeated.
Yes, they are weakened immensely, but has Benjamin Netanyahu achieved the “total victory” over the group he set out to do two years ago? No.
So why has he suddenly agreed to a partial victory?
Image: Smoke rises following an Israeli military strike in the northern Gaza Strip. Pic: AP
Speaking to those in the Israeli security establishment, one could develop a somewhat cynical view about his decision.
Recent leaks in the media around talks between Donald Trump and Israel’s prime minister, reports that the US president told Mr Netanyahu to “stop being so f***ing negative,” could be more coordinated than it seems at first glance, according to these conversations that I am having here in Israel.
It now suits Mr Netanyahu politically to stop the war.
For the past two years, he has needed to keep his coalition with the far-right together to prevent his government from collapsing.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:01
Gazans reflect on two years of war
That meant continuing to pound Gaza, restricting the flow of aid, and allowing the likes of Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir to continue, unchecked, to fan the flames of ethnonationalism and call for the ethnic cleansing of the area.
Now, next year’s elections are honing into view.
Mr Netanyahu needs a win so he can go to his country as the statesman who got the hostages back and ended the war.
He needs external pressure from the US president to get this war done.
Don’t forget that, for Mr Trump, the timing is also key; the Nobel Peace Prize is announced on Friday and there is not much more that the president wants than to put the gong on his mantelpiece.
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Never mind that this deal looks a lot like the deal former US President Joe Biden presented more than a year ago. The timing wasn’t right then, but it might be now.
The Palestinians living through sheer hell in Gaza desperately need this deal to be finalised.
As do those Israelis with family still held captive by Hamas.
A dual hell for both sides, separated by mere miles, and depending on a man who may have finally decided that the time for peace has come because it suits him.
A woman accused of stalking Madeleine McCann’s parents shouted: “Why are you doing this to me?” and was led away in tears by officers, during her trial.
Giving evidence against 24-year-old Julia Wandelt, Mrs McCann said her first contact with the Polish woman happened “about three years ago”.
Wandelt insisted that she was Madeleine, who went missing in Portugal in 2007, while stalking the missing girl’s parents by sending emails, calling them and turning up at their address, prosecutors allege.
Image: Wandelt claims to be missing Madeleine McCann (pictured)
Wandelt is accused of one count of stalking causing serious alarm and distress to Mrs McCann and Gerry McCann between June 2022 and February this year. She denies stalking.
She is on trial with 61-year-old Karen Spragg, from Cardiff, who is accused of the same offence and also denies the offence.
Speaking from behind a blue curtain screening her from the dock at Leicester Crown Court, Mrs McCann spoke about the defendants visiting her home address in Leicestershire on 7 December last year.
More on Madeleine Mccann
Related Topics:
Image: A court sketch of Karen Spragg (left) and Julia Wandelt (right), with Kate McCann sitting behind a blue curtain. Pic: PA
Mrs McCann told the court that Wandelt had been “pleading” with her, asking why she wouldn’t agree to do a DNA test.
Spragg, who accompanied Wandelt, was “slightly more aggressive”, asking her whether she didn’t want to find her daughter, Mrs McCann added.
“I told them to leave. I told them I was distressed,” she told the court.
Image: Karen Spragg arrives at Leicester Crown Court. Pic: PA
Asked how the incident had made her feel, Mrs McCann added: “I felt quite distressed to be honest. I think I had been on edge anyway because of the recent communications from her.”
After Mrs McCann had given her first round of evidence, Wandelt was led away from the dock after sobbing loudly and shouting: “Why are you doing this to me?”.
Mrs McCann told the jury that Wandelt had been “incessant” with her messages, which left her with a “little niggle” about doing a DNA test.
Image: Kate and Gerry McCann are pictured in 2012 with a missing poster depicting an age progression computer-generated image of Madeleine. Pic: AP
She said part of her brain was “saying ‘what if'” because of Wandelt’s frequent messages, but added: “Having seen a photo of her, she’s Polish … it doesn’t make sense.”
“I can’t say what Madeleine looks like now, but if I saw a photo of her, I would recognise her,” she said.
But she added that the “persistance” of Wandelt’s behaviour started to “get to” her, making her “almost [want] a DNA test to put it to bed”.
Asked about the impact on her between June 2022, when Wandelt first made contact, and February this year, when the 24-year-old was arrested, Mrs McCann said: “I feel like it has escalated, the level of stress and anxiety it’s caused me has increased over that time.”
She added that she has felt “more relaxed” since Wandelt’s arrest.
Gerry McCann told the court he answered the phone to Julia Wandelt on one of the many occasions that she tried to call Kate. He said he told Wandelt: “You’re not Madeleine.”
He said: “I made it very clear these were unwanted calls. To be honest, it was a bit of a blur.”