Harry and Meghan have been involved in a “near catastrophic” car chase after being followed by paparazzi – the latest in a long string of run-ins between the press and the prince.
Sky News looks at the strained relationship between the prince and the press and what he’s previously said about the paparazzi.
Harry blames paparazzi for Princess Diana’s death
Harry has made no secret of where he lays the blame for the Paris car crash that killed his mother.
He said: “I think one of the hardest things to come to terms with is the fact that the people that chased her through into the tunnel were the same people that were taking photographs of her, while she was still dying on the back seat of the car.”
“Even if the man had been drinking, even if he had been drunk, he wouldn’t have had any problem driving through such a short tunnel. Unless paparazzi were following him and dazzled him,” he wrote.
“Why had those paparazzi got off lightly? Why weren’t they in prison? Who had sent them? And why weren’t those people in jail either? What other reason could there be apart from corruption and cover-ups being the order of the day?”
Advertisement
Image: French police officers at the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris where the fatal crash that killed Diana happened
‘Every time I hear a click it takes me straight back’
In an interview with ITV’s Tom Bradby in 2019, when the prince was on a trip to Africa for the Harry & Meghan: An African Journey documentary, Harry was asked if he is at peace “in a way yet” with his mother’s death or if there is still “a wound that festers”.
He says it’s a wound that festers, and that being followed by paparazzi is the “worst” reminder of her life as opposed to the best.
“Every single time I see a camera, every single time I hear a click, every single time I see a flash, it takes me straight back.”
A “feeding frenzy” surrounding his relationship with Meghan
Prince Harry described the media interest in his relationship with Meghan in the context of his mother.
“To see another woman in my life, that I love, go through this feeding frenzy, that’s hard,” he said.
“It is basically the hunter versus the prey,” he added.
“No matter what I did, they were still going to find a way to destroy me,” Meghan said.
Car chases and disguises
Harry said the early days of dating “became a combination of car chases, anti-surveillance driving and disguises, which isn’t a particularly healthy way to start a relationship but we always came at it with as much humour as possible”.
Meghan also described paparazzi following her and how she received a death threat while she was in Toronto.
“I would say to the police, if any other woman in Toronto said to you I have six grown men who are sleeping in their cars around my house who follow me everywhere that I go and I feel scared, wouldn’t you say that it was stalking?
“And they said yes, but there’s really nothing we can do because of who you’re dating. I was like, so I’m just supposed to live like this? And then I got a death threat and things changed because I needed to have security.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:21
Prince Harry and Meghan leave an awards ceremony moments before a car chase
Duke blames media for Meghan’s miscarriage
The Duchess of Sussex had a miscarriage in 2020 “because of what the Mail did”, according to Harry.
He said: “I watched the whole thing. Now, do we absolutely know that the miscarriage was created, caused by that? Course we don’t.
“But bearing in mind the stress that it caused, the lack of sleep and the timing of the pregnancy, how many weeks in she was, I can say from what I saw, that miscarriage was created by what they were trying to do to her.”
Paparazzi feature in early memories of Diana
InHarry and Meghan’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, he described his early memories of his mother – and how photographers were in the background.
“Strapped in the car, seatbelt across, with my brother in the car as well, and my mother driving, being chased by three, four, five mopeds with paparazzi on, and she was always unable to drive because of tears. There was no protection,” he said.
“Invasive” paparazzi photos of Archie
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex settled a claim against a celebrity picture agency that took “unlawful, invasive and intrusive” photos of Meghan and their son Archie in January 2020.
A scuffle with a cameraman
Asa 20-year-old, Prince Harry was involved in a scuffle with a photographer outside a London nightclub.
A royal spokesperson said he was hit in the face by a camera, while the photographer said the prince lashed out at him.
‘Getting in bed with the devil’
Prince Harry accused members of the Royal Family of getting in “bed with the devil” over their links with the tabloid press in an interview when Spare was published.
He has previously described the British tabloid press as “the mothership of online trolling”, and says he is exposing alleged media wrongdoing “to save journalism as a profession”.
The prince says it’s his “life’s work” to change the British “media landscape”, making it more accountable for its actions.
Fighting tabloids in court
The prince is currently pursuing four cases against UK tabloids.
The lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers alleges the prince was the victim of “unlawful information gathering”.
Harry’s case is said to cover the period between 1995 and 2011, including 148 articles published between 1996 and 2010 by MGN titles that were allegedly obtained through unlawful means.
The subjects of the articles in the case include Harry’s relationship with his family and ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, a few injuries and illnesses, his military service and allegations of drug use.
Rachel Reeves needs to “make the case” to voters that extending the freeze on personal income thresholds was the “fairest” way to increase taxes, Baroness Harriet Harman has said.
Speaking to Sky News political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the Labour peer said the chancellor needed to explain that her decision would “protect people’s cost of living if they’re on low incomes”.
In her budget on Wednesday, Ms Reeves extended the freeze on income tax thresholds – introduced by the Conservatives in 2021 and due to expire in 2028 – by three years.
The move – described by critics as a “stealth tax” – is estimated to raise £8bn for the exchequer in 2029-2030 by dragging some 1.7 million people into a higher tax band as their pay goes up.
Image: Rachel Reeves, pictured the day after delivering the budget. Pic: PA
The chancellor previously said she would not freeze thresholds as it would “hurt working people” – prompting accusations she has broken the trust of voters.
During the general election campaign, Labour promised not to increase VAT, national insurance or income tax rates.
He has also launched a staunch defence of the government’s decision to scrap the two-child benefit cap, with its estimated cost of around £3bn by the end of this parliament.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:30
Prime minister defends budget
‘A moral failure’
The prime minister condemned the Conservative policy as a “failed social experiment” and said those who defend it stand for “a moral failure and an economic disaster”.
“The record highs of child poverty in this country aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet – they mean millions of children are going to bed hungry, falling behind at school, and growing up believing that a better future is out of reach despite their parents doing everything right,” he said.
The two-child limit restricts child tax credit and universal credit to the first two children in most households.
The government believes lifting the limit will pull 450,000 children out of poverty, which it argues will ultimately help reduce costs by preventing knock-on issues like dependency on welfare – and help people find jobs.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
8:46
Budget winners and losers
Speaking to Rigby, Baroness Harman said Ms Reeves now needed to convince “the woman on the doorstep” of why she’s raised taxes in the way that she has.
“I think Rachel really answered it very, very clearly when she said, ‘well, actually, we haven’t broken the manifesto because the manifesto was about rates’.
“And you remember there was a big kerfuffle before the budget about whether they would increase the rate of income tax or the rate of national insurance, and they backed off that because that would have been a breach of the manifesto.
“But she has had to increase the tax take, and she’s done it by increasing by freezing the thresholds, which she says she didn’t want to do. But she’s tried to do it with the fairest possible way, with counterbalancing support for people on low incomes.”
She added: “And that is the argument that’s now got to be had with the public. The Labour members of parliament are happy about it. The markets essentially are happy about it. But she needs to make the case, and everybody in the government is going to need to make the case about it.
“This was a difficult thing to do, but it’s been done in the fairest possible way, and it’s for the good, because it will protect people’s cost of living if they’re on low incomes.”
The football associations of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales have officially launched and released more details about their joint bid for the 2035 Women’s World Cup.
If the bid is successful, it would be the first football World Cup hosted in the UK since 1966, and the largest single-sport event ever staged in the country.
The bid includes 22 proposed stadiums – 16 in England, three in Wales, two in Scotland and one in Northern Ireland – across 16 host cities.
Organisers claim it would be the most accessible tournament ever, with 63 million people living within two hours of a proposed venue.
They predict the tournament would generate 4.5 million ticket sales and have a projected global TV audience of 3.5 billion.
The tournament would involve 104 matches contested by 48 teams over 39 days, with 48 team base camp training sites, 82 venue-specific training sites and 32 FIFA Fan Festival Sites proposed.
In a joint statement, the CEOs of the various football associations, said: “We are proud of the growth that we’ve driven in recent years across the women’s and girls’ game.”
They added that: “A Women’s World Cup in the UK has the power to turbo charge the women’s and girls’ game both in the UK and globally.”
Where would the matches be played?
The bid details the host cities and stadiums as follow:
• Belfast – The Clearer Twist National Stadium at Windsor Park
• Birmingham – The Sports Quarter Stadium and Villa Park
• Brighton & Hove – The American Express Stadium
• Bristol – Ashton Gate
• Cardiff – Cardiff City Stadium and Principality Stadium
• Edinburgh – Easter Road
• Glasgow – Hampden Park
• Leeds – Elland Road
• Liverpool – The Hill Dickinson Stadium
• London – Chelsea FC Stadium, Emirates Stadium, Selhurst Park, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and Wembley Stadium connected by EE
• Manchester – Etihad Stadium
• Trafford – Old Trafford
• Newcastle – St James’ Park
• Nottingham – The City Ground
• Sunderland – Stadium of Light
• Wrexham – STōK Racecourse
However, some of the stadiums mentioned above were merely the ones put forward in the official bid and are likely to change after the construction of new stadiums are completed.
The manager of an Edinburgh cocktail bar will speak to police today over the “catastrophic” theft of an eight-foot tall nutcracker figure from outside his venue.
In what can only be described as a total nightmare before Christmas, a person riding an e-bike guaranteed a place on the naughty list by stealing the Copper Blossom’s festive statue on Monday.
They are seen on CCTV placing the soldier across their lap and riding off into the night down George Street towards St Andrew Square.
Image: The thief was wearing a dark hoodie
Speaking to The UK Tonight on Sky News, manager Paul Paxton said it was a massive financial blow for his bar.
“The individual nutcrackers are about £900 each,” he revealed.
The stolen one is named Nolan, while his “brother” Nelson remains “safe and sound”.
They were part of the Copper Blossom’s outdoor Christmas display, and Nelson has now been moved into the foyer.
Mr Paxton said he would be speaking to police about their investigation, with sightings having been reported “around Edinburgh” later on the night of the incident.
Nolan, who the owner described as “massive”, was taken at around 10.10pm. The CCTV footage shows the thief removing the statue and dragging it on to their bike.
Image: You can see Nolan being taken away in this shot
As if losing a £900 nutcracker wasn’t bad enough, a table costing hundreds of pounds was also broken.
“It’s pretty catastrophic,” said Mr Paxton.
The bar had originally put out an appeal that said “if you return it, we’re all good” – but he admitted he doesn’t expect Nolan’s return any time soon.
Image: Paul Paxton is dwarfed by his nutcracker soldiers
And while he’d “never want someone to go into harm’s way”, he told Jayne Seckerhe was a little disappointed no witnesses alerted him or his staff to the theft.
“There were about 12 or 13 people who walked past,” he said.
“Even if someone had run in, that could have helped. It wasn’t a quick process – he fell off his bike.