Connect with us

Published

on

The Cabinet Office is seeking a judicial review of Baroness Hallett’s order to release Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages, diaries and notebooks, it confirmed in a letter to the COVID inquiry.

The government department said it was bringing a judicial review challenge “with regret” – but added that there were “important issues of principle at stake”.

Despite the development, it said it would “continue to co-operate fully with the inquiry before, during and after the jurisdictional issue in question”.

The legal action comes after days of wrangling in which the government hesitated over handing the tranche of documents to the public inquiry over fears it would compromise ministers’ and other individuals’ right to privacy.

Outlining its refusal to hand over the material in its letter, the Cabinet Office again questioned whether it had “the power to compel production of documents and messages which are unambiguously irrelevant to the inquiry’s work”.

COVID legal challenge ‘desperate attempt to withhold evidence – politics latest

Such materials include personal messages and “matters unconnected to the government’s handling of COVID”, it said.

More on Boris Johnson

It argued that requesting “irrelevant” material “represents an unwarranted intrusion into other aspects of the work of government” and that “important issues of principle are at stake here, affecting both the rights of individuals and the proper conduct of government”.

It said it had explored “a number of possible avenues for resolving this difference of opinion”, including offering redacted versions of the materials and “a more focused or sequential approach to the direction of the information requirements”.

“We remain hopeful and willing to agree together the best way forward.”

Inquiry chair Lady Hallett ordered the government to hand over the documents last week without any amendments, using a section 21 notice.

The tranche includes messages sent between former prime minister Mr Johnson and his fellow ministers and advisers during the pandemic, as well as diary entries.

But the Cabinet Office said today that Mr Johnson’s messages did not cover whole period the inquiry wants because he was using a new phone from May 2021.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rishi Sunak gives his response to speculation surrounding Boris Johnson’s messages being given to the COVID inquiry.

A government lawyer said the former prime minister had also swapped his own legal representation recently and gave “specified legal counsel permission to access an electronic record of certain WhatsApps” over the past two days.

Then on Wednesday night, Mr Johnson “invited Cabinet Office to share this information with the inquiry”.

“By working through the night, lawyers acting for Cabinet Office have now completed our review for national security and unambiguously irrelevant material and are in a separate communication providing the relevant material to the inquiry today,” it added/

What is the COVID inquiry asking for?

  • Unredacted messages sent and received by Boris Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022.
  • Unredacted diaries for Mr Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022
  • Copies of 24 unredacted notebooks filled in by Mr Johnson between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022
  • Unredacted messages sent and received by adviser Henry Cook between 1 January 2020 and 24 February 2022.
  • The inquiry wants messages – even from group chats – about the government response to COVID, as well as contact with a list of certain experts, ministers, civil servants and advisers

But the department wanted to note they had “not been able to verify the completeness of this material” given to them by Mr Johnson, saying it did not cover the “whole of the specified time period, but only the period from May 2021 when the former prime minister acquired a new phone”.

It added: “We have asked Boris Johnson if he will provide to us any further messages caught by the Section 21 notice.”

The inquiry confirmed on Thursday afternoon that it had received a response from the Cabinet Office.

In a short statement, it said: “At 4pm today the chair of the UK COVID public inquiry was served a copy of a claim form by the Cabinet Office seeking to commence judicial review proceedings against the chair’s ruling of 22 May 2023.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Cabinet Office has reiterated its refusal to hand over some of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp messages to the COVID inquiry

Further information will be provided at a preliminary hearing at 10.30am on 6 June, it said.

On Wednesday afternoon, Mr Johnson’s team said all the information the inquiry wanted had been passed to the Cabinet Office.

His spokesman said the ex-prime minister wanted the Cabinet Office to “urgently” hand over the material, in a move that put pressure on Rishi Sunak and the government to hand over the documents.

Responding to the judicial review, Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner accused Mr Sunak of undermining the inquiry and said he was “hopelessly distracted with legal ploys to obstruct the Covid Inquiry in a desperate attempt to withhold evidence”.

Read more:
Boris Johnson hands COVID material to Cabinet Office in ‘full and in unredacted form’
How Boris Johnson was ‘doorstepped’ in US – and the key question he failed to answer

“Instead of digging himself further into a hole by pursuing doomed legal battles to conceal the truth, Rishi Sunak must comply with the Covid Inquiry’s requests for evidence in full. There can be no more excuses.”

Daily Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, also criticised the government’s decision, calling it a “kick in the teeth” for bereaved families.

“This cowardly attempt to obstruct a vital public inquiry is a kick in the teeth for bereaved families who’ve already waited far too long for answers.

“The government is delaying the inquiry even further and clogging up court time, all to prevent Sunak and his Conservative colleagues from having to release their messages.”

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine peace plan ‘not final offer’ Trump says, ahead of crisis talks in Geneva

Published

on

By

Ukraine peace plan 'not final offer' Trump says, ahead of crisis talks in Geneva

Donald Trump has said that his 28-point peace plan for Ukraine is “by far” not the “final offer”, ahead of crisis talks in Geneva.

Meeting on the sidelines of a G20 summit in South Africa, European and other Western leaders scrambled to respond to the US president’s demand for Ukraine to accept the plan drawn up by the Trump administration and the Kremlin.

In a joint statement on Saturday, they said the plan announced on Friday could serve as a basis for talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine but required “additional work”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How Ukraine peace plan came about

Follow the latest on the Ukraine peace plan

As a result, a meeting has been hastily convened in Geneva, Switzerland, on Sunday, where national security advisers from the E3 – France, Britain and Germany – will meet EU, US and Ukrainian officials for further discussions.

Ahead of the talks, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a video address to his nation that Ukrainian representatives at the talks “know how to protect Ukrainian national interests and exactly what is needed to prevent Russia from carrying out” another invasion.

“Real peace is always based on security and justice,” the Ukrainian leader added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: ‘More to do’ on US Ukraine peace plan

The 28-point peace plan closely resembles the list of demands repeatedly stated by the Kremlin since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago and if adopted, would see Ukraine cede territory to Russia – and cut the size of its military.

Mr Trump has said he wants a response from Ukraine by Thursday, while suggesting an extension could be possible.

On Saturday, Mr Trump told reporters outside the White House that the plan was not the “final offer” when asked.

He said: “We’d like to get the peace, it should’ve happened a long time ago. The Ukraine war with Russia should’ve never happened. If I was president, it would have never happened. We’re trying to get it ended. One way or another, we have to get it ended.”

His secretary of state Marco Rubio insisted that the peace proposal was authored by the US, despite what a handful of senators have alleged.

“It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The 28-point peace plan explained

Leaders have sought to balance praise for President Trump’s attempt to end the war with recognition that some terms in his proposal are unpalatable for Kyiv.

“There are many things that cannot simply be an American proposal, which requires broader consultation,” French
President Emmanuel Macron said on the sidelines of the G20, adding that an agreement had to allow for peace for Ukrainians and “security for all Europeans”.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz underlined the importance to Europe of supporting Ukraine.

“If Ukraine loses this war and possibly collapses, it will have an impact on European politics as a whole, on the entire European continent. And that is why we are so committed to this issue,” he said.

“There is currently an opportunity to end this war, but we are still quite a long way from a good outcome for everyone.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Keir Starmer calls for growth plan at G20

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told reporters in Johannesburg: “We are concerned about [caps on military], because it’s fundamental that Ukraine has to be able to defend itself if there’s a ceasefire.”

He said the proposal “requires additional work”, adding: “And that’s why there’s been the agreement that in Geneva tomorrow [Sunday], you’ll have senior US personnel, you’ll have European NSAs [national security advisers], including the UK NSA, and obviously Ukrainians there to work further on the draft.”

Sir Keir also spoke to Mr Trump, relaying discussions held at G20 to the US leader, according to a Downing Street spokesperson, who added that the two leaders would speak again on Sunday.

Meanwhile, Sir Keir, who has defended his decision to fly to the G20 days before a difficult budget, said the role of the G20 is “critical at this moment”.

“The G20 has worked together before to fix fundamental problems in the global economy. We need to find ways to play a constructive role again today in the face of the world challenges,” he said.

“I’d like to see us come together around a five-point plan for growth that leaves no one behind.”

Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz at the G20 summit. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz at the G20 summit. Pic: PA

The US, however, is boycotting the talks.

The Trump administration made its opposition to South Africa’s G20 agenda clear earlier this year when the country started holding meetings ahead of the summit. South Africa gets to set the agenda as the country holding the rotating G20 presidency.

G20 leaders broke with tradition and adopted a declaration at the start of their summit – despite opposition from the US.

Vincent Magwenya, spokesman for South African president Cyril Ramaphosa, said a leaders’ declaration was adopted unanimously in Johannesburg.

The White House later accused South Africa of refusing to facilitate a smooth transition of the G20 presidency.

Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Read more:
Analysis: Europe scrambles at G20 over Ukraine peace plane
G20 lands in South Africa: But who feels forgotten?

The G20 bloc was formed in 1999 as a bridge between rich and poor nations to confront global financial crises.

While it often operates in the shadow of the powerful Group of Seven nations, G20 members represent around 85% of the world’s economy, 75% of international trade and more than half the global population.

Continue Reading

World

COP30: Countries reach draft deal to help speed up climate action

Published

on

By

COP30: Countries reach draft deal to help speed up climate action

Countries attending COP30, the biggest climate meeting of the year, have agreed steps to help speed up climate action, according to a draft deal.

The meeting of leaders in the Brazilian city of Belem also saw them agree to reviewing related trade barriers and triple the money given to developing countries to help them withstand extreme weather events, according to the draft.

However, the summit’s president Correa do Lago said “roadmaps” on fossil fuels and forests would be published as there was no consensus on these issues.

The annual United Nations conference brings together world leaders, scientists, campaigners, and negotiators from across the globe, who agree on collective next steps for tackling climate change.

The two-week conference in the Amazon city of Belem was due to end at 6pm local time (9pm UK time) on Friday, but it dragged into overtime.

The standoff was between the EU, which pressed for language on transitioning away from fossil fuels, and the Arab Group of nations, including major oil exporter Saudi Arabia, which opposed it.

The impasse was resolved following all-night negotiations led by Brazil, negotiators said.

More on Cop30

The European Union’s climate commissioner, Wopke Hoekstra, said on Saturday that the proposed accord was acceptable, even though the bloc would have liked more.

“We should support it because at least it is going in the right direction,” he said.

The Brazilian presidency scheduled a closing plenary session.

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and about 80 countries, including the UK and coal-rich Colombia, had been pushing for a plan on how to “transition away from fossil fuels”.

This is a pledge all countries agreed to two years ago at COP28 – then did very little about since.

But scores of countries – including major oil and gas producers like Saudi Arabia and Russia – see this push as too prescriptive or a threat to their economies.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

World

Israel launches strikes on Gaza in further test of fragile ceasefire

Published

on

By

Israel launches strikes on Gaza in further test of fragile ceasefire

Israel says it has begun striking Hamas targets in Gaza, reportedly killing at least nine people, after what it called a “blatant violation of the ceasefire agreement”.

Local health authorities in Gaza said there had been three separate airstrikes, one hit a car in the densely populated Rimal neighbourhood, killing five people and wounding several others.

Shortly after the attack on the car, the Israeli air force hit two more targets in the central Gaza Strip, medics said.

They said at least four people died when two houses were struck in Deir Al-Balah city and Nuseirat camp.

The Israeli military said there had been a “blatant violation of the ceasefire agreement”.

It claimed a gunman had crossed into Israeli-held territory after exploiting “the humanitarian road in the area through which humanitarian aid enters southern Gaza”.

A Hamas official rejected the Israeli military’s allegations as baseless, calling them an “excuse to kill”, adding the Palestinian group was committed to the ceasefire agreement.

More on Gaza

The Israeli airstrikes are a further test of a fragile ceasefire with Hamas, which has held since 10 October following the two-year Gaza war.

Israel pulled back its troops, and the flow of aid into the territory has increased. But violence has not completely halted.

Palestinian health authorities say Israeli forces have killed 316 people in strikes on Gaza since the truce.

Meanwhile, Israel says three of its soldiers have been killed since the ceasefire began and it has attacked scores of militants.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the latest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

Trending