Connect with us

Published

on

The world contains vast quantities of lithium, an integral element in electric vehicle batteries. And though lithium is commonly mined from hard rock, the majority of the world’s lithium reserves are actually found in brine, extremely salty water beneath the Earth’s surface.

Today, brine mining involves evaporating the brine in massive, extravagantly colored pools over a series of about 18 months, leaving high concentrations of lithium behind. It’s a simple but inefficient process that takes up vast swaths of land and is ecologically disruptive.

As automakers around the world struggle to meet extraordinarily ambitious electric vehicle production targets, there’s growing interest in doing things differently. 

The auto industry requires a 20x increase in lithium supply, and there’s just no way to achieve that type of growth with conventional technologies,” said Dave Snydacker, founder and CEO of Lilac Solutions.

Lilac is one of a number of companies piloting a set of new and largely unproven technologies called direct lithium extraction, or DLE, which could increase the efficiency and decrease the negative externalities of the brine mining process.

Instead of concentrating lithium by evaporating brine in large pools, DLE pulls the brine directly into a processing unit, puts it through a series of chemical processes to separate the lithium, then injects it back underground. This process produces battery-grade lithium carbonate or hydroxide in a matter of hours, without the need to transport concentrated brine to a separate processing facility.

DLE could also help jump-start the domestic lithium mining market. Today, most lithium brine mining takes place in the Salar de Atacama, an expansive salt flat in northern Chile that contains the highest quality lithium brine in the world. But DLE technologies require much less land and can help unlock resources in areas where the brine contains less lithium and more impurities.

North American companies Lilac Solutions, EnergyX and Standard Lithium are exploring lithium resources in areas such as Arkansas’ Smackover Formation, California’s Salton Sea and Utah’s Great Salt Lake, as well as abroad in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile. The Chilean government has even announced that all new lithium projects will be required to use DLE technology.

“So the timing is right and ripe for this to see the light of day very, very soon,” said Amit Patwardhan, CTO of EnergyX.

Direct lithium extraction company EnergyX is building demonstration plants in Argentina, Chile, California, Utah and Arkansas.

EnergyX

Doing things differently

In a world before electric vehicles, traditional methods of brine mining and hard rock mining more than sufficed to meet global lithium demand.

“The world didn’t need DLE for the last 50 years. Lithium’s primary use was industrial — ceramics, glass and lubricants,” said Robert Mintak, CEO of Standard Lithium.

But with demand for EVs and the lithium-ion batteries that power them booming, now there’s a supply crunch. 

Over the last 10 years, 90% of new lithium production has come from hard rock projects. But hard rock projects are increasingly expensive as we go into lower grade resources. And if you add up all the hard rock projects, there’s just not enough resource out there to meet automaker goals. It’s the brine resources that are large enough to electrify the vehicle industry,” Snydacker said.

DLE is already being used to some extent in both Argentina and China, where the companies Livent and Sunresin are implementing commercial tech that combines DLE with traditional evaporation pond operations.

These companies both rely on a technology called adsorption, the only commercially proven approach to DLE. In this process, lithium molecules in the brine adhere to an adsorbant substance, removing them from surrounding impurities. But experts say that stripping the lithium from the adsorbents requires a lot of fresh water, a big problem considering many of the world’s best brine resources are in arid areas.

Livent’s most recent sustainability report indicates that it uses 71.4 metric tons of fresh water per metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent, or LCE, produced. Lilac reported that in pilot testing it uses between 10 and 20 metric tons of fresh water, while EnergyX says it uses less than 20 metric tons.

China-based Sunresin says that it recycles all of its fresh water, and that its newer projects will operate without evaporation ponds.

But a host of other companies are now getting into the industry, testing out alternative technologies which they claim will not only eliminate evaporation ponds altogether, but increase yields while lowering energy and fresh water requirements.

New players

Bay Area-based Lilac Solutions is using a technology called ion exchange. It’s currently piloting its tech in Argentina in partnership with Australian lithium company Lake Resources.

“With the Lilac ion-exchange bead we’ve developed a ceramic material. This ceramic selectively absorbs lithium from the brine while releasing a proton. Once the lithium is absorbed into the material, we then flush the lithium out of the bead using dilute acid and that produces a lithium chloride concentrate which can be easily processed into battery grade chemicals,” Snydacker explained.

Lilac Solutions is developing a direct lithium extraction facility in Argentina in partnership with Australian lithium company Lake Resources.

Lilac Solutions

Lilac expects to have its first commercial-scale module operating before the end of 2024. The company is backed by BMW and the Bill Gates-funded Breakthrough Energy Ventures, and Ford has signed a nonbinding agreement to buy lithium from its Argentina plant.

EnergyX, which is based out of both San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Austin, Texas, uses a combination of technologies that it can tailor to the specific brine resource. Step one is traditional adsorption, followed by a method known as “solvent extraction,” in which the concentrated brine is mixed with an organic liquid. The lithium is then transferred to the organic before it’s stripped free and concentrated. Membrane filtration is the final stage, which removes all remaining impurities.

“So you see these all these loops and synergies that come out of combining these technologies. And that is another big differentiator in what EnergyX does and what really drives the cost of the technology much lower compared to anybody else,” said Patwardhan.

EnergyX is building demonstration plants with undisclosed partners in Argentina, Arkansas, Chile, California and Utah, and is aiming to have the first two up and running by the end of this year. Recently, the company secured $50 million in funding from GM to help scale its tech.

Vancouver-based Standard Lithium also has big backers. The public company’s largest investor is Koch Industries, and it’s been running a demonstration plant in South Arkansas for the last three years, producing lithium at a preexisting bromine plant.

The company uses both ion-exchange and adsorption technologies, depending on the resource. It expects to begin construction on a commercial-scale DLE facility next year and is expanding into Texas as well.

“We have an opportunity as we expand from Arkansas to Texas to be the largest producing area for lithium chemicals in North America, utilizing in an area that’s not under water stress, that has a social license to operate,” said Mintak.

Companies such as Standard Lithium, which are leaning into the U.S. market, stand to benefit from the Inflation Reduction Act, which ties electric vehicle subsidies to domestic sourcing of battery materials. Automakers can also receive the full EV credit if they source from countries that have free trade agreements with the U.S., such as Chile.

While Chile has announced that all new lithium projects in the country will be required to use DLE technologies, it has not announced what companies it will be partnering with for these new projects.

Neighboring Bolivia was considering technology from both EnergyX and Lilac Solutions to help unlock the country’s vast but largely undeveloped lithium resources. The government ultimately tapped a consortium of Chinese companies, led by battery giant CATL, to spearhead DLE efforts in its salt flats.

Most new lithium supply will continue to come from hard rock projects for the rest of this decade, Snydacker said. “But by the end of this decade, we’ll see very large-scale brine projects coming online …” he predicted. “And going out into the next decade, this technology will provide a majority of new supply.”

Overall, lithium production from DLE is projected to grow from about 54,000 metric tons today to 647,500 metric tons by 2032, according to Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. That’s forecast to be worth about $21.6 billion.

“But when we place it in relative terms against the rest of the global market, that only represents around 15% of total supply,” said James Mills, principal consultant at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. “So we’re still going to have to rely on traditional forms of production for the lithium units, whether it’s evaporation ponds or hard rock mining.”

Watch the video to learn more about the companies looking to bring direct lithium extraction into the mainstream.

Continue Reading

Technology

AWS recovers, Apple rallies, General Motors beats and more in Morning Squawk

Published

on

By

AWS recovers, Apple rallies, General Motors beats and more in Morning Squawk

Attendees walk through an exposition hall at AWS re:Invent, a conference hosted by Amazon Web Services, in Las Vegas on Dec. 3, 2024.

Noah Berger | Getty Images

This is CNBC’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox.

Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day:

1. WTF, AWS

What began as an early morning outage report for Amazon Web Services snowballed into a daylong saga that limited access to popular websites used for work, school, entertainment and travel. Monday evening, the company said all its services returned to normal operations.

Here’s a recap:

  • Downdetector showed users had problems accessing a variety of sites, ranging from Snapchat to Lyft to The New York Times to Venmo. Travelers reported problems with finding airline reservations and checking in online, while the British government said it was in communication with AWS over impacted services.
  • AWS is the leading vendor of cloud infrastructure technology, with millions of companies and groups using its services tied to servers and storage.
  • Cybersecurity executive Rob Jardin told CNBC that the outage didn’t seem to be caused by a cyber attack and was likely due to a technical issue with one of Amazon’s key data centers.
  • It’s not the only outage in recent memory: AWS faced a disruption in 2023, and Microsoft Windows systems went dark last year following a problematic CrowdStrike software update.
  • AWS said it will share a “post-event summary” following Monday’s outage.

2. Green Apple

Consumers experience the iPhone 17 in an Apple store in Shanghai, China on October 13, 2025.

Cfoto | Future Publishing | Getty Images

On the other hand, yesterday was a great day for Apple investors. Shares rallied to all-time highs after a report from technology research firm Counterpoint showed iPhone 17 sales were off to a good start in the U.S. and China.

CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Apple’s surge shows why you’re better off holding the stock than dumping it. Meanwhile, Ritholtz Wealth Management CEO Josh Brown said on CNBC that Apple’s artificial intelligence efforts can create a “whole different story” for the investing outlook.

Apple’s jump helped juice the broader market, with the three major indexes all gaining more than 1%. Follow live market updates here.

3. Greasing the wheel

Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange on March 27, 2025.

Brendan McDermid | Reuters

The latest big-name corporate earnings reports out this morning came in stronger than Wall Street anticipated.

General Motors blew past analysts’ consensus expectations for both earnings per share and revenue in the third quarter. The automaker also lifted its full-year guidance and said the impact from tariffs would be lower than previously forecast. Shares surged 8.5% in premarket trading.

Coca-Cola also beat the Street’s forecasts on both lines for the third quarter, sending shares up nearly 2% before the bell. However, the soda maker said demand remained soft.

4. End in sight?

White House National Economic Adviser Kevin Hassett prepares to give a live television interview at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 4, 2025.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

There could be light at the end of the tunnel for the federal government shutdown. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told CNBC the closure — which is now on its 21st day — “is likely to end sometime this week.”

The White House adviser warned, however, that the Trump administration could impose “stronger measures” if a resolution isn’t reached. Hassett said he heard that Senate Democrats felt it would be “bad optics” to reopen the government before the “No Kings” protests against Trump that took place nationwide Saturday.

Get Morning Squawk directly in your inbox

5. Down under

U.S. President Donald Trump, and Anthony Albanese, Australia’s prime minister, shake hands outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, Oct. 20, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

As the focus on rare earth materials intensifies, the U.S. and Australia inked an agreement that includes project plans totaling as much as $8.5 billion. As CNBC’s Spencer Kimball notes, this deal comes as Trump pushes to build a rare earth supply chain that’s independent of China.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said each country would contribute $1 billion over the next six months. Later, the White House said in a fact sheet that the countries would each invest more than $3 billion in that time frame.

Shares of U.S.-listed rare earth stocks jumped in Monday’s session. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs soared more than 20% after the steel producer said it was considering creating a rare earth mining business.

The Daily Dividend

Mark Cuban says PBMs are too powerful but gives Trump credit for tackling drug prices with TrumpRx

CNBC’s Spencer Kimball, Tasmin Lockwood, Kevin Breuninger, Jaures Yip, Luke Fountain, Sean Conlon, Annie Palmer, Katrina Bishop and Leslie Josephs contributed to this report. Terri Cullen edited this edition.

Continue Reading

Technology

China’s rare earth magnet exports to U.S. fall for second month, reversing brief recovery

Published

on

By

China's rare earth magnet exports to U.S. fall for second month, reversing brief recovery

Annealed neodymium iron boron magnets sit in a barrel prior to being crushed into powder at Neo Material Technologies Inc.’s Magnequench Tianjin Co. factory in Tianjin, China, on Friday, June 11, 2010.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

China’s exports of rare earth magnets to the U.S. fell sharply in September, ending months of recovery as the two economic superpowers remain locked in trade disputes and Washington pushes to secure alternative supply chains.

Data from China’s General Administration of Customs on Monday showed that U.S.-bound exports fell 28.7% in September from August to 420.5 tonnes. That figure was also nearly 30% lower than a year prior.

It was the second consecutive monthly decline after a short-lived rebound that started in June, when Beijing had agreed to expedite rare earth export permits during trade talks with U.S. officials in London.

Chinese rare earth magnet companies have reportedly been facing tighter scrutiny on export license applications starting in September. The customs figures also come from before Beijing expanded its export licensing regime earlier this month.

China has a stranglehold on the production of rare-earth permanent magnets, with an estimated 90% of the market, and a similar dominance in refining the elements used to make them, according to the International Energy Agency. 

The magnets are vital for technologies such as electric vehicles, renewable energy, electronics and defense systems. Beijing’s previous restrictions caused shortages and supply disruptions across industries earlier this year.

China’s export curbs have also extended beyond just the U.S., with total rare earth magnet shipments falling 6.1% in September from August, according to customs data. 

The disruptions have prompted the U.S. and its partners to accelerate efforts to build alternative rare earths and critical mineral supply chains. 

On Monday, the U.S. and Australia signed a minerals deal worth up to $8.5 billion. The agreement includes funding for multiple projects to boost supplies of rare earth and critical mineral materials used in defense manufacturing and energy security.

The deal comes as U.S.-based Noveon Magnetics signed a memorandum of understanding with Australia’s Lynas Rare Earths earlier this month to form a strategic partnership aimed at developing a scalable American supply chain for rare earth magnets.

However, manufacturing rare earth magnets is highly complex and relies on upstream rare earth element mining and refining operations. 

Currently, only a handful of U.S. companies manufacture magnets domestically, with many in the early stages of production.

Continue Reading

Technology

CoreWeave CEO says Core Scientific ‘not a need to have’ as shareholder opposition to deal rises

Published

on

By

CoreWeave CEO says Core Scientific 'not a need to have' as shareholder opposition to deal rises

CoreWeave Inc. signage in Times Square in New York, US, on Friday, May 9, 2025.

Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator told CNBC Tuesday that the firm’s proposed acquisition of Core Scientific would be a “nice to have” rather than a necessity as shareholders prepare to potentially block the deal.

In July, AI cloud provider Coreweave proposed an all-stock deal valued at around $9 billion to buy the Bitcoin miner and data center firm, Core Scientific. Immediately after the news, Core Scientific’s stock price fell, plummeting nearly 18%.

The deal has received criticism with key proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) recommending on Monday that shareholders vote against the acquisition. Core Scientific’s share price has conitnued to rise after the deal was announced which suggests some investors think that the company is valued higher than what CoreWeave has offered, ISS said.

Intrator said that he was “disappointed” by the ISS report and continues to believe that the deal is “in the long-term interest of Core Scientific shareholders.” However, CoreWeave will not raise the price of the offer.

“We think that the bid that we put out there for [Core Scientific] is a fair representation of the relative value of the two companies as an all stock deal,” Intrator told CNBC. “We are going to just kind of proceed as we have, in the event that the transaction does not go through. It is a nice to have, not a need to have for us.”

“Everything has a value, and the number we put out is the value we’re willing to pay for them under all circumstances,” Intrator added.

CoreWeave CEO calls Core Scientific a 'nice to have' amid rising opposition to the acqusition

Earlier this month Two Seas Capital, a major Core Scientific shareholder publicly opposed the acquisition saying that the price CoreWeave is offering is too low. Shareholders will vote on the deal on October 30.

“We see no reason why Core Scientific shareholders should accept such an underwhelming deal. Based on recent trading data, we see little evidence that they will,” Two Seas Capital said in a Friday letter to shareholders.

CoreWeave has aggressive pursued acqusitions this year to buy AI-related firms like OpenPipe, Weights & Biases, and Monolith as it looks to expand its product offering.

The company, which has built data centers and offers Nvidia-powered computing power to hyperscalers like Microsoft, has been riding the wave of artificial intelligence investments.

“We’ve been in acquisitive mode as we continue to build and extend the functionality of our company,” Intrator said.

Continue Reading

Trending