Connect with us

Published

on

A Tesla Model 3 refresh prototype was spotted ahead of the launch, which could be imminent as the automaker appears to be liquidating existing Model 3 vehicles.

Late last year, we started hearing rumors that Tesla was working on a Model 3 refresh that would come during the second half of 2023. The project is reportedly codenamed “Highland.”

In December, a Model 3 prototype with heavy camouflage was spotted being tested in California. Another prototype was spotted shortly after as Tesla is expected to be closer to releasing the vehicle.

With the heavy camouflage on the front and back of those prototypes, it has been hard to identify any specific change to the Model 3. But in April, the first picture of the new Model 3 without camouflage leaked, giving us our first proper look at the upcoming refresh.

Despite rumors that the launch would be imminent, we haven’t seen a refreshed Model 3 prototype in a while.

Now, it’s been spotted again being tested on public roads in California:

The vehicle again has camouflage in the front and back – confirming that those are the outer parts that differ from the current version. The camouflage might specifically be trying to hide the taillights and headlights, which are clearly different in this refreshed Model 3.

It also features the Hardware 4.0 cameras seen in all of Tesla’s new vehicles other than the Model 3:

Last week, we reported that Tesla appears to be liquidating Model 3 vehicles ahead of the refresh launch.

The reason it looks like Tesla is liquidating Model 3 vehicles is because the discounts are for “new inventory vehicles” rather than new custom orders.

It’s possible that buyers ordering on Tesla’s website could get the new version of the vehicle while people buying the cheaper new inventory vehicles are getting the last few current generation Model 3 vehicles.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Penske signs on to demo and sell a customized version of REE’s P7-C electric truck

Published

on

By

Penske signs on to demo and sell a customized version of REE's P7-C electric truck

Commercial EV technology developer REE Automotive has added some clout to its growing order book as global transportation provider Penske has signed on to help demonstrate the former’s PC-7 electric truck to its customers and help facilitate sales.

2024 is proving to be a fruitful year for REE Automotive ($REE) as the modular EV startup continues to take massive orders for its vehicles as it scales production. The company’s flagship model, the PC-7 chassis cab, began initial deliveries this past January after receiving certification from the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) – the first “x-by-wire” vehicle to do so.

In March, REE closed a public offering of ordinary shares totaling nearly $15 million while announcing a new collaboration with Airbus. Weeks later, the PC-7 became eligible for CARB credits, qualifying the EV for up to $100,000 in incentives for fleet customers while adding more sales potential to its order book, which sat at over $40 million as of October 2023.

Today, REE has announced a new partnership with Penske, which will help promote and sell REE’s electric trucks to its customers.

  • Penske electric truck
  • Penske electric truck
  • Penske electric truck

Penske, REE to share more electric truck plans at ACT Expo

Per REE, Penske Truck Leasing has signed on as a new partner to offer electric trucks “Powered by REE” to fleet customers across North America who are interested in going electric. The move adds potential to REE’s EV order book, which currently sits at around $50 million.

The PC-7 electric trucks Penske will promote have been fitted with a 16-foot DuraPlate body with a ramp from Wabash, who helped optimize the EVs to suit the needs of Penske customers. REE co-founder and CEO Daniel Barel elaborated:

Today’s announcement is a testament to the synergy between REE’s revolutionary technology and Penske’s commitment to leading in the transportation and logistics industry. This is the fruit of a long collaboration and incorporation of Penske’s voice of the customer. We are currently working on additional P7-C configurations to maximize utilization within Penske’s large product offering. By partnering with Wabash for this upfit, we believe that we were able to provide a superior product to Penske, meeting their requirements as well as expanding our roster of upfitters that can seamlessly integrate with REE’s platforms.

The “Powered by REE” Penske electric truck will be displayed at the REE booth at the ACT Expo in Las Vegas later this month. Furthermore, REE and Penske said they will hold a joint press conference during the expo to “expand on the collaboration.” We will learn more during that event, scheduled for May 22 at 12:45 PM PT.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

House Democrat presses oil CEOs for details of Trump’s fundraising dinner at Mar-a-Lago

Published

on

By

House Democrat presses oil CEOs for details of Trump's fundraising dinner at Mar-a-Lago

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Accountability hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on September 28, 2023.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

The House Oversight Committee’s top Democrat asked oil executives to reveal whether former President Donald Trump had proposed a “quid-pro-quo” arrangement to them at a recent Florida fundraising dinner, according to letters released Tuesday by Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.

The letters arose from a Washington Post report that Trump hosted the executives for dinner Apr. 11 at his private club, Mar-a-Lago. “You all are wealthy enough,” Trump reportedly told the assembled guests. “You should raise $1 billion to return me to the White House.”

The former president then reportedly told the oil executives that if they helped him win another term as president, he would reverse the Biden administration’s freeze on permits for liquefied natural gas exports, auction more oil drilling leases in the Gulf of Mexico and roll back rules on auto emissions.

The reporting raises “significant potential ethical, campaign finance, and legal issues,” Raskin wrote.

The issues “flow from the effective sale of American energy and regulatory policy to commercial interests in return for large campaign contributions,” wrote Raskin, who is the ranking Democrat on the Oversight Committee.

Raskin asked the executives to provide descriptions of any discussions related to policy proposals or campaign finance they had at the dinner, as well as any efforts by the CEOs’ respective companies to support Trump’s campaign.

A general view of Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property, ahead of his watch party event to mark the Super Tuesday primary elections, in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S. March 5, 2024. 

Marco Bello | Reuters

The letters were sent to Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods, Continental Resources CEO Robert Lawler, Chesapeake Energy CEO Domenic Dell’Osso, Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub, Venture Global CEO Mike Sabel, Cheniere Energy CEO Jack Fusco, EQT CEO Toby Rice and the CEO of major oil lobby American Petroleum Institute Mike Sommers.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the congressional request.

Trump would hardly be the first presidential candidate who made campaign promises to certain groups in order as he asked for donations.

But the wining and dining of executives from just one industry at a candidate’s residence, like Mar-a-Lago, raised eyebrows.

Corporations are prohibited from donating directly to presidential candidates. They can contribute to PACs and their employees’ can make private donations, but neither can do so if the donation is intended as a bribe in exchange for favorable treatment.

Despite Raskin’s demands, and his deadline of May 27 for responses, as long as Republicans hold the House majority there is very little that Raskin can do to force any of the oil execs to turn over information.

Nonetheless, Raskin’s decision to demand answers from Trump’s dinner guests could potentially benefit his fellow Democrats in a different way.

That’s because corporate executives typically go to great lengths to avoid becoming the targets of congressional requests for information.

The prospect of getting caught up in Raskin’s inquiry could potentially be enough to make some private sector leaders reconsider whether to accept an invitation to a small, Trump fundraising dinner.

Continue Reading

Environment

Toyota once again ranked as worst automaker on climate lobbying globally

Published

on

By

Toyota once again ranked as worst automaker on climate lobbying globally

Toyota has the worst climate lobbying score of any automaker, and the third-worst 2030 EV production plans, according to InfluenceMap’s annual report on climate lobbying.

Another year, another report showing how bad Toyota is for the environment.

Toyota has routinely ranked at the bottom of InfluenceMap’s climate policy engagement rankings, and this year is no different.

InfluenceMap routinely ranks automakers and auto industry associations based on how much they lobby to stop climate policy goals. These rankings don’t just show automakers’ EV plans, but also show how much each automaker is doing to try to stop governments from protecting the populace from pollution.

Some of this lobbying comes from automakers themselves, and some of it comes from their membership in trade associations, which aggregate the positions of several companies to increase lobbying power.

InfluenceMap looks at the actions of these trade associations across the globe, and ranks automakers based on how many associations they’re a member of, how many briefs they’ve filed in favor of or against various climate policy goals, and what their plans are for the future of their manufacturing.

This is broken down into an “organization score” (how much the organization itself lobbies), “relationship score” (membership in trade organizations and how positive their lobbying efforts are), “engagement intensity” (how involved in lobbying the corporation is), and what the manufacturer’s EV manufacturing plans total up to.

Tesla led the list, but only received a “B” score because of its low engagement intensity. While Tesla supports positive climate policy and is generally a member of groups pushing positive instead of negative climate policy, it doesn’t lobby as much as other organizations do (a situation that may be made worse by the departure of Tesla’s policy head in April).

Some other automakers were given kudos for occasional positive moves, like Ford, GM, VW and Mercedes. But pretty much nobody got what could be considered a passing score – with “C-” grades or worse for all but three automakers.

And as usual, the Japanese automakers are ranked among the lowest. The Japanese EV industry has been slow to electrify, putting an important national industry at risk. Nissan is the standout from amongst the Japanese, but it still did not receive a passing grade.

On production plans, most automakers score poorly, with only 3 of the 15 automakers analyzed having commitments compatible with the International Energy Agency’s target of 66% EVs by 2030. This number is necessary to have any chance of limiting climate change to 1.5ºC. Forecasts suggest the industry will only produce 53% EVs by 2030 at current pace.

Toyota does not actually rank last place on this measure – Honda and Suzuki are behind it. But given the intensity of Toyota’s negative climate lobbying, it gets the crown for worst automaker on climate once again, continuing the several years it has worn it.

For more detail into the rankings, read the full InfluenceMap report here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending