Published
2 years agoon
By
adminThis image shows how the sun’s appearance changes between solar maximum (on the left) and solar minimum (on the right). (Image credit: NASA/Solar Dynamics Observatory)
From a distance, the sun may seem calm and steady. But zoom in, and our home star is actually in a perpetual state of flux, transforming over time from a uniform sea of fire to a chaotic jumble of warped plasma and back again in a recurring cycle.
Every 11 years or so, the sun’s magnetic field gets tangled up like a ball of tightly wound rubber bands until it eventually snaps and completely flips — turning the north pole into the south pole and vice versa. In the lead-up to this gargantuan reversal, the sun amps up its activity: belching out fiery blobs of plasma, growing dark planet-size spots and emitting streams of powerful radiation.
This period of increased activity, known as solar maximum, is also a potentially perilous time for Earth, which gets bombarded by solar storms that can disrupt communications, damage power infrastructure, harm some living creatures (including astronauts) and send satellites plummeting toward the planet.
And some scientists think the next solar maximum may be coming sooner — and be much more powerful — than we thought.
Originally, scientists predicted that the current solar cycle would peak in 2025. But a bumper crop of sunspots, solar storms and rare solar phenomena suggest solar maximum could arrive by the end of this year at the earliest — and several experts told Live Science we are poorly prepared.
Related: 10 signs the sun is gearing up for its explosive peak — the solar maximum What causes the solar cycle?
Approximately every 11 years, the sun goes from a low point in solar activity, known as solar minimum, to solar maximum and back again. It’s not clear exactly why the sun’s cycles last this long, but astronomers have noted the pattern ever since the first, aptly named Solar Cycle 1, which occurred between 1755 and 1766. The current cycle, Solar Cycle 25, officially began in December 2019, according to NASA.
So what causes our home star’s fluctuation? “It all comes down to the sun’s magnetic field,” Alex James, a solar physicist at University College London in the U.K., told Live Science.
At solar minimum, the sun’s magnetic field is strong and organized, with two clear poles like a normal dipole magnet, James said. The magnetic field acts as a “giant forcefield” that contains the sun’s superheated plasma, or ionized gas, close to the surface, suppressing solar activity, he added.
A butterfly-shaped coronal mass ejection explodes from the sun’s far side on March 10. (Image credit: NASA/Solar and Heliospheric Observatory)
But the magnetic field slowly gets tangled, with some regions becoming more magnetized than others, James said. As a result, the sun’s magnetic field gradually weakens, and solar activity begins to ramp up: Plasma rises from the star’s surface and forms massive magnetized horseshoes, known as coronal loops, that pepper the sun’s lower atmosphere. These fiery ribbons can then snap as the sun’s magnetic field realigns, releasing bright flashes of light and radiation, known as solar flares. Sometimes, flares also bring enormous, magnetized clouds of fast-moving particles, known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs).
A few years after the maximum, the sun’s magnetic field “snaps” and then completely flips. This ushers in the end of the cycle and the beginning of a new solar minimum, James said.
Related: Could a solar storm ever destroy Earth?
To determine where we are in the solar cycle, researchers monitor sunspots — darker, cooler, circular patches of our local star’s surface where coronal loops form.
“Sunspots appear when strong magnetic fields poke through the surface of the sun,” James said. “By looking at those sunspots we can get an idea of how strong and complex the sun’s magnetic field is at that moment.”
A time-lapse image of two major sunspot groups moving across the surface of the sun between Dec. 2 and Dec. 27, 2022. (Image credit: Şenol Şanlı)
Sunspots are almost completely absent at solar minimum and increase in numbers until a peak at solar maximum, but there’s a lot of variation from cycle to cycle.
“Every cycle is different,” James said.Solar Cycle 25
In April 2019, the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, which is made up of dozens of scientists from NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), released its forecast for Solar Cycle 25, suggesting that the solar maximum would likely begin sometime in 2025 and would be comparable in size to the maximum of Solar Cycle 24, which peaked unusually late between mid-2014 and early 2016 and was quite weak compared with past solar maximums.
But from the beginning, the forecast seemed off. For instance, the number of observed sunspots has been much higher than predicted.
In December 2022, the sun reached an eight-year sunspot peak. And in January 2023, scientists observed more than twice as many sunspots as NASA had predicted (143 observed versus 63 estimated), with the numbers staying nearly as high over the following months. In total, the number of observed sunspots has exceeded the predicted number for 27 months in a row.
While the bounty of sunspots is a major red flag, they are not the only evidence solar maximum could be here soon.
The ghostly lines of the sun’s corona, or upper atmosphere, were clearly visible during a “hybrid eclipse” on April 20. The red ring surrounds a CME that erupted the same day. (Image credit: Petr Horálek, Josef Kujal, Milan Hlaváč)
Another key indicator of solar activity is the number and intensity of solar flares. In 2022, there were fivefold more C-class and M-class solar flares than there were in 2021, and year on year, the number of the most powerful, X-class solar flares is also increasing, according to SpaceWeatherLive.com. The first half of 2023 logged more X-class flares than in all of 2022, and at least one has directly hit Earth. (Solar flare classes include A, B, C, M and X, with each class being at least 10 times more powerful than the previous one.)
Related: 10 solar storms that blew us away in 2022
Solar flares can also bring geomagnetic storms — major disturbances of Earth’s magnetosphere caused by solar wind or CMEs. For instance, on March 24, a “stealth” CME hit Earth without warning and triggered the most powerful geomagnetic storm in more than six years, which created vast auroras, or northern lights, that were visible in more than 30 U.S. states. An overall increase in the number of geomagnetic storms this year has also caused the temperature in the thermosphere — the second-highest layer of Earth’s atmosphere ― to reach a 20-year peak.
Rare solar phenomena also become increasingly common near solar maximum — and several have happened in recent months. On March 9, a 60,000-mile-tall (96,560 kilometers) plasma waterfall rose above and then fell back towards the sun; on Feb. 2 an enormous polar vortex, or ring of fire, swirled around the sun’s north pole for more than 8 hours; and in March, a “solar tornado” raged for three days and stood taller than 14 Earths stacked on top of each other.
All this evidence suggests that the solar maximum is “going to peak earlier and it’s going to peak higher than expected,” James told Live Science. This opinion is shared by many other solar physicists, experts told Live Science.Image 1 of 4A “plasma waterfall” rained down on the solar surface on March 9. (Image credit: Eduardo Schaberger Poupeau) A CME measuring around 1 million miles erupted from the sun in September 2022. (Image credit: Andrew McCarthy) A towering “solar tornado” raged on the sun’s surface for three days in March. (Image credit: NASA/SDO/composite by Steve Spaleta) A never-before-seen “polar vortex” appeared around the sun’s north pole on Feb. 2.in (Image credit: NASA/ Solar Dynamics Observatory)
The exact start to solar maximum will likely only be obvious once it has passed and solar activity decreases. However, one research group led by Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist and deputy director of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, has predicted the solar maximum could peak later this year.
Past cycles suggest the solar maximum may last for somewhere between one and two years, though scientists don’t know for sure. Potential impacts on Earth
So, the solar maximum may be coming on stronger and sooner than we anticipated. Why does that matter?
The answer primarily depends on whether solar storms barrel into Earth, Tzu-Wei Fang, a researcher at NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center who was not part of the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel, told Live Science. To hit Earth, solar storms must be pointing in the right direction at the right time. Increases in solar activity make this more likely but don’t guarantee the planet will be slammed with more storms, she added.
But if a solar storm does hit, it can ionize Earth’s upper atmosphere and fuel radio and satellite blackouts. Big storms that block the planet’s connections to satellites can temporarily wipe out long-range radio and GPS systems for up to half the planet, Fang said. On its own, that is just a minor inconvenience, but if a lengthy blackout coincided with a major disaster, such as an earthquake or tsunami, the results could be catastrophic, she added.
Strong solar storms can also generate ground-based electrical currents that can damage metallic infrastructure, including older power grids and rail lines, Fang said.
Airplane passengers may also be walloped by higher levels of radiation during solar storms, although it’s not clear if the doses would be high enough to have any health impacts, Fang said. However, such spikes in radiation would be much more significant for astronauts onboard spacecraft, such as the International Space Station or the upcoming Artemis mission to the moon. As a result, “future missions should factor solar cycles into consideration,” she added.
Related: Could a powerful solar storm wipe out the internet?
Past research has also revealed that geomagnetic storms can disrupt the migrations of gray whales and other animals that rely on the Earth’s magnetic field lines to navigate, such as sea turtles and some birds, which can have disastrous consequences.
This blurry image of auroras was taken from an airplane window during a major geomagentic storm on March 24. (Image credit: Dakota Snider)
An ionized upper atmosphere also becomes denser, which can create additional drag for Earth-orbiting satellites. This extra drag can push satellites into each other or force them out of orbit. For instance, In February 2022, 40 of SpaceX’s Starlink satellites burned up in Earth’s atmosphere when they plummeted to Earth during a geomagnetic storm the day after they were launched.
And the number of satellites has exponentially increased compared with past solar cycles, Fang said. Most are operated by commercial companies that rarely factor space weather into satellite design or launch schedules, she added.
“Companies want to launch satellites as soon as they can to make sure they don’t delay rocket launches,” Fang said. “Sometimes it’s better for them to launch a group and lose half than not launch at all.” This all raises the risks of major collisions or deorbiting satellites during the solar maximum, she added.
The chances of a once-in-a-century superstorm, such as the Carrington Event in 1859, also slightly increase during solar maximum, Fang said. While a long shot, such a storm could cause trillions of dollars’ worth of damage and majorly impact everyday life, she added.
Humans can do little to shield ourselves from a direct solar storm hit, but we can prepare for them by altering satellite trajectories, grounding planes and identifying vulnerable infrastructure, Fang said. As a result, more accurate solar weather forecasts are needed to help us prepare for the worst, she addedWhy were the forecasts wrong?
If so many clues point to solar maximum being stronger and earlier than predicted, why didn’t scientists see it coming? Part of the problem is the way the prediction panels come up with their forecasts, Scott McIntosh told Live Science.
NASA and NOAA’s models have barely changed in the last 30 years, “but the science has,” McIntosh said. The models use data from past solar cycles such as sunspot number and cycle length, but do not fully account for each cycle’s individual progression, he added.
Related: When will the sun explode?
“It’s kind of like a big game of pin the tail on the donkey,” McIntosh said, where the “donkey” is the upcoming solar maximum and the prediction panel has blindfolded themselves by not using all available methods at their disposal.
McIntosh and colleagues have proposed an alternative way to predict the strength of an upcoming solar maximum: so-called “solar terminators,” which occur right at the end of each solar minimum after the sun’s magnetic field has already flipped.
During solar minimum, a localized magnetic field, which is left behind from the sun’s magnetic-field flip, surrounds the sun’s equator. This localized field prevents the sun’s main magnetic field from growing stronger and getting tangled up, meaning the localized field essentially acts like a handbrake preventing solar activity from increasing.
But suddenly and without warning, this localized field disappears, releasing the brake and enabling solar activity to ramp up. This drastic change is what the team dubbed solar cycle termination events, or terminators. (Because solar terminators occur at the exact moment solar minimums end, they occur after each solar cycle has officially begun.)
Looking back over centuries of data, the team identified 14 individual solar terminators that preceded the start of solar maximums. The researchers noticed that the timing of these terminators correlates with the strength of the subsequent solar peaks. (The early years of data are sparse, so the team couldn’t identify solar terminators in every cycle.)
A graph showing the effects of solar terminators on solar cycle progression. The blurry sections represent solar minimum, and the dashed lines show terminator events. Solar activity sharply rises after solar terminators occur. (Image credit: McIntosh etl al. 2003)
For example, the terminator at the start of Solar Cycle 24 happened later than expected, which allowed for less magnetic field growth during Solar Cycle 24, resulting in a weaker solar maximum. But the terminator at the start of Solar Cycle 25, which occurred on Dec. 13, 2021, was earlier than expected, which the researchers took as a sign that the solar maximum would be stronger than the previous one. Ever since the 2021 terminator, solar activity has been ramping up faster than expected. RELATED STORIES—Puzzle of the sun’s mysterious ‘heartbeat’ signals finally solved
—Sun’s fiery surface revealed in amazing composite of 90,000 images
—Mini sun with simulated gravity could help prepare us for deadly solar storms
The way Solar Cycle 25 is progressing suggests that solar terminators could be the best way of predicting future solar cycles, McIntosh said. In July 2022, NASA acknowledged the work done by McIntosh and colleagues and noted that solar activity seemed to be ramping up sooner than expected.
Still, NASA hasn’t updated its 2025 forecast in light of McIntosh’s data and is probably not going to incorporate terminators into future forecasts, McIntosh predicted. “I think they will just stick with their models.”
You may like
Politics
UK and US have ‘balanced’ trading relationship after Trump tariff threat, No 10 says
Published
2 hours agoon
February 3, 2025By
adminThe UK and the US have a “fair and balanced trading relationship”, Number 10 has said, after Donald Trump claimed the UK is “out of line”.
The American president suggested he is ready to impose tariffs on both the UK and the EU after he announced 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada, and 10% on China.
The FTSE 100 index of leading UK shares fell sharply on Monday morning after Mr Trump was asked if he will slap levies on Britain too.
He replied: “UK is out of line but I’m sure that one… I think that one can be worked out.”
Politics latest: Starmer meeting EU leaders in post-Brexit milestone
Reacting to that comment, a UK government spokesman said: “The US is an indispensable ally and one of our closest trading partners, and we have a fair and balanced trading relationship which benefits both sides of the Atlantic.
“We look forward to working closely with President Trump to continue to build on UK-US trading relations for our economy, businesses and the British people.”
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
The US represents 18% (£300bn) of the UK’s trade and the countries are each other’s single largest investors with £1.2trn invested in each other’s economies.
Read more:
How Trump’s tariffs could impact US consumers and UK
Breaking economies could be first step for expansionist Trump
Canada and Mexico hit back with retaliatory tariffs
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:41
Mr Trump’s comments and the subsequent market fallout, also seen in Europe, are set to overshadow Sir Keir Starmer becoming the first UK leader to meet all 27 EU chiefs since Brexit.
UK ministers have previously suggested the country could avoid US tariffs as it does not have a trade deficit with Britain.
Despite his threat, Mr Trump had positive words for the UK when he said discussions with the prime minister have “been very nice”.
“We’ve had a couple of meetings. We’ve had numerous phone calls. We’re getting along very well,” he said.
However, he said tariffs will “definitely” be placed on goods from the EU as he said America’s trade deficit with the bloc is “an atrocity” and “they take almost nothing and we take everything from them”.
Following Mr Trump revealing levies on Canada, Mexico and China, but before his UK and EU tariff comments, Sir Keir said: “It is early days. What I want to see is strong trading relations.
“In the discussions that I have had with President Trump, that is what we have centred on – a strong trading relationship.”
Canada, Mexico and China have all vowed to slap tariffs on US goods, sparking fears of a global trade war.
World
Migrant crossings: Why are more people crossing the Channel on the weekend?
Published
2 hours agoon
February 3, 2025By
adminMore people are crossing the English Channel in small boats on the weekend. Our data analysis shows last year 40% of the total number of arrivals happened on a Saturday or Sunday.
We have been looking into possible reasons why many more people are arriving in small boats on the weekend, and the explanation might not be quite what you expect.
Here are a few theories.
French staffing and resources
One suggestion is that French border force, police and coastguard are not working to a consistent level seven days a week.
“Gangs have realised there are lower or less engaged staffing on weekends on the French side,” a former senior Home Office official who worked closely on deals with the French told Sky News.
A former immigration minister said they found it “frustrating” that “we were paying the French but weren’t able to specify operational deployments”.
More on Migrant Crisis
Related Topics:
They said it would “not surprise me if the French had fewer people at the weekend and the people smugglers have come to realise that”.
Hundreds of millions have been given by the UK to France to police the Calais coast, most recently almost £500m in 2023.
Another former senior government official with responsibility for borders said the French would be able to demonstrate that “hundreds or thousands of officers are working there” but “strategically it suits France to have the gust with us”.
But when we put this to the French side there was a pushback.
Marc de Fleurian, the Calais MP from Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party, says “blaming the other side of the Channel” is the “easy answer”.
He said it’s “cowardly to say it’s the other side’s fault”.
Read more:
UK to introduce ‘world first’ sanctions regime to target smugglers
Can government make bold plan bite?
Starmer’s year to prove he can deliver on small boats
Pierre Henri Dumont, who was the Calais MP from 2017-2024, said: “The reality is you can have as many police officers as you want, but people will cross the Channel. If you have eight rather than 100 police officers that won’t change anything at all.”
A French coastguard source told Sky News there are the same staffing levels at the weekend, he says “any suggestion there is less staffing on the weekends is laughable and an easy thing to say”.
Sir Keir Starmer’s spokesman said the government’s work with the French saw “more than 28,000 dangerous unnecessary crossing attempts prevented last year”.
He added French law enforcing officers “routinely patrol beaches on weekends as well as during the week”.
Smuggler planning
Smuggler supply chains might be linked to a specific day for a range of reasons, for example, as one former senior Home Office official suggests, the fact “boat engines, or parts, might arrive on a Friday”.
Mr Dumont says smuggling networks rely on people to do small jobs, like transporting boats, who may also have day jobs in the week. He says the reasons behind the weekend uptick “are not necessarily predictable ones”.
Another factor may be that because French police tend not to intervene once a boat is in the water, many small boats set off from inland waterways. The canal-type waterways which come inland before the Channel are often full of fishing boats on weekdays, making it easier to launch from the waterways on weekends.
Another suggestion from a Home Office source is that while many migrants who cross the channel are based in the camps around Calais, many use public transport to arrive for a timed departure and are therefore reliant on transport timetables which may be more limited at different times of the week.
Weather coincidence
Leaked Home Office analysis shows that of the number of weekend days where small boat crossings were more likely because of good weather conditions was disproportionately high last year.
The figures show that 61 out of 197 days where the weather meant there was a realistic possibility, likely or highly likely there would be a channel crossing were weekend days. However, we only have figures for 2024, and it seems unlikely the weather alone could account for three years of higher crossings on weekend days.
World
Donald Trump’s tariffs: What’s going on and what does it all mean?
Published
2 hours agoon
February 3, 2025By
adminDonald Trump has ordered sweeping tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China, kicking off a trade war that will affect the globe.
Here we look at the tariffs and what they all mean for the world:
What did Trump announce?
The US president has confirmed that goods from Mexico and Canada will face 25% tariffs, while 10% taxes will be implemented on imports from China.
Canadian energy, including oil, natural gas and electricity, will be taxed at a 10% rate.
Trade war latest: Follow live updates
The levies are expected to all take effect on Tuesday, with Mexico and Canada both announcing counter-tariffs of their own in response.
Mr Trump has also threatened to go further, saying tariffs on the European Union would be implemented “pretty soon”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:36
When questioned about the UK, the president said Britain was “out of line” when it came to trade but he thought the situation could be “worked out” without the use of tariffs.
What are tariffs, and how do they work?
Put simply, tariffs are taxes on goods that are brought in from other countries.
By raising the price of imports, tariffs aim to protect domestic manufacturers by making locally made goods cheaper.
Contrary to what Mr Trump has said, it is not foreign countries that pay tariffs, but the importing companies that buy the goods.
For example, American businesses like Walmart or Target pay tariffs directly to the US treasury.
In the US, these tariffs are collected by customs and border protection agents, who are stationed at 328 ports of entry across the country.
To compensate for tariffs, companies then put up their prices, so customers end up paying more for goods.
Tariffs can also damage foreign countries as it makes their products pricier and harder to sell.
This can lead to them cutting prices (and sacrificing profits) to offset levies and maintain their market share in the US.
Why is Trump doing this?
Mr Trump has argued that imposing higher levies will help reduce illegal migration and the smuggling of the synthetic opioid fentanyl to the US.
On Mexico, the US leader claimed drug traffickers and the country’s government “have an intolerable alliance” that in turn impacts national security.
He further claimed that Mexican drug cartels are operating in Canada.
On China, he said the country’s government provides a “safe haven” for criminal organisations.
He has also pledged to use tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing.
“We may have short term some little pain, and people understand that. But long term, the United States has been ripped off by virtually every country in the world,” he said.
His aim appears to be to force governments in those countries to work much harder to prevent what he calls illegal migration and the smuggling of the deadly drug fentanyl. But, even if the countries do not do what America wants, it will still potentially benefit firms that produce goods in the US.
What could the consequences be?
Mexico and Canada are two of America’s largest trading partners, with the tariffs upending decades-old trade relationships.
Goods that could be affected most by the incoming tariffs include fruit and veg, petrol and oil, cars and vehicle parts and electronic goods.
New analysis by the Budget Lab at Yale University found that the average US household would lose the equivalent of $1,170 US dollars (£944) in income from the tariffs.
Read more: This is how US consumers will be affected
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:10
The research also found that economic growth would slow and inflation would worsen, as the tariffs forced up prices.
Immediate consequences were felt on Monday morning, as shares on Asian markets took a tumble.
Japan’s Nikkei opened down 2.9% while Australia’s benchmark – often a proxy trade for Chinese markets – fell 1.8%. Stocks in Hong Kong, which include listings of Chinese companies, fell 1.1%.
UK stocks were also significantly down, with the benchmark FTSE 100 index – containing the most valuable companies on the London Stock Exchange – dropped more than 1.3% on the open.
In Europe, stock markets opened sharply lower while the euro slid 1.3%. The Europe-wide index of companies, the Stoxx 600 dropped as much as 1.5%.
While Mexico’s peso hit its lowest in nearly three years.
‘Very scary path’
Sky News’ data and economics editor Ed Conway said the long term consequences of a trade war is that “everyone gets poorer”, which is what happened to the world before World War Two.
“As countries get poorer, they get frustrated and you get more nationalism,” Conway said, speaking on Friday’s Sky News Daily podcast.
“This is exactly what happened in the 1930s, and the world ended up at war with each other. It is a very, very scary path, and yes, we are basically on a potential of that path.”
However, Conway added that one positive of Mr Trump’s tariffs could be highlighting “massive imbalances” within the global economy.
He said Mr Trump may be able to shift the conversation to problems that “economists don’t want to talk about”.
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈
“At the moment, we have a dysfunctional global economy,” he explained.
“You have got massive imbalances like trade deficits [when a country’s imports exceeds the value of its exports] and trade surpluses [when a country’s exports exceeds the cost of its imports].
“There might well be a better way of everyone getting together and having a conversation and working out how to align their affairs, so we don’t have these imbalances in the future.
“And tariffs help to get you to this point.”
How has the world reacted?
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reacted strongly against Mr Trump’s tariffs, saying his country would impose 25% tariffs on $155bn Canadian dollars (£85.9bn) of US goods in response.
He added that the move would split the two countries apart, and urged Canadians to choose domestic products rather than American ones.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:50
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum posted on X to say she had ordered her economy minister to implement tariff and non-tariff measures to defend Mexico’s interests.
She said her government “categorically rejects” the claim that it has “alliances with criminal organisations” and called on the White House to “fight the sale of drugs on the streets of their major cities”.
Meanwhile, China has claimed the US action violates World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, and vowed to bring a case before the body that governs global commerce.
It also threatened to take “necessary counter-measures to defend its legitimate rights and interests”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:59
A spokesperson for the UK government reiterated that the US is an “indispensable ally” and one of the country’s “closest trading partners”.
They added that the trading relationship was “fair and balanced”, after Mr Trump criticised the UK, saying it was “out of line”.
European Union (EU) leaders have also taken a strong stance against looming US tariffs.
Kaja Kallas, the chief of foreign policy for the bloc, said there were no winners in a trade war, and if the US and Europe started one “then the one laughing on the side is China”.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz added that the EU is strong enough to “respond to tariffs with our own tariffs”, while French President Emmanuel Macron said declarations by the US were pushing Europe to be “stronger and more united”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:31
What’s the history of trade wars?
Imposing tariffs is not new to Mr Trump, or the US for that matter.
During his first term in the White House, he imposed higher levies on China and Vietnam.
In 2018, he imposed 25% tariffs on imported steel and 10% on imported aluminium from most countries, a response to what he said was the unfair impact of Chinese steel driving down prices and negatively affecting the US steel industry.
China then hit back with retaliatory tariffs on US imports, including 15% on 120 American products such as fruits, nuts, wine and steel pipes and a 25% tariff on US pork and recycled aluminium.
Before that, democrat Jimmy Carter went so far as to completely ban the sale of wheat to Russia, which remained in effect until Ronald Reagan ended it in 1981.
Read more:
Breaking economies could be just Trump’s first step
Trump’s changed tack to focus on Mexico and Canada – why?
Toronto Raptors fans boo US national anthem
In 2019, Mr Trump also used the threat of tariffs as leverage to persuade Mexico to crack down on migrants crossing Mexican territory on their way to the US.
A study by economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Zurich, Harvard and the World Bank concluded that Mr Trump’s tariffs the first time around failed to restore jobs to the American heartland.
The tariffs “neither raised nor lowered US employment” when they were supposed to protect jobs, according to Sky News’ US partner network NBC News.
Trending
-
Sports2 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports10 months ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway