Connect with us

Published

on

Lawmakers are looking ahead to the 2024 election as a pivotal opportunity to shape the future of the Supreme Court because of the possibility that conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, 75, and Samuel Alito, 73, could retire.  

Democrats are worried that if Biden loses and the GOP wins the Senate majority, it could allow a GOP president to replace both men with younger conservatives who could rule far into the future.  

“It’s critical. President Biden, who I feel confident will be reelected, needs to be able to put more judges on the bench, federal judges, including Supreme Court. It is absolutely critical that the Senate remain in Democratic hands,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who will retire at the end of next year.   

Stabenow warned that if Republicans flip the White House and Senate and replace Thomas and Alito with younger conservatives, “it would be devastating for anyone who cares about privacy and their own personal freedom,” alluding to last year’s 6-3 Supreme Court opinion that overturned the constitutional right to an abortion and raised questions about other rights protected by the 14th Amendment.   

Republicans also see high stakes in next year’s elections because of the court.  

“Probably the next president will have a chance to appoint another member of the court,” said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I expect that you’d see, over the course between now and the end of the next [presidential] term, probably another retirement or two.”  

Hawley said replacing older conservatives such as Thomas and Alito with younger ones could create an “enduring majority,” but he cautioned that it’s tough to predict how a justice’s opinions might evolve over years on the Supreme Court.   

“Republicans have had the majority of Supreme Court appointments for decades now and have not succeeded in getting a stable conservative majority on that court until very recently,” he said. “Does the next election matter for the court? I think it really does. I don’t know how much of a [conservative] majority it is. I don’t know how stable it is.”  

Republican appointees now hold a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice John Roberts, 68, emerging as the most likely swing vote since the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018.  

Among the Democratic appointees, Obama-nominated Justice Sonia Sotomayor, 69, is the oldest. Justice Elena Kagan, another Obama appointee, is 63 and Ketanji Brown Jackson, whom President Biden put on the court, is 52.   

The remaining three justices, Neil Gorsuch, 55, Brett Kavanaugh, 58, and Amy Coney Barrett, 51, were appointed by former President Trump.

The Supreme Court’s importance to the balance of political power in the United States was underscored once again Tuesday, when a 6-3 majority ruled to reject a legal theory that would have given state legislatures nearly unlimited power to set rules for federal elections, without judicial restraint.  

It was another decision that showed justices don’t always march in line with the party of the president who appointed them. Roberts wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by the court’s three liberals as well as Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh. Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch dissented.   

The conservative majority now on the court is likely to be there for some time, regardless of what happens with Alito and Thomas.  

An analysis of the court’s projected composition by academics at three prestigious schools suggested the next time the majority of justices will be appointed by a Democrat is likely to be around 2065.   

It found that the Democrats’ failure to confirm Obama-nominee Merrick Garland in 2016, combined with the death in 2016 of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was quickly replaced by Trump, “reduced its likely control of the court by about 19 years out of the next 100 and increased the number of years until the party takes control again by 36 years.”  

The study caught the attention of judicial reform advocates on both sides of the ideological spectrum who say it further highlights the stakes of next year’s presidential and Senate races.  

“I do think that the 2024 election is important. I do think Alito and Thomas will be getting up there in age, and there’s quite a real possibility that replacements for them could be in order in the next four-year presidential window,” said Brian Fallon, co-founder and executive director of Demand Justice, which seeks to restore “ideological balance and legitimacy” to the courts.  

Fallon noted that prominent Republicans dropped hints about wanting to see Thomas retire while Trump was president.  

“It’s hugely important to win the upcoming election, and I think the court will be more salient of an issue than ever,” he said. “It’s important to win the next election because if there is going be an opportunity to replace a Thomas or Alito, you don’t want to miss it by not winning a Senate race here or there and preventing us from filling a seat. But we shouldn’t delude ourselves into thinking that the court’s balance is going to be shifted anytime soon just by winning a few elections.”  

Carrie Campbell Severino, the president of JCN, a conservative advocacy group that favors “the Founders’ vision of a nation of limited government” observed that “if the next president has the opportunity to appoint a Supreme Court justice, that person could easily serve another 30 years.”  

She also questioned whether a conservate majority on the Supreme Court will really last as long as some studies have predicted. “It strikes me as pretty optimistic,” she said.  

Senate Democrats have an uphill battle to keep their majority after the 2024 election; they have to defend three highly vulnerable seats in Ohio, Montana and West Virginia, while Republicans don’t have any seats in real danger of flipping.   

Democrats also have to worry about the future of independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s (Ariz.) seat, which now counts in the Democrats’ column for the purpose of determining the majority. She hasn’t said whether she will run for reelection.   

The battle for the White House also is seen as a jump ball.    Watch live: Blinken discusses Biden administration foreign policy at Council on Foreign Relations Economic optimism best since early 2022, Gallup finds

A Morning Consult poll published Tuesday showed Trump leading Biden in a hypothetical matchup for the first time, 44 percent to 41 percent.  

The same poll showed Trump trouncing his nearest Republican rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, 57 percent to 19 percent, among 3,650 potential Republican primary voters nationwide.  

A Morning Consult poll in April showed Biden leading Trump by 1 percentage point. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform UK tops landmark poll for first time

Published

on

By

Reform UK tops landmark poll for first time

Reform have topped a Sky News/YouGov poll for the first time as the party continues to shake up British politics.

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has edged in front on 25%, with Labour pushed into second on 24% and the Tories on 21%.

The YouGov poll, taken on Sunday and Monday, also puts the Lib Dems on 14% and Greens on 9%.

Watch and follow reaction and analysis live in the Politics Hub

Reform have overtaken Labour in the latest Sky News/YouGov poll

All the polling moves that push Reform UK to the top for the first time this week are within the margin of error and the overall picture remains unchanged – with Britain in a new period of three party politics in the polls.

However, the symbolism of Reform UK topping the poll is likely to be seized on by MPs from all parties.

More on Conservatives

One in five Tory voters at the last election would now vote for Reform.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is Reform UK winning the ‘bro vote’?

The Tories are likely to be the hardest hit by the poll, having been in third place since YouGov restarted polling after the general election.

The Sky News/YouGov poll also found Kemi Badenoch has slipped behind Nigel Farage when voters are asked whether they have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of the leaders.

Last month, Badenoch has a net favourability rating of -25, but that has now dropped to -29 this month.

This puts her below Farage, who had a net favourability rating of -32 last month, which has now risen to -27 this month.

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch giving a speech at 116 Pall Mall.
Pic: PA
Image:
Kemi Badenoch has fallen behind Nigel Farage in terms of net favourability rating. Pic: PA

Keir Starmer is less popular than both Farage and Badenoch, with his net favourability rating now at -36.

Lib Dem leader Ed Davey is much more popular, with his net favourability rating now at -9 – although this is not directly translated across into voting intention.

These figures are likely to restart the debate in the Tory party about whether they should consider merging with Reform UK, something which Badenoch has repeatedly rejected.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer is less popular than both Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage. Pic: PA

A total of 43% of those polled who voted Tory in the last general election support a merger, compared with 31% against.

Reform UK voters are more likely to oppose, with 40% against and 31% for.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer must delicately balance his risky EU reset as UK braces for Trump’s next move on tariffs

Published

on

By

Starmer must delicately balance his risky EU reset as UK braces for Trump's next move on tariffs

As Donald Trump kicks off his threatened trade war by slapping tariffs on both friends and foes alike, Number 10 is preparing for the moment he turns his attention to the UK.

The unpredictability of the returning president, emboldened by a second term, means the prime minister must plan for every possible scenario.

Under normal circumstances, the special relationship might be the basis for special treatment but the early signs suggest, maybe not.

Donald Trump and Keir Starmer.
Pic:Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump and Keir Starmer. Pic: Reuters

It was never going to be an easy ride, with Sir Keir Starmer’s top team racking up years of insults against Trump when they were in opposition.

The bad feeling continued when Peter Mandelson was proposed as the UK’s new ambassador to the US – prompting speculation he might even be vetoed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Tariffs against Canada ‘will put US jobs at risk’

Amid all of this, the much-anticipated call between the two leaders seemed slow to take place, although it was cordial when POTUS finally picked up the phone last Sunday, with a trip to Washington to come “soon”.

It is against this slightly tense backdrop that the future of transatlantic trade will be decided, with Westminster braced for the impact of the president’s next move.

So, it’s unsurprising that as he waits, Sir Keir will spend the next few days resetting a different trading relationship – with Europe.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Ed Conway explains Donald Trump’s plan for tariffs

In this area, he is on slightly firmer ground, as the spectre of a global trade war makes European leaders want to huddle closer together to weather the storm.

And conversely, the Labour government’s track record works in their favour here, as they cash in their pro-EU credentials and wipe the slate clean after the bad-tempered Boris Johnson years.

Read more:
Lib Dem leader shrugs off Musk insult
Home secretary’s warning about recruiting from abroad

Ursula von der Leyen and  Keir Starmer address the media in Brussels.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Ursula von der Leyen and Keir Starmer address the media in Brussels in October. Pic: Reuters

It is still, however, an ambitious and risky endeavour to begin the delicate process of removing some of the most obstructive post-Brexit bureaucracy.

For minimal economic benefits on both sides, the UK must convince the Europeans that they are not letting Britain “have its cake and eat it”.

At the same time, Brexiteers back at home will cry betrayal at any hint that the UK is sneaking back into the bloc via the back door.

Donald Trump takes questions as he speaks to reporters.
Pic Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

To make it even trickier, it must all be done with one eye on Washington, because while a united Europe may be necessary in the Trump era, the prime minister will not want to seem like he is picking sides so early on.

As with so many things in politics, it’s a delicate balancing act with the most serious of consequences, for a prime minister who is still to prove himself.

Continue Reading

Environment

GM is cutting a shift at its EV plant in Mexico because of the Honda Prologue

Published

on

By

GM is cutting a shift at its EV plant in Mexico because of the Honda Prologue

GM cut a shift at its Ramos Arizpe manufacturing plant in Mexico, where it builds the Chevy Equinox EV and Honda Prologue. According to GM, the move was due to Honda’s decision to slow Prologue output. With sales of its sole electric SUV in the US surging, why is Honda cutting back?

GM cuts shift at Mexico EV plant over Prologue output

Although GM just added a third shift in May 2024, the plant returned to a two-shift schedule starting on January 20.

The move was initially thought to be because its contract to build the Prologue ended, but it turns out that Honda is scaling back.

“This change is mainly due to our customer Honda’s strategy of reducing the production volume of the Prologue model,” GM said in a statement. The shift was added to meet higher export demand for gas engines and Ultium-based EVs like the Chevy Equinox and Blazer EVs and Honda’s Prologue.

With less Prologue EV output, GM no longer needs the extra shift in Mexico. According to Mexico Business News, the company is eliminating 800 jobs at the plant due to the changes.

GM-shift-Mexico-EV
2024 Honda Prologue Elite (Source: Honda)

GM also said the changes were due to “an adjustment in the mix of production of GM vehicles at the site,” so it wasn’t entirely the Prologue’s fault. The company also builds gas-powered Chevy Blazers at the site.

Honda didn’t confirm the changes, but a spokesperson (via Automotive News) said, “It is quite normal for our business to make production adjustments during the year in order to meet customer needs and market conditions. We will continue to carefully manage production and inventory for our entire product lineup to meet anticipated demand in 2025.”

GM-shift-Mexico-EV
Chevy Equinox EV LT (Source: GM)

After delivering the first models in March, Honda’s Prologue was one of the best-selling EVs in the US in 2024. With over 33,000 models sold last year, Honda’s electric SUV was the seventh top-selling EV, ahead of the Chevy Equinox EV (28,874).

Electrek’s Take

Given that the Prologue is one of the top-selling EVs, why is Honda slowing production? Honda is moving away from GM’s Ultium platform with its upcoming 0 Series EVs, but that isn’t the reason yet.

The Prologue was once again one of the top-selling EVs in the US last month. With 3,744 models sold, it outsold Ford’s Mustang Mach-E (3,529), the Hyundai IONIQ 5 (2,250), and the Kia EV6 (1,542).

The move to slow output at this point is questionable. As more details unfold, we’ll learn more. Check back for more information on the situation.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending